Romney’s New Ad Contains Yet Another Dishonest Obama Quote

Dirty politics, in your face
Politics • Views: 20,066

Mitt Romney’s first political ad of this election season is now infamous for a blatantly dishonest out of context quote from President Obama. When the lie was exposed, Romney’s staff simply boasted that “it worked.”

Dishonesty is working so well for Romney that his new advertisement carries on the tradition, with another blatantly dishonest, out of context quote from President Obama. A pattern is beginning to emerge.

This time the dishonest quote is pulled from Obama’s interview with 60 Minutes last weekend; here’s the question from Steve Kroft and Obama’s answer:

Kroft: You declared your candidacy. And you said, “The reason we’ve not met our challenges is a failure of leadership, the smallness of our politics, the ease with which we’re distracted by the petty and the trivial, our chronic avoidance of tough decisions, our presence for scoring cheap political points instead of rolling up our sleeves and building a working consensus to take on big problems.” I mean those were eloquent words and true words. Unfortunately, they’re still largely true today. Did you overpromise? Did you underestimate how difficult this was gonna be?

Obama: I didn’t overpromise. And I didn’t underestimate how tough this was gonna be. I always believed that this was a long term project. That reversing a culture here in Washington, dominated by special interests, it was gonna take more than a year. It was gonna take more than two years. It was gonna take more than one term. Probably takes more than one president.

Romney’s ad uses the last sentence, “Probably takes more than one president,” and implies Obama was talking about fixing the economy. But as you can see from the transcript above, this is simply false. Obama was actually talking about changing the culture in Washington, not fixing the economy.

LGF reader ElCapitanAmerica first pointed out this egregious lie yesterday: No, the president didn’t say the recovery would likely take ‘more than one president’ on 60 minutes.

Clearly, ethics are not even on the Romney campaign’s radar; they will lie outright to the American people to gain power. He’s now two for two — the centerpiece statements of both his political advertisements are flat out dishonest.

Youtube Video

Jump to bottom

60 comments
1 blueraven  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 9:41:37am

Desperation smells ugly.

2 Iwouldprefernotto  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 9:46:06am

It's OK to lie if you're conservative. It's also OK to change your positions or cheat on your wife.

3 Sol Berdinowitz  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 9:46:51am

He saw that it worked last time, why not stick with a winning formula?

4 Four More Tears  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 9:48:40am

I'll bet Mitt 10 grand that that line was taken out of context.

5 Our Precious Bodily Fluids  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 9:49:21am

re: #1 blueraven

Desperation smells ugly.

Indeed.
Image: d1d1cd0f2c52a1c9d4accc94ceef2425.jpg

6 Varek Raith  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 9:49:57am

re: #5 negativ

Indeed.
Image: d1d1cd0f2c52a1c9d4accc94ceef2425.jpg

Nice burn!
XD

7 Flounder  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 9:50:08am

I told mittens not to run with scissors.

8 allegro  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 9:52:21am

What I did find somewhat encouraging the last time was that the MSM covered it and exposed it for the lie it was. I saw it on the national ABC news with Stephanopoulos who showed the entire Obama quote in context and flat out called the ad a lie. It was at least a step in the right direction.

9 erik_t  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 9:56:07am

Unfortunate but unsurprising.

10 Romantic Heretic  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 9:56:28am

But, to the people he's talking to, it doesn't matter if it is true, a lie or out of context. It's an attack on the 'socialist, foreign, Muslim n-word' who cheated his way into the White House.

So that makes it okay in their eyes.

11 wrenchwench  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 9:58:25am

"Believe in America, because you sure can't believe Mitt Romney."

12 Four More Tears  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:03:55am

re: #10 Romantic Heretic

But, to the people he's talking to, it doesn't matter if it is true, a lie or out of context. It's an attack on the 'socialist, foreign, Muslim n-word' who cheated his way into the White House.

So that makes it okay in their eyes.

Yeah, you make a good point in that the only people who matter at the moment are Republican Primary voters.

13 blueraven  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:04:17am

Mitt Romney 2002

I am Not a partisan Republican. My views are Progressive!

14 Ming  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:05:45am

Mitt Romney is so convinced of his own moral virtue, his own moral superiority, that this absolves him of any need to actually, in the real world, behave morally.

He knows he's a virtuous guy. Shucks, he just knows it. He's a hardworking guy, a family man, a member of a church, he's made lots of money, and he has no doubt that he's just, well, better.

Ironically, this leaves him free to flat-out lie, on national television no less, in his own ads. To him, his lies are nothing, compared with his awesome moral virtue, and his awesome qualifications to be President.

15 William Barnett-Lewis  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:07:04am

I'll bet Mitten's $10,000 that he never becomes president.

16 Four More Tears  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:12:06am

re: #15 wlewisiii

I'll bet Mitten's $10,000 that he never becomes president.

If he does, he'll just downsize us and sell us off for a profit.

17 wrenchwench  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:14:58am

Nice Page, ElCapitanAmerica. Comes with a bonus opportunity to downding Buck.

18 Alexzander  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:17:36am

The right is imploding so incredibly right now:

Glenn Beck: I’d consider Ron Paul as third party over Newt Gingrich

19 Obdicut  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:19:28am

re: #18 Alexzander

Would Ron Paul actually give up his position on GOP committees to run third party, though? I doubt it.

20 Alexzander  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:20:17am

re: #19 Obdicut

Would Ron Paul actually give up his position on GOP committees to run third party, though? I doubt it.

No, he wouldn't.
I think the bigger issue is that it would damage his son's career too.

21 Alexzander  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:21:55am
22 Four More Tears  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:22:27am

re: #18 Alexzander

The right is imploding so incredibly right now:

Glenn Beck: I’d consider Ron Paul as third party over Newt Gingrich

I really don't want to hear any bitching about what Obama does in his second term from a party that can't get its shit together. This is chaos.

23 blueraven  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:22:38am

re: #19 Obdicut

Would Ron Paul actually give up his position on GOP committees to run third party, though? I doubt it.

You know, I wouldn't put it past him. He is old. How much longer will he stay in congress anyway?

24 Simply Sarah  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:23:51am

re: #21 Alexzander

From Fox News: Beck Suggests Tea Party Is Racist

It's a good thing I decided to stop trying to make sense of Glenn Beck a long time ago.

25 Henchman 25  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:24:01am

re: #21 Alexzander

From Fox News: Beck Suggests Tea Party Is Racist

I'm so curious about the comments section for that, but the people who post there scare the hell outta me.

27 S'latch  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:26:44am

Obama said "The reason we’ve not met our challenges is a failure of leadership . . .."

What are the "challenges" that he was talking about?

28 Sol Berdinowitz  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:27:05am

re: #26 lawhawk

If this is on the level, then it is quite interesting. The sounds of the conservative movement coming apart at the seams...

29 blueraven  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:27:45am

re: #26 lawhawk

He's done with Congress; he's focusing his efforts at running for the WH.

I thought I remembered that he will not run for congress in 2012. That makes him pretty dangerous to the republican party.

Honey Badger dont give a shit.

30 Sol Berdinowitz  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:27:47am

re: #27 Lawrence Schmerel

Obama said "The reason we’ve not met our challenges is a failure of leadership . . .."

What are the "challenges" that he was talking about?

making it possible for the 1% to create enough jobs for the remaining 99%

31 Iwouldprefernotto  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:30:43am

re: #19 Obdicut

Would Ron Paul actually give up his position on GOP committees to run third party, though? I doubt it.

Paul is going to retire, so it doesn't matter.

32 wrenchwench  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:31:29am

re: #29 blueraven

I thought I remembered that he will not run for congress in 2012. That makes him pretty dangerous to the republican party.

Honey Badger dont give a shit.

Those very words came to my mind too.

Ron Paul doesn't care about the Republican Party, and I think it's mutual. I doubt he worries about damage to his son's career, either. I'd guess he and his son would see a third-party candidacy as a strengthening move, not a weakening one.

33 S'latch  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:32:50am

Mitt Romney should focus on attacking Newt Gingrich. He could probably find a way to do that without being dishonest.

34 Four More Tears  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:33:20am

re: #32 wrenchwench

Those very words came to my mind too.

Ron Paul doesn't care about the Republican Party, and I think it's mutual. I doubt he worries about damage to his son's career, either. I'd guess he and his son would see a third-party candidacy as a strengthening move, not a weakening one.

The genuine Maverick.

35 William Barnett-Lewis  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:36:45am

re: #29 blueraven

I thought I remembered that he will not run for congress in 2012. That makes him pretty dangerous to the republican party.

Honey Badger dont give a shit.

Yep. He's never cared about the party except as a means to an end. Look at his history with the Theocracy Constitution Party.

Run Laup Nor Run! Guarantee 4 more years of Obama!

36 NJDhockeyfan  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:39:23am

re: #30 ralphieboy

making it possible for the 1% to create enough jobs for the remaining 99%

It has to be because millionaire job creators are like unicorns, they are impossible to find and don't exist.

37 blueraven  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:41:29am

re: #35 wlewisiii

Yep. He's never cared about the party except as a means to an end. Look at his history with the Theocracy Constitution Party.

Run Laup Nor Run! Guarantee 4 more years of Obama!

He has nothing to lose really. I dont think he believes he would actually win, but he can influence the debate and bring his ideas front and center. Why not?

38 Sol Berdinowitz  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:44:02am

re: #36 NJDhockeyfan

It has to be because millionaire job creators are like unicorns, they are impossible to find and don't exist.

It is a matter of housetraining them: as in getting them to create jobs for US citizens and not abroad...

39 Sol Berdinowitz  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:45:08am

re: #37 blueraven

He has nothing to lose really. I dont think he believes he would actually win, but he can influence the debate and bring his ideas front and center. Why not?

Perhaps he has decided that Obama would be a better choice than anyone the GOP is going to nominate and is about to act accordingly...

40 lawhawk  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:48:33am

re: #33 Lawrence Schmerel

Mitt's figuring that he's going to win the nomination so he's looking ahead at the general election. Romney's already weathered the Perry and Cain ascendancy and subsequent meltdowns without using attack ads against either. Mitt figures he can afford to let Newt flame out on his own too.

That is a presumption that he's taking for granted that he'll win the nomination. Given the way the GOP is these days, it's not a lock that he'll win the nomination by going after the others in the race, but at the same time, by giving those others play in attack ads, he'd be increasing their visibility and give credence to their campaigns.

41 HappyWarrior  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:50:50am

Mitt "Anything to be President" Romney. And he whines when his blatant inconsistency on issues is pointed out.

42 Political Atheist  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:54:04am

When was there ever a sadder list of GOP contenders? Ever?

43 NJDhockeyfan  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:54:37am

re: #38 ralphieboy

It is a matter of housetraining them: as in getting them to create jobs for US citizens and not abroad...

I'm sure the CEO of my company is a millionaire and there are thousands of jobs here.

44 Obdicut  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:59:42am

re: #43 NJDhockeyfan

I'm sure the CEO of my company is a millionaire and there are thousands of jobs here.

CEOs don't create companies. They run them. And their pay is not tied to actual performance. CEOs can run companies into the ground and make millions doing so.

45 BishopX  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 11:02:06am

re: #40 lawhawk

There's a wealth of focus group data showing that even if the current republican candidates ignore the 11th commandment, many republican voters still do. Running an intra-party negative campaign is an incredibly dangerous thing to do, and it's something that the two current front runners (Gingrich and Romney) have more or less avoided. There's a lesson here.

46 NJDhockeyfan  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 11:05:58am

re: #44 Obdicut

CEOs don't create companies. They run them. And their pay is not tied to actual performance. CEOs can run companies into the ground and make millions doing so.

Then who in the world is creating jobs in this company?

47 zora  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 11:06:42am

re: #21 Alexzander

beck plays the race card against teabaggers who support gingrich. how delicious.

48 sattv4u2  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 11:07:53am

re: #45 BishopX

There's a wealth of focus group data showing that even if the current republican candidates ignore the 11th commandment, many republican voters still do. Running an intra-party negative campaign is an incredibly dangerous thing to do, and it's something that the two current front runners (Gingrich and Romney) have more or less avoided. There's a lesson here.

I've never understood the "negative campaigning" between intra party rivals in a (especially) national election

Point out differences, sure
Discuss what variance of the same (or similar) plank in the platform you espouse, absolutley

But tear apart the person that could end up being 'your" standard bearer

head scratcher

49 Obdicut  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 11:09:32am

re: #46 NJDhockeyfan

Then who in the world is creating jobs in this company?

Well, the demand for the product is what creates the jobs, along with the capitalization that allows the labor to be done, and the labor that does it. No one part is more important than the other, except that without demand, there is no job. Of course, there's ancillary jobs like advertising, research, etc. that have indirect effects on creation of product and therefore jobs.

So, basically, the interconnected working of capital and labor produces a product or service. You have a job because it's profitable for the company to employ you; you make them money. You are just as important as the capitalization that allows you to be employed. Your labor is worthwhile.

50 allegro  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 11:10:44am

re: #46 NJDhockeyfan

Then who in the world is creating jobs in this company?

That would be the consumers of the products or services the company provides.

51 kirkspencer  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 11:14:11am

re: #46 NJDhockeyfan

Then who in the world is creating jobs in this company?

Let's run this with a negation test.

If the CEO died tomorrow, would the jobs continue to exist?

If yes, then the CEO is not creating the jobs.

(The Galt's Gulch fallacy, demonstrated.)

52 uncah91  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 11:16:43am

More importantly, there is no relationship between small marginal tax increases on large earners and there willingness to employ someone.

They employ someone if that person is profitable, i.e. if there is demand for the product they make, at a price that makes them profitable.

53 sattv4u2  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 11:18:25am

Damn!!

[Link: news.yahoo.com...]

Attack in Belgian city leaves 4 dead, 75 wounded

54 allegro  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 11:20:57am

It really is pretty stunning that someone who has a job is really so clueless about why he has it. It's so clear to me that the money I earn is only due to people needing my services enough to pay for them along with the ability to pay.

55 Sol Berdinowitz  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 11:33:15am

re: #43 NJDhockeyfan

The GOP atitude seems to be that in order to create more jobs, we have to start lowering our environemental, safety and social standards to match those of China. Is that what we really want?

56 leftynyc  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 11:35:29am

re: #3 ralphieboy

He saw that it worked last time, why not stick with a winning formula?

Seeing as how he failed to climb in the polls, where exactly did he get the idea it worked?

57 leftynyc  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 11:46:20am

From the fox news site, trump has "decided not to moderate the newsmax debate". Nothing about it being an abject failure, of course. No link yet.

58 Eventual Carrion  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 11:52:43am

re: #46 NJDhockeyfan

Then who in the world is creating jobs in this company?

People buying your product. If that quits then you will be without a job.

59 ElCapitanAmerica  Tue, Dec 13, 2011 12:31:13pm

re: #17 wrenchwench

Thanks!

The positive thing is that this really exposes Romney as a liar.
The negative thing is that explaining the context of the quote requires people to be open to an explanation and be reasonable about it, which I think a lot of people who are already rabidly against the president and not disposed to do.

60 wheat-dogghazi  Wed, Dec 14, 2011 1:38:57am

Politicians lying about each other. What else is news?


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
The Pandemic Cost 7 Million Lives, but Talks to Prevent a Repeat Stall In late 2021, as the world reeled from the arrival of the highly contagious omicron variant of the coronavirus, representatives of almost 200 countries met - some online, some in-person in Geneva - hoping to forestall a future worldwide ...
Cheechako
2 days ago
Views: 92 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
2 weeks ago
Views: 259 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1