Video: Ron Paul Walks Out Of CNN Interview

‘I didn’t write them, I didn’t read them at the time, I disavow them’
Politics • Views: 27,344

As Ron Paul’s popularity has risen in polls, the media are suddenly interested in his racist, antisemitic newsletters again — and the increased focus is obviously starting to rattle him. Today in an interview with CNN’s Gloria Borger, Paul flatly denied that he wrote or even read any of the newsletters, then got very cranky, took his mic off, and walked out when Borger started asking specific questions about the content of the letters:

Youtube Video
Related

Jump to bottom

176 comments
1 Targetpractice  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:27:39pm

For the longest time, Paulians have told us that the media doesn't give Crazy Uncle Ron any attention because they're afraid of the "truth" he'd speak in front of the cameras. Well, now the media's paying attention, just not to the "truth" as Ron sees it.

2 allegro  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:28:51pm

Shutting off the mics, turning off the cameras, walking out of the interview... think there's a pattern here?

3 Obdicut  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:32:27pm

If you never read any of them, Paul, then why did you defend their contents?

Do you often defend things that you haven't read?

4 allegro  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:35:07pm

re: #3 Obdicut

If you never read any of them, Paul, then why did you defend their contents?

Do you often defend things that you haven't read?

How often does he put his name on stuff he hasn't written or read? And get money for it? For years?

Please. He thinks we're all idiots.

5 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:35:30pm

And Paulites will actually applaud him for that and condemn CNN for doing its job.

6 Only The Lurker Knows  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:36:55pm

Run Paul, Run! For the nearest exit you racist scumbag.

7 The Ghost of a Flea  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:38:23pm

re: #6 Bubblehead II

Run Paul, Run! For the nearest exit cliff you racist scumbag.

8 Mattand  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:40:20pm

The only thing I'm shocked at is that someone in the mainstream press asked a tough question. They're all going to have to take 3 weeks off to recover.

9 Digital Display  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:41:22pm

re: #3 Obdicut

If you never read any of them, Paul, then why did you defend their contents?

Do you often defend things that you haven't read?

Oh Obdi.. No matter how fast he runs.. He can't out run his words...

10 MittDoesNotCompute  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:41:42pm

Touchy, touchy, aren't you there, Mr. Paul?

The "truth" sucks when it's come home to your roost, doesn't it?

11 Targetpractice  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:41:59pm

re: #5 Sergey Romanov

And Paulites will actually applaud him for that and condemn CNN for doing its job.

Why are they obsessing about all this old bullshit when Paul's got ideas for fixing the America we live in NOW?! They can't let him talk about the things that matter, so they're trying to shut him up with this! It's a hit-job concocted by the establishment!

12 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:43:02pm

re: #11 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

Why are they obsessing about all this old bullshit when Paul's got ideas for fixing the America we live in NOW?! They can't let him talk about the things that matter, so they're trying to shut him up with this! It's a hit-job concocted by the establishment!

Well, Trilaterals, you know. And whatchamacallits... Bilderbergers. Yeah.

13 Targetpractice  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:43:17pm

Reload your browsers for that last one, I forgot it was "[]" instead of "".

14 wrenchwench  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:45:21pm

He's wearing Herman Cain's power tie.

15 [deleted]  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:45:55pm
16 Surabaya Stew  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:48:11pm

I'm waiting for Andrew Sullivan's mea culpa.

Should I hold my breath on this one?

17 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:48:52pm

re: #16 Surabaya Stew

I'm waiting for Andrew Sullivan's mea culpa.

Should I hold my breath on this one?

No, Sully already dismissed all this as non-essential. He can be pretty dumb when he wants.

19 BongCrodny  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:50:55pm

re: #5 Sergey Romanov

And Paulites will actually applaud him for that and condemn CNN for doing its job.

Walking out on CNN will undoubtedly be seen as a + to a big chunk of Republican primary voters. I imagine there will soon be a migration in the polls from Gingrich to Paul, Lord Non-Romney the Fifth.

20 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:52:44pm

re: #19 BongCrodny

Walking out on CNN will undoubtedly be seen as a + to a big chunk of Republican primary voters. I imagine there will soon be a migration in the polls from Gingrich to Paul, Lord Non-Romney the Fifth.

Yeah, he "stuck it to the libs". Moreover, a lot of the wingnut base (and - I've seen that among the far far moonbats too) basically now treats accusations of racism as a badge of merit. If you haven't been accused of racism, you're too PC.

21 William Barnett-Lewis  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:53:17pm

re: #18 The Ghost of a Flea

There's an interesting back and forth occurring between Andrew Sullivan and Ta-Nehisi Coates. Looks like Sully is still trying to spin this.


To everything spin,spin,spin
There is a season spin,spin,spin
And a time for every lie under heaven

(all apologies to The Byrds... )

22 jaunte  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:54:52pm

Ron Paul not willing to eat dinner at the Ron Paul Grill.

23 BongCrodny  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:56:09pm

...and I confess to having a problem with the fact that if Paul won the nomination, 40-45% of this country's voters would gladly pull the lever for Paul.

That's just wrong.

24 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:57:44pm

re: #23 BongCrodny

...and I confess to having a problem with the fact that if Paul won the nomination, 40-45% of this country's voters would gladly pull the lever for Paul.

That's just wrong.

I doubt it would be more than 30%...

25 wrenchwench  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:59:54pm

re: #22 jaunte

Ron Paul not willing to eat dinner at the Ron Paul Grill.

It's the fault of people like Gloria Borger that he has to answer these questions over and over...

26 Kragar  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:03:09pm

Walking off camera seems to be the new GOP trick.

27 Charles Johnson  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:04:00pm

Notice that he really lost it when Borger began asking about specific things written in the newsletters. Ron Paul doesn't want the media to let people know how bad they really were.

28 BongCrodny  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:04:06pm

re: #24 Sergey Romanov

I doubt it would be more than 30%...

I'd like to think you're right, but Christine O'Donnell got 40% of the vote in Delaware.

Would she have done any worse in the South?

29 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:07:54pm

re: #28 BongCrodny

I'd like to think you're right, but Christine O'Donnell got 40% of the vote in Delaware.

Would she have done any worse in the South?

O'Donnel's foreign policy (if it existed) was probably somewhere on the right of the American mainstream.

Paul's foreign policy is not in the mainstream at all. The fact that will be used against him to great effect if he ever slithers through the primaries.

30 sod  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:08:00pm

He's denied that he wrote the newsletters. He's said that he didn't pay close enough attention to the content that was going out with his name on it.

I haven't seen any definitive proof to the contrary.

He's disavowing the content. Content that he said he didn't write and that nobody seems to be able to prove that he did.

This wouldn't be the first time that circumstantial evidence supposedly "proving" something would turn out to be wrong - (see Wiener and Yfrog).

This wouldn't be the first time somebody distanced themselves from comments made in the past - (see RoPMA).

31 BishopX  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:09:26pm

re: #28 BongCrodny

The way to think about this is that a 10% margin in an election is crushing. Getting 40% of the vote in a 2 candidate race means you got crushed twice as hard.

32 Obdicut  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:09:41pm

re: #30 sod

If he's 'disavowing' the content, why isn't he willing to actually do so? He's acting as though anyone bringing up the content is being unfair to him.

And why do you need proof to the contrary of his statement? Why do you take his claim as true on face value? Surely the presumption would be that a newsletter published for years under his name, making him millions of dollars, would receive his attention?

33 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:10:36pm

re: #30 sod

Sorry, how plausible is that he didn't know about his own newsletter's content? The newsletter that bore his name? Newsletter ghostwritten by his closest associates whose racist views were obviously known to him? Answer: not plausible at all.

34 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:11:23pm
#206 sod :: Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:47:01 pm
They're all looking great and sounding even better! Go GOP!!!
35 Varek Raith  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:11:58pm

re: #34 Sergey Romanov

Rofl

36 allegro  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:12:09pm

re: #30 sod

He's denied that he wrote the newsletters. He's said that he didn't pay close enough attention to the content that was going out with his name on it.

I haven't seen any definitive proof to the contrary.

He's disavowing the content. Content that he said he didn't write and that nobody seems to be able to prove that he did.

This wouldn't be the first time that circumstantial evidence supposedly "proving" something would turn out to be wrong - (see Wiener and Yfrog).

This wouldn't be the first time somebody distanced themselves from comments made in the past - (see RoPMA).

OK, so some really are that stupid.

37 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:14:00pm

re: #30 sod

He's denied that he wrote the newsletters. He's said that he didn't pay close enough attention to the content that was going out with his name on it.

I haven't seen any definitive proof to the contrary.

He's disavowing the content. Content that he said he didn't write and that nobody seems to be able to prove that he did.

This wouldn't be the first time that circumstantial evidence supposedly "proving" something would turn out to be wrong - (see Wiener and Yfrog).

This wouldn't be the first time somebody distanced themselves from comments made in the past - (see RoPMA).

Sorry, not buying it. Either he wrote this himself, or he put his name on it and never read a word of it. He defended parts of it. I'm supposed to believe that now that he wants my vote, oh dear, that was all big misunderstanding?

That's nuts.

38 BongCrodny  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:14:37pm

re: #34 Sergey Romanov

See what I mean? :-)

39 Only The Lurker Knows  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:14:55pm

re: #7 The Ghost of a Flea

Run Paul, Run! For the nearest exit cliff you racist scumbag.

Just as long as he takes his minions bots with him.

40 Jerk  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:15:22pm

re: #30 sod

"Editor" is not a position people usually just throw around, especially with such a small operation.

41 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:15:24pm

re: #38 BongCrodny

See what I mean? :-)

One of the 30%? ;)

42 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:16:10pm

re: #37 SanFranciscoZionist

Sorry, not buying it. Either he wrote this himself, or he put his name on it and never read a word of it. He defended parts of it. I'm supposed to believe that now that he wants my vote, oh dear, that was all big misunderstanding?

That's nuts.

We're also not talking about stuff that would have been more acceptable at the time, and times having changed. This vile garbage was vile even at the time.

43 jaunte  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:19:00pm

re: #37 SanFranciscoZionist

Either he wrote this himself, or he put his name on it and never read a word of it.

Either choice disqualifies him as executive material.

44 MittDoesNotCompute  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:20:51pm

re: #26 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Walking off camera seems to be the new GOP trick.

Wait, didn't Rand Paul do the same trick to a Fox station back in KY when asked about that incident (among other things) where a protestor was more or less tackled and stomped on the ground getting too close to him at a campaign appearance last year?

45 BongCrodny  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:21:53pm

re: #41 Sergey Romanov

One of the 30%? ;)

Exit polls (and granted, you take exit polls with a huge grain of salt) suggested that Christine O'Donnell actually won the white vote in Delaware.

My freaking dope dealer told me last weekend that "old style liberalism isn't working."

If you've lost the dope dealers...

46 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:23:37pm

re: #45 BongCrodny

Well, again, COD wasn't even near Paul's views when it came to actual policy nuttiness - and she was nutty all right. I doubt that with Paul's views on Iran's nukes, targeted killing of Osama, Israel and many other issues he has a chance for more than 30% (and that only because of Obama-hatred).

47 Big Joe  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:24:10pm

re: #45 BongCrodny

Exit polls (and granted, you take exit polls with a huge grain of salt) suggested that Christine O'Donnell actually won the white vote in Delaware.

My freaking dope dealer told me last weekend that "old style liberalism isn't working."

If you've lost the dope dealers...

Dope dealers are big C capitalists.

48 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:28:05pm

re: #46 Sergey Romanov

In fact, if Paul were to miraculously win the nom, I would predict a third-party run - whether by Sarah or anyone else.

49 BongCrodny  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:30:26pm

re: #46 Sergey Romanov

Well, again, COD wasn't even near Paul's views when it came to actual policy nuttiness - and she was nutty all right. I doubt that with Paul's views on Iran's nukes, targeted killing of Osama, Israel and many other issues he has a chance for more than 30% (and that only because of Obama-hatred).

Well, with any luck it will be a moot point.

But consider:

Obama vs. Paul

I don't think Obama could ever lose to Paul, but some of those numbers look mighty close.

50 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:32:29pm

brave sir Ron ran away

Nothing would make me happier than RP launching an independent campaign and all the libertarian fanboy nerds who love him seeing him ripped to shreds over his past, through the whole campaign


Public shaming! Shove that up your gold standard

51 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:34:11pm

re: #49 BongCrodny

Damn.

However, I believe that the gen. election period "missile ad exchange", as well as massive attacks on Paul by almost everyone from the right to the left (fully justified, because most people in the mainstream would not want an extreme bigoted nut to be a President) would bring this number down.

52 Only The Lurker Knows  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:34:27pm

re: #42 SanFranciscoZionist

We're also not talking about stuff that would have been more acceptable at the time, and times having changed. This vile garbage was vile even at the time.

Please, correct me if I am wrong. But didn't Paul defend the right of a Business to refuse service to a person based upon their race at the start of this debates fiasco?

Why, yes He did

53 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:34:40pm

re: #49 BongCrodny

Well, with any luck it will be a moot point.

But consider:

Obama vs. Paul

I don't think Obama could ever lose to Paul, but some of those numbers look mighty close.

they're only close because the contest hasn't started yet. The reality is RP will not survive a real campaign apparatus focused and dedicated to annihalating him. The president's campaign machine versus Ron Paul's blimp and his online obsessives? It would be a comedic thrashing :D

54 The Ghost of a Flea  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:36:07pm

re: #30 sod

He's denied that he wrote the newsletters. He's said that he didn't pay close enough attention to the content that was going out with his name on it.

He has an income stream derived from these publications. He allowed his name to be used in the header and his signature to be mimeographed onto the printing. He was listed as the editor, which implies doing editing--or at least rubber stamp approval--of content. The articles were given no author attribution, and many are written in the first person, up to and included the article Charles did a page on. That is all factual.

Paraphrasing TNC, the most merciful interpretation still results in Ron Paul being catastrophically incompetent about managing his own image.

I'm not merciful. If Paul had named names or bodily stepped away from the people who were involved in his various publications, I might give him some leeway. But instead he's ducked and weaved around and still hangs out with (and takes money from) racist fringe types. Had he backbone enough to specifically address the ugly things said under his name, I might be less skeptical...but instead he's trying to stuff it under a rug and bluff about it all not mattering.

55 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:36:07pm

re: #53 WindUpBird

Yeah, that's what I'm talking about.

56 Idle Drifter  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:39:51pm

I almost want to believe Ron Paul doesn't want to be President. No leader of the free world can walk out because they want to avoid a confrontation. As if this whole bid for election was just a stunt to keep himself relevant somehow. Just so he can stand on his soap box to criticize what he sees as America's failings.

Then again Ron Paul has had some sick twisted desire to make America a throw back to a long gone age of isolationism, gold standards, and no Israel. Taking advantage of this age of economic uncertainty to catapult himself into a power play on the backs of disenchanted whom have no concept of what the hell is going on expect the next talking point. Well thankfully the media have long memories and well stocked supply of shovels to dig up what he had hoped to remain buried.

57 Idle Drifter  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:41:17pm

re: #50 WindUpBird

brave sir Ron ran away

Nothing would make me happier than RP launching an independent campaign and all the libertarian fanboy nerds who love him seeing him ripped to shreds over his past, through the whole campaign

Public shaming! Shove that up your gold standard

58 SpaceJesus  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:42:10pm
60 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:46:11pm
61 Only The Lurker Knows  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:46:46pm

re: #58 SpaceJesus

The world is better off with this asshole dead.

62 Idle Drifter  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:47:16pm

re: #59 Sergey Romanov

re: #60 Sergey Romanov

Oh they can dish it out but they can't take any return fire. :D

63 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:48:16pm

re: #61 Bubblehead II

The world is better off with this asshole dead.

You do understand it's sarcasm?

64 Firstinla  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:48:22pm

re: #56 Idle Drifter

I was at a Christmas dinner on Monday night and was seated beside a real lovely lady in her mid-80's. She was sharp and well-informed. When the subject of Gingrich came up and all were voicing their opinions, she piped up: "Oh I don't think Mr. Gingrich really wants to be president. That is why he says all these outrageous things. He knows these opinions just turn everybody off. He just wants to stay in the news and make more money."

65 SpaceJesus  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:53:13pm

re: #61 Bubblehead II

yup, but we will continue to make fun of him forever

66 The Ghost of a Flea  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:53:27pm

re: #64 Firstinla

I was at a Christmas dinner on Monday night and was seated beside a real lovely lady in her mid-80's. She was sharp and well-informed. When the subject of Gingrich came up and all were voicing their opinions, she piped up: "Oh I don't think Mr. Gingrich really wants to be president. That is why he says all these outrageous things. He knows these opinions just turn everybody off. He just wants to stay in the news and make more money."

The lady, a point she has....

67 BongCrodny  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:53:52pm

re: #53 WindUpBird

they're only close because the contest hasn't started yet. The reality is RP will not survive a real campaign apparatus focused and dedicated to annihalating him. The president's campaign machine versus Ron Paul's blimp and his online obsessives? It would be a comedic thrashing :D

Honestly, I hope you and Sergey are right. I'd love to see a real ass-kicking by Obama and a twofer of sending a bunch R's packing, but I'd prefer to see a real ass-kicking by Obama with Romney as the Republican candidate.

It would take one of every three Republican voters -- folks who knew Sarah Palin was a heartbump away from the Presidency -- to desert a Paul candidacy to get the numbers down to 30%.

If I had Mitt Romney's money, I'd bet ten grand that the Republican nominee -- whoever he or she might be -- would get at least 40% of the vote.

68 Idle Drifter  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:55:31pm

re: #64 Firstinla

See: "I almost want to believe Ron Paul doesn't want to be President."

This clown wants to be President. But like all clowns with piss poor planning they bank too much on people not digging up their past.

69 Only The Lurker Knows  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:56:00pm

re: #63 Sergey Romanov

You do understand it's sarcasm?

Must of missed it. My Sarc meter has been a bit wonkie lately.

The down ding has been reversed, but the sentiment remains the same RE #61.

70 Idle Drifter  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 4:57:12pm

re: #65 SpaceJesus

yup, but we will continue to make fun of him forever

71 wrenchwench  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:02:09pm

re: #30 sod

We used to get a ton of fervent Luap Nor defenders whenever a bit of truth was posted here about him.

Is this all they've got now?

72 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:03:00pm

re: #71 wrenchwench

I love the tu quoque in the last two paras :)

73 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:03:45pm

That'll show 'em.

74 kirkspencer  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:03:56pm

re: #49 BongCrodny

Well, with any luck it will be a moot point.

But consider:

Obama vs. Paul

I don't think Obama could ever lose to Paul, but some of those numbers look mighty close.

Close? The closest margin of the last month is 5 points. That's twice the margin of Bush v Kerry (2.46%). It's barely below the margin by which Clinton beat Bush (5.56%).

The 7.7 RCP average is larger than Obama v McCain and in line with Bush v Dukakis. Clinton's walkover of Dole was only 8.51%.

Close is relative, and 5 points as the worst poll is not close in a national presidential election.

75 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:06:20pm

re: #67 BongCrodny

Honestly, I hope you and Sergey are right. I'd love to see a real ass-kicking by Obama and a twofer of sending a bunch R's packing, but I'd prefer to see a real ass-kicking by Obama with Romney as the Republican candidate.

It would take one of every three Republican voters -- folks who knew Sarah Palin was a heartbump away from the Presidency -- to desert a Paul candidacy to get the numbers down to 30%.

If I had Mitt Romney's money, I'd bet ten grand that the Republican nominee -- whoever he or she might be -- would get at least 40% of the vote.

For the honor of the presidency, I would much rather see Obama beat Romney.

76 Interesting Times  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:08:02pm

re: #75 SanFranciscoZionist

For the honor of the presidency, I would much rather see Obama beat Romney.

Makes sense, but for the dishonor of the GOP, I'd like to see the nominee be anyone but Romney ;)

if they insist on going off a cliff, might as well do fanciful cartwheels, somersaults and backflips on the way down

77 engineer cat  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:08:36pm

"i didn't read them"

you allowed "newsletters" to get sent out under your name and you never read them?

78 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:10:21pm

re: #77 engineer dog

"i didn't read them"

you allowed "newsletters" to get sent out under your name and you never read them?

Ex-President Paul in court for the criminal Executive Orders with his signature:

Well, I didn't actually read them...

///

79 kirkspencer  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:11:09pm

re: #76 publicityStunted

Which is why I'm with BongCrodny in wishing a Reagan v Mondale or Nixon v McGovern margin of victory.

"Mandate THIS."

80 Stormageddon, Dark Lord of All  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:14:38pm

re: #30 sod

Look, I'm more than willing to entertain the idea that Ron Paul didn't write or somehow didn't know what was written in his name. But that doesn't excuse what *was* written in his name. And his unwillingness to accept responsibility not only shows a lack of empathy, it shows a basic lack of understanding of what it means to be in charge.

Then throwing in the donations from neo nazi groups and Ron Paul... at the VERY least, has surrounded himself with people who have bigoted and racist views. So even if Ron Paul isn't Racist or Bigoted, he's going to be tarred with the label. and you know what? until he cleans house, he'll deserve it.

81 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:16:28pm

re: #80 bloodstar

"Look, I'm more than willing to entertain the idea that Ron Paul [...] somehow didn't know what was written in his name"

That's absurd any way you look at it.

82 BishopX  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:19:16pm

re: #81 Sergey Romanov

Given Luap Nor's tenous connection to reality I wouldn't find it suprising if he had no idea what was going on. I mean he usually doesn't.

83 Stormageddon, Dark Lord of All  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:20:42pm

re: #81 Sergey Romanov

"Look, I'm more than willing to entertain the idea that Ron Paul [...] somehow didn't know what was written in his name"

That's absurd any way you look at it.

I'm trying to show that viewing things in the *best* possible light for Ron Paul still shows his responses are lacking and that what was written doesn't magically become ok even if he didn't know.

In a way, his claim of ignorance is even worse, because as a leader, you damn well should know what's going on around you. How in the heck could he be President if he's that clueless on what's going on around him?

84 reine.de.tout  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:20:55pm

Interesting tweet from John Podhoretz. He says he got an e-mail from a Paulite:

John Podhoretz @jpodhoretz 3m Reply Retweeted Favorite · Open
Email from Ron Paulite: "i am shortening your name to j putz. Zionist scum"

Any question as to what Paul stands for or the type of voter he's trying to attract?

85 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:21:51pm

re: #84 reine.de.tout

Hiya Toots!

86 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:22:11pm

re: #81 Sergey Romanov

"Look, I'm more than willing to entertain the idea that Ron Paul [...] somehow didn't know what was written in his name"

That's absurd any way you look at it.

Ron Paul and the Racists keeps reminding me of a classic Onion piece with a NFSW title.

The longer you read, the less you believe that he has no idea why anyone would think he has anything to do with these people.

87 reine.de.tout  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:22:42pm

re: #85 Fat Bastard Vegetarian

Hiya Toots!

Heya, FBV!
Good to "see" you!

88 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:25:19pm

re: #87 reine.de.tout

Heya, FBV!
Good to "see" you!

Good being seen.

Ahem... I'll close the blinds. Sorry.

89 Only The Lurker Knows  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:25:47pm

re: #30 sod

Belated Response.

NO! It went out under his name as well as in his news letter. Regardless of who actually wrote it. Paul owns it. End of Story. And you are a Paul Bot?

"He's denied that he wrote the newsletters. He's said that he didn't pay close enough attention to the content that was going out with his name on it."

Then He is a F***ing Idiot and doesn't deserve to be President

90 chaosium  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:26:14pm

re: #11 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

Considering that his ideas stem from the late 19th century, these white supremacist newsletters are far newer than his ideas :)

91 Killgore Trout  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:26:31pm

re: #60 Sergey Romanov

It's like an epidemic or something.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange walks out of CNN interview

Rapey.

92 reine.de.tout  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:27:03pm

re: #91 Killgore Trout

Rapey.

Upding, just 'cause I like it when you start shit.

93 wrenchwench  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:27:53pm

I hate when they call Ron Paul "avuncular". But then, none of my uncles are/were creepy.

94 chaosium  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:27:54pm

re: #16 Surabaya Stew

I'm waiting for Andrew Sullivan's mea culpa.

Should I hold my breath on this one?

Considering that Sully is still pushing the Bell Curve, I wouldn't assume that Sullivan gives a shit.

95 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:28:11pm

re: #91 Killgore Trout

Stabby.

96 Alexzander  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:28:18pm

re: #92 reine.de.tout

Upding, just 'cause I like it when you start shit.

Yeah I'm just here for the arguments.
//

97 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:29:25pm

re: #96 Alexzander

Yeah I'm just here for the arguments.
//

Down the hall.

98 Killgore Trout  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:29:40pm

re: #92 reine.de.tout

Upding, just 'cause I like it when you start shit.

;)

99 reine.de.tout  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:29:49pm

I'm trying to figure out why and how, exactly, the Bank of Montreal has locked my account, seeing as how I don't have an account.

100 MittDoesNotCompute  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:30:17pm

re: #91 Killgore Trout

Rapey.

Now, if Assange starts getting stabby, he may be in for a world of shit.

101 Decatur Deb  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:30:50pm

re: #99 reine.de.tout

I'm trying to figure out why and how, exactly, the Bank of Montreal has locked my account, seeing as how I don't have an account.

Mistook you for Elizabeth II.

102 kirkspencer  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:31:04pm

re: #99 reine.de.tout

phishing.

I got one the other day about my Blizzard (World of Warcraft) account. Well done phish, actually, except that I closed my account about three years ago.

103 reine.de.tout  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:31:50pm

re: #101 Decatur Deb

Mistook you for Elizabeth II.

HAHA!
Yes, that must be it.
LOL.

104 Killgore Trout  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:32:03pm

re: #96 Alexzander

Yeah I'm just here for the arguments.
//

M: Look, I CAME HERE FOR AN ARGUMENT, I'm not going to just stand...!!
Q: OH, oh I'm sorry, but this is abuse.
M: Oh, I see, well, that explains it.
Q: Ah yes, you want room 12A, Just along the corridor.
M: Oh, Thank you very much. Sorry.
Q: Not at all.
M: Thank You.

105 reine.de.tout  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:32:32pm

re: #101 Decatur Deb

Mistook you for Elizabeth II.

That particular email DID come in at my "reine" email addy. hehehe.

106 Alexzander  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:33:01pm

re: #104 Killgore Trout

M: Look, I CAME HERE FOR AN ARGUMENT, I'm not going to just stand...!!
Q: OH, oh I'm sorry, but this is abuse.
M: Oh, I see, well, that explains it.
Q: Ah yes, you want room 12A, Just along the corridor.
M: Oh, Thank you very much. Sorry.
Q: Not at all.
M: Thank You.

107 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:33:35pm

Damn IPhone! Can't use it with my stabby fingers!
Image: 1277481287_ss7110_00.jpg

//

108 SanFranciscoZionist  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:35:09pm

I finally saw "The King's Speech". Speaking of royalty.

109 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:35:35pm

re: #108 SanFranciscoZionist

Is it any good?

/ducks

110 reine.de.tout  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:35:42pm

re: #108 SanFranciscoZionist

I finally saw "The King's Speech". Speaking of royalty.

I loved that movie.

111 The Ghost of a Flea  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:37:02pm

re: #107 Sergey Romanov

Damn IPhone! Can't use it with my stabby fingers!
Image: 1277481287_ss7110_00.jpg

//

Think laterally. Buy a cocktail-weiner size sausage and use it as a stylus.

112 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:39:30pm

HA HA HA

113 b_sharp  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:44:34pm

re: #94 chaosium

Considering that Sully is still pushing the Bell Curve, I wouldn't assume that Sullivan gives a shit.

Why is that thing still going?

114 b_sharp  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:45:39pm

re: #99 reine.de.tout

I'm trying to figure out why and how, exactly, the Bank of Montreal has locked my account, seeing as how I don't have an account.

What is BMO doing that far south?

115 zora  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:48:58pm

re: #18 The Ghost of a Flea

the newsletters read like stormfront. sully's off sometimes. with israel, sarah palin's baby, and now ron paul. he's being willfully ignorant on this one.

116 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:50:35pm

re: #115 zora

It's interesting how his foreign policy views changed 180 over the years. I remember coming to his blog ca. 2003 and oh boy. (He did endorse Kerry then, though.)

117 reine.de.tout  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:50:57pm

re: #114 b_sharp

What is BMO doing that far south?

scraping the bottom of the barrel??????

This thing came in to my reine at yahoo email addy. I suspect the French name and the mention of being Queen of Everything fooled somebody into thinking I have $$$$$$$$.

118 Achilles Tang  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:52:06pm

re: #89 Bubblehead II

Belated Response.

NO! It went out under his name as well as in his news letter. Regardless of who actually wrote it. Paul owns it. End of Story. And you are a Paul Bot?

"He's denied that he wrote the newsletters. He's said that he didn't pay close enough attention to the content that was going out with his name on it."

Then He is a F***ing Idiot and doesn't deserve to be President

There are many other reasons why he cannot be president, aside from deserve, but my also belated question on this matter is;

has RP ever disowned these issues, since 1992, before this most recent hissy fit?

119 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:52:37pm

re: #117 reine.de.tout

scraping the bottom of the barrel???

This thing came in to my reine at yahoo email addy. I suspect the French name and the mention of being Queen of Everything fooled somebody into thinking I have $$$.

I got what I thought was a piece of spam, but I clicked on it and patiently waited, and lo and behold...

10 years after it took over as a means of communication, my kids' school is going to try to use email to communicate.

120 Achilles Tang  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:53:00pm

re: #99 reine.de.tout

I'm trying to figure out why and how, exactly, the Bank of Montreal has locked my account, seeing as how I don't have an account.

You are not seriously asking, are you?

121 Mostly sane, most of the time.  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:53:04pm

re: #117 reine.de.tout

Well, I'll tell you the truth--I always assumed you have a 4 key and a shift key.

122 reine.de.tout  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:53:33pm

re: #118 Naso Tang

There are many other reasons why he cannot be president, aside from deserve, but my also belated question on this issue is;

has RP ever disowned these issues, since 1992, before this most recent hissy fit?

Has he really disowned them now? He said he didn't write the stuff (which I don't believe), but has he disowned the ideas, described in detail how he disagrees with them? I don't think so.

123 b_sharp  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:53:35pm

re: #117 reine.de.tout

scraping the bottom of the barrel???

This thing came in to my reine at yahoo email addy. I suspect the French name and the mention of being Queen of Everything fooled somebody into thinking I have $$$.

Well, when you send them money, have them stick it in my account.
It'll be safe there.

124 reine.de.tout  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:53:43pm

re: #120 Naso Tang

You are not seriously asking, are you?

No.

125 Fat Bastard Vegetarian  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:53:56pm

re: #117 reine.de.tout

The King of Ethiopia finally made a deposit in your account!

126 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:54:17pm

re: #123 b_sharp

Well, when you send them money, have them stick it in my account.
It'll be safe there.

Because you have pen?

127 reine.de.tout  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:55:30pm

re: #126 Sergey Romanov

Because you have pen?

And, his name is Peggy.

128 The Ghost of a Flea  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:55:56pm

re: #115 zora

the newsletters read like stormfront. sully's off sometimes. with israel, sarah palin's baby, and now ron paul. he's being willfully ignorant on this one.

Sullivan's attempt at explanation/mitigation is incredibly weak; you're absolutely right--he wants this to be a non-issue.

129 b_sharp  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:56:00pm

re: #126 Sergey Romanov

Because you have pen?

No, I know how to spend.

130 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:56:04pm

re: #127 reine.de.tout

And, his name is Peggy.

No, his name is Nikolai, President of the Bank of Nikolai.

131 Achilles Tang  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:56:05pm

re: #122 reine.de.tout

Has he really disowned them now? He said he didn't write the stuff (which I don't believe), but has he disowned the ideas, described in detail how he disagrees with them? I don't think so.

Yes, belatedly I thought I should have made that point also.

132 Only The Lurker Knows  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:57:52pm

Night Lizards. May the Deity of Your Choice Smile Down Upon You.

Not my usual type of post when I sign off for the night/day.

133 reine.de.tout  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 5:58:51pm

re: #130 Sergey Romanov

No, his name is Nikolai, President of the Bank of Nikolai.

[Video]

hehe.
Nikolai is at least honest!

But I don't know - I think I trust Peggy:


134 reine.de.tout  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:00:56pm

I love the Peggy ads.
I am sooo easily amused.

135 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:01:20pm

re: #77 engineer dog

"i didn't read them"

you allowed "newsletters" to get sent out under your name and you never read them?

if that's true, what would that say about him as a chief executive? :D

A guy who can't manage his newsletter and we're supposed to believe he'd make a good president?

136 Our Precious Bodily Fluids  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:03:25pm

I've never heard any actual Socialists voicing support for Obama, despite how insistent lots of conservatives are that he's somehow basically a Marxist. But when Ron Paul runs for something, the Birchers and the Stormfront types line up behind him every time. I'm sure that's entirely coincidental.

137 b_sharp  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:03:59pm

re: #135 WindUpBird

if that's true, what would that say about him as a chief executive? :D

A guy who can't manage his newsletter and we're supposed to believe he'd make a good president?

Give the dufus man a break, he just wants POTUS on his CV.

138 Gus  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:06:05pm

re: #135 WindUpBird

if that's true, what would that say about him as a chief executive? :D

A guy who can't manage his newsletter and we're supposed to believe he'd make a good president?

Imagine yourself with a newsletter. On that newsletter is your name. The newspaper represents you. Now imagine yourself caring about what goes in your name. Your voice.

139 chaosium  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:06:20pm

re: #118 Naso Tang

Because he still supports segregation to this very day. Because... people would just be nice to each other and they would never create Sundown Towns again because people aren't mean!

140 zora  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:09:07pm

re: #116 Sergey Romanov

i didn't start to follow his blog until the last democratic primaries. i definitely hadn't seen his recent posts defending the bell curve but it makes sense in light of his defense and support of ron paul.

141 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:10:09pm

re: #134 reine.de.tout

I love the Peggy ads.
I am sooo easily amused.

I'm watching them right now.

142 Prononymous, rogue demon hunter  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:11:29pm

All he could do was walk out. First they shut out Bobby Fischer. Now they won't stop harassing poor Ron Paul. The darned Jew media is just that pervasive.

You will also note that this is a bit of hypocricy on their part. Censorship and discrimination by the private media? Oh noes! What makes them think we want to extend that possibility to all parts of society?

What are your thoughts on the League of Nations? How do you feel about the Harriday act? Wrong answer, no soup/medical service/electricity/whatever for you!

143 Gus  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:11:34pm

Ron Paul though is one of the first Tea Party types...

144 Sheila Broflovski  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:11:43pm

re: #141 Sergey Romanov

I'm watching them right now.

Are you in them?

145 b_sharp  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:13:01pm

re: #139 chaosium

Because he still supports segregation to this very day. Because... people would just be nice to each other and they would never create Sundown Towns again because people aren't mean!

They would be nice to each other because it is in their best interest and the market doesn't let stuff not in their best interest survive.

Or something like that.

146 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:13:18pm

re: #144 Alouette

Are you in them?

Sometimes I feel like it.

147 Gus  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:15:04pm

And a link. Lucy. Patient zero...

First known observation in the field of an evolving political species.

148 chaosium  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:19:50pm

re: #145 b_sharp

Right, it goes well with his other BRILLIANT economic insights, like how corporations would never think to take melamine-like shortcuts with adulterants or rush a medication sans all regulatory bodies because if they kill a single customer, they've lost a customer!

149 Gus  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:19:51pm

New rules for commercial pilots from the FAA.

150 Gus  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:21:40pm

Republicans make fools of themselves. Buttons falls into a well. Do we have anything in sport?

Mongo have big chunky keyboard.

151 Gus  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:22:42pm

And it's snowing like a postcard outside.

Enter Winter.

152 b_sharp  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:33:38pm

re: #148 chaosium

Right, it goes well with his other BRILLIANT economic insights, like how corporations would never think to take melamine-like shortcuts with adulterants or rush a medication sans all regulatory bodies because if they kill a single customer, they've lost a customer!

He doesn't have much of an understanding of human psychology or corporate reality.

The consumer is nothing but a piece of data in a statistical analysis.

153 Talking Point Detective  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:38:50pm

re: #139 chaosium

Because he still supports segregation to this very day. Because... people would just be nice to each other and they would never create Sundown Towns again because people aren't mean!

Paul thinks that a black cop as matter of law must protect a white, racist store owner's property, but that same cop should not be guaranteed, as a matter of law, the right to shop in that same store.

The man's a lunatic.

154 Obdicut  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:39:31pm

re: #153 Talking Point Detective

So does Rogue.

155 Talking Point Detective  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:40:58pm

re: #145 b_sharp

They would be nice to each other because it is in their best interest and the market doesn't let stuff not in their best interest survive.

Or something like that.

“The forced integration dictated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 increased racial tensions while diminishing individual liberty…

Oh, brother.

156 prairiefire  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:42:34pm

Congressman Cleaver at his Holiday open house:[Link: imgur.com...]

157 MittDoesNotCompute  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:42:46pm

re: #152 b_sharp

He doesn't have much of an understanding of human psychology or corporate reality.

The consumer is nothing but a piece of data in a statistical analysis.

Three words: Cost. Benefit. Analysis.

Words that came back to haunt Ford in the 70's after the real and perceived fuckup that was the Pinto.

158 Talking Point Detective  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:44:12pm

re: #154 Obdicut

So does Rogue.

I generally respect Rogue - disagreement on issues is just fine with me in most cases. This issue, and "enhanced interrogation techniques," however, are two issues where Rogue's perspective just boggles my mind.

159 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:47:55pm

re: #137 b_sharp

Give the dufus man a break, he just wants POTUS on his CV.

when I think CV, i think: [Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

160 Talking Point Detective  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:48:43pm

re: #145 b_sharp

They would be nice to each other because it is in their best interest and the market doesn't let stuff not in their best interest survive.

Or something like that.

That's the argument I've heard: Racist business-owners wouldn't discriminate because it wouldn't be good for long-term profits.

I mean, seriously, how does someone let free-market fetishism distort their understanding of reality that badly?

161 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:49:00pm

re: #158 Talking Point Detective

I generally respect Rogue - disagreement on issues is just fine with me in most cases. This issue, and "enhanced interrogation techniques," however, are two issues where Rogue's perspective just boggles my mind.

torture and racism are things we should not tolerate in America

162 Gus  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:49:14pm

[Link: images.google.com...]

(C, L-R) Musician Frank Zappa and children Moon Unit and Dweezil visting backstage at Broadway musical "Cats" cast incl. actress Betty Buckley (C, bottom)

163 Gus  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:49:52pm

This one is the cutest.

[Link: images.google.com...]

164 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:50:13pm

re: #161 WindUpBird

torture and racism are things we should not tolerate in America

Rogue is not racist, and his libertarian perspective on "freedom of association" is wrong-headed, but doesn't stem from racism. Torture though...

165 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:50:21pm

re: #160 Talking Point Detective

That's the argument I've heard: Racist business-owners wouldn't discriminate because it wouldn't be good for long-term profits.

I mean, seriously, how does someone let free-market fetishism distort their understanding of reality that badly?

man's inhumanity to man pays big $$$ i guess

166 Talking Point Detective  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:50:41pm

re: #161 WindUpBird

torture and racism are things we should not tolerate in America

But isn't restricting the right to torture an infringement on individual liberties?

167 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:51:48pm

re: #164 Sergey Romanov

Rogue is not racist, and his libertarian perspective on "freedom of association" is wrong-headed, but doesn't stem from racism. Torture though...

he's not racist (I like Rogue btw, I get along with him on music) but allowing businesses to be systemically racist is unacceptable


those laws are for the greater good. Some people just don't believe we should be legislating such things. I do! Simple as that

168 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:52:24pm

re: #166 Talking Point Detective

But isn't restricting the right to torture an infringement on individual liberties?

hahahah :D

169 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:53:05pm

re: #167 WindUpBird

Agreed on all points.

170 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:53:11pm

just like americans with disabilities act. free--market libertarians hate that act

guess what, they can go get fucked :D

171 Gus  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:56:11pm

re: #169 Sergey Romanov

Agreed on all points.

Flag!

172 Gus  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 6:56:56pm

Holding! Defense. 5 yard penalty. Still first down!

173 b_sharp  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 7:05:16pm

re: #159 WindUpBird

when I think CV, i think: [Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

Yah, but you're weird.

174 Robert O.  Wed, Dec 21, 2011 8:00:44pm

You know, I have been following the polls of this Republican nomination, and I have noticed in the last few days, Romney's numbers are heading up sharply again. I am starting to think crazy-uncle climbing to the lead in Iowa has sent the GOP into shock. Many GOPers are now ready to stop poking around for the anti-Romney (they have run out of options), and may be rallying around their most competitive candidate, because Ron Paul induces as much fear (if not more) in the hearts of mainstream GOPers and Christian right as President Obama. At this stage, I'm prepared to call Newt Gingrich out. It will be Ron Paul v Mitt Romney in Iowa, and it will be a close finish.

175 _RememberTonyC  Thu, Dec 22, 2011 3:48:14am

I wonder what Herman Cain thinks of all this?

176 Decider  Thu, Dec 22, 2011 9:56:02am

Put Paul in the same category as Governor n*****head.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh