WaPo: Ron Paul Signed Off On Racist 1990s Newsletters

Ron Paul’s newsletter problem gets worse, but Paulians won’t care
Wingnuts • Views: 25,420

The Washington Post has new information today on Ron Paul’s racist, antisemitic newsletters; a former secretary in the company that produced the newsletters says Ron Paul was fully aware of their content: Ron Paul signed off on racist 1990s newsletters, associates say.

Ron Paul, well known as a physician, congressman and libertarian , has also been a businessman who pursued a marketing strategy that included publishing provocative, racially charged newsletters to make money and spread his ideas, according to three people with direct knowledge of Paul’s businesses.

The Republican presidential candidate has denied writing inflammatory passages in the pamphlets from the 1990s and said recently that he did not read them at the time or for years afterward. Numerous colleagues said he does not hold racist views.

But people close to Paul’s operations said he was deeply involved in the company that produced the newsletters, Ron Paul & Associates, and closely monitored its operations, signing off on articles and speaking to staff members virtually every day.

“It was his newsletter, and it was under his name, so he always got to see the final product. . . . He would proof it,’’ said Renae Hathway, a former secretary in Paul’s company and a supporter of the Texas congressman.

And there’s more; Paul apparently made a deliberate effort to peddle his newsletters to racists and extremists, using the mailing list of a notorious antisemitic newspaper published by Holocaust denier Willis Carto:

Ed Crane, the longtime president of the libertarian Cato Institute, said he met Paul for lunch during this period, and the two men discussed direct-mail solicitations, which Paul was sending out to interest people in his newsletters. They agreed that “people who have extreme views” are more likely than others to respond.

Crane said Paul reported getting his best response when he used a mailing list from the now-defunct newspaper Spotlight, which was widely considered anti-Semitic and racist.

This comes as absolutely no surprise, but I predict it will have no impact on Ron Paul’s popularity. Anyone who still supports this creepy old crypto-racist has either found a way to rationalize this stuff, or has no problems with it.

Jump to bottom

54 comments
1 William Barnett-Lewis  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 10:16:47am

His campaign is already squealing.

[Link: www.npr.org…]

2 Kragar  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 10:17:16am

What a dick.

3 Gus  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 10:23:52am

Ron Paul. Republican. Now consider that the Republican Party allows a man of this nature to represent their party. It’s very telling as in “birds of a feather.”

4 darthstar  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 10:24:43am
5 rwdflynavy  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 10:24:56am

Wait. Luap Nor is a crazy racist!? Why the hell aren’t I notified about these things!!??
//

6 wrenchwench  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 10:29:26am
This comes as absolutely no surprise, but I predict it will have no impact on Ron Paul’s popularity. Anyone who still supports this creepy old racist has either found a way to rationalize this stuff, or has no problems with it.

It may increase his popularity among those who had not taken him seriously before, but were disappointed last night when Gringorich and MexicanMitt fought over being the least anti-immigrant.

7 Petero1818  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 10:30:52am

well, I think in Florida this sort of thing has an impact. And in Maine (where he is now) it may have an impact. Once you move off the east coast, I think his supporters are unlikely to give a crap. Most of them were probably on those mailing lists he used.

8 Feline Fearless Leader  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 10:32:41am

He doesn’t hold those positions personnally, but he’s willing to espouse them in print if it will pull the money in. So it’s down to pandering for the sake of money. Standard political (lack of) principles for this day.

9 Targetpractice  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 10:48:55am

Blah, blah, blah, disgruntled ex-employees, blah, blah, blah, political pay-off, blah, blah, blah, Ron Paul is a saint!

10 Charles Johnson  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 10:57:09am

Andrew Sullivan continues to defend Ron Paul.

[Link: andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com…]

Pathetically thin rationalizations masquerading as deep thoughts.

11 rwdflynavy  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:00:06am

You guys are completely confused on Ron Paul. He’s as cool as the other side of my pillow! I heard he even let a black person use his bathroom once!
//

12 Obdicut  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:01:45am

What would it take for the GOP to strip Paul of his committee chairmanships?

13 rwdflynavy  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:02:15am

re: #12 Obdicut

What would it take for the GOP to strip Paul of his committee chairmanships?

Standards, morals, you know the regular stuff.
//

14 erik_t  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:03:26am

re: #12 Obdicut

Live boy, dead girl… you know, the usual.

15 Ming  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:07:00am

I hope that the blog post is wrong about the following: “This comes as absolutely no surprise, but I predict it will have no impact on Ron Paul’s popularity.”

I’m quibbling about that sentence because I think the main problem here is that there’s not much real journalism left in America. Too often, a story like this isn’t investigated nearly enough.

But once it IS investigated, as Charles has done and continues to do (thank you), I think it WILL impact Paul’s popularity.

What I’m trying to say is, ***America is dying for more real, honest, actual journalism***. It’s not that millions of people don’t care about Ron Paul’s racist personal associations. It’s that most people aren’t political junkies, and get their news as entertainment (e.g. Fox News). They just take the news they receive at face value. That doesn’t mean they don’t or wouldn’t care.

Once the journalism is out there, I’m confident that it WILL have a deep impact. We desperately need less journalism-as-entertainment, and lots more real journalism.

16 aagcobb  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:08:24am

re: #15 Ming

It would be nice, but his son Rand defended racial discrimination by business owners during his 2010 Senate campaign, and he won easily.

17 Tumulus11  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:11:46am

. Ron Paul is an ugly crank and a liar:

‘I absolutely honestly do not know who wrote those things.’
// Ron Paul to Wolf Blitzer. CNN, Jan. 08, 2008.

‘Dr. Paul denied suggestions that he was a racist and said he was not evoking stereotypes when he wrote the columns. He said they should be read and quoted in their entirety to avoid misrepresentation.’
// The Dallas Morning News — May 22, 1996.

18 wrenchwench  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:12:06am

re: #10 Charles

Andrew Sullivan continues to defend Ron Paul.

[Link: andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com…]

Pathetically thin rationalizations masquerading as deep thoughts.

Sully says:

he deserves to be judged on his recent history as well as his increasingly distant past

It is never a good idea to judge someone on what he says now rather than what he has done in the past. Talk is cheap.

19 Iwouldprefernotto  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:13:15am

re: #16 aagcobb

It would be nice, but his son Rand defended racial discrimination by business owners during his 2010 Senate campaign, and he won easily.

In Kentucky.

20 wrenchwench  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:13:46am

re: #12 Obdicut

What would it take for the GOP to strip Paul of his committee chairmanships?

A GOP that cared to oppose racism.

It seems to have gone missing.

21 Feline Fearless Leader  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:14:09am

re: #18 wrenchwench

Sully says:


It is never a good idea to judge someone on what he says now rather than what he has done in the past. Talk is cheap.

I await Sullivan saying that everyone should stop mentioning Reagan since that’s thirty years in the past and any of the candidates associations with him are at least twenty years old as well.

22 lawhawk  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:15:15am

re: #18 wrenchwench

Focusing on what you want to hear, instead of hearing and reading all that was written. Selective memories., etc.

Paul’s up to no good - then or now. He thrives by being a crank and caters to an audience that thinks of itself on the fringe. The more outrageous things he says, the more support he apparently garners.

There’s another name for people like this - demagogue.

23 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:15:49am

I guess Chris Christie was inspired by Paul’s newsletters when he said that civil rights would have been better decided by a referendum

24 Kragar  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:18:04am

re: #21 oaktree

I await Sullivan saying that everyone should stop mentioning Reagan since that’s thirty years in the past and any of the candidates associations with him are at least twenty years old as well.

Nobody in the GOP has the balls to say “Forget Reagan, 20 years from now, I want people trying to be the next me.”

25 Charles Johnson  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:18:11am

re: #18 wrenchwench

Sully says:

It is never a good idea to judge someone on what he says now rather than what he has done in the past. Talk is cheap.

Ron Paul has not changed anything he says, really — his isolationism and eccentric economic ideas are exactly the same as they’ve been for decades. And he hasn’t changed who he associates with, either — Birchers, far right extremists, the Robert Taft Club, neo-Confederates, Alex Jones, etc.

Sullivan, who’s supposed to be a smart person, is getting totally played by this creepy libertarian nut.

26 wrenchwench  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:21:33am

re: #23 Dreggas

I guess Chris Christie was inspired by Paul’s newsletters when he said that civil rights would have been better decided by a referendum

What an ignorant thing to say.

Isn’t he supposed to be a moderate?

27 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:23:17am

re: #26 wrenchwench

Uh, hardly. He’s a wingnut darling.

28 Max  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:23:24am

re: #25 Charles

Sullivan, who’s supposed to be a smart person, is getting totally played by this creepy libertarian nut.

That’s the key word. Supposed.

Andrew Sullivan has always gone along with the hip politics of the time. He backed the neoconservatives in the liberal hawks in the early 2000s, he joined forces with the left-wing Iraq War critics in 2006, he voted for Obama in 2008, bashed Israel during Operation Cast Lead, and now he’s carrying water for the Paulians.

29 Max  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:24:39am

re: #27 Dreggas

Uh, hardly. He’s a wingnut darling.

Hardly. Chris Christie has been lambasted as a “RINO” by Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, and other prominent conservative talk radio hosts. Plus, he’s thrown his lot in with Mitt Romney.

30 wrenchwench  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:25:21am

re: #29 Max D. Reinhardt

Hardly. Chris Christie has been lambasted as a “RINO” by Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, and other prominent conservative talk radio hosts. Plus, he’s thrown his lot in with Mitt Romney.

Good to know where you get your info.

31 wrenchwench  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:25:39am

re: #27 Dreggas

Uh, hardly. He’s a wingnut darling.

Thanks.

32 Max  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:25:53am

re: #30 wrenchwench

Good to know where you get your info.

My two favorite news sources are NPR and The New York Times.

33 Feline Fearless Leader  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:26:17am

Does RINO mean “Reality Identifying Not Objectionable” at this point?

34 wrenchwench  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:27:15am

re: #32 Max D. Reinhardt

My two favorite news sources are NPR and The New York Times.

Are you still hanging out with David Appletree?

35 William Barnett-Lewis  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:29:06am

re: #27 Dreggas

Uh, hardly. He’s a wingnut darling.

He’s been kowtowing to the Koch Brothers as well. It pays well to sell your soul to them.

36 Max  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:30:55am

re: #34 wrenchwench

Are you still hanging out with David Appletree?

Well, if I see him I’ll say hi, but it’s not like we hang out or anything.

37 wrenchwench  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:36:12am

re: #36 Max D. Reinhardt

Well, if I see him I’ll say hi, but it’s not like we hang out or anything.

He doesn’t want to hear from me.

So, still just tweeting each other, that kind of thing?

38 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:40:35am

re: #29 Max D. Reinhardt

correction then, he WAS a darling for them when he was attacking teachers.

39 aagcobb  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:46:11am

re: #33 oaktree

Does RINO mean “Reality Identifying Not Objectionable” at this point?

Isn’t it a bizarre turn of events that to be a troooo Republican, you have to be a neo-confederate? Old Abe is spinning in his grave.

40 makeitstop  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:50:34am

re: #18 wrenchwench

Sully says:

he deserves to be judged on his recent history as well as his increasingly distant past

I got the same argument from someone on Facebook yesterday regarding Gingrich’s history of ethical misbehavior. ‘That was over 20 years ago! Don’t you think people can grow and change?’

They use that argument now, sure. But wait until some Democrat is running for office who did something they didn’t like ‘over 20 years ago.’

41 zora  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:52:36am

re: #26 wrenchwench

What an ignorant thing to say.

Isn’t he supposed to be a moderate?

he doesn’t want to sign a gay marriage bill so he wants the voters to decide. cowardice.

42 mikec6666  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:52:56am

Actual (imagined) Ron Paul newsletter editing notes:

“Editors note: change rotten Jews to dirty Jews.”

“Editors note: change Gay to homo”

“Editors note: we don’t say chinks anymore, we say slant-eyes”

etc.

43 makeitstop  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:53:07am

re: #29 Max D. Reinhardt

Chris Christie has been lambasted as a “RINO” by Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, and other prominent conservative talk radio hosts because he’s thrown his lot in with Mitt Romney.

FTFY

44 Ming  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 11:58:09am

re: #10 Charles

Andrew Sullivan continues to defend Ron Paul.

[Link: andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com…]

Pathetically thin rationalizations masquerading as deep thoughts.

In his post, Sullivan writes, “he [Paul] deserves to be judged on his recent history as well as his increasingly distant past.” Well, one of the most important aspects of Ron Paul’s “recent history” is how he has handled, and is handling, the news about his white-supremacist personal associations.

This is a question of CHARACTER. A person of admirable character, with a past like that, would be abjectly apologizing all over himself. This is conspicuously NOT what Ron Paul is doing now.

There’s an interesting contrast with, of all people, former LAPD detective Mark Fuhrman. A long time ago, Fuhrman wrote a book about the OJ Simpson case. The first page of that book was a heartfelt, abject apology. I was positively impressed with Fuhrman’s character, just from reading that awesome apology. (I’m sure I wouldn’t agree with him about many things, but that apology was one of the most admirable things I’ve ever read.)

Contrast this with Ron Paul’s brusque treatment of CNN’s Gloria Borger, when she asked him about the newsletters.

Ron Paul is showing his true character TODAY, just as he’s done for all those past decades. Until and unless Ron Paul pulls a Fuhrman and meets this issue head-on, as a changed man, I don’t see how anyone can continue to defend him.

45 Gus  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 12:01:58pm
46 Robert O.  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 12:04:20pm

After he loses another bid for the Presidency, Ron Paul will write a book about “My Struggle” against the Zionist forces of evil that conspired to stop him winning the Presidency he deserves. He will describe how federal government oppresses white people at the behest of minorities and foreign entities. Oh, and there will be a chapter on how we can reclaim the Panama Canal (see a previous article linked at LGF).

47 Feline Fearless Leader  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 12:06:31pm

re: #46 Robert O.

After he loses another bid for the Presidency, Ron Paul will write a book about “My Struggle” against the Zionist forces of evil that conspired to stop him winning the Presidency he deserves. He will describe how federal government oppresses white people at the behest of minorities and foreign entities. Oh, and there will be a chapter on how we can reclaim the Panama Canal (see a previous article linked at LGF).

And then he can don his glo-stick uniform, grab his data disk, and ride off into the future on his golden lightcycle.

48 wrenchwench  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 12:18:45pm

re: #37 wrenchwench

He doesn’t want to hear from me.

So, still just tweeting each other, that kind of thing?

Can’t even get a ‘lizard’ to repudiate a bigot, let alone get Luap Nor to do so.

49 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 12:18:56pm

re: #28 Max D. Reinhardt

Was John Kerry hip?

50 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 12:19:37pm

re: #34 wrenchwench

Are you still hanging out with David Appletree?

This one? [Link: en.wikipedia.org…]

51 wrenchwench  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 12:20:03pm

re: #50 Sergey Romanov

This one? [Link: en.wikipedia.org…]

That’s the one.

52 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 12:20:32pm

re: #51 wrenchwench

Heh.

53 Lidane  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 12:21:17pm

re: #40 makeitstop

I got the same argument from someone on Facebook yesterday regarding Gingrich’s history of ethical misbehavior. ‘That was over 20 years ago! Don’t you think people can grow and change?’

They use that argument now, sure. But wait until some Democrat is running for office who did something they didn’t like ‘over 20 years ago.’

On that note:

Duke Cunningham Tells Newt He’d Have The Felon Vote Locked Down

54 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Fri, Jan 27, 2012 12:24:33pm

re: #10 Charles

Andrew Sullivan continues to defend Ron Paul.

[Link: andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com…]

Pathetically thin rationalizations masquerading as deep thoughts.

Very weak sauce.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
The Pandemic Cost 7 Million Lives, but Talks to Prevent a Repeat Stall In late 2021, as the world reeled from the arrival of the highly contagious omicron variant of the coronavirus, representatives of almost 200 countries met - some online, some in-person in Geneva - hoping to forestall a future worldwide ...
Cheechako
Yesterday
Views: 79 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
2 weeks ago
Views: 253 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1