The Republican Party’s Deranged War on Women’s Rights

Birth control: the ultimate wedge issue
Politics • Views: 24,039

The truth is, the Republican Party has lost its mind. They present themselves as the party of “limited government,” but they’re now engaged in an all-out maneuver to vastly expand the government’s intrusion into women’s private lives. And it isn’t just about abortion any more — they’ve set their sights on birth control.

This is simple insanity. Something like 98% of American women use birth control at some point in their lives. How in the world can these Neanderthal misogynists believe the country is behind their efforts to drag women back to the Dark Ages? I keep trying to figure out what their game is, but at this point it just looks like sheer derangement.

Their latest move: trying to attach an anti-birth control amendment to a highway bill: Birth Control Amendment ‘Dangerous,’ Obama Spokesman Says.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, in a statement to The Huffington Post, weighed in heavily against a toughly-worded measure being considered in the Senate that would greatly restrict women’s access to critical health care services.

“Let’s be clear about what’s at stake,” said Carney. “The proposal being considered in the Senate applies to all employers — not just religious employers. And it isn’t limited to contraception. Any employer could restrict access to any service they say they object to. That is dangerous and it is wrong. Decisions about medical care should be made by a woman and her doctor, not a woman and her boss.”

The measure, proposed by Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) would amend the Affordable Care Act to allow any employer to exclude any health service coverage, no matter how critical or basic, by claiming that it violates their religious or moral convictions. Moreover, according to the National Women’s Law Center, the amendment would remove critical non-discrimination protections from the Affordable Care Act. For instance, an insurer could deny maternity care coverage to a same-sex couple, an interracial couple or a single woman for religious or moral reasons.

Coming just days after last week’s debate over the White House decision that religious-affiliated hospitals and schools had to provide contraception coverage in plans for employees, the Blunt amendment resembled a serious ratcheting-up of the culture war debates. But if the GOP calculation was that the Obama administration was in retreat (the president was forced to revise the ruling on Friday under political pressure), Carney’s statement suggested the opposite.

Also see

Jump to bottom

145 comments
1 erik_t  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:44:02am

So... no road hea freeway fellatio, then. Damn.

/

2 wrenchwench  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:45:44am

Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) violates my moral convictions by holding office. But I'm not the sort to try to do anything about it, except in the political sphere.

3 General Nimrod Bodfish  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:46:09am

Dark Ages would be too enlightening for the GOP, they want to go back to the Stone Age.

4 Kragar  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:46:13am

The Republican Party violates my religious and moral convictions, so I will exclude myself from any legislation they pass.

5 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:47:02am

re: #4 Kragar

The Republican Party violates my religious and moral convictions, so I will exclude myself from any legislation they pass.

with their behavior they've violated me, period.

6 Sol Berdinowitz  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:48:31am

They do not realize how badly they have shot themselves in the foot over this ideological overreach.

7 Kragar  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:48:34am

I feel the need for speed, so speed limits violate my moral convictions. Screw your speeding tickets.

8 Simply Sarah  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:48:36am

The social misogynists have been waiting to jump on contraception for years. Since Griswold and Eisenstadt, at least. They just finally decided they had an opening to push through this part of their disgusting anti-women agenda. I like to think that they've jumped the gun and we can fight them back for now, but I'm honestly not as sure as I'd like to be.

9 HappyWarrior  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:49:03am

I really hope there's a huge backlash against them because of this.

10 Kragar  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:49:56am

re: #6 Ministry of Fairness and Balance

They do not realize how badly they have shot themselves in the foot over this ideological overreach.

What makes you think that?
Fischer Compares Obama to Hitler, Claims Government is 'No Different' from Nazi Germany
Pat Robertson Claims Obama is Becoming a Dictator

11 Lidane  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:50:36am

re: #9 HappyWarrior

I really hope there's a huge backlash against them because of this.

Support Is Found for Birth Control Coverage and Gay Unions

On contraceptive coverage, 65 percent of voters in the poll said they supported the Obama administration’s requirement that health insurance plans cover the cost of birth control, and 59 percent, said the health insurance plans of religiously affiliated employers should cover the cost of birth control.

---

A majority of Catholic voters in the poll were at odds with the church’s official stance, agreeing with most other voters that religiously affiliated employers should offer health insurance that provides contraception.

12 Gus  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:50:53am

re: #3 Exit Light, Enter Night

Dark Ages would be too enlightening for the GOP, they want to go back to the Stone Age.

Last night I picturing the GOP as this invasive larval organism. Sort of like a tape worm.

13 [deleted]  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:51:28am
14 Lidane  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:51:36am

re: #10 Kragar

What makes you think that?
Fischer Compares Obama to Hitler, Claims Government is 'No Different' from Nazi Germany
Pat Robertson Claims Obama is Becoming a Dictator

Dear Pat and Bryan--

Until Obama starts rounding people up in cattle cars and killing them by the trainload, kindly fuck off.

No love,
Me

15 Simply Sarah  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:52:00am

re: #11 Lidane

Support Is Found for Birth Control Coverage and Gay Unions

The question is, how much of that support is from people that would trade away all those social issues for promises of slightly lower taxes and for punishing the illegals/welfare queens?

16 darthstar  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:52:20am

This is going to piss off the Uterati. (one of my favorite facebook groups)

17 Lidane  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:52:33am

re: #15 Simply Sarah

The question is, how much of that support is from people that would trade away all those social issues for promises of slightly lower taxes and for punishing the illegals/welfare queens?

We'll know the answer if Santorum ends up the nominee.

18 Kragar  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:54:02am

Fox News ‘Expert’ Keith Ablow: Media Matters Founder Is ‘Dangerous’ Because He Was Adopted

ABLOW: He’s a dangerous man, because having followers and waging war… this isn’t accidental language. It’s about violence, destruction, and he feels destroyed in himself. [...] This is an adopted boy who needs to plumb the depths of his psyche. He was adopted. Many adopted children are tremendously well-adjusted, but for some reason, this man feels he’s unloved and unloveable, shunted to the side, and that’s the antidote he feels: unlimited power. Guess what? It never ever works.

This being the same "expert" who claimed Newt was the perfect candidate because he got married three times.

19 kirkspencer  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:54:46am

Utter brilliance on Reid's part to allow full debate and vote on the amendment.

20 jaunte  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:54:59am

I hope the vast middle of the road 'not paying attention majority' will start to wake up and notice the crazies.

21 Simply Sarah  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:55:18am

re: #18 Kragar

Fox News ‘Expert’ Keith Ablow: Media Matters Founder Is ‘Dangerous’ Because He Was Adopted

This being the same "expert" who claimed Newt was the perfect candidate because he got married three times.

All while saying kids seeing Chaz Bono on Dancing With the Stars would destroy their sexual orientation and gender identity and otherwise fuck them up.

22 Tumulus11  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:55:48am
'Nothing in this title shall be construed to require an individual or institutional health care provider, or authorize a health plan to require a provider, to provide, participate in, or refer for a specific item or service contrary to the provider’s religious beliefs or moral convictions.'

. Thus allowing any employer to disallow any and all health care coverage to any employee for any reason. We'll see how this turkey flies in the general election.

23 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:56:11am

re: #20 jaunte

I hope the vast middle of the road 'not paying attention majority' will start to wake up and notice the crazies.

if they were then 2010 probably would have turned out differently.

24 Kragar  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:56:38am

re: #21 Simply Sarah

All while saying kids seeing Chaz Bono on Dancing With the Stars would destroy their sexual orientation and gender identity and otherwise fuck them up.

I think Dancing with the Stars fucks up people well enough on its own.

GO READ A BOOK OR SOMETHING!

25 ProMayaLiberal  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:57:02am

re: #22 Tumulus11

At this point, I'm beginning to think that this form of Conservatism is a threat to the First Amendment.

26 erik_t  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:57:53am

re: #25 ProGunLiberal

Ya think?

27 shutdown  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:57:56am

I am still unclear on the concept of how any legal entity, short of an actual religious organization such as a church or synagogue, can have "religious convictions", or "morally" object to anything. These objections reflect the sentiment of controlling shareholders, management or the board of directors. This is the same kind of sticky thinking that imbues corporations with "rights" of free speech.

29 wrenchwench  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:59:09am

re: #13 Channeling Confucius

Nice thought, but we should worry about the fragility of socio-cultural progress based on something as ephemeral as politics.

Socio-cultural progress is as ephemeral as politics.

Can you explain what you mean another way?

30 jaunte  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:59:10am

Dr. Keith (Diagnoses for a Dollar) Ablow.

31 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:59:30am

re: #27 Turnabout is Fair Play


It goes hand in hand with their whole defense of pharmacists not giving birth control to women. They think a pharmacist should not have to fill a prescription if that prescription violates their personal beliefs. As with everything else they want their religious ideas to be law for everyone else even if everyone else disagrees.

32 Sol Berdinowitz  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:00:29am

re: #27 Turnabout is Fair Play

I am still unclear on the concept of how any legal entity, short of an actual religious organization such as a church or synagogue, can have "religious convictions", or "morally" object to anything. These objections reflect the sentiment of controlling shareholders, management or the board of directors. This is the same kind of sticky thinking that imbues corporations with "rights" of free speech.

And if a lunch counter has some sort of religious reservations about serving black people?

33 HappyWarrior  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:00:40am

I think Pat and Bryan really want to be persecuted bad. They can always move to North Korea but then they'd have to give up their lifestyle of being con artists.

34 Kragar  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:02:00am

re: #30 jaunte

Dr. Keith (Diagnoses for a Dollar) Ablow.

A dollar a blow? I'll take one!
/rimshot

35 General Nimrod Bodfish  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:02:08am

re: #33 HappyWarrior

I think Pat and Bryan really want to be persecuted bad.

Closet masochists?

"Persecute me harder!"
*whip crack*

//////

36 shutdown  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:02:10am

re: #31 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance

re: #32 Ministry of Fairness and Balance

I have decided to develop religious and moral reservations about using my left turn signal, ceding the right of way to bankers, and not running Cadillac STS's off the road.

37 jaunte  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:02:35am
How in the world can these Neanderthal misogynists believe the country is behind their efforts to take women back to the Dark Ages?

They really do live in a bubble of confirmation bias.

38 HappyWarrior  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:02:57am

re: #35 Exit Light, Enter Night

Closet masochists?

"Persecute me harder!"
*whip crack*

///

Thinking like Mel Gibson on South Park.
Go ahead and crucify me, you'd like that.

39 Simply Sarah  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:03:26am

re: #32 Ministry of Fairness and Balance

And if a lunch counter has some sort of religious reservations about serving black people?

"Them's the breaks."

40 Gus  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:05:56am

Woot!

There's Racist Dog-Whistling, and Then There's... Racism

Check it out Charles... folks...

41 HappyWarrior  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:06:08am

Also you can tell how badly the GOP wants to women's vote with stuff like this and my state's majority Republican house of delegates wanting a vaginal ultrasound on women getting abortions. And we're supposed to believe that the Republican Party is the party of small government and individual liberty. Yeah, and I'm fucking Santa Claus.

42 lawhawk  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:06:18am

The same people who would seemingly go out of their way to ban shariah if given the opportunity are amazingly also first in line to push legislation that would impose their religious beliefs on everyone else.

At the same time, the misogynistic nature of the GOP comes through loud and clear.

Attaching birth control legislation to the highway bill? I guess the GOP can think of no better way to kill a bill that would otherwise have bipartisan support (and which is critical to getting highway (and mass transit) project funding across the country going).

Claiming to be for limited government all while mandating the most intrusive kinds of tests to obtain abortions - a legal procedure is unjustified and also adds costs to health care that undoubtedly are intended to limit access even further for those of limited means. So much for being a party that claims to be fiscally responsible. Require needless tests all to punish women who seek a legal procedure (but one with which the socons want to eliminate entirely, and are again pushing personhood bills at the state level).

The GOP claims to be doing this because they've got a mandate? Most Americans want and use birth control of some form. So, that can't be the basis. I can only surmise that it must come down to control and/or an oblique attack on PP, which does offer up birth control among its services.

43 lawhawk  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:07:15am

re: #40 Gus

Woot!

There's Racist Dog-Whistling, and Then There's... Racism

Check it out Charles... folks...

But Charles' not relevant.... remember? /

44 Gus  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:07:52am

re: #43 lawhawk

But Charles' not relevant... remember? /

Extra super dooper splodey heads in 3, 2, 1...

45 Renaissance_Man  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:09:38am

Why are Americans so happy to have their employer control their health care?

It's a phenomenon unique to the US, and given the strong anti-authoritarian streak in the American psyche, I would have thought it would be anathema. Yet, for reasons I don't fully understand, Americans seem furiously resistant to ceding any power to an entity that answers democratically to the American people, but more than happy to cede ever-increasing power to entities that already control much of their lives by paying them a wage, and don't answer to them at all.

46 Achilles Tang  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:11:45am

Let's be clear, this is not about intruding in women's lives, or bodies, alone. What affects women affects men. What controls women controls men.

47 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:12:03am

re: #45 Renaissance_Man

because somehow we (not all of us but many) have been convinced that corporations are better than government and that we should praise our employer for being kind enough to offer us health insurance and a pay check.

48 jaunte  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:12:06am

re: #45 Renaissance_Man

The most inventive answer comes once again from Bryan Fischer:

"What this really is, this is no different, it’s really very little different than the government than the form of government you had in Nazi Germany. Remember, Adolf Hitler got elected, people elected him in 1933 in overwhelming majorities, they elected their own tyrant. We’ve essentially done the same thing here in the United States, we elected somebody at the ballot box who is behaving like a dictatorial tyrant, completely ignoring the constraints and the limits of the law and the Constitution and imposing his view of society on us."

49 andydp  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:12:25am

I'm expecting a vast majority of women who are in the "throes GOP love" as the "values" party to realize exactly what values are being espoused. At some point, regardless of political affiliation, they will say "Enough !!".

A few years back Loretta Lynn wrote and recorded a song called "The Pill". She was told it would get her in "trouble", would not sell, no one would play it etc etc. The song was a big hit for Ms Lynn. Its definitely not a "guy song" so somebody must have bought it...

Same thing here.

50 Killgore Trout  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:14:36am

re: #45 Renaissance_Man

Why are Americans so happy to have their employer control their health care?

It's a phenomenon unique to the US, and given the strong anti-authoritarian streak in the American psyche, I would have thought it would be anathema. Yet, for reasons I don't fully understand, Americans seem furiously resistant to ceding any power to an entity that answers democratically to the American people, but more than happy to cede ever-increasing power to entities that already control much of their lives by paying them a wage, and don't answer to them at all.

Mostly because it's the only system we know. The vast majority of people never see their insurance premium payments so they have no idea what it costs. I think over the past decade people are starting to notice that fewer employers are offering health insurance and when they do the coverage is slowly decreasing. We are waking up to the problem a little late.

51 Renaissance_Man  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:15:33am

re: #6 Ministry of Fairness and Balance

They do not realize how badly they have shot themselves in the foot over this ideological overreach.

I really don't think they have. Every time reasonable people might start to react to far right ideological overreach, the deluge of Conservativist propaganda that permeates through American culture soothes them into believing it's the new normal. In a few short years, American people as a whole now believe it's entirely normal and okay to hate liberals and believe their government is borderline Communist. That's the new norm. Soon enough outright racism and misogyny may well be the new norm.

52 Iwouldprefernotto  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:15:44am

I can't wait until this comes up in the Presidential debates. Romney is going to be squirming trying to defend some of this insanity.

53 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:16:27am

re: #46 Red Sea Desjardini Tang

i have to agree with this line of thought in that Virginia's law is really nothing more than state sanctioned rape by proxy. Violent? No. Humiliating? Yes.

54 jaunte  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:17:16am

re: #49 andydp

The GOP is going to lose women.

...With his now-famous “nope, zero” response last spring, President Obama simply shut down Republicans in Congress who wanted to defund family planning as part of a deal to reduce the federal deficit. The action elicited a sudden surge in his popularity, especially in the highly contested demographic of women voters between the ages of 30 and 49 who voted for him in 2008 but wound up frustrated by failed promises and disappointing economic policies. Campaign polling has since uncovered a big opening for Obama with this group because they are furious over Republican social extremism. An astonishing 80 percent of them disapproved of congressional efforts to defund Planned Parenthood last spring. Polling among Catholics in response to last week’s controversy shows identical patterns, with 57 percent overall supporting the Obama “compromise” to ensure full coverage of contraception, according to reporting by Joe Conason in The National Memo, and cross-tabs demonstrating much higher margins of support from Catholic women, Latinos, and independent Catholic voters — all prime Obama election targets. [Link: www.salon.com...]

55 Simply Sarah  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:17:52am

re: #46 Red Sea Desjardini Tang

Let's be clear, this is not about intruding in women's lives, or bodies, alone. What affects women affects men. What controls women controls men.

While this is true, it is still mostly about the control of women and our bodies.

56 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:18:32am

re: #45 Renaissance_Man

Why are Americans so happy to have their employer control their health care?

It's a phenomenon unique to the US, and given the strong anti-authoritarian streak in the American psyche, I would have thought it would be anathema. Yet, for reasons I don't fully understand, Americans seem furiously resistant to ceding any power to an entity that answers democratically to the American people, but more than happy to cede ever-increasing power to entities that already control much of their lives by paying them a wage, and don't answer to them at all.

it's incredibly stupid and backwards, but that's America

57 Gus  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:19:00am

Oh snap. Another one!

Santorum's stone-age view of women - CNN.com

Taken with statements Santorum made in his 2005 book, "It Takes a Family: Conservatism and the Common Good," his opposition to contraception (as well as to abortion, even in the case of rape) seems part and parcel of a deep hostility toward efforts to empower women and enhance their status. He has shown nothing but contempt for what his book called the "radical" feminist "pitch" that "men and women be given an equal opportunity to make it to the top in the workplace." So perhaps it's not surprising that at the time of publication he did not list his wife as a co-author or contributor, although when asked last week about this and other comments on working mothers, he now says his wife wrote that part of the book.

Click on the link in the body of the text.

58 Sol Berdinowitz  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:19:13am

re: #51 Renaissance_Man

I really don't think they have. Every time reasonable people might start to react to far right ideological overreach, the deluge of Conservativist propaganda that permeates through American culture soothes them into believing it's the new normal. In a few short years, American people as a whole now believe it's entirely normal and okay to hate liberals and believe their government is borderline Communist. That's the new norm. Soon enough outright racism and misogyny may well be the new norm.

They are good at being noisywhile campaigning, but the voting booth is a very quiet place...

59 Simply Sarah  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:19:26am

re: #53 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance

i have to agree with this line of thought in that Virginia's law is really nothing more than state sanctioned rape by proxy. Violent? No Yes. Humiliating? Yes.

I'd argue that it most certainly is violent. It's a violent and unwanted invasion of a woman's body.

60 Gus  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:19:29am

That one is yours Lawhawk.

61 Gus  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:20:29am

The Atlantic... CNN... Booming into insignificance.

62 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:20:32am

re: #59 Simply Sarah

I was thinking more in terms of being physically assaulted and hurled to the ground etc, however I can see your point.

63 celticdragon  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:21:08am

re: #45 Renaissance_Man

Why are Americans so happy to have their employer control their health care?

It's a phenomenon unique to the US, and given the strong anti-authoritarian streak in the American psyche, I would have thought it would be anathema. Yet, for reasons I don't fully understand, Americans seem furiously resistant to ceding any power to an entity that answers democratically to the American people, but more than happy to cede ever-increasing power to entities that already control much of their lives by paying them a wage, and don't answer to them at all.

American anti authoritarianism is very selective. We tend to be anti "big gub'mint" types when the Federal government is concerned, but we look the other way and whistle when the local police bust down the wrong door and blow away a couple of dogs and some old lady sleeping on a sofa over a bad tip on a pot buy.

Many Americans actually love statist violence with black clad SWAT officers, submachineguns and the like, or seeing union strike lines getting busted up by riot officers because they want to think the violence is being done in their name and with their approval. In that respect, we are no different at all from Germans in 1922

64 Interesting Times  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:21:30am
65 Bubblehead II  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:21:35am

re: #49 andydp

The Pill.

66 lawhawk  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:21:43am

re: #60 Gus

Hot diggity damn.... just when you think you're out... they pull you back in... /

67 jaunte  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:22:15am

re: #60 Gus

That one is yours Lawhawk.

Linked from a CNN opinion piece. Pretty good!

68 HappyWarrior  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:22:38am

re: #63 celticdragon

American anti authoritarianism is very selective. We tend to be anti "big gub'mint" types when the Federal government is concerned, but we look the other way and whistle when the local police bust down the wrong door and blow away a couple of dogs and some old lady sleeping on a sofa over a bad tip on a pot buy.

Many Americans actually love statist violence with black clad SWAT officers, submachineguns and the like, or seeing union strike lines getting busted up by riot officers because they want to think the violence is being done in their name and with their approval. In that respect, we are no different at all from Germans in 1922

Yeah it is very selective. We're an odd bunch though. Always have been.

69 Gus  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:22:41am

re: #67 jaunte

Linked from a CNN opinion piece. Pretty good!

I can see the red faces from here.

70 ProMayaLiberal  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:23:01am

Well, my parents a got a Jury Summons for me in the mail. I want to serve on a jury at least once in my life.

Unfortunately, I'm not in Colorado, and can absolutely not serve on the Jury, because of being at OU.

Fuck.

71 jaunte  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:23:05am

re: #69 Gus

In palest denial.

72 Eventual Carrion  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:23:25am

re: #48 jaunte

The most inventive answer comes once again from Bryan Fischer:

"What this really is, this is no different, it’s really very little different than the government than the form of government you had in Nazi Germany. Remember, Adolf Hitler got elected, people elected him in 1933 in overwhelming majorities, they elected their own tyrant. [snip]"

I think he even has this wrong. Hitler got beaten in the election and also in the run off election (as no one got a majority of the votes in the initial election). He was appointed to the position of chancellor not voted in.

73 Renaissance_Man  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:23:30am

re: #56 windupbird is in the gravity well

it's incredibly stupid and backwards, but that's America

You know, it's not really. America remains an amazing place, incredibly progressive and enlightened. It has been so for decades, despite the terrible things that still happen and the old attitudes that still haunt it. So many parts of the world would have never even had a Civil Rights movement, or any of the social advances that began here. What worries me now is how completely in thrall to a non-benevolent media the American mindset has become.

74 HappyWarrior  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:24:07am

re: #73 Renaissance_Man

You know, it's not really. America remains an amazing place, incredibly progressive and enlightened. It has been so for decades, despite the terrible things that still happen and the old attitudes that still haunt it. So many parts of the world would have never even had a Civil Rights movement, or any of the social advances that began here. What worries me now is how completely in thrall to a non-benevolent media the American mindset has become.

This.

75 jaunte  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:24:14am

re: #72 RayFerd

Yeah, it's just another example of the incredible blizzard of bs that's thrown up around the subject.

76 lawhawk  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:24:35am

re: #57 Gus

Oh, but that's not relevant because it's from a professor at Evergreen State University in Oregon, and we all know who went there (hint: the use of her nickname has resulted in more than a few bannings and deleted postings). /

77 Gus  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:25:47am

re: #76 lawhawk

Oh, but that's not relevant because it's from a professor at Evergreen State University in Oregon, and we all know who went there (hint: the use of her nickname has resulted in more than a few bannings and deleted postings). /

But. But. Obviously that was written by, uh, Killgore!

//

78 General Nimrod Bodfish  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:26:29am

re: #70 ProGunLiberal

I think you can write to the court explaining why you can't attend because of you being out of the state. They'll excuse you if you let them know that you can't attend because of that.

79 ProMayaLiberal  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:26:57am

Romney is still ahead in Arizona, but not as much as two weeks ago:

New American Research Group poll has Romney up 38-31 on Santorum in Arizona.

80 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:27:38am

Santorum: being a woman is a lifestyle choice

81 HappyWarrior  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:28:31am

re: #80 windupbird is in the gravity well

Santorum: being a woman is a lifestyle choice

Heh so is choosing to support his frothiness for president.

82 ProMayaLiberal  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:28:33am

re: #79 ProGunLiberal

I don't think Santorum will be able to win Arizona. The Mormon Bloc Voting will be too hard to overcome.

83 celticdragon  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:28:39am

re: #76 lawhawk

Christ on a crutch...!

Take the book's dismissal of programs to help impoverished single mothers improve their job prospects by returning to school: "The notion that college education is a cost-effective way to help poor, low-skill, unmarried mothers with high school diplomas or GEDs move up the economic ladder is just wrong."

That sweater vest wearing smear of froth is actually against helping single mothers get an education.

*spit*

84 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:28:42am

re: #76 lawhawk

Oh, but that's not relevant because it's from a professor at Evergreen State University in Oregon, and we all know who went there (hint: the use of her nickname has resulted in more than a few bannings and deleted postings). /

Evergreen's in WA

85 Kragar  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:28:50am

RNC Accuses Obama Campaign Manager Of Insensitivity Toward Latinos

The insensitivity in question would be the Campaign Manager quoting John McCain.

86 William Barnett-Lewis  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:29:34am

re: #72 RayFerd

I think he even has this wrong. Hitler got beaten in the election and also in the run off election (as no one got a majority of the votes in the initial election). He was appointed to the position of chancellor not voted in.

The number of Germans voting for him in '33 had started dropping. That's why they seized power instead of continuing to game the system. NDSP support peaked at 37% in the two elections in 1932 and had dropped to 33% in 1933.

87 Eventual Carrion  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:29:57am

re: #75 jaunte

Yeah, it's just another example of the incredible blizzard of bs that's thrown up around the subject.

Well to be fair he probably didn't mean it to be a true statement, it just added to the color of his oration. Or to put it another way, he is fucking opportunistic liar.

88 lawhawk  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:30:34am

re: #84 windupbird is in the gravity well

Yeah, just missed making that correction - time expired. Thanks.

89 ProMayaLiberal  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:30:45am

re: #84 windupbird is in the gravity well

Hilariously, this is the translation of its Latin Motto:

Let it all hang out

90 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:31:26am

re: #88 lawhawk

Yeah, just missed making that correction - time expired. Thanks.

^_^;

91 HappyWarrior  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:31:26am

re: #85 Kragar

RNC Accuses Obama Campaign Manager Of Insensitivity Toward Latinos

The insensitivity in question would be the Campaign Manager quoting John McCain.

This is hilarious.

92 Vicious Michigan Union Thug  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:31:31am

re: #59 Simply Sarah

I'd argue that it most certainly is violent. It's a violent and unwanted invasion of a woman's body.

But PETA says that women love it rough!

93 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:32:01am

re: #88 lawhawk

Yeah, just missed making that correction - time expired. Thanks.

I used to hang out with friends who went to college there, BOY does that school have a lot of concrete, it looks like a map from a 90's FPS

94 Gus  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:32:27am

re: #84 windupbird is in the gravity well

Evergreen's in WA

Close enough.

//

95 Kragar  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:33:51am

I will be going out to my car this afternoon, grabbing all my Megadeth CDs and throwing them into my office's cd grinder.

Megadeth Frontman Dave Mustaine Endorses Rick Santorum

96 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:34:13am
97 Bulworth  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:34:54am

re: #95 Kragar

I will be going out to my car this afternoon, grabbing all my Megadeth CDs and throwing them into my office's cd grinder.

Megadeth Frontman Dave Mustaine Endorses Rick Santorum

Take it easy on Peace Sells...But Who's Buying?

98 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:34:57am

re: #95 Kragar

I will be going out to my car this afternoon, grabbing all my Megadeth CDs and throwing them into my office's cd grinder.

Megadeth Frontman Dave Mustaine Endorses Rick Santorum

dude, hahahah Mustaine has always been nuts, he's a birther and a conspiracy theorist, he's in alex jones territory

99 Simply Sarah  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:34:59am

re: #92 Look At My New Grandbaby!

But PETA says that women love it rough!

So true! And who am I to question a group that is such a paragon of feminist thinking?
/Ugh

100 lawhawk  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:35:14am

re: #95 Kragar

It's a symphony of destruction? A cavalcade of CD chipping? The office spacing of an era?

101 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:36:51am

re: #91 HappyWarrior

I read that and just shook my head.

102 William Barnett-Lewis  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:39:18am

re: #95 Kragar

I will be going out to my car this afternoon, grabbing all my Megadeth CDs and throwing them into my office's cd grinder.

Megadeth Frontman Dave Mustaine Endorses Rick Santorum

Ack. What a doofus.

103 Gus  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:41:26am

News Corp is hacking our phone lines as we type.

//

104 Feline Fearless Leader  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:44:49am

This is the kind of dispute that makes me fear neighbor relations sometimes.

[Link: usnews.msnbc.msn.com...]

Well, in my case I don't have dogs, or neighbors with dogs that poop in my apartment, so I might be safe for now. Though I do wonder if the Feline Overlord annoys the neighbors when he goes into Brat Cat* mode.

* - Deaf Siamese cat howling at the top of his feline lungs just to complain about things in general. Luckily he doesn't do it for extended periods of time. (At least while I'm there.)

105 jaunte  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:45:47am

What Led to Breitbart's Epic 'Rape' Rant at CPAC?

... as Breitbart is preparing to go confront the crowd, someone off-camera says that it would look bad to do so with a glass of wine in his hand.

“So what? We’re allowed to drink wine in America!” Breitbart says. A moment later, there’s the sound of breaking glass.

106 celticdragon  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:46:47am

re: #95 Kragar

I will be going out to my car this afternoon, grabbing all my Megadeth CDs and throwing them into my office's cd grinder.

Megadeth Frontman Dave Mustaine Endorses Rick Santorum

Metallica looks positively prescient in dumping that asshat.

107 Kragar  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:48:05am
108 Gus  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:48:54am

re: #107 Kragar

BEHAVE YOURSELVES!

Poor Andrew.

//

109 M. Dubious  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:49:46am

re: #95 Kragar

I will be going out to my car this afternoon, grabbing all my Megadeth CDs and throwing them into my office's cd grinder.

Megadeth Frontman Dave Mustaine Endorses Rick Santorum

Heh. From your link:

Ron Paul… you know, I heard somebody say he was like insecticide - 98 percent of it’s inert gases, but it’s the two percent that’s left that will kill you. What that means is that he’ll make total sense for a while, and then he’ll say something so way out that it negates everything else.

110 kirkspencer  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:50:51am

re: #82 ProGunLiberal

I don't think Santorum will be able to win Arizona. The Mormon Bloc Voting will be too hard to overcome.

If what you posted previously is accurate (that Romney-Santorum is now 38-31) I wouldn't bet money either way.

On the 1st Rasmussen had Romney up 48-13. One of the things a lot of people have been noticing is that primary voting is volatile; the historical process of averaging four weeks of polls (the RCP method) that does reasonably well in general elections misses the numbers in primaries. Instead, watch the trend line and project.

Nate Silver addressed this when he said he'd bet against himself concerning Santorum in Iowa - and we now know that he was right; Santorum won.

Watch the polls next week. If Santorum keeps climbing and/or Romney keeps dropping, the Mormon vote in the state might not mean anything.

One last thing. Arizona (with 29 delegates) is the last winner-take-all till the end of April. If Santorum wins it will go a long way to eliminating the current delegate gap. (presently 105 Mitt 71 Rick) Add a Santorum win in Michigan and suddenly it is Mitt who desperately needs Super Tuesday to break his way.

111 jaunte  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:52:15am

Rick Santorum’s Medical Malpractice Lawsuit

...in 1999, his wife Karen sued her chiropractor $500,000 for allegedly injuring her back. Santorum testified in the case, telling the jury that the injury caused his wife pain and impaired her ability to campaign for him.
...
At the time, Democrat James Carville called Santorum “a world class hypocrite” because while his wife sued for $500,000, he had co-sponsored a bill limiting medical malpractice lawsuits to $250,000 in non-economic damages.

112 labman57  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:52:26am

Republicans have no one to blame but themselves.

They want to take on Obama about the economy, except that they have no substantive policy positions, and the overall economy is improving significantly.

They want to be critical of his perceived weakness on attacking terrorism, but then bin Laden met his demise.

So they have chosen Door #3 and have returned to their favorite turf, hurling hyperbolic rhetoric, racially-insensitive epithets, and fact-devoid, inflammatory accusations about the evils of birth control and a mythical "war on Christianity" ... and the American people are responding, "WTF are you talking about???"

113 Gus  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:53:29am

re: #111 jaunte

Rick Santorum’s Medical Malpractice Lawsuit

Tort reform! Frivolous lawsuit! Derp!

//

114 TedStriker  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:53:39am

re: #95 Kragar

I will be going out to my car this afternoon, grabbing all my Megadeth CDs and throwing them into my office's cd grinder.

Megadeth Frontman Dave Mustaine Endorses Rick Santorum

I loves me some Megadeth, but I can't help but facepalm at Mustaine. However, this should really be a shock to anyone, because AFAIK, he's been a RWNJ for a long time.

This is not gonna make me dispose of my Megadeth collection; hell, if I tossed all of the media stuff done by people whose politics I didn't care for, it'd be a hell of a lot smaller.

115 Kragar  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:54:34am

re: #112 labman57

Republicans have no one to blame but themselves.

They want to take on Obama about the economy, except that they have no substantive policy positions, and the overall economy is improving significantly.

They want to be critical of his perceived weakness on attacking terrorism, but then bin Laden met his demise.

So they have chosen Door #3 and have returned to their favorite turf, hurling hyperbolic rhetoric, racially-insensitive epithets, and fact-devoid, inflammatory accusations about the evils of birth control and a mythical "war on Christianity" ... and the American people are responding, "WTF are you talking about???"

2008, I was loyal Republican who thought Obama would be a terrible president, and when I wanted to know what they planned to do about it, all I could hear was that he was a secret Muslim from Kenya.

It was then I started thinking maybe some of their other logic might be a tad suspect.

116 lawhawk  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:55:55am

re: #106 celticdragon

And the funny thing is that the excuse often given was that Mustaine had an alcohol problem. That's particularly ironic given Metallica's nickname - Alcoholica for their drinking to excess.

117 William Barnett-Lewis  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:57:26am

re: #106 celticdragon

Metallica looks positively prescient in dumping that asshat.

Meh, 6 of one, half a dozen of the other...

118 Gus  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 11:59:50am
119 Kragar  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:00:32pm

Anti-Muslim Extremist James Lafferty Angry he was Quoted Verbatim

Today in her WorldNetDaily column, Geller responded to the “anti-freedom, pro-jihad left” for trying to “twist the meaning of remarks by one of our speakers, James Lafferty.” She then included a short statement to “set the record straight” saying that he “does not condone ore encourage nay criminal act or vandalism against any mosque” and believes in the free exercise of religion:

I have been organizing events at CPAC since I first brought Geert Wilders to the conservative confab back in 2009, but this was our most powerful one yet. The only coverage of our landmark event in defense of freedom, however, was from the anti-freedom, pro-jihad left. Islamic supremacists and their quisling apologists in the leftist media immediately tried to twist the meaning of remarks by one of our speakers, James Lafferty. They accused Lafferty, founder and chairman of the Virginia Anti-Shariah Task Force, of applauding the destruction of mosques. Lafferty set the record straight in a statement he sent me: “I do not condone or encourage any criminal act or vandalism against any mosque. I am a firm believer in the rule of law and the protections our Constitution provides for the free exercise of religion – and that means all religions.”

But this brief statement does nothing to “set the record straight,” and doesn’t even come close to addressing what Lafferty said at the panel.

120 Kragar  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:01:55pm

re: #118 Gus

I've got my eye on you.

121 Gus  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:02:35pm

re: #120 Kragar

I've got my eye on you.

Ya gotta be fast!

//

122 ProMayaLiberal  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:04:01pm

re: #118 Gus

I hope this fucker likes the Party Van.

In other news, I think we need to defeat the Snowe in this year's election:

Snowe & Collins Seem To Be Hedging On Birth Control

123 ProMayaLiberal  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:06:54pm

re: #122 ProGunLiberal

There is no such thing as a good congressional republican.

If there is a Republican in "Blue" Territory, bring them down.

124 Kragar  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:07:00pm

re: #121 Gus

Ya gotta be fast!

//

Anyone can be fast, I was good.

125 Gus  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:07:37pm

re: #122 ProGunLiberal

I hope this fucker likes the Party Van.

In other news, I think we need to defeat the Snowe in this year's election:

Snowe & Collins Seem To Be Hedging On Birth Control

Snowe's a lifer. She has a lot of seniority on the hill and while she might waver on issues she knows how to bring the bacon home. Would be a tough call on the part of the DSCC which would probably look at it through a cost benefit analysis.

126 ProMayaLiberal  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:10:34pm

re: #125 Gus

Again though, she has shown herself to be no different then the rest of her nutty side. Make her sink with them.

127 Gus  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:10:51pm
128 Sol Berdinowitz  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:12:40pm

re: #79 ProGunLiberal

Romney is still ahead in Arizona, but not as much as two weeks ago:

Lotsa Mormons in AZ.

129 Sol Berdinowitz  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:13:40pm

re: #83 celticdragon

Christ on a crutch...!

That sweater vest wearing smear of froth is actually against helping single mothers get an education.

*spit*

women are supposed to rise in station by marrying into money.

130 sagehen  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:19:14pm

A few days ago I posted that Obama was looking at 65-70% of the women's vote this fall... now I'm wondering if it might not be 80-85%.

I'm having visions of Obama entering his second term on a Reagan-sized landslide, with 250 house seats and 62 senators.

131 kirkspencer  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:20:40pm

re: #130 sagehen

A few days ago I posted that Obama was looking at 65-70% of the women's vote this fall... now I'm wondering if it might not be 80-85%.

I'm having visions of Obama entering his second term on a Reagan-sized landslide, with 250 house seats and 62 senators.

73%, more or less.

132 Sol Berdinowitz  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:21:24pm

re: #130 sagehen

A few days ago I posted that Obama was looking at 65-70% of the women's vote this fall... now I'm wondering if it might not be 80-85%.

I'm having visions of Obama entering his second term on a Reagan-sized landslide, with 250 house seats and 62 senators.

Don't see it as that extreme, but the GOp is going to pay the price for maintaining its ideological purity. Can't they use some kind of ideological morning-after pill?

133 darthstar  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:22:05pm

re: #130 sagehen

A few days ago I posted that Obama was looking at 65-70% of the women's vote this fall... now I'm wondering if it might not be 80-85%.

I'm having visions of Obama entering his second term on a Reagan-sized landslide, with 250 house seats and 62 senators.

I wish that could happen, but the GOP is already starting to focus on those races and seems to be caring less about Romney or Santorum...

134 What, me worry?  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:24:11pm

re: #130 sagehen

A few days ago I posted that Obama was looking at 65-70% of the women's vote this fall... now I'm wondering if it might not be 80-85%.

I'm having visions of Obama entering his second term on a Reagan-sized landslide, with 250 house seats and 62 senators.

If Santorum gets the nomination, it's a slam dunk for sure.

135 Political Atheist  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:24:27pm

For those interested but delayed earlier, desmogblog seems to be working fine.

136 ProMayaLiberal  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:24:43pm

re: #128 Ministry of Fairness and Balance

Exactly.

They are a very reliable bloc among the Conservatives. Which isn't surprising, considering they only allowed African-Americans the priesthood in the 1970's, and having a worse view of women than the Catholic Church.

On the African American issue:

Under the pre-1978 policy, black men of African descent could not hold the priesthood in this way, and were also prohibited from participating in the temple Endowment and sealings, ordinances that the church teaches are necessary for the highest degree of salvation.

On Women, from a Former Mormon (Stoney321)

It's also important to note that a single woman (in the Mormon beliefs, and this is true for FLDS, too) CAN NOT obtain the highest level (kingdom) of heaven. She will HAVE to be sealed to a man to get there. So... anyone who wants to tell me that this lifestyle is about women's power, because they run the house, etc.

137 kirkspencer  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:27:08pm

re: #133 darthstar

I wish that could happen, but the GOP is already starting to focus on those races and seems to be caring less about Romney or Santorum...

My opinion, the reason the GOP is focusing more on the downticket races is "coat tails".

If Obama wins by a large margin, it's going to be reflected down-ticket. Whether it's because more of the base turned out, or Republicans either switched or stayed home, the tendency is to vote same party down the line. (There are exceptions, there are always exceptions. It is still the tendency).

Obama winning by 10 points (6 more than last time) is a 5 to 6 point shift Dem-ward for the Senators and Congresscritters and governors and...

138 CuriousLurker  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:32:36pm
I keep trying to figure out what their game is, but at this point it just looks like sheer derangement.

Suicide by voter?

They seem to actually believe people will support this stuff, in which case they've become completely unmoored from reality. Either that, or they think the bulk of voters outside their base are so weak/clueless/distracted that they won't notice what they're trying to do, which would indicate utter contempt for the majority of their fellow Americans (whom they now appear to regard as mortal enemies who need to be forced into submission—for their own good, of course). Whatever moderates may be left seem to have turned into spineless jellyfish, unwilling or unable to stand up to the rabid base.

Regardless of the cause, it's seriously unhinged behavior. It's the extreme, fundie worldview, up close and personal in all it's twisted, dogmatic, self-righteous glory. This discord and damage it causes is why I despise it in every form.1

1. For those of you who might be interested, what's going on right now is one aspect of what is meant in Islam by the word fitna—fragmentation, discord within a community that causes upheaval and/or chaos.

139 ProMayaLiberal  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 12:35:12pm

re: #138 CuriousLurker

These guys are the Christian Salafists. That is the only rational explanation I can get for this behavior.

This, of course, makes them a threat to the Constitution.

140 Achilles Tang  Wed, Feb 15, 2012 1:13:35pm

re: #55 Simply Sarah

While this is true, it is still mostly about the control of women and our bodies.

I said "alone".

141 carlaschluge  Thu, Feb 16, 2012 12:27:24pm

I don't want my insurer, a private company, to be told by the federal government what it needs to cover, including contraceptives. If the insurer wants to do that, then fine. If the insurer doesn't want to, then fine. But there is no constitutional basis for the federal government issuing a mandate that requires a private insurer to provide certain kinds of coverage.

142 jaunte  Thu, Feb 16, 2012 12:30:59pm

"...promote the general welfare..."

143 wrenchwench  Thu, Feb 16, 2012 12:31:03pm

re: #141 carlaschluge

I don't want my insurer, a private company, to be told by the federal government what it needs to cover, including contraceptives. If the insurer wants to do that, then fine. If the insurer doesn't want to, then fine. But there is no constitutional basis for the federal government issuing a mandate that requires a private insurer to provide certain kinds of coverage.

They don't have to cover contraception, as long as they also don't cover any other prescription drugs. It's called discrimination if they pick and choose.

144 Charles Johnson  Thu, Feb 16, 2012 12:59:11pm

Dead thread hero strikes again.

145 Obdicut  Thu, Feb 16, 2012 5:16:52pm

re: #141 carlaschluge

I don't want my insurer, a private company, to be told by the federal government what it needs to cover, including contraceptives. If the insurer wants to do that, then fine. If the insurer doesn't want to, then fine. But there is no constitutional basis for the federal government issuing a mandate that requires a private insurer to provide certain kinds of coverage.

That's a rather extremist view. Are you against building codes, too? And food inspection?


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
The Pandemic Cost 7 Million Lives, but Talks to Prevent a Repeat Stall In late 2021, as the world reeled from the arrival of the highly contagious omicron variant of the coronavirus, representatives of almost 200 countries met - some online, some in-person in Geneva - hoping to forestall a future worldwide ...
Cheechako
2 days ago
Views: 100 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
2 weeks ago
Views: 264 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1