1 | Shvaughn Thu, Apr 26, 2012 1:47:04pm |
Interview with Bill Ayers at, of all places, Comics Alliance.
2 | Mich-again Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:01:30pm |
Colbert is funny as always, but the original assumption made in the commercial he cited is based on every single American having an equal carbon footprint, which is really really dumb. So the old lady down the street that doesn’t even have a car has the same carbon footprint as the guy who commutes to work in a Dualie pickup truck or a millionaire who flies in a private plane around the world. Yep, everyone is the same.
I’d guess an average low income immigrant would be far below the average for carbon footprint. So new immigrants probably bring the average down.
3 | Kragar Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:08:02pm |
4 | Targetpractice Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:09:34pm |
re: #3 Kragar
Fischer to Romney: ‘You Want to Win this Election, You Better Start Listening to Me’
What are the odds that we’d see a response headline of:
“Romney to Fischer: Get Stuffed!”?
5 | wrenchwench Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:10:19pm |
Look who is a member of the CAPS advisory board.
Victor Fucking Davis Hanson.
Or is that Victor Davis Fucking Hanson?
6 | Iwouldprefernotto Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:11:11pm |
One of the most brilliant Cobert clips ever!
7 | TedStriker Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:15:29pm |
re: #3 Kragar
Fischer to Romney: ‘You Want to Win this Election, You Better Start Listening to Me’
Please, oh please, Mitt, listen to that twisted old coot Fischer; it’d be the best gift the Democrats (and America) could ever receive this election year.
8 | wrenchwench Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:16:43pm |
9 | rwdflynavy Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:18:42pm |
Now that illegals are leaving in droves, time to get some comprehensive immigration reform!!!
//
10 | dragonfire1981 Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:23:56pm |
11 | dragonfire1981 Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:24:50pm |
re: #3 Kragar
Fischer to Romney: ‘You Want to Win this Election, You Better Start Listening to Me’
Translation: Please be a little more like Santorum…Pleeeeeease?
12 | TedStriker Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:36:27pm |
re: #11 dragonfire1981
Translation: Please be a little more like Santorum…Pleeease?
I read into it, “…OR ELSE!”
Also, note the delicious irony of a theocrat like Fischer, instructing His Mittness to talk and act like he does if he wants to win, while standing in front of a graphic of the Constitution.
You can’t buy cognitive dissonance like that…
13 | dragonfire1981 Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:39:51pm |
How Canadian Conservatives differ from American Conservatives..
By Meagan Fitzpatrick, CBC News
Prime Minister Stephen Harper will not support a motion from one of his own MPs that calls for a committee to be set up to study when life begins, he said Thursday, ahead of a debate on the motion.
Harper was asked during question period by NDP Leader Tom Mulcair why he is allowing Conservative MP Stephen Woodworth and other members of his caucus to reopen the debate on abortion.
The prime minister said party leaders do not have control over the motions introduced by MPs and that it’s “unfortunate” an all-party committee decided the motion is eligible for a vote.
“In my case, I will be voting against the motion,” Harper said.
Woodworth’s motion isn’t binding, and won’t come to a vote on Thursday. It is up for one hour of debate beginning around 5:30 and then drops to the bottom on the order of precedence, and gets another hour of debate when it returns to the top of the list.
The House will vote on the motion the Wednesday following its next hour of debate, which Woodworth expects will be in June or September.
Woodworth says that according to current Canadian law, human life begins when a child has fully emerged from the mother’s birth canal, which is based on a 400-year-old definition imported from Britain. He originally said when he announced his intention to introduce the motion that he is simply interested in updating the law to agree with 21st-century medicine.
But speaking to Radio-Canada on Monday, he acknowledged his motion is linked to abortion. “It certainly allows us to have an honest discussion about the abortion question. How can we honestly discuss all of the complicated issues around abortion if we cannot decide whether or not a child is a human being before the moment of the complete birth?” Woodworth said.
The NDP’s women’s issues critic, Niki Ashton, asked Harper if Woodworth’s motion was part of his “real agenda” for women in Canada. “When will the Conservatives stop rolling the clock back on Canadian women’s rights?” said Ashton.
Conservative House leader Peter Van Loan said Harper has made it clear he will not reopen the abortion debate.
14 | Kragar Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:39:58pm |
re: #12 ArthurSlugworth
I read into it, “…OR ELSE!”
Also, note the delicious irony of a theocrat like Fischer, instructing His Mittness to talk and act like he does if he wants to win, while standing in front of a graphic of the Constitution.
You can’t buy cognitive dissonance like that…
“Hey, we know our guy totally blew it in the primaries because of his whacko platform, but trust us. You totally need to adopt his ideas if you want to win.”
15 | Mich-again Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:47:30pm |
re: #3 Kragar
So what is the chance Mitt will tell Fischer the one sensible thing. Look dummie, You can tell your followers to either vote for me or sit it out and hand Obama a 2nd term. If I want any shit outta you, I’ll squeeze your head.
16 | Kragar Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:48:26pm |
re: #15 Mich-again
So what is the chance Mitt will tell Fischer the one sensible thing. Look dummie, You can tell your followers to either vote for me or sit it out and hand Obama a 2nd term. If I want any shit outta you, I’ll squeeze your head.
2 chances of that: Fat and slim.
17 | Targetpractice Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:51:16pm |
re: #15 Mich-again
So what is the chance Mitt will tell Fischer the one sensible thing. Look dummie, You can tell your followers to either vote for me or sit it out and hand Obama a 2nd term. If I want any shit outta you, I’ll squeeze your head.
None. He’s gonna pander all the way to Election Day, it’s the only means of campaigning he knows how to do. Really, he could call a press conference tomorrow and declare to the GOP “I don’t have to put up with the shit of the lunatics in this party anymore, because I’m all you got!,” and the party would be left making excuses for why he’s right.
18 | Mich-again Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:51:24pm |
I am sitting in the VIP Lounge in the Bangkok airport having a cocktail at 5AM, getting set for a 15 hour flight in Business Class… Life is good. ha
19 | Mich-again Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:53:13pm |
re: #17 Targetpractice
None. He’s gonna pander all the way to Election Day, it’s the only means of campaigning he knows how to do. Really, he could call a press conference tomorrow and declare to the GOP “I don’t have to put up with the shit of the lunatics in this party anymore, because I’m all you got!,” and the party would be left making excuses for why he’s right.
True. It might actually help his chances. He isn’t going to win the center catering to the right and you can’t get elected without winning the middle.
20 | ProBosniaLiberal Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:53:27pm |
So, with the way the vote turned out in the Senate, can Democrats state that republicans support violence against women? I think this is a valid talking point.
21 | TedStriker Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:54:23pm |
re: #14 Kragar
“Hey, we know our guy totally blew it in the primaries because of his whacko platform, but trust us. You totally need to adopt his ideas if you want to win.”
If His Mittness does heed Fischer and (predictably) fails in the general, the sage words of Otter from Animal House comes to mind:
[…] You can’t spend your whole life worrying about your mistakes! You fucked up… you trusted us! Hey, make the best of it!
22 | Targetpractice Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:54:50pm |
re: #20 ProGunLiberal
So, with the way the vote turned out in the Senate, can Democrats state that republicans support violence against women? I think this is a valid talking point.
We’ve already heard the excuse, we’ll just hear it more for the next week. You know, the one that goes “If they put a ‘clean bill’ on the table, the GOP would gladly pass it!”
23 | Kragar Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:55:00pm |
re: #18 Mich-again
I am sitting in the VIP Lounge in the Bangkok airport having a cocktail at 5AM, getting set for a 15 hour flight in Business Class… Life is good. ha
Chess tournament?
24 | Charles Johnson Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:58:20pm |
Stalker account blocked again.
[Link: twitter.com…]
25 | Mich-again Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:59:24pm |
re: #23 Kragar
Chess tournament?
uh, not quite, I was here training some Thai engineers and helping them with some plant problems they couldn’t figure out. I got to teach some math to a roomful of Asian engineers. Not many people can say that. ha..
26 | ProBosniaLiberal Thu, Apr 26, 2012 2:59:54pm |
re: #22 Targetpractice
I say use this vote as a weapon. In addition, this sort of rhetoric needs to be adopted by moderates everywhere to push back against radicals.
Another example: Salafi MPs in Egypt want to eliminate the Age of Consent.Time to paint the Salafis as Pedophiles. Push back against them, ostracize them.
However, in the past couple of months, some Salafist MPs argued that there should be no minimum age for marriage for both sexes, explaining that in Islamic Sharia, an age for marriage is not specified. They also argue that not defining an age for marriage can help stem the prevalence of vice and eliminate spinsterhood.
Grind the extremists into the ground.
27 | rwdflynavy Thu, Apr 26, 2012 3:00:04pm |
28 | WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.] Thu, Apr 26, 2012 3:01:01pm |
re: #27 Darth Vader Gargoyle
I get my kicks above the waistline Sunshine!
go back to your bars…your temples…your massage parlors…
29 | TedStriker Thu, Apr 26, 2012 3:01:08pm |
30 | kirkspencer Thu, Apr 26, 2012 3:03:25pm |
re: #28 windupbird is in the gravity well
go back to your bars…your temples…your massage parlors…
don’t forget the guys who cut your keys.
31 | Targetpractice Thu, Apr 26, 2012 3:05:37pm |
re: #26 ProGunLiberal
I say use this vote as a weapon. In addition, this sort of rhetoric needs to be adopted by moderates everywhere to push back against radicals.
Another example: Salafi MPs in Egypt want to eliminate the Age of Consent.Time to paint the Salafis as Pedophiles. Push back against them, ostracize them.
Grind the extremists into the ground.
Oh, it’s likely going to be brought up as a weapon, but like I said, the excuse is already in play. The GOP’s gonna play this up as the DNC purposefully poisoning the vote so that the subsequent failure to pass is used against them, that they’re all in support of renewing the Act, but they’re not going to allow the Democrats to use it to pass “their agenda.”
33 | Shvaughn Thu, Apr 26, 2012 3:50:44pm |
re: #26 ProGunLiberal
Another example: Salafi MPs in Egypt want to eliminate the Age of Consent.Time to paint the Salafis as Pedophiles.
I think you’re doing that thing again where you spout off random emotional nonsense without thinking it through.
34 | Feline Fearless Leader Thu, Apr 26, 2012 4:03:26pm |
re: #18 Mich-again
I am sitting in the VIP Lounge in the Bangkok airport having a cocktail at 5AM, getting set for a 15 hour flight in Business Class… Life is good. ha
Coming back due to running out of clean clothes? Or did you find a Laundromat?