The Reclaim America PAC is actually the Marco Rubio PAC (nudge nudge, wink wink, Citizens United, say no more), and tonight they’re marketing a new product to the rubes: the official Marco Rubio Water Bottle.
Big Miami-Dade names are lining up behind Sen. Marco Rubio’s Reclaim America PAC: Super-lobbyist Brian Balard, American Conservative Union chief Al Cardenas, Pepe Fanjul of Florida Crystals, Newt Gingrich’s new Florida campaign chief, Jose Mallea; Florida House Republican leader Carlos Lopez-Cantera, Jorge and Aleyda Mas of MasTech…
The Louisiana PAC’s website touts “core” Louisiana values, such as school choice. Eddie Rispone, a Baton Rouge contractor, is chairman but the Louisiana Federation’s headquarters are in suburban Washington. Its treasurer, Lisa Lisker, was a partner in a political accounting firm that worked for Republican candidates and groups, according to disclosures.
Speaking of Tea Baggers, I met Ms. Heidi Cruz, wife of Ted Cruz (RWNJ-TX) tonight.
A completely nice woman. Kids, 4 and 2. It was at a fundraiser for the new Texas chapter of the Children’s Heart Foundation, which funds peeds cardiology research.
Visited with her for twenty minutes or so. I came away thinking that Ted’s positions during the recent campaign have nothing to do with his mindset and everything to do with beating David Dewhurst. He rode the TP wave, but if his spousal unit is any indication, he’s WAY to the center of his avowed positions.
I blame the Internet (and, maybe, the X-Files). That’s what got those conspiracy theories propelled to the outer fringes of the almost-mainstream.
Or the mainstream, if you’re right-wing.
I just spent a few minutes looking at Rand’s version of Objectivism and Rational Self-interest. Her ideas of consciousness and perception of reality do not reflect the reality of how the brain works, the impact of genetics and the evolution of our social structures. It seems those who adopt her philosophy are not being objective about what cognitive science is telling us about how we think.
I just spent a few minutes looking at Rand’s version of Objectivism and Rational Self-interest. Her ideas of consciousness and perception of reality do not reflect the reality of how the brain works, the impact of genetics and the evolution of our social structures. It seems those who adopt her philosophy are not being objective about what cognitive science is telling us about how we think.
Speaking of Tea Baggers, I met Ms. Heidi Cruz, wife of Ted Cruz (RWNJ-TX) tonight.
A completely nice woman. Kids, 4 and 2. It was at a fundraiser for the new Texas chapter of the Children’s Heart Foundation, which funds peeds cardiology research.
Visited with her for twenty minutes or so. I came away thinking that Ted’s positions during the recent campaign have nothing to do with his mindset and everything to do with beating David Dewhurst. He rode the TP wave, but if his spousal unit is any indication, he’s WAY to the center of his avowed positions.
They are living in an alternative universe. One in which up is down, cold is hot, wrong is right, fantasy is fact, stupid is smart. It must suck to be them.
Infowars is, in spades-their ‘trade’ on UN documents as if they’re diktats that must be obeyed ignoring the reality that every government is beholden to their own special interests.
Just try to listen to Alex Jones’s so-called “show” (he has a show, sadly, on SiriusXM)-it’s mostly littered with ads that cater to preppers and gold bugs-and like a stopped clock, they’re right-but only twice a day.
Alex Jones needs to direct his anger and angst against the right targets-but he keeps missing the target.
I don’t know if Jones has been a target of South Park yet-if he hasn’t, he should be-then again, if Stone/Parker is unwilling to take Jones on, perhaps they agree with him….
Since the far moonbat left is more marginalized than the wingnut right, the impact of inforwars makes it worse. IMHO.
The impact of Infowars and the Paulians cross borders at the moronic convergence. Glenn Greenwald, Andrew Sullivan, Ron Paul, Anon, 9-11 truthers, etc. The political compass gets fuzzy around the edges.
The existence of conspiracy theorists is weird and sad, but it’s just one of those things. Giving them credibility and power is where things start to go off the rails— that’s why the GOP has turned into such a bizarre formation. It’s not any coincidence that their whackaloon policies are matched with conspiracy theories throughout.
I know what you’re saying. The way I see it though is I hate seeing nuts that are close to my side of the aisle. Not that I’m a communist or anything. True story, I hate communists other than the academic sorts. I didn’t end up unfollowing half a dozen people on Twitter for nothing last night and it was because of the ambivalence or feelings of empathy about Dorner from people whom I normally agree with. So in the end. Sure, the right has their nuts but that’s them. When I see nuts from close to my side, it bothers me even more. Make sense?
And here’s the other thing. We all think the “other” side is way nuttier because they are further away from our beliefs to start with! (I hope that was clear)
My point is that the Workers World Party and their ilk have been completely marginalized on the left. But Alex Jones, World Net Daily, Breitbart.com, etc. etc., are part of daily mainstream political discourse on the right.
And here’s the other thing. We all think the “other” side is way nuttier because they are further away from our beliefs to start with! (I hope that was clear)
Uh, the moonbat crazies are marginalized by the Dems.
The wingnut crazies are in charge of the GOP.
See the difference?
;)
The impact of Infowars and the Paulians cross borders at the moronic convergence. Glenn Greenwald, Andrew Sullivan, Ron Paul, Anon, 9-11 truthers, etc. The political compass gets fuzzy around the edges.
Since most Americans cluster around an arbitrary centre somewhat more conservative than other countries like Canada, the place they converge is less important than the distance that centre is from the point of convergence. The political compass seem to me to be more of a sphere.
My point is that the Workers World Party and their ilk have been completely marginalized on the left. But Alex Jones, World Net Daily, Breitbart.com, etc. etc., are part of daily mainstream political discourse on the right.
My point is that the Workers World Party and their ilk have been completely marginalized on the left. But Alex Jones, World Net Daily, Breitbart.com, etc. etc., are part of daily mainstream political discourse on the right.
It’s not even close to being comparable.
Which reminded me of how wrong Dick Armey was to say about the birthers, “they might be nuts, but they’re our nuts.” See, I think that’s wrong. But that’s what’s good about the Dem side is that they don’t accept that sort of nonsense.
My point is that the Workers World Party and their ilk have been completely marginalized on the left. But Alex Jones, World Net Daily, Breitbart.com, etc. etc., are part of daily mainstream political discourse on the right.
My point is that the Workers World Party and their ilk have been completely marginalized on the left. But Alex Jones, World Net Daily, Breitbart.com, etc. etc., are part of daily mainstream political discourse on the right.
It’s not even close to being comparable.
To be fair: Alex Jones is maybe one or two steps on the wingnut ladder below Breitbart.com.
I think there are one or two people left in the Republican Entertainment-Industrial Complex who still can comprehend the concept of “plausible deniability”.
I only read one work by Ayn Rand, Anthem, which I read in 9th grade. It was all cutesy with the plural pronouns but the story was so freaking lame.
The ending is very unsatisfying for the female character. I believe that Ayn Rand was really a sexual submissive in spite of her alleged notions of sexual freedom and pro-choice.
Which reminded me of how wrong Dick Armey was to say about the birthers, “they might be nuts, but they’re our nuts.” See, I think that’s wrong. But that’s what’s good about the Dem side is that they don’t accept that sort of nonsense.
I don’t know if Jones has been a target of South Park yet-if he hasn’t, he should be-then again, if Stone/Parker is unwilling to take Jones on, perhaps they agree with him….
See “The Mystery of the Urinal Deuce”.
Alex Jones isn’t a typical Republican/Democrat, Conservative/Liberal etc. partisan. Name any American power structure, be it individual, governmental, or corporate, and I guarantee you he can six-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon that entity into some Grand Unified Conspiracy Theory that has its roots with the Illuminati and/or Freemasons and/or Knights Templar, etc. In his world, nothing is what it seems (literally everything is a false flag operation), and everyone who seems to hold power is merely a puppet for the REAL masters of reality. Sure Obama is a bloodthirsty fiend, but so was Bush 43, Clinton, Bush 41, et al. They’re all Literally Hitler, but even Hitler was just a puppet of _________.
If Mitt Romney had won the 2012 election, right now Alex Jones would have nine 45-minute videos out showing how the entire Romney family is all part of the Scary Omnipotent Cabal that controls everything flawlessly yet is so inept at concealing this fact that only the pathetic sleeping sheeple are fooled. Certainly he’s not fooled, nor are the people whose eyes are open wide enough to buy DVDs and T-shirts from his website.
I only read one work by Ayn Rand, Anthem, which I read in 9th grade. It was all cutesy with the plural pronouns but the story was so freaking lame.
The ending is very unsatisfying for the female character. I believe that Ayn Rand was really a sexual submissive in spite of her alleged notions of sexual freedom and pro-choice.
Lets be fair in theory you can totally be sexually submissive and be pro choice. You can also be sexually submissive and preach sexual freedom since sexual freedome should include the right to whatever sort of sexual interaction both parties agree upon and find enjoyable.
That said given the amount of quasi rapes which I have heard show up in Raynds work I have few doubts that you are right about her views on females being sexually submissive.
Alex Jones isn’t a typical Republican/Democrat, Conservative/Liberal etc. partisan. Name any American power structure, be it individual, governmental, or corporate, and I guarantee you he can six-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon that entity into some Grand Unified Conspiracy Theory that has its roots with the Illuminati and/or Freemasons and/or Knights Templar, etc. In his world, nothing is what it seems (literally everything is a false flag operation), and everyone who seems to hold power is merely a puppet for the REAL masters of reality. Sure Obama is a bloodthirsty fiend, but so was Bush 43, Clinton, Bush 41, et al. They’re all Literally Hitler, but even Hitler was just a puppet of _________.
If Mitt Romney had won the 2012 election, right now Alex Jones would have nine 45-minute videos out showing how the entire Romney family is all part of the Scary Omnipotent Cabal that controls everything flawlessly yet is so inept at concealing this fact that only the pathetic sleeping sheeple are fooled. Certainly he’s not fooled, nor are the people whose eyes are open wide enough to buy DVDs and T-shirts from his website.
Very true. We saw the conversion happen after Bush left office. However, Alex Jones was never embraced by the mainstream left while the mainstream right has embraced Alex Jones thanks to Drudge and other venues.
Which reminded me of how wrong Dick Armey was to say about the birthers, “they might be nuts, but they’re our nuts.” See, I think that’s wrong. But that’s what’s good about the Dem side is that they don’t accept that sort of nonsense.
You’re on to something there but it’s not the whole story. There’s Jimmy Carter who invited Michael Moore to the DNC convention. There’s nuts like Bill Ayers who’s still well accepted. Who’s doing the rejection in this relationship? I’m sure the Dems would have loved to adopt OWS as a political tool but the fringe left isn’t interested in participating in the system and the Dems are smart enough to keep the toxic radicals at arms length. It’s a long distance relationship and I think it’s important to keep it that way.
And what would JFK think of the Nancy Pelosis, the Howard Deans, etc
He would be freaked out because we not only openly admit there are gay people but preech equality with them. The same way that Lincoln would be freaked out by the fact that LBJ said that legally blacks and whites should be treated exactly the same.
It is the nature of each generations if progressives to freak out the prior one by what they push society to accept.
Not crazy, just not within the framework of his vision of the party
((ask not ,,,, ))
I’ll admit I don’t know a lot about JFK’s domestic agenda (I was 5 when he died). Yet just 10 years before his presidency, another Democrat tried to get universal health care enacted, and before that we had FDR. How does the New Deal fit into the “ask not” paradigm?
And what the hell is it with all those damn commas ,,,,,,,,,?
You’re on to something there but it’s not the whole story. There’s Jimmy Carter who invited Michael Moore to the DNC convention. There’s nuts like Bill Ayers who’s still well accepted. Who’s doing the rejection in this relationship? I’m sure the Dems would have loved to adopt OWS as a political tool but the fringe left isn’t interested in participating in the system and the Dems are smart enough to keep the toxic radicals at arms length. It’s a long distance relationship and I think it’s important to keep it that way.
I don’t know. Michale Moore is tough to figure out. He says some pretty stupid things sometimes but in the end he finally fell in line during last years campaign and turned out to be rather pragmatic on many issues. Now that the election is over he may go back to his old familiar ways which are rather questionable. But I really was surprised to see how he changed, at least for the duration, last year. He’s still not mainstream however and he will receive an occasional dose of criticism from the “pragmatic Obots.” Sadly though, I saw those very same “pragmatic Obots” go emoprog over Dorner last night. People are complicated I guess. I went emoprog on Obama over Operation Pillar of Cloud yet remain on Israel’s side. Weird, ain’t it?
Carter inviting Moore to the convention isn’t even comparable to the shit the GOP pulls on a regular basis. Like inviting phony lord Monkton to speak before congress.
The GOP— not the fringes, but actual elected people— actively spout conspiracy theories like pea soup from Linda Blair. Every time Issa or King open their mouths, they’re spewing another conspiracy story.
Seriously, though - I sincerely believe that Michael Moore is one of those rare animals: A left-wing pragmatist.
He’s full of populism when the other side is in power; but he’s well aware of what he can get when his side is.
Yup. I recall that (I spent the summer between my junior and senior years of High School playing for a summer Junior B league team based outside of Montreal)
I don’t know. Michale Moore is tough to figure out. He says some pretty stupid things sometimes but in the end he finally fell in line during last years campaign and turned out to be rather pragmatic on many issues. Now that the election is over he may go back to his old familiar ways which are rather questionable. But I really was surprised to see how he changed, at least for the duration, last year. He’s still not mainstream however and he will receive an occasional dose of criticism from the “pragmatic Obots.” Sadly though, I saw those very same “pragmatic Obots” go emoprog over Dorner last night. People are complicated I guess. I went emoprog on Obama over Operation Pillar of Cloud yet remain on Israel’s side. Weird, ain’t it?
It is a complicated picture and some people are hard to figure out. It’s always been fascinating to me. There are true believer ideologues (Ron Paul, Code Pink, Noam Chomsky), there are partisan shills for personal profit/attention (Breitbart, Michael Moore), corporate shills for profit and selling advertizing (MSNBC, FOX). Most of the population is susceptible to their political instincts, thus becoming prey to the above mentioned predators. Not everybody is easy to categorize but some people are more transparent than others.
I plead a 5th. Well, given that wingnuts have more power through current state legislatures? Wingnuts. That being said if moonbats were to have that same power they would be equally dangerous.
Many historians distinguish between a “First New Deal” (1933–34) and a “Second New Deal” (1935–38), with the second one more liberal and more controversial. The “First New Deal” (1933–34) dealt with diverse groups, from banking and railroads to industry and farming, all of which demanded help for economic survival. The Federal Emergency Relief Administration, for instance, provided $500 million for relief operations by states and cities, while the short-lived CWA (Civil Works Administration) gave localities money to operate make-work projects in 1933-34.[3]
The “Second New Deal” in 1935–38 included the Wagner Act to promote labor unions, the Works Progress Administration (WPA) relief program (which made the federal government by far the largest single employer in the nation),[4] the Social Security Act, and new programs to aid tenant farmers and migrant workers. The final major items of New Deal legislation were the creation of the United States Housing Authority and Farm Security Administration, both in 1937, and the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which set maximum hours and minimum wages for most categories of workers.[5]
I think Kennedy would have been opposed to the 2nd
One collects guns, the other collects crystals, pyramids and uses homeopathy.
Like that’s harmless! Pyramids shoot out Tachyon Energy - that’ll travel back in time and hit you before you can even think about firing your God-Given-Gun!
Clearly, moonbats are a national threat, and the NRA would do well to address them in their next press conference!
If that’s a flounce, it’s the strangest damned one I’ve ever seen. Usually when they flounce, they douse themselves in napalm and strike a match. First time I can remember seeing a sock come clean and then show themselves the door.
I just spent a few minutes looking at Rand’s version of Objectivism and Rational Self-interest. Her ideas of consciousness and perception of reality do not reflect the reality of how the brain works, the impact of genetics and the evolution of our social structures. It seems those who adopt her philosophy are not being objective about what cognitive science is telling us about how we think.
In my opinion, if you want to understand Rand, understand Marx. Her whole worldview is Marxist, but inverted so bad is good and good is bad.
I only read one work by Ayn Rand, Anthem, which I read in 9th grade. It was all cutesy with the plural pronouns but the story was so freaking lame.
The ending is very unsatisfying for the female character. I believe that Ayn Rand was really a sexual submissive in spite of her alleged notions of sexual freedom and pro-choice.
As a dominant, I know a sub when I see one, and I’ve seen Ms. Rand.
However, I’ll disagree that D/s means being against sexual freedom and choice. My wife is a sub and she’s fiercely pro-choice. So am I for that matter. We’re very pro-LGBT as well.
Which reminded me of how wrong Dick Armey was to say about the birthers, “they might be nuts, but they’re our nuts.” See, I think that’s wrong. But that’s what’s good about the Dem side is that they don’t accept that sort of nonsense.
I think she may be an empathy-free sociopath who resents people who don’t have her deficits. And she’s built up an abstract philosophy to try to compensate for lacking normal human connection and empathy.
Shocker. Though one of the county’s mentioned is a particularly small one. Still though, there’s a lot of evidence that the Red States and their voters are more “takers” than Blue state voters. I really don’t care but I resent the living hell out of Republican politicians like Romney implying that I vote Democratic mostly because I’m “dependent” and “want free stuff.”
speaking of which, the difference i notice most between the end of the 20th century and the beginning of this one is that that great font of creativity that was american popular music - manufactured products like madonna aside - has finally run dry
The ironic thing was that Romney’s 47% whine was part of a sentence where he complained that the “takers” weren’t responsive to his message of lowering taxes.
So his complaint that Obama won by “giving away free stuff” was a complaint that he was giving free stuff to a lower class than Romney said he was building his whole campaign on.
So basically Romney’s campaign message was “if you’re upper class, THEN I HAVE FREE STUFF FOR YOU!”
And somehow THAT’s good, but health care for the poor is theft.
The ironic thing was that Romney’s 47% whine was part of a sentence where he complained that the “takers” weren’t responsive to his message of lowering taxes.
So his complaint that Obama won by “giving away free stuff” was a complaint that he was giving free stuff to a lower class than Romney said he was building his whole campaign on.
So basically Romney’s campaign message was “if you’re upper class, THEN I HAVE FREE STUFF FOR YOU!”
And somehow THAT’s good, but health care for the poor is theft.
Yeah fucked up message by an even more fucked up candidate.
speaking of which, the difference i notice most between the end of the 20th century and the beginning of this one is that that great font of creativity that was american popular music - manufactured products like madonna aside - has finally run dry
In my opinion, if you want to understand Rand, understand Marx. Her whole worldview is Marxist, but inverted so bad is good and good is bad.
She’s the Marxist equivalent of a Satanist.
Yet, if there’s one thing Marx and Rand agreed upon, it’s that they both took a very dim view of religion. Which is what makes it so hilarious when so many who supposedly pray at the Altar of Rand fail to realize that she’d laugh her ass off if they came to her whining that the government was encroaching on their religious freedoms. Or declared that religious morals should guide society and its laws.
Yet, if there’s one thing Marx and Rand agreed upon, it’s that they both took a very dim view of religion. Which is what makes it so hilarious when so many who supposedly pray at the Altar of Rand fail to realize that she’d laugh her ass off if they came to her whining that the government was encroaching on their religious freedoms. Or declared that religious morals should guide society and its laws.
Yeah, it is pretty funny to see. Happens a lot too.
I think she may be an empathy-free sociopath who resents people who don’t have her deficits. And she’s built up an abstract philosophy to try to compensate for lacking normal human connection and empathy.
Well, Rand specifically stated that her idea of the perfect man was a man who actually was a sociopathic killer.
As a dominant, I know a sub when I see one, and I’ve seen Ms. Rand.
However, I’ll disagree that D/s means being against sexual freedom and choice. My wife is a sub and she’s fiercely pro-choice. So am I for that matter. We’re very pro-LGBT as well.
Well, I really don’t know all that much about that life style. I didn’t even read 50 Shades. I just thought her portrayal of the woman in Anthem as totally subservient to the man, as being in contradiction to the ideals of feminism.
This is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title and text already filled in.
A new study confirms that the vast majority of scientists who research the climate accept that the planet is warming and human beings are largely responsible. Yet a large slice of the American public believes that scientists are deeply split about global warming.
More: Scientists Agree on Climate Change, Why Doesn't the Public? : NPR
A Travis County district court judge ruled this week that a Houston-based tea party group is not a nonprofit corporation as it claims, but an unregistered political action committee that illegally aided the Republican Party through its poll-watching efforts during the 2010 elections. The summary judgment by Judge John Dietz upheld several Texas campaign finance laws that had been challenged on constitutional grounds ...
Having failed twice before, Rep. Frank Hoffmann, R-West Monroe, is promoting another stealth creationist bill, House Bill 116, which "provides relative to textbooks and other instructional materials for [public] elementary and secondary schools."When Rep. Gene Reynolds, D-Dubberly, expressed concern that HB116 could permit adoption of controversial books on evolution and other subjects (Advocate May 13), he was exactly right. Hoffmann responded, "That is ...
In a speech on April 15 before the McLennan County Republican Club, Greg Abbott, the Republican Attorney General and a potential candidate for governor in 2014, declared that Battleground Texas represents a bigger danger to the state than Kim Jong-un, the leader of North Korea: One thing that requires ongoing vigilance is the reality that the state of Texas is coming under a ...
... sorry about the rampant disregard for spell checking or proper grammar, the irony of it being Nazi's with grammar issues is not lost on me.
I won't admit to how many of the things mentioned in this video I used (or was guilty of)
RBS
WINDSOR, Ontario -- Assumption Park gives residents of this city lovely views of the Ambassador Bridge and the Detroit skyline. Lately they've been treated to another sight: a three-story pile of petroleum coke covering an entire city block on the other side of the Detroit River. Detroit's ever-growing black mountain is the unloved, unwanted and long overlooked byproduct of Canada's oil sands boom. ...
A scowling Donald Trump raised his voice on the witness stand Wednesday while an attorney grilled him and then rolled his eyes at the "Apprentice" star's answers, prompting a federal judge to scold both men in open court and order them to behave. The admonition came during Trump's second and final day on the stand at a civil trial where he is accused ...
Gold Box Deal of the Day: Up to 55% Off Studio Ghibli Films on DVD and Blu-rayToday only, May 17, 2013, save up to 55% on select Studio Ghibli favorites, including Kiki's Delivery Service, Ponyo, Spirited Away, Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind, and more on DVD and Blu-ray in our Gold Box Deal of the Day. More: Gold Box Deals Time ...
Zounds! Kenny Bunk has found the method to Obama's madness!
BTW, for what it's worth, I am becoming convinced that the key to "understanding" the Obama Phenomenon is Deconstruction Philosophy, Dadaism
More: Freeper Madness: Obama's True Agenda - Dadaist Islam!
John Rosenow is a fifth-generation dairy farmer, but times have changed since his Norwegian ancestors began farming in Cochrane, Wis. And Rosenow has changed with the times. Much of his workforce is now from Mexico, and Rosenow travels regularly to their village in southern Mexico to meet their families. [...] Rosenow’s business has grown. He and his workers now milk 550 cows, three ...
Editor's Note: The controversial fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or DSM-5 (a.k.a. the manual formerly known as "DSM-V") was just released - after a 14-year revision process to update its criteria for defining mental disorders. This opinion is from the former taskforce chairman and leader of previous DSM editions. Nature takes the long view, mankind the short. ...
The IRS division responsible for flagging Tea Party groups has long been an agency afterthought, beset by mismanagement, financial constraints and an unwillingness to spell out just what it expects from social welfare nonprofits, former officials and experts say. The controversy that erupted in the past week, leading to the ousting of the acting Internal Revenue Service commissioner, an investigation by the FBI, ...
Your sex appeal shoots through the roof! You achieve the status of "sexy man". Your wife sees you in a new attractive light which is the only light that allows her to see you this way. In fact, many other women notice as well--wherever you are. You morph into that man other guys envy and women adore. And until now, you had no ...
We are in the midst of the worst Washington scandal since Watergate. The reputation of the Obama White House has, among conservatives, gone from sketchy to sinister, and, among liberals, from unsatisfying to dangerous. No one likes what they're seeing. The Justice Department assault on the Associated Press and the ugly politicization of the Internal Revenue Service have left the administration's credibility deeply, ...
Political discourse in America has reached levels of douchebaggery previously only theorized about but never observed, like conversational dark matter. We're in a whole new world of hating people based solely on their opinions on a few key issues, and since this is unexplored territory, our conversations about politics are usually only a couple notches beyond the "hold your breath until the other ...
Seems a good way to solicit ideas for touristing destinations and activities. Will have 4-5 days so some opportunity for visiting multiple sites. And since I do have an interest in history and military history items in that area will be welcome suggestions. (The USS Midway down in San Diego is already on the list.) If there is anything California-geology related that would be ...
I hate to have to point this out, but: I DID NOT WRITE THIS ESSAY. I'm just READING IT ALOUD. This essay came to my attention recently, and it's an excellent exercise for a skeptic or atheist to experience this feeling of loss of innocence and the painful feelings it summons. See it through to the end before posting, please. The source:samharris.org Next ...