Erick Erickson’s Mom Says She’s Not as Racist as Erick Says She Is

The family that wingnuts together
Wingnuts • Views: 58,590

So a few days ago, RedState founder and raving right wing loon Erick Erickson tweeted a blatantly racist message about his upbringing, claiming his parents never let him eat “Asian food” on December 7th because they were “children of WWII.”

Gawker’s J.K. Trotter contacted Erickson’s mother to see if she’d verify her son’s claim that she was a racist, and guess what? Erick Erickson’s Mom Denies Son’s Story About Boycotting Asian Food Because of Pearl Harbor.

Erickson’s tweet appeared to explain, in its nostalgia for an era when adults could express racial hatred without social reprobation, how the author came to embrace his own brand of fear-mongering about black people, Muslims, and Arabs. But it turns out that there’s some disagreement within the Erickson household about Erickson, Jr.’s tale of boycotting Asian cuisine.

Erickson’s sister, a woman named Gretchen Erickson Barlow, immediately hung up when we called and asked if Erick Erickson was her brother, so we weren’t able to verify her brother’s account with her. But at least one of their parents was eager to debunk the story.

“I’ve never heard that before,” Erickson’s mother, Kathleen Erickson, told Gawker when we asked about Erickson’s statement in a telephone conversation this morning. After we read aloud her son’s tweet to her, she insisted, “Whatever you heard, I think that is completely your idea, I have never heard of that before. Somebody is making that up about my son.”

Since Erickson’s mother wasn’t even born when Pearl Harbor was attacked, Trotter also asked about Erick’s claim that his parents were “children of WWII,” and the following exchange occurred:

Ms. Erickson: What do you think of Jesus Christ?

Gawker: What do I think of Jesus Christ? He is obviously an important figure in Christian theology.

Erickson: Jesus Christ is the Lord and Savior, Mr. Trotter. He is the King of Kings. And he is coming again. So I hope and pray that you are Christian, Mr. Trotter. I will add you to my prayer list. [Hangs up.]

Ohhhkay then.

But perhaps the best part of this ridiculous story is that Erickson immediately responded by tweeting this:

So to recap, Erick Erickson got busted making up a racist lie to appeal to his knuckle-dragging followers, then tried to cover it up by saying his own mother is losing her memory.

But hey, it’s all good because Jesus!

Right wingers are the weirdest people on the planet.

Jump to bottom

232 comments
1
Kragar  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:36:03pm
2
Charles Johnson  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:38:20pm
3
lawhawk  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:40:47pm

Oh, and he’s claiming that mom doesn’t know what she’s talking about, even though Erickson said it was an annual thing at his family. “never letting us have Asian food on December 7th.”

That means every December 7. Not just some, or a one-time event. Every year.

But hey, if that’s how he wants to treat his mom by throwing her under the bus to keep his nonsensical raving intact, so be it. We know how Erickson rolls (right over his mom).

4
Kragar  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:45:08pm

“Mom, are we having kimchee for dinner tonight?”

“No, because its December 7th!”

5
Khal Wimpo  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:45:10pm

BTW - is anyone else hearing about RWNJs forming a “Trump Party” to run if/when The Donald breaks from the GOP? I’m starting to see stuff in my Facebook feed - reactions from conservatives disappointed that the GOP “has no backbone” and is denouncing Trump.

They allegedly want to run in the Senate and House races in reliably Red States so that they can replace the hated “cuckservatives” in Congress, and “take the country back.”

This may be just a few loons right now - or the fevered imaginations of deeply angry/racist Trump supporters - but if this kind of thing gains momentum, and Trump does go 3rd party, wouldn’t this basically split the GOP vote not only for the presidency, but also for the Senate and House?

6
Shiplord Kirel  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:45:54pm

Gee, at least his mom is still alive to contradict him in public.

My mother would rise from the grave and drive all the way from Lubbock just to beat my ass if I talked trash like that about her.

7
bratwurst  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:47:32pm

If I were a conservative, the fact that this awful excuse for a human being is an important figure in my movement would give me serious pause.

8
BeachDem  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:47:53pm

re: #6 Shiplord Kirel

Gee, at least his mom is still alive to contradict him in public.

My mother would rise from the grave and drive all the way from Lubbock just to beat my ass if I talked trash like that about her.

I’ve always said that my family situation is proof against an afterlife, because if anything would cause my father to rise from the grave, it would be to smack some sense into my wingnut brother.

9
De Kolta Chair  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:48:42pm

Uh-oh, it’s on now dawg…

10
Charles Johnson  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:48:58pm

re: #3 lawhawk

Couldn’t be more obvious that the whole story is just a lie to appeal to his racist right wing followers.

11
Eclectic Cyborg  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:49:30pm

So if I understand the GOP correctly Muslims should have no rights except the right to own a gun?

12
teleskiguy  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:49:33pm
13
Charles Johnson  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:50:59pm

Oh boy.

Facebook Post

14
WhatEVs  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:51:18pm

So I just finished reading the last thread and I have to say, I have to go to Austin next week and I am terrified.

I really do not want to take this trip.

Crap.

15
team_fukit  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:51:19pm

Erickson just kinda reminds me of the Kool-Aid Man

Oh, Yeah.
16
FormerDirtDart  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:51:31pm
17
KingKenrod  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:51:52pm

I wonder if the “Asian” food ban in the Erickson household included WWII allies like China, Vietnam, Mongolia, Korea, etc? Did they swear off spring rolls and Kung Pao?

18
Charles Johnson  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:52:01pm

Chuck’s going to be really sorry he did that. California’s anti-SLAPP laws are going to bite him hard.

19
Eclectic Cyborg  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:52:51pm

re: #18 Charles Johnson

Chuck’s going to be really sorry he did that. California’s anti-SLAPP laws are going to bite him hard.

I was just thinking the same thing. I’ve never someone so adept at digging their own grave.

20
goddamnedfrank  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:52:55pm

To be fair, it makes a certain kind of sense that someone like Erickson could actually be the product of people stupid enough to hold the cuisine of an entire Continent responsible for the attack on Pear Harbor.

21
WhatEVs  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:53:05pm

re: #13 Charles Johnson

What does that mean?

22
lawhawk  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:53:26pm

re: #13 Charles Johnson

[clarified]It should have been filed in CA federal court in the first place. But at least he’s got a filing in the right state (for the moment).

And if not in CA, then in NY, which is where Gawker’s offices are located). Instead of wasting the court’s time in Missouri.

So, he’s out all the money he wasted in Missouri, and now he’s prepping to file in California.

Oh, the suspense is terrible. I hope it lasts.

23
teleskiguy  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:53:29pm

re: #13 Charles Johnson

Does that mean UpChuck’s Gawker case has been transferred from Missouri to California? If so, UpChuck is boned. He’s going to get anti-SLAPPed right into bankruptcy.

24
Eclectic Cyborg  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:53:40pm

I wonder if he finally got fed up with his lawyer?

25
Eclectic Cyborg  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:54:41pm

CCJ to get bitchSLAPPed, video will follow shortly.

26
Charles Johnson  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:54:49pm

There’s nothing new on the Missouri case at Pacer.

27
goddamnedfrank  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:55:54pm

re: #13 Charles Johnson

Oh boy.

[Embedded content]

Is this an attempt to not exceed the statute of limitations?

If so it’s hands down the dumbest goddamned move he could have possibly made. Now Gawker stands to win TWO anti-SLAPP motions against him.

28
KingKenrod  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:56:13pm

Filing the same complaint in multiple venues would be a big mistake, right?

29
dholmes32  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:56:39pm

re: #13 Charles Johnson

Oh, that’ll be bounced straight to federal court. In other words, the Rage Furby wasted his money.

30
lawhawk  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:56:58pm

re: #28 KingKenrod

Filing the same complaint in multiple venues would be a big mistake, right?

Courts tend to frown on this. A lot.

31
teleskiguy  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:57:08pm

So, UpChuck is going forward with two concurrent lawsuits in two different jurisdictions? This fucker is a goddamned genius!

32
Kragar  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:57:32pm

re: #16 FormerDirtDart

33
Eclectic Cyborg  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:58:00pm

re: #31 teleskiguy

High IQ!!

34
darthstar  Dec 9, 2015 • 12:58:40pm
35
Charles Johnson  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:00:00pm

He filed this suit pro se! (Representing himself.)

He’s fucked already. It will get immediately anti-SLAPPed.

36
Backwoods_Sleuth  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:00:13pm
37
stpaulbear  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:00:29pm

re: #34 darthstar

I wish I had more updings for that one. lol.

38
klys (maker of Silmarils)  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:00:46pm

Maybe it’s just me, but simply having someone tell me that “Jesus is my lord and savior” doesn’t qualify as witnessing.

Of course, I was always more interested in the “actions” and “living according to the spirit” side of that, which is probably why I got fed up with the whole mess.

39
Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:00:51pm

re: #9 De Kolta Chair

Uh-oh, it’s on now dawg…

[Embedded content]

I was kinda thinking that the other day especially after the whole “would you go back in time and kill baby hitler” thing.

40
goddamnedfrank  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:01:59pm

re: #29 dholmes32

Oh, that’ll be bounced straight to federal court. In other words, the Rage Furby wasted his money.

Maybe not. Gawker may well decide that a California Court is more likely to rule in their favor in an anti-SLAPP hearing.

Remember, they removed the Missouri state court filing to federal district court precisely as a way to argue California’s rules as the appropriate governing choice of law. All Chuck has done now is place the noose that Gawker has been arguing for in the Missouri case firmly around his own neck.

This is the most epic own goal I’ve ever seen.

41
Lidane  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:02:00pm

Mental health break:

42
darthstar  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:03:46pm

re: #24 Eclectic Cyborg

I wonder if he finally got fed up with his lawyer?

Why not pay a lawyer when you can not pay yourself.

43
Backwoods_Sleuth  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:04:44pm
44
goddamnedfrank  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:05:10pm

If I were Gawker I’d pay my lawyers to work overtime tonight and get an anti-SLAPP motion filed in CA before the end of the week. Because after that Chuck won’t be able to drop this insanely stupid case. Gawker will straight up own him after that.

45
Backwoods_Sleuth  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:05:36pm
46
Dr. Matt  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:05:54pm
Erick son of Erick was born in Jackson in East Feliciana Parish, Louisiana, moved to Dubai, United Arab Emirates when he was five, and returned to Jackson when he was fifteen

I’m sure East Feliciana Parish, Louisiana and Dubai were hotbeds for Japanese food 35 years ago.

47
stpaulbear  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:06:59pm

re: #40 goddamnedfrank

Maybe not. Gawker may well decide that a California Court is more likely to rule in their favor in an anti-SLAPP hearing.

Remember, they removed the Missouri state court filing to federal district court precisely as a way to argue California’s rules as the appropriate governing choice of law. All Chuck has done now is place the noose that Gawker has been arguing for in the Missouri case firmly around his own neck.

This is the most epic own goal I’ve ever seen.

Is Chuck’s Missouri lawyer dancing a happy dance because of this? Does this get him off the hook for Chuck’s insane wrecklessness?

48
goddamnedfrank  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:07:48pm

re: #24 Eclectic Cyborg

I wonder if he finally got fed up with his lawyer?

The CA lawyer defending him against the NAF subpoena clearly passed on the chance to represent him in this case.

Chuck filed this because he’s panicked about having the case in MO thrown out after the statue of limitations has expired, at which point filing his case in CA would become impossible.

49
Dave In Austin  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:08:20pm

re: #14 WhatEVs

So I just finished reading the last thread and I have to say, I have to go to Austin next week and I am terrified.

I really do not want to take this trip.

Crap.

We should all get together for coffee… Or…

50
dholmes32  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:08:50pm

I’m particularly unimpressed with Abigail Fisher’s case against UT. You know, the one that caused Scalia to talk about how African-Americans should go to less difficult schools from the Supreme Court bench today. (The racism, it stuns me.) Granted, I graduated from UT a couple of decades before the Top-10 plan went into place, but when I graduated from high school, I was NOT a candidate for either flagship school (UT or A&M). Heck, I wasn’t a candidate for a second tier school either I just wasn’t. I wouldn’t have been accepted if I had applied, because my grades were in the toilet.

But I did three semesters at a junior college (paying more in tuition than I ever paid at UT), got on the honor roll all three semesters, and then was able to transfer in based on much better grades than I’d gotten in high school. My bachelor’s degree is from UT. I don’t see that Abigail Fisher did anything of the sort to get herself into UT. Instead, she seems to have whined about being denied her due white privilege to attend UT. I’m so unimpressed.

This may offend some people, but I’m acutely aware that the country has NOT made up for the fact that we kept people of color down by law and custom until the 1960s, and the rest of the time has been rather a fight. People like Abigail Fisher annoy me because of their privilege.

51
goddamnedfrank  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:09:06pm

re: #47 stpaulbear

Is Chuck’s Missouri lawyer dancing a happy dance because of this? Does this get him off the hook for Chuck’s insane wrecklessness?

I have no idea. It looks like Burns just missed another filing deadline so he’s probably staring down the barrel of a very pissed off Judge at this point.

52
Kragar  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:12:10pm
53
lawhawk  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:13:46pm

re: #47 stpaulbear

Is Chuck’s Missouri lawyer dancing a happy dance because of this? Does this get him off the hook for Chuck’s insane wrecklessness?

No. His Missouri lawyer is still on the hook for whatever he’s done in Missouri.

54
goddamnedfrank  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:14:34pm

Prediction: This time next year Chuck will have filed for bankruptcy protections from at least one massive judgement against him, possibly to no avail. Any property he co-owns with his wife will almost certainly have liens placed against it, and Gawker will own the GotNews internet domain.

55
Charles Johnson  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:15:08pm

re: #44 goddamnedfrank

If I were Gawker I’d pay my lawyers to work overtime tonight and get an anti-SLAPP motion filed in CA before the end of the week. Because after that Chuck won’t be able to drop this insanely stupid case. Gawker will straight up own him after that.

I’m reading it now. Chuck is SO fucked here. Paragraph 2 is an outright lie.

56
Franklin  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:15:21pm

re: #54 goddamnedfrank

Prediction: This time next year Chuck will have filed for bankruptcy protections from at least one massive judgement against him, possibly to no avail. Any property he co-owns with his wife will almost certainly have liens placed against it, and Gawker will own the GotNews internet domain.

So basically both sides lose ;)

57
Kragar  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:15:27pm

Chuck’s lawsuit

Paragraph 2 under Factual Allegations:

“2. Plaintiff Charles C. Johnson has never before initiated a lawsuit for defamation.”

58
Dr. Matt  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:15:30pm

re: #54 goddamnedfrank

Prediction: This time next year Chuck will have filed for bankruptcy protections from at least one massive judgement against him, possibly to no avail. Any property he co-owns with his wife will almost certainly have liens placed against it, and Gawker will own the GotNews internet domain.

He can continue to fleece his cult via GoFundMe et al.

59
stpaulbear  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:15:36pm

re: #53 lawhawk

No. His Missouri lawyer is still on the hook for whatever he’s done in Missouri.

Bummer
.
.
.
(hahahahah)

60
Charles Johnson  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:16:15pm
61
psddluva4evah  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:17:16pm

re: #50 dholmes32

Oh…you mean… this from Scalia…

And I suppose Clarence Thomas just nodded along. I”m inclined to agree with Keith Boykin here!

62
Charles Johnson  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:17:23pm

This is basically just a duplicate of the suit he filed in Missouri.

63
Dr. Matt  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:17:56pm

re: #57 Kragar

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

Plaintiff Charles C. Johnson has never before initiated a lawsuit for defamation.

Per Quantcast, Gawker Media has over One Million unique Missouri readers.

What a fucking idiot. He filed the exact same document from his Missouri suit.

64
Kragar  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:18:28pm

re: #62 Charles Johnson

This is basically just a duplicate of the suit he filed in Missouri.

Unpossible. He clearly states he’s never initiated a lawsuit for defamation before.
/

65
dholmes32  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:18:44pm

re: #61 psddluva4evah

Yeah. That’s what I mean.

66
Belafon  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:19:13pm

re: #64 Kragar

Unpossible. He clearly states he’s never initiated a lawsuit for defamation before.
/

He had his fingers crossed the first time.

67
lawhawk  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:20:25pm

re: #55 Charles Johnson

Perpetuating fraud before the court:

For those not keeping score, here’s Paragraph 2:

Plaintiff Charles C. Johnson has never before initiated a lawsuit for defamation.

Fact. He initiated defamation lawsuit in Missouri local court before it was kicked over to federal court in Missouri. Why Missouri? He found an idiot lawyer who’d take his case (and then promptly botched it in every way imaginable).

If he thinks that the CA court will not be aware of this, he’s in for a very rude awakening. And Gawker is going to be more than willing to make this fact known.

It almost appears as though Chucky thought he could simply cut/paste his prior filing into CA. That includes the BS multi-fonts and random quotes, content, etc.

68
Blind Frog Belly White  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:21:01pm

re: #62 Charles Johnson

This is basically just a duplicate of the suit he filed in Missouri.

Yeah. Note how the ‘facts’ that he tried to use to establish jurisdiction in Missouri (pp3-4) are still there. He just changed the cover page, and filed the same damn complaint, hence the ‘has never filed before’ lie.

69
lawhawk  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:21:05pm

re: #63 Dr. Matt

What a fucking idiot. He filed the exact same document from his Missouri suit.

Right down to the multiple fonts.

70
Stanley Sea Toujours  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:21:40pm

re: #62 Charles Johnson

This is basically just a duplicate of the suit he filed in Missouri.

I was wondering how he had the legal formatting on his laptop.

71
Dr. Matt  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:22:12pm

re: #69 lawhawk

Right down to the multiple fonts.

The pixel sizes are different though.

////

72
Nyet  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:22:18pm

Sigh. Wish this week would already end.

73
Blind Frog Belly White  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:22:21pm

I wonder if he’s even GOT a lawyer in CA working on this?

74
wrenchwench  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:22:35pm

re: #61 psddluva4evah

Oh…you mean… this from Scalia…

[Embedded content]

If I had to have my photo taken with him, I want this t-shirt

75
Backwoods_Sleuth  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:22:35pm

re: #62 Charles Johnson

This is basically just a duplicate of the suit he filed in Missouri.

LOL!
Why would a court in California give a rat’s ass about Gawker having “over one million unique Missouri readers”? (item 13 on page 3)

Lord, he’s dumber than a turnip.

76
Charles Johnson  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:22:47pm

re: #73 Blind Frog Belly White

I wonder if he’s even GOT a lawyer in CA working on this?

No, it’s pro se.

77
CuriousLurker  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:23:00pm

re: #62 Charles Johnson

Welp, that clears that up:

Full story: Planned Parenthood Attack Suspect: ‘I Am Guilty’

78
Fourth Football of the Apocalypse  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:24:47pm

re: #66 Belafon

He had his fingers crossed the first time.

Well, his lawyer initiated that other lawsuit. Not him.

///

79
wrenchwench  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:24:54pm

re: #77 CuriousLurker

Welp, that clears that up:

[Embedded content]

Full story: Planned Parenthood Attack Suspect: ‘I Am Guilty’

‘I am a jailbird for the babbies.’

80
Nyet  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:25:14pm
81
Belafon  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:25:32pm

re: #77 CuriousLurker

Welp, that clears that up:

Full story: Planned Parenthood Attack Suspect: ‘I Am Guilty’

But he went to the wrong place! But some Islamists shot up a Christmas party!

//

82
goddamnedfrank  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:25:38pm

re: #75 Backwoods_Sleuth

LOL!
Why would a court in California give a rat’s ass about Gawker having “over one million unique Missouri readers”? (item 13 on page 3)

Lord, he’s dumber than a turnip.

This is vexatious litigant territory, strike one. The CA Courts are going to remember this stunt for a long time. The fallout from this is going to be brutal.

83
Blind Frog Belly White  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:25:38pm

re: #76 Charles Johnson

No, it’s pro se.

They say a man who represents himself has a fool for a client. Well, with God as my witness, I am that fool!

84
WhatEVs  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:25:48pm

re: #49 Dave In Austin

FFLzxx2tJtdP4KXiXm0cAgGylw5Y8FRAwJL5xqCpiCHBZerofhvOIKtMXd/GBuXXqOwCgeWlCqtJi9cpFC1uwkpDRQSB48G5IKbdzyaztCqYhPGV20YOid9JEtQ3rLXoX4JolPe1jTIBc2L46c7zwp3xE12GfxXzFlnd3kXomCZ4LMBf0Xog5R+afnvONGD0KOwVZOHLomNpvfEYYB4Rd+I+R1gj9gq2BBGrbaLGO2MagNzAENu6OmD1BixR8OVh/SRzRKTLo5U7lpOOAfpBt7ErwWbydRQ7DugPYKxiw8ym0rLOYypUuRVJ7rBFCA0U

85
dog philosopher ஐஒஔ௸  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:26:02pm

trump electorate:

It is about the majority of Muslims who want to tell me that I can’t fly the US American flag at my own house because it offends them and their religion

86
KGxvi  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:27:45pm

re: #57 Kragar

First… Chuck is not a lawyer, thus, he can’t represent GotNews. He needs to lawyer up quickly otherwise the complaint as per GotNews will get dismissed.

Second… If one of the other California lawyers wants to correct me on this go ahead, but I think Chuck wouldn’t necessarily be barred by the statute of limitations in California if/when the Missouri action was dismissed because he could argue that the Missouri action tolled the statute of limitations. Partly because while there’s no personal jurisdiction in Missouri, there could be in either California or New York federal court.

Third… This looks very much like forum shopping. Judges are not fond of that. How not fond, you ask? It’s something you learn, literally (and I mean literally literally not literally figuratively), in the first week of law school.

87
bratwurst  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:27:51pm

Worst. Leftist. Transexual. Ever.

Oh, and this:

88
Backwoods_Sleuth  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:29:17pm

I like right off the bat where he refers to “by and through his undersigned counsel” and that this is supposed to be his “First Amended Complaint”.

lolololol

89
Dr Lizardo  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:29:49pm

re: #83 Blind Frog Belly White

Gomez Addams (Funny Police Station Scene)

Damn, I miss Raul Julia.

90
goddamnedfrank  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:30:22pm

Chuck should immediately drop this suit and check into a rehab facility. He might find some measure of mercy if he realizes quickly how badly he’s fucked up and makes immediate moves to mitigate his impending doom. If he waits until Gawker files a response and anti-SLAPP motion nothing can save him.

91
Fourth Football of the Apocalypse  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:30:30pm

re: #85 dog philosopher ஐஒஔ௸

trump electorate:

It is about the majority of Muslims who want to tell me that I can’t fly the US American flag at my own house because it offends them and their religion

Yup, happens all the time.

//

92
goddamnedfrank  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:32:25pm

re: #86 KGxvi

First… Chuck is not a lawyer, thus, he can’t represent GotNews. He needs to lawyer up quickly otherwise the complaint as per GotNews will get dismissed.

Second… If one of the other California lawyers wants to correct me on this go ahead, but I think Chuck wouldn’t necessarily be barred by the statute of limitations in California if/when the Missouri action was dismissed because he could argue that the Missouri action tolled the statute of limitations. Partly because while there’s no personal jurisdiction in Missouri, there could be in either California or New York federal court.

Third… This looks very much like forum shopping. Judges are not fond of that. How not fond, you ask? It’s something you learn, literally (and I mean literally literally not literally figuratively), in the first week of law school.

He filed it in his own name and in the name of GotNews though. So even if GN LLC is dismissed he’ll still be on the hook personally, with no LLC protections, or am I missing something?

93
Blind Frog Belly White  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:33:14pm

re: #89 Dr Lizardo

[Embedded content]

Damn, I miss Raul Julia.

Me too.

94
dog philosopher ஐஒஔ௸  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:33:17pm

The man accused of killing three people in a shooting at a Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood clinic last month on Wednesday called himself a “warrior for the babies” at a court hearing.

christian terrorist

95
dholmes32  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:34:20pm

re: #77 CuriousLurker

Welp, that clears that up:

[Embedded content]

Full story: Planned Parenthood Attack Suspect: ‘I Am Guilty’

So can we talk about the terrorists who are endangering women and our health care yet???

96
I Would Prefer Not To  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:34:38pm

re: #85 dog philosopher ஐஒஔ௸

trump electorate:

It is about the majority of Muslims who want to tell me that I can’t fly the US American flag at my own house because it offends them and their religion

97
Blind Frog Belly White  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:35:43pm

re: #95 dholmes32

So can we talk about the terrorists who are endangering women and our health care yet???

Lone wolf…Nobody could have predicted…

98
Nyet  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:35:44pm

I didn’t have much time to read LGF for a few days, coming home all exhausted and stuff, but I caught up today and boy, was there a lot of derp.

The main point about the other candidates tepidly renouncing Trump (tepidly, because they don’t have the guts to call it what it is - fascism) and saying he’s not fit for presidency is that they signed that pledge to support him once he wins. With that in mind their denunciations ring hollow.

99
Wendell Zurkowitz (slave to the waffle light)  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:36:10pm

re: #96 I Would Prefer Not To

It is about the majority of Muslims who want to tell me that I can’t fly the US American flag at my own house because it offends them and their religion

…and all those liberals who say I can’t fly a Confederate battle flag above my state capitol because it offends them!

100
Kragar  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:36:14pm
101
Blind Frog Belly White  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:36:24pm

re: #98 Nyet

I didn’t have much time to read LGF for a few days, coming home all exhausted and stuff, but I caught up today and boy, was there a lot of derp.

The main point about the other candidates tepidly renouncing Trump (tepidly, because they don’t have the guts to call it what it is - fascism) and saying he’s not fit for presidency is that they signed that pledge to support him once he wins. With that in mind their denunciations ring hollow.

Time to ask Jeb Bush if he’d kill baby Trump.

102
Belafon  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:36:46pm

re: #95 dholmes32

So can we talk about the terrorists who are endangering women and our health care yet???

This ‘bortion doctors are the greatest threat to the health of the babbies!

103
CuriousLurker  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:38:02pm

re: #95 dholmes32

So can we talk about the terrorists who are endangering women and our health care yet???

I wanna know if we can refuse entrance to the U.S. to all European Christians now, and maybe start shutting down churches… //

104
Backwoods_Sleuth  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:39:29pm
105
CuriousLurker  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:40:56pm

re: #85 dog philosopher ஐஒஔ௸

trump electorate:

It is about the majority of Muslims who want to tell me that I can’t fly the US American flag at my own house because it offends them and their religion

LOLWUT? Where in the hell do they get this nonsense from?

106
Dr. Matt  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:41:04pm

re: #87 bratwurst

Accused Planned Parenthood Shooter Calls Himself A “Warrior For The Babies” In Court t.co pic.twitter.com
— BuzzFeed News (@BuzzFeedNews) December 9, 2015

The Media’s Response: There are still questions about his motive and whether he was actually targeting Planned Parenthood

107
KGxvi  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:42:08pm

re: #92 goddamnedfrank

Right, he’d still be on the hook for anti-SLAPP sanctions. He could also get in trouble for effectively practicing law with out a license if he tries to maintain a claim on behalf of the LLC - California law specifically requires corporations, LLC’s, and partnerships to be represented by counsel because of their status as “legal persons”. And while a natural person can file in pro per, they can’t represent a corporation without being a licensed attorney. Depending on how much he pisses off the court, it likely won’t get referred to the State Bar on the practicing without a license bit - but this is Chuck.

Where he’s more likely to get in trouble is filing a claim while the exact same claim is being litigated in another jurisdiction. And on demurrer, the fact that he has filed an identical complaint in another jurisdiction is judicially noticeable.

108
Blind Frog Belly White  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:43:27pm

re: #106 Dr. Matt

The Media’s Response: There are still questions about his motive and whether he was actually targeting Planned Parenthood

“I heard he was looking for a bank, and going into PP was a mistake!”

“Yeah, well I heard he’s a Leftist Tranny!”

109
Nyet  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:43:38pm

re: #100 Kragar

Take away the healthy government, and you’ll see wingnuts cutting off heads like it’s nobody’s business.

Abu Ghraib was just a weak taste of what would come.

110
Jayleia  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:45:18pm
111
Dr. Matt  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:45:33pm
112
CuriousLurker  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:45:44pm
113
FormerDirtDart  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:46:28pm

Troll Level 1000

114
Dr. Matt  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:48:46pm

The right-wing terrorist is a “Warrior For The Babies” yet he murdered three parents.

115
Nyet  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:48:49pm

re: #113 FormerDirtDart

The way such tests are structured, you simply choose non-Trump each time (except the last one).

116
BeachDem  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:49:19pm

re: #57 Kragar

Chuck’s lawsuit

[Embedded content]

Paragraph 2 under Factual Allegations:

“2. Plaintiff Charles C. Johnson has never before initiated a lawsuit for defamation.”

Good dog—I admire the fortitude of anyone who can actually read (rather than skim) all this crap. From a cursory glimpse, what I got was, “Wah, wah, Gawker made fun of me and hurt my fee-fees. Give me many millions of dollars.”

IANAL, but I consider myself a sentient being and now I have a huge headache.

117
Stanley Sea Toujours  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:49:26pm

THE FUCK?

118
I Would Prefer Not To  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:49:29pm

re: #113 FormerDirtDart

Troll Level 1000

[Embedded content]

I got 7 out of 7 correct. Spoiler: The last one is a trick question.

119
Blind Frog Belly White  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:50:05pm

re: #114 Dr. Matt

The right-wing terrorist is a “Warrior For The Babies” yet he murdered three parents.

So, you gotta ask yourself - to the people out there who say, “But PP kills millions!”, was Dear a GGWAG or a BGWAG?

120
dog philosopher ஐஒஔ௸  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:50:29pm

re: #96 I Would Prefer Not To

the US American flagre: #105 CuriousLurker

LOLWUT? Where in the hell do they get this nonsense from?

i asked, but how likely is it that i’ll get an answer?

121
Brian J.  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:50:55pm

re: #119 Blind Frog Belly White

So, you gotta ask yourself - to the people out there who say, “But PP kills millions!”, was Dear a GGWAG or a BGWAG?

To quote Bruce Campbell, “Good, bad, I’m the guy with a gun.” There are no GGWAGS and no BGWAGs, just GWAGs.

122
WhatEVs  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:51:24pm

re: #113 FormerDirtDart

123
Alephnaught  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:51:41pm

re: #45 Backwoods_Sleuth

[Embedded content]

Blimey, that’s quick. It was around 274K when I signed earlier this evening.

124
CuriousLurker  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:52:02pm

re: #77 CuriousLurker

Welp, that clears that up:

[Embedded content]

Full story: Planned Parenthood Attack Suspect: ‘I Am Guilty’

I couldn’t resist on this one. Someone goes Godwin in the first comment:

Charles Wolf • 21 minutes ago

I thought the defendant was the crazy one involved in this mess.
Wassup with the Prosecution???
“Prosecutors … will be filing 179 counts against Dear, including murder…???
There weren’t that many charges filed against the the nazis at The Nuremburg Trials! Israel charged Adolph Eichmann with only 15 counts.
He got a fair trial… and then they hanged him.

I hope the CS prosecutors didn’t miss out on illegal parking outside the clinic… it will give the jury something serious to ponder.

*facepalm*

125
I Would Prefer Not To  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:52:29pm

The tagline on the Quiz

Love trumps hate. Add your name if you agree:

Hillary’s peeps are doing a nice job on social media.

126
Blind Frog Belly White  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:52:49pm

re: #121 Brian J.

To quote Bruce Campbell, “Good, bad, I’m the guy with a gun.” There are no GGWAGS and no BGWAGs, just GWAGs.

Little goody two shoes! Little goody two shoes!
127
Backwoods_Sleuth  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:53:06pm

re: #123 Alephnaught

Blimey, that’s quick. It was around 274K when I signed earlier this evening.

i was watching the map tracking very early on.
Most of the signatures were coming from Scotland then.

128
Blind Frog Belly White  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:53:52pm

re: #125 I Would Prefer Not To

The tagline on the Quiz

Love trumps hate. Add your name if you agree:

Hillary’s peeps are doing a nice job on social media.

Love may trump hate, but Trump loves hate.

129
Jay C  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:54:01pm

re: #41 Lidane

That look just says “Oh wow, extra treats for eight days, right??!!!”

130
Dr. Matt  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:54:22pm

re: #117 Stanley Sea Toujours

THE FUCK?

I saw the story yesterday and the photos. The pics were very creepy. It seems like the Windermere Police Department are stumped about one or more cases dealing with unconscious women.

131
psddluva4evah  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:54:42pm
132
Blind Frog Belly White  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:55:35pm

re: #131 psddluva4evah

Jeb Bush: Trump is ‘the other version’ of Barack Obama

As the kids say, “Bish…whut?”

You mean like Bizarro Obama?

133
Alephnaught  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:56:00pm

re: #127 Backwoods_Sleuth

i was watching the map tracking very early on.
Most of the signatures were coming from Scotland then.

Well, it was the front page story in the main UK free newspaper today, and nearly everybody I heard was saying along the lines of “What’s this guy about?!?” and making Nazi parallels, so I’m not too surprised.

134
danarchy  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:57:03pm

re: #113 FormerDirtDart

Troll Level 1000

[Embedded content]

I gotta say the quote from Rand was pretty tame, I am sure they could have found something better than that.

135
Nyet  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:57:31pm
JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israeli politicians of all persuasions called on Wednesday for a planned visit by U.S. Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump to be blocked over his call for a ban on Muslims entering the United States, which has raised an international outcry.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued a statement later saying he rejected the remarks but added that the visit, set two weeks ago, would go ahead as planned and did not indicate support for Trump.
[…]
It added that the Israeli leader had determined a uniform policy towards meeting all U.S. presidential candidates from both parties who visit Israel.

“This policy does not reflect support for the candidates or for their platforms, rather, it expresses the importance that the prime minister ascribes to the strong alliance between Israel and the United States,” the statement added.

news.yahoo.com

Uh, Bibi, it doesn’t work that way. If it were David Duke, you know you would not meet with him. Fuck you.

136
bratwurst  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:58:38pm

re: #131 psddluva4evah

Jeb Bush: Trump is ‘the other version’ of Barack Obama

As the kids say, “Bish…whut?”

Any condemnation of Trump that includes mention of President Obama is pathetic.

137
The Vicious Babushka  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:59:03pm

Erick doubles down on the Derp and insists his mother never allowed him to eat CHINESE on Dec. 7 because PEARL HARBOR

138
The Vicious Babushka  Dec 9, 2015 • 1:59:56pm

FFS

139
Fourth Football of the Apocalypse  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:03:07pm

re: #105 CuriousLurker

LOLWUT? Where in the hell do they get this nonsense from?

USE THE GOOGLE I WONT DO UR RESEARCH FOR U!!!!!!11

140
Fourth Football of the Apocalypse  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:03:32pm

re: #138 The Vicious Babushka

FFS

So today is not the day Erick son of Erick finds gainful employment?

141
psddluva4evah  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:03:49pm
142
Fourth Football of the Apocalypse  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:04:49pm

re: #131 psddluva4evah

Jeb Bush: Trump is ‘the other version’ of Barack Obama

As the kids say, “Bish…whut?”

So…Trump is the opposite of Obama?

That’s what I would have said, too.

143
The Vicious Babushka  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:04:57pm

Erick can’t even keep his bullshit lies consistent.
Either it was a one-time event or a yearly tradition.

144
Fourth Football of the Apocalypse  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:05:26pm

re: #143 The Vicious Babushka

Erick can’t even keep his bullshit lies consistent.
Either it was a one-time event or a yearly tradition.

Or he just made it up.

145
calochortus  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:06:13pm

re: #87 bratwurst

Worst. Leftist. Transexual. Ever.

[Embedded content]

I’m not seeing this on conservative forums. Odd…

146
Nyet  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:06:52pm

re: #143 The Vicious Babushka

Notice how face-wise Erickson is just Chucky without the beard?

147
Nyet  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:08:07pm

Has anyone seen Erick and Chucky together? //

148
dholmes32  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:11:27pm

re: #113 FormerDirtDart

6 out of 7. But yeah. Troll Level 1000.

149
Sionainn  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:11:59pm

re: #24 Eclectic Cyborg

I wonder if he finally got fed up with his lawyer?

I wonder if his check to the court is going to bounce.

150
Decatur Deb  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:12:19pm

re: #38 klys (maker of Silmarils)

Maybe it’s just me, but simply having someone tell me that “Jesus is my lord and savior” doesn’t qualify as witnessing.

Of course, I was always more interested in the “actions” and “living according to the spirit” side of that, which is probably why I got fed up with the whole mess.

That’s what they call “hate-witnessing”.

151
Nyet  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:13:03pm

re: #148 dholmes32

6 out of 7. But yeah. Troll Level 1000.

I also got the last one wrong. //

152
b.d.  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:13:49pm

I remember seeing a young Erick eating Asian food on 12/7. He was eating it on a roof in Jersey with a thousand cheering Muslims.

153
Brian J.  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:14:25pm

re: #152 b.d.

I remember seeing a young Erick eating Asian food on 12/7. He was eating it on a roof in Jersey with a thousand cheering Muslims.

And his hair was perfect.

154
Nyet  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:16:37pm

re: #152 b.d.

I remember seeing a young Erick eating Asian food on 12/7. He was eating it on a roof in Jersey with a thousand cheering Muslims.

Mmmmm… forbidden donut Asian food!

155
InfidelOfFreedom  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:18:15pm

re: #136 bratwurst

Apparently Jeb isn’t the smart one, he’s the delusional one. On all counts.

156
teleskiguy  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:22:05pm

Finally got my snow tires mounted on my horseless chariot. And just in time, too. We may see significant snowfall this weekend, which makes me go

157
calochortus  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:22:51pm

re: #50 dholmes32

I’m particularly unimpressed with Abigail Fisher’s case against UT. You know, the one that caused Scalia to talk about how African-Americans should go to less difficult schools from the Supreme Court bench today. (The racism, it stuns me.) Granted, I graduated from UT a couple of decades before the Top-10 plan went into place, but when I graduated from high school, I was NOT a candidate for either flagship school (UT or A&M). Heck, I wasn’t a candidate for a second tier school either I just wasn’t. I wouldn’t have been accepted if I had applied, because my grades were in the toilet.

But I did three semesters at a junior college (paying more in tuition than I ever paid at UT), got on the honor roll all three semesters, and then was able to transfer in based on much better grades than I’d gotten in high school. My bachelor’s degree is from UT. I don’t see that Abigail Fisher did anything of the sort to get herself into UT. Instead, she seems to have whined about being denied her due white privilege to attend UT. I’m so unimpressed.

This may offend some people, but I’m acutely aware that the country has NOT made up for the fact that we kept people of color down by law and custom until the 1960s, and the rest of the time has been rather a fight. People like Abigail Fisher annoy me because of their privilege.

I completely agree on the Abigail Fisher case. And that Scalia’s remark was inexcusable.

There is a teeny, tiny grain of truth in it, however. Studies have shown that average students do better at second tier schools where they are near the top of their class than they do at top tier schools where they are near the bottom of their class. Minority students are less likely to go to good schools and therefore are less likely to be top performers at a top tier school. On the other hand, there are some kids who come from mediocre high schools and go on to set the world on fire when they have access to a top college.

Where Scalia totally misses the point is that the answer isn’t to say “Well, we’ll just keep those top schools almost all white.” It’s to improve educational opportunities for minorities and the poor.

158
bratwurst  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:23:17pm

Jake fucking Tapper, such a journalistic heavyweight.

I think Hugh Hewitt is awful, but I have to admit he certainly fits right in with the current CNN format.

159
Decatur Deb  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:27:57pm

re: #109 Nyet

Take away the healthy government, and you’ll see wingnuts cutting off heads like it’s nobody’s business.

Abu Ghraib was just a weak taste of what would come.

All through loving-kindness and a concern for the sinner’s soul.

160
BeachDem  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:28:11pm

Speaking of lawsuits, I think our own Happy Warrior should launch one against the Hill for besmirching his username by utilizing it to describe Andrew Breitbart:

When You Yearn for the Calm Political Discourse of Andrew Breitbart
Here’s some delusional stupid for lunch.

The author is dismayed by the effect that Donald Trump is having on our political discourse, and he yearns for the bygone era of reasoned debate and good humor personified by…well, you’re not going to believe it.

Take a breath before you explode, if you’re a Donald Trump supporter. I have nothing against The Donald and the energy he has brought to the presidential primary process. Andrew Breitbart was the happy warrior.

esquire.com

161
teleskiguy  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:28:13pm

re: #158 bratwurst

The “Trump as a Hillary plant” thing seems to really be taking off these days with more mainline conservatives. To me that indicates that the GOP establishment and big donors are fully in pants-shitting mode in re: The Donald™ for President.

162
Nyet  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:29:43pm

re: #159 Decatur Deb

All through loving-kindness and a concern for the sinner’s soul.

All ad maiorem Dei gloriam of course.

163
The Vicious Babushka  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:30:24pm
164
The Vicious Babushka  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:32:25pm

THIS IS THE STUPIDEST TRUMP APOLOGIA YOU WILL READ ALL DAY==>

165
bratwurst  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:32:32pm

I cannot fathom why an ostensibly serious news organization would have ANYTHING to do with an online poll the way Bloomberg is pimping theirs today.

If online polls had a SHRED of scientific validity, President Ron Paul would be about to wrap up his second term.

166
No Country For Old Haters  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:32:57pm

re: #16 FormerDirtDart

167
Nyet  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:33:16pm

re: #163 The Vicious Babushka

He didn’t do her any favors by publishing it…

168
Belafon  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:38:47pm

re: #161 teleskiguy

The “Trump as a Hillary plant” thing seems to really be taking off these days with more mainline conservatives. To me that indicates that the GOP establishment and big donors are fully in pants-shitting mode in re: The DonaldTM for President.

They’re still in the deny stage of grief. “It’s not our fault Trump’s popular, it’s Clinton’s fault for encouraging Trump to be in the race.” Totally ignoring the support he’s getting.

169
Jay C  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:39:16pm

Heh. To me, a telling bit of the Erickson “Pearl Harbor” saga is:

Erickson’s sister, a woman named Gretchen Erickson Barlow, immediately hung up when we called and asked if Erick Erickson was her brother, so we weren’t able to verify her brother’s account with her.

So…: family solidarity, or family shame?

170
Romantic Heretic  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:40:29pm

re: #105 CuriousLurker

LOLWUT? Where in the hell do they get this nonsense from?

Donald Trump’s ass.

171
Dr. Matt  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:40:32pm

re: #169 Jay C

He. To me, a telling bit of the Erickson “Pearl Harbor” saga is:

SO: family solidarity, or family shame?

Perhaps she’s embarrassed to be related to that fucking idiot. Wouldn’t you?

172
Backwoods_Sleuth  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:41:04pm

Charlie Spies, the Republican campaign-finance whiz who counsels PACs supporting Jeb Bush, is alleging that Trump illegally mixed business and politics when his corporate attorney warned the billionaire’s opponents that attack ads could trigger defamation lawsuits. The claim comes in a complaint filed Wednesday with the Federal Election Commission that was obtained exclusively by POLITICO.

Alan Garten, general counsel of the Trump Organization, FedEx’ed bombastic cease-and-desist letters on company letterhead to the Club for Growth, the Right to Rise leadership PAC, and Mike Fernandez, one of Bush’s biggest donors. Spies is alleging that Trump crossed a line by using corporate resources to do his campaign’s “dirty work.”

snip

“In light of your confusion over the difference between Leadership PACs and Super PACs, we have to assume you may also be unaware of the FEC’s prohibition on a federal candidate’s use of corporate resources for campaign purposes,” Spies wrote. “Just as your client is attempting to quickly learn the basics of foreign policy, we wish you personally the best in your attempts to learn election law.”

Spies called on the FEC to investigate immediately and to make a referral to the Justice Department.

173
Charles Johnson  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:41:16pm
174
teleskiguy  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:44:13pm

re: #170 Romantic Heretic

Donald Trump’s ass.

I couldn’t resist.

:-P

175
Charles Johnson  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:44:21pm
176
Decatur Deb  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:44:46pm

The Art of the Troll.

177
EPR-radar  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:45:21pm

re: #161 teleskiguy

The “Trump as a Hillary plant” thing seems to really be taking off these days with more mainline conservatives. To me that indicates that the GOP establishment and big donors are fully in pants-shitting mode in re: The DonaldTM for President.

The GOP establishment will do anything to avoid facing its own exclusive responsibility for the rise of Trump.

178
wrenchwench  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:46:04pm

re: #174 teleskiguy

[Embedded content]

I couldn’t resist.

:-P

Needs a little mustache.

179
KGxvi  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:46:34pm

re: #164 The Vicious Babushka

Why did I click through to that column? Why?

I really want to know what these people would have done? Full on war with Russia over Ukraine? Regardless of what the Ukrainian people wanted? Inserting ourselves into Syria’s FOUR SIDED civil war with no clear objective? War with China because, reasons? Reinvade Afghanistan and Iraq for shits and giggles?

Why do I have a feeling if he’d done any of those things, they’d be criticizing him for doing them? Or screaming that he should be impeached for leading us into a war that the American people didn’t support and on false pretenses, or something?

180
Decatur Deb  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:47:07pm

re: #174 teleskiguy

[Embedded content]

I couldn’t resist.

:-P

Your viewpoint is tainted.

181
InfidelOfFreedom  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:47:40pm

re: #50 dholmes32

Statistically, isn’t it white women who have benefited most from affirmative action? So what is this presumptuous whiner talking about? Who the hell does she think she is anyway? You got rejected, find another school who will take your whiny ass.

182
Eric The Fruit Bat  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:48:17pm

re: #172 Backwoods_Sleuth

Don’t mind me….I’m just a spectator…..

183
Charles Johnson  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:48:18pm
184
BeachDem  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:49:32pm

At what top tier university did Antonin Scalia learn to form sentences such as this one?

I’m just not impressed by the fact that the University of Texas may have too fewer. Maybe it ought to have too fewer. And maybe some, you know, when you take more, the number of blacks, really competent blacks admitted to lesser schools, turns out to be less.

185
Joe Bacon  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:49:37pm

Hey, isn’t it time to reset the Chuck C Clock???????

186
Charles Johnson  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:49:51pm
187
No Country For Old Haters  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:50:07pm

re: #87 bratwurst

188
Eric The Fruit Bat  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:50:47pm

re: #185 Joe Bacon

Yep-and updates the number of suits filed to a whopping TWO!

189
Great White Snark  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:51:07pm

re: #103 CuriousLurker

I wanna know if we can refuse entrance to the U.S. to all European Christians now, and maybe start shutting down churches… //

Drudge is all “Carter banned Iranians during the hostage crisis”. Right he did. Students, technicians tourists. Not refugees. WITH an exception for humanitarian reasons, there were no refugees and oh BTW banning by nation is one thing, banning by religion is quite another. And there was no credible terrorist threat at all. It was an F.U. aimed at the new regime in Iran, not a anti terror attack paranoid fantasy.

190
Great White Snark  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:51:24pm
191
Charles Johnson  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:51:53pm
192
Kent Dorfman  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:51:56pm
Lars
193
InfidelOfFreedom  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:54:35pm

re: #184 BeachDem

Um, what?? I can’t make heads or tails of that. And I actually tried.

194
GlutenFreeJesus  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:54:52pm

re: #189 Great White Snark

So that’s where that gibberish on Facebook is coming from. Geez. Of course, anyone using that as an excuse is incapable of seeing the difference.

195
sagehen  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:54:54pm

re: #181 UrbanAchiever

Statistically, isn’t it white women who have benefited most from affirmative action? So what is this presumptuous whiner talking about? Who the hell does she think she is anyway? You got rejected, find another school who will take your whiny ass.

White women did well with affirmative action because AA gave all eligible x amount of help, then white women also had the nepotism amplifier.

196
WhatEVs  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:55:18pm

re: #164 The Vicious Babushka

Rothman was a lying sack of shit when he wrote for Mediaite. He’s still a lying sack.

197
jaunte  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:56:04pm

re: #177 EPR-radar

The GOP establishment will do anything to avoid facing its own exclusive responsibility for the rise of Trump.

“For some reason all our voters like the loudest, most blustery nativist.”

198
No Country For Old Haters  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:56:18pm

re: #137 The Vicious Babushka

Erick doubles down on the Derp and insists his mother never allowed him to eat CHINESE on Dec. 7 because PEARL HARBOR

[Embedded content]

199
calochortus  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:56:30pm

re: #168 Belafon

Ooops, didn’t mean to downding. That’s what I get for carrying a whole lot of little things in one hand and my laptop (open of course) in the other. I have corrected it.

200
Romantic Heretic  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:58:10pm

re: #174 teleskiguy

Image: U7Hfw.gif

201
HappyWarrior  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:58:12pm

27 year old event? Didn’t he make this out to be a constant of his childhood? Just admit it, Erick, you were trying to show off your racist bonafides to all the other conservative kids and your Mom called you out on it.

202
Barefoot Grin  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:58:26pm

Just a second ago clicking through the channels, I catch Don Lemon asking Donald Trump this: “you’ve been very kind to me, introduced me to your family, been very gracious…How does it make you feel when people call you a racist and a homophobe?”

I changed channels before I heard Trump answer.

203
Backwoods_Sleuth  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:58:55pm
204
Eric The Fruit Bat  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:59:11pm

Today’s GOP leaders have more in common with the leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran than you could possibly imagine.

Food for thought.

205
HappyWarrior  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:59:58pm

re: #204 Eric The Fruit Bat

Today’s GOP leaders have more in common with the leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran than you could possibly imagine.

Food for thought.

Heh pun intended though I know Erickson isn’t actually GOP.

206
Sionainn  Dec 9, 2015 • 2:59:58pm

This is frickin’ hilarious.

Drunk Trump

207
klys (maker of Silmarils)  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:00:04pm

Not surprising.

208
HappyWarrior  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:00:41pm

re: #207 klys (maker of Silmarils)

[Embedded content]

Not surprising.

Good move UT.

209
BeachDem  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:00:52pm

re: #193 UrbanAchiever

Um, what?? I can’t make heads or tails of that. And I actually tried.

Here’s the whole block quote, but I don’t think it helps:

“There are those who contend that it does not benefit African­-Americans to get them into the University of Texas where they do not do well, as opposed to having them go to a less ­advanced school, a less ­­ a slower­ track school where they do well. One of, ­one of the briefs pointed out that most of the black scientists in this country don’t come from schools like the University of Texas… They come from lesser schools where they do not feel that they’re pushed ahead in classes that are too fast for them…I’m just not impressed by the fact that the University of Texas may have too fewer. Maybe it ought to have too fewer. And maybe some, you know, when you take more, the number of blacks, really competent blacks admitted to lesser schools, turns out to be less. I don’t think it stands to reason that it’s a good thing for the University of Texas to admit as many blacks as possible.”

210
Decatur Deb  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:01:46pm

re: #203 Backwoods_Sleuth

I’m pleased to announce the first plane carrying Syrian refugees arrives in Canada tomorrow at 9:15 pm ET.

That’s diplomat-speak for “Take that, you chickenshit grit-eaters who hog all the warm coastlines”.

211
Romantic Heretic  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:01:51pm

re: #203 Backwoods_Sleuth

Didn’t vote for his party. But I like him.

212
EPR-radar  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:02:19pm

re: #191 Charles Johnson

Conservatism in the US has returned to its historical norm of being essentially stupid. The WFB/National Review era is an anomaly caused by WFB having power within the conservative movement combined with wanting the movement to be seen as intellectual.

So theses days all the RWNJ pundits etc. converge on the stupidest available ‘answers’ to any public policy question. Cutting taxes on the rich, fear mongering and scapegoating are the real three pillars of the conservative stool.

213
HappyWarrior  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:03:35pm

re: #212 EPR-radar

Conservatism in the US has returned to its historical norm of being essentially stupid. The WFB/National Review era is an anomaly caused by WFB having power within the conservative movement combined with wanting the movement to be seen as intellectual.

So theses days all the RWNJ pundits etc. converge on the stupidest available ‘answers’ to any public policy question. Cutting taxes on the rich, fear mongering and scapegoating are the real three pillars of the conservative stool.

Only going to get worse. The problem with conservatism is well conservatism frankly.

214
Wendell Zurkowitz (slave to the waffle light)  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:04:50pm

re: #152 b.d.

I remember seeing a young Erick eating Asian food on 12/7. He was eating it on a roof in Jersey with a thousand cheering Muslims.

There was video but the Right Wing Media Conspiracy has covered it up!

/

215
BeachDem  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:05:40pm

re: #210 Decatur Deb

That’s diplomat-speak for “Take that, you chickenshit grit-eaters who hog all the warm coastlines”.

I do live on a warm coastline, but I don’t eat grits, so I can still love Justin Trudeau, thank dog!

216
InfidelOfFreedom  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:07:15pm

re: #209 BeachDem

Thanks! Really provides the context for the abject racism coming out of his face.

217
Decatur Deb  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:07:19pm

re: #215 BeachDem

I do live on a warm coastline, but I don’t eat grits, so I can still love Justin Trudeau, thank dog!

This time of year Panama City Beach flies more Canadian flags than Confederate battle flags.

218
stpaulbear  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:09:20pm

re: #138 The Vicious Babushka

What does 1000 rounds of #ammunition look like? Like this.

What does it look like when your garage full of ammunition catches fire? Like this:

Cold Springs Circle in Lake Hills (garage fire with live ammo exploding.

219
Skip Intro  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:11:04pm

re: #131 psddluva4evah

Jeb Bush: Trump is ‘the other version’ of Barack Obama

As the kids say, “Bish…whut?”

Jeb Bush is the other version of George Bush, except dumber.

220
BeachDem  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:11:16pm

re: #216 UrbanAchiever

Thanks! Really provides the context for the abject racism coming out of his face.

You’re welcome. I wasn’t trying to obfuscate the context—Scalia is a racist pig.
I merely wanted to point out the hideous sentence structure and grammar.

221
BeachDem  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:12:06pm

re: #217 Decatur Deb

This time of year Panama City Beach flies more Canadian flags than Confederate battle flags.

Huh. I believe our CanAm festivities occur later in the off-season.

222
Alephnaught  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:13:06pm

Just been watching The Trad Awards (Scottish folkie music awards) on BBC Alba via iPlayer, (This took place a couple of days ago in Dundee’s Caird Hall.) and the Album of the Year awards was presented by a stuffy looking record company person who, before presenting the award, basically said “Well, I’ve been told I can’t take too long, so.. REFUGEES ARE WELCOME IN SCOTLAND!” Cue massive applause. Wow.

223
InfidelOfFreedom  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:13:57pm

re: #220 BeachDem

I got ya! Gotta love a good word salad.

224
Decatur Deb  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:19:03pm

re: #218 stpaulbear

What does it look like when your garage full of ammunition catches fire? Like this:

[Embedded content]

Video

His insurance company is going to put him through the wringer. The Army stores packaged small-ams stuff as fire category 1.4—no great projectile risk unless confined (like in the barrels of your arsenal).

225
Emoprog Refugee  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:28:25pm

Why is Erick Erickson obsessing that it’s a “27 year old event”?
Didn’t he originally say, “When I was growing up, we didn’t eat Asian food on 12/7”? or something to that effect?
That makes it sound like it was some manner of annual ritual on 12/7, to make a stink about anything for dinner except Asian, cuz stinky Pearl Harbor bombers!
Now he seems to be indicating that it was this one time in ~1988 when he was 13 (I’m making the assumption that he’s 40) that his parents decided that now was the time to develop a grudge against all Asians for WWII. That’s really weird.

226
klys (maker of Silmarils)  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:36:45pm

re: #224 Decatur Deb

Impressive firewall between the garage and the house though.

I need to get that repaired. Sigh.

227
Decatur Deb  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:43:40pm

re: #226 klys (maker of Silmarils)

Impressive firewall between the garage and the house though.

I need to get that repaired. Sigh.

Our code calls for 3/4 hour, IIRC. I have to put a new drywall hatch in the attic access—dropped it getting down ornaments.

Small-arms is scary, but re-loaders are worse. They store powder in bulk. A volunteer fireman buddy had his helmet blown back into the street when he did an entry for a moron who was storing 10 lbs. Lost 6 months work.

228
Tigger2  Dec 9, 2015 • 3:49:08pm

re: #138 The Vicious Babushka

FFS

[Embedded content]

We should all report Erick to Trump for being a suspicious person for having all that ammunition stored. lol

229
klys (maker of Silmarils)  Dec 9, 2015 • 4:13:35pm

re: #227 Decatur Deb

Our code calls for 3/4 hour, IIRC. I have to put a new drywall hatch in the attic access—dropped it getting down ornaments.

Small-arms is scary, but re-loaders are worse. They store powder in bulk. A volunteer fireman buddy had his helmet blown back into the street when he did an entry for a moron who was storing 10 lbs. Lost 6 months work.

I know this in theory, but seeing it in reality is a different thing, you know?

Not quite sure what our code calls for, but there’s a spot or two where it is either just short or just past the interior of the house that should get extended to be clear, I think, and then a few jagged spots where it’s gotten worn over the years. You might know - is that something a standard drywall company can handle? I’ve been at a loss on who to talk to about this.

230
Decatur Deb  Dec 9, 2015 • 4:17:10pm

re: #229 klys (maker of Silmarils)

I know this in theory, but seeing it in reality is a different thing, you know?

Not quite sure what our code calls for, but there’s a spot or two where it is either just short or just past the interior of the house that should get extended to be clear, I think, and then a few jagged spots where it’s gotten worn over the years. You might know - is that something a standard drywall company can handle? I’ve been at a loss on who to talk to about this.

NBD—the resistance is inherent in the (proper) materials. Any competent drywall guy can fix it.

231
klys (maker of Silmarils)  Dec 9, 2015 • 4:18:06pm

re: #230 Decatur Deb

NBD—the resistance is inherent in the (proper) materials. Any competent drywall guy can fix it.

Thanks. :) That will go on the list for top priority after the holidays, then, because I don’t think it’s getting fit in before we leave.

232
Shimshon  Dec 9, 2015 • 4:43:56pm

Everything about their ideology is morally bankrupt and all for show, this isn’t surprising, sadly. These people live in such make believe realities that everything they say has to serve that purpose of upholding and justifying their partisan beliefs, so even their parents’ actions are fair game in this reality distortion field. I’d call them mentally ill and then classify tens of millions as also worthy of being put into institutions, but FEMA is already on the case ready to start their extraction plans before Obama leaves office.

He is another one of those fair-weather Christians. He thinks all you need to be “saved” in the coming judgement day is to call yourself Christian. You do not have to follow the words of Jesus, you just wear a cross and go to Church and you can spew hate and judgement at everyone. The American Taliban is a dangerous organization.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
The Pandemic Cost 7 Million Lives, but Talks to Prevent a Repeat Stall In late 2021, as the world reeled from the arrival of the highly contagious omicron variant of the coronavirus, representatives of almost 200 countries met - some online, some in-person in Geneva - hoping to forestall a future worldwide ...
Cheechako
2 days ago
Views: 104 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
2 weeks ago
Views: 270 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1