Video: Keith Olbermann: 176 Reasons Donald Trump Shouldn’t Be President

A mind-boggling list of malfeasance, mendacity and megalomania
Politics • Views: 39,261

YouTube

Keith Olbermann lays out 176 Reasons Donald Trump Shouldn’t Be President; the length of this appalling list is simply mind-boggling. How did we ever get to a point where someone this awful — in every way! — is even close to taking charge of the most powerful office in the world?

Jump to bottom

92 comments
1
Frankie Five Angels  Sep 13, 2016 • 1:51:29pm

Remember when the Republicans warned us that if Bill Clinton was elected president in 1992 the country would be irreversibly damaged? No? Okay, well do you remember when the Republicans warned us that if Barack Obama was elected president in 2008 the country would be irreversibly damaged? No? Okay, well do you remember when Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin warned us that bloodshed would be necessary if Hillary Clinton is elected in 2016?

2
Decatur Deb  Sep 13, 2016 • 1:53:10pm

How did we ever get to a point where someone this awful — in every way! — is even close to taking charge of the most powerful office in the world?

Because the GOP lost control of its rabid wombat shock troops in the Tea Party. Take some solace in the fact that Prince Rebus isn’t any happier than we are.

3
S'latch  Sep 13, 2016 • 1:54:59pm

It is incredibly how low we have fallen. There is much that is seriously wrong that will take generations to repair if is possible to repair.

4
Decatur Deb  Sep 13, 2016 • 1:57:09pm

re: #3 S’latch

It is incredibly how low we have fallen. There is much that is seriously wrong that will take generations to repair if is possible to repair.

Start by redesigning K-8 education, if we can even do that without reaching a working consensus on what “good” is.

5
Frankie Five Angels  Sep 13, 2016 • 1:58:07pm

Keith, you could only come up with 176?

6
piratedan  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:01:38pm

The difficult part is that list has to keep getting updated damn near every day. I understand that the Press has a difficult job keeping up, but for fucks sake, that’s what they’re getting paid to do.

This is just without even VETTING him as a candidate, this is just shit that he’s said and accepted as a candidate

The fact that the MSM is just along for the ride here is simply astounding, it’s as if they’re operating in their own little gated community and none of the statements issued or proposed policy coming from the GOP camp would ever have any effect on them, or their families or people they know. Their lack of curiosity is telling.

7
Charles Johnson  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:05:49pm
8
wrenchwench  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:07:46pm

re: #3 S’latch

It is incredibly how low we have fallen. There is much that is seriously wrong that will take generations to repair if is possible to repair.

Sometimes I think some people who see us as having fallen are only recognizing now how low things have always been for others. [Not meaning you. You seem pretty clear-eyed.]

I see us as rising, and hitting that glass ceiling damn hard. OW!

9
Charles Johnson  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:08:24pm
10
wrenchwench  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:08:54pm

re: #7 Charles Johnson

[Embedded content]

I thought he was joking at first.

11
goddamnedfrank  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:12:03pm
12
Backwoods_Sleuth  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:12:16pm

re: #5 Frankie Five Angels

Keith, you could only come up with 176?

pacing himself…

13
EPR-radar  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:12:52pm

re: #10 wrenchwench

I thought he was joking at first.

I”ll take anything that might knock down Trump’s share of the vote, but (if true), this really shouldn’t be much of a factor compared to Trump’s yuuge portfolio of show-stoppers.

Trump is a liar, bigot and demagogue. Everything else is pretty much irrelevant.

14
EPR-radar  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:14:38pm

re: #11 goddamnedfrank

Determined denial of GOP bigotry is how moderate Republicans earn their horns, bat wings, and cloven hooves.

15
lawhawk  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:16:01pm
16
The Very Reverend Battleaxe of Knowledge  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:16:43pm

re: #7 Charles Johnson

[Embedded content]

[Embedded content]

Tom Eagleton saw a psychiatrist once—CEHCKMATE, LIBTARDS!!11!!

17
Decatur Deb  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:22:03pm

re: #9 Charles Johnson

Whoa if true.
[This tweet has apparently been deleted.]

@kurteichenwald

Too much like the RWNJs’ “We’re saved, Hillary is dying of scrofula!!”

18
lawhawk  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:25:43pm

re: #9 Charles Johnson

Looks like he took down that tweet.

twitter.com

It wouldn’t surprise me that Trump suffers from a long term mental illness of some form. It wouldn’t surprise me that he’s been high functioning all while suffering from a mental illness.

We have no idea if he’s still being treated for a mental illness, that he’s going unmedicated, or that there’s some other underlying ailment affecting his character/judgment.

His actions and statements over the past year remain disqualifying, regardless of the earlier hospitalization or even consideration of mental illness.

What’s worse is that the GOP has steadfastly opposed health care options for folks, and mental health gets short shrift, even when there’s insurance available. Obamacare expands health care options, including for mental health, but GOP and Trump have opposed Obamacare too.

19
EPR-radar  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:27:42pm

re: #17 Decatur Deb

Too much like the RWNJs’ “We’re saved, Hillary is dying of scrofula!!”

I refuse to care about normal political issues in connection with Trump.

I also refuse to care about normal political gossip (e.g., health rumors) in connection with Trump.

IMO these are distractions from the indisputable fact that Trump must not become president because he is a liar, a bigot and a dangerous clown with no clue how to be POTUS.

20
Decatur Deb  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:29:43pm

re: #19 EPR-radar

I refuse to care about normal political issues in connection with Trump.

I also refuse to care about normal political gossip (e.g., health rumors) in connection with Trump.

IMO these are distractions from the indisputable fact that Trump must not become president because he is a liar, a bigot and a dangerous clown with no clue how to be POTUS.

We would be in about as much danger, and have to work just as hard, if a ‘normal’ Republican POS like Walker, Kasich, or Pence were the candidate.

21
EPR-radar  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:34:54pm

re: #20 Decatur Deb

We would be in about as much danger, and have to work just as hard, if a ‘normal’ Republican POS like Walker, Kasich, or Pence were the candidate.

Pretty much, although Trump as POTUS gives rise to a chance of global thermonuclear war that normal Republican candidates don’t.

Most Republicans are dangerous lying bigots, but Trump excels in all three areas, even among his fellow Republicans.

22
makeitstop  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:37:09pm

re: #7 Charles Johnson

Whoa if true.

23
makeitstop  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:38:39pm

re: #22 makeitstop

Whoa if true.

(Posted before seeing Charles’ tweet.)

24
A wild WITHAK appeared!  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:42:50pm

I just came here to post the @kurteichenwald deal.

I am still willing to believe it’s a “whoa if true” story… I guess we’ll find out tomorrow.

25
wrenchwench  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:45:59pm
26
Charles Johnson  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:46:16pm

re: #24 A wild WITHAK appeared!

Nope, he tweeted that the story coming out tomorrow isn’t about this - it’s something else. But he’s obviously got some information, so we’ll see what develops.

27
A wild WITHAK appeared!  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:47:40pm

re: #26 Charles Johnson

Nope, he tweeted that the story coming out tomorrow isn’t about this - it’s something else. But he’s obviously got some information, so we’ll see what develops.

Yup, I gathered that. I just am holding out hope it’s some other kind of bombshell.

28
Timothy Watson  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:49:49pm

re: #27 A wild WITHAK appeared!

Yup, I gathered that. I just am holding out hope it’s some other kind of bombshell.

Short of verified video of Trump engaging in Satanic sacrifices, what would it have to be to get the lamestream media interested?

29
A wild WITHAK appeared!  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:49:58pm

Funny how profile pictures work. I would never have known that Eichenwald is bald without clicking through to see the whole thing. He also appears to have heterochromia.

(This concludes another episode of Things on Twitter That Are Probably Only Interesting to Me, and Mildly So at That.)

30
piratedan  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:51:30pm

re: #26 Charles Johnson

the scary part is, which of the many threads gets pulled….

a) pay for play via the Trump Foundation w/Abbott and Bioni
b) the old rape case coming back around
c) The Russian/Putin angle
d) What Nationalists R ‘Us
e) hiring of undocumented workers
f) one of the many lawsuits coming to a head
g) Melania angle

the scary part is, it could be none of those and still be something incredibly awful, the man is a buffet of shit, it all is shit, just that the texture, odor and color changes…

31
Belafon  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:51:48pm

How we got here is this: a whole lot of Republicans will vote for the Republican over any Democrat, and the fringe of that party has used this to get Trump close to the White House. They have been helped by the Republicans being in control of so many states that they are able to skew elections in their favor. All of the things that have been set up over the decades, such as state elections occurring in off-presidential years, has allowed them to remain in power for far longer than they should. Some of them realize this, though, and are bending and twisting things to stay in power, even if it means breaking the country. It doesn’t help that a large portion of Democrats haven’t figured out what’s happening.

32
A wild WITHAK appeared!  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:52:01pm

re: #28 Timothy Watson

Short of verified video of Trump engaging in Satanic sacrifices, what would it have to be to get the lamestream media interested?

Perhaps something still [mental] health-related, if he’s been on the “Was Trump institutionalized?” trail.

33
Timothy Watson  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:56:01pm
A University of Richmond fraternity has been suspended over what the school called a “grossly offensive” email that described a party as one that “makes fathers afraid to send their daughters away to school.”

The fraternity’s suspension comes as the school faces scrutiny over its handling of alleged sexual assaults after two female students wrote highly critical essays about the university last week on The Huffington Post.

The university has suspended operations, activities and events of Richmond’s Kappa Alpha chapter, pending an investigation into the email, which was sent to about 100 students, the school said in a statement. The fraternity’s national headquarters said in a statement that it has also suspended the chapter due to actions that are contrary to its value of “gentlemanly conduct.”

wtop.com

34
Scottishdragon  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:57:17pm
How did we ever get to a point where someone this awful — in every way! — is even close to taking charge of the most powerful office in the world?

Richard Nixon and the Southern Strategy is probably as good a place as any to start if you want to find the origin of this.

35
Belafon  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:57:30pm

re: #29 A wild WITHAK appeared!

Funny how profile pictures work. I would never have known that Eichenwald is bald without clicking through to see the whole thing. He also appears to have heterochromia.

(This concludes another episode of Things on Twitter That Are Probably Only Interesting to Me, and Mildly So at That.)

Neat. My kids and my eyes are brown around the pupil and green on the rest of the Iris. I now have a name.

36
makeitstop  Sep 13, 2016 • 2:59:47pm

As background to Eichenwald’s tweet, here’s what Trump was doing in 1990 - ruining the career of an honest financial analyst.

Minutes later, when he called the Janney headquarters, he was told to return to the office immediately and was faxed a letter management had received from Donald Trump earlier that morning. In it, Trump expressed “outrage” at Roffman’s disparaging remarks about the Taj and said that he’d long considered Roffman “an unguided missle (sic)” as an analyst. Trump added that he was “planning to institue (sic) a major lawsuit against your firm unless Mr. Roffman makes a major public apology or is dismissed.” Trump has disclaimed any intention of getting Roffman fired and merely wanted him to be more circumspect in communicating his negative views on the Taj.

Upon his return, Roffman was ushered into the office of the firm’s co-chairman Edgar Scott Jr., who, according to Roffman, had shed his usually patrician manner to read Roffman the riot act. Roffman was told that he could no longer talk to the press and was expected to draft and send a letter of apology to Trump the following day.

Afraid of losing his job, the analyst said he complied with the request and the following day dutifully signed the letter to Trump. The tone of the letter was, at once, fawning and groveling. Roffman claimed that “95%” of what he told the WSJ reporter was complimentary of Trump’s casino empire in Atlantic City. In conclusion, Roffman begged Trump, “I do hope that you will let me continue to cover your companies and that you will forgive what has turned out to be a very unfortunate interview on my part.”

Although he claims that he didn’t write the letter, it reflected Roffman’s comments to management. He became especially disturbed when he learned from Trump in a telephone conversation that he planned to publish the letter to make Roffman’s humiliation public. He says Trump even demanded that one sentence in the letter be altered to read “I have every expectation that the Taj will ultimately be very profitable.” In the original Roffman had said he had “every hope.”

[…]

After a sleepless night and a visit to his lawyer, he decided to fax a retraction of his previous day’s letter, directing that the latter missive not be used for any purpose. Trump’s faxed reply to the retraction was direct: “Only a fool, a highly unstable one at that, would send a letter such as your second one negating your original letter. You have proved by these strange and irrational actions to be a great liability to your firm…..I look forward to seeing you and your firm in court.”

Lots more at the link. He was out of control.

37
Big Beautiful Door  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:00:48pm

re: #7 Charles Johnson

[Embedded content]

[Embedded content]

Could be big, if there is evidence. If not, Trump will deny it and there will be no impact.

38
ObserverArt  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:01:08pm

re: #9 Charles Johnson

[Embedded content]

[Embedded content]

Linky no worky.

39
Scottishdragon  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:03:34pm

In related news. the NYT ran a lengthy opinion piece today on how magical balance narratives (which the Times is infamous for) really don’t exist and it is only liberals who hate their super detailed and repetitive reporting on a Clinton charity (which never turned up wrong doing in any event).

40
Big Beautiful Door  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:07:24pm

re: #39 Scottishdragon

[Embedded content]

[Embedded content]

In related news. the NYT ran a lengthy opinion piece today on how magical balance narratives (which the Times is infamous for) really don’t exist and it is only liberals who hate their super detailed and repetitive reporting on a Clinton charity (which never turned up wrong doing in any event).

But the NYT is a liberal rag hopelessly biased in favor of Clinton, don’tcha know.

41
Patricia Kayden  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:10:22pm

re: #11 goddamnedfrank

[Embedded content]

[Embedded content]

He’s okay with normalizing White Supremacy. That’s what.

42
Charles Johnson  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:10:54pm
43
The Very Reverend Battleaxe of Knowledge  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:11:03pm

re: #39 Scottishdragon

[Embedded content]

[Embedded content]

In related news. the NYT ran a lengthy opinion piece today on how magical balance narratives (which the Times is infamous for) really don’t exist and it is only liberals who hate their super detailed and repetitive reporting on a Clinton charity (which never turned up wrong doing in any event).

That was the last straw for Doug J at Balloon Juice:

I just cancelled my online NYT subscription. The public editor’s piece on “The Truth About ‘False Balance’” was the last straw. I can take sneering, and I can take ignorance, but I can’t take ignorant sneering:

The problem with false balance doctrine is that it masquerades as rational thinking. What the critics really want is for journalists to apply their own moral and ideological judgments to the candidates.

Josh Marshall correctly describes the situation at the Times as a crisis.
44
Scottishdragon  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:12:11pm

re: #40 Big Beautiful Door

But the NYT is a liberal rag hopelessly biased in favor of Clinton, don’tcha know.

One of the biggest unreported stories of the last 40 years is how the GOP managed to ‘work the ref’ (IE the press) with a non stop barrage of attacks, insults and threats. The complete inability of the press today to critically examine the GOP and various claims on AGW, racism etc are the result of a 4 decade campaign to wire the media for GOP control.

45
Scottishdragon  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:12:55pm

Gonna lay down for a bit. BBL.

46
Patricia Kayden  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:13:00pm

re: #15 lawhawk

[Embedded content]

[Embedded content]

When does Bondi face any repercussions for taking a bribe?

47
Tigger2  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:14:24pm
48
Patricia Kayden  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:15:22pm

re: #42 Charles Johnson

[Embedded content]

With the polls tightening up to the point where Secretary Clinton is only leading nationally by two points, no one can presume anything. This is a nerve wrecking election.

49
wrenchwench  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:16:13pm

re: #29 A wild WITHAK appeared!

Funny how profile pictures work. I would never have known that Eichenwald is bald without clicking through to see the whole thing. He also appears to have heterochromia.

(This concludes another episode of Things on Twitter That Are Probably Only Interesting to Me, and Mildly So at That.)

Now I learn that I have homochromia. (Both brown.)

50
The Very Reverend Battleaxe of Knowledge  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:16:30pm

re: #46 Patricia Kayden

When does Bondi face any repercussions for taking a bribe?

Yeah, it’s usually the bribee that takes the rap. In the Teapot Dome Scandal, Secretary Fall was convicted of receiving a bribe that Doheny was acquitted of paying him, IIRC.

51
scottslemmons  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:18:51pm

re: #44 Scottishdragon

One of the biggest unreported stories of the last 40 years is how the GOP managed to ‘work the ref’ (IE the press) with a non stop barrage of attacks, insults and threats. The complete inability of the press today to critically examine the GOP and various claims on AGW, racism etc are the result of a 4 decade campaign to wire the media for GOP control.

The question remains — and really, it never even gets considered — how is this problem going to get fixed? (I’ve got my own preferred solution, but it usually gets me yelled at about “That’s not what we want to consider” and “That’s not socially acceptable or constructive” and “Who on earth is going to build a meat grinder as large as that?”) But it’s clear that using the right’s methods of working the refs isn’t going to work for liberals, and the press is all too eager to discount and ignore anyone who isn’t a conservative white male. So how is this problem going to get fixed?

52
Charles Johnson  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:21:22pm
53
jaunte  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:22:41pm
I believe Trump was institutionalized in a mental hospital for a nervous breakdown in 1990, which is why he won’t release medical records.
— Kurt Eichenwald

Maybe this is why Kellyanne Conway was so cranky today.

54
The Vicious Babushka  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:22:58pm

In which Baby Whiplash claims that Hillary supporters are just as “deplorable” as Trump supporters because they are pro-choice and think Black people should not be lynched by police.

55
jaunte  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:24:04pm
56
wrenchwench  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:24:23pm

re: #35 Belafon

Neat. My kids and my eyes are brown around the pupil and green on the rest of the Iris. I now have a name.

I met a young lady with eyes that were half brown and half blue, divided on the diagonal. When she met you, she’d hold a gaze until you let go. Accustomed to stares, I guess.

57
Big Beautiful Door  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:28:26pm

re: #52 Charles Johnson

[Embedded content]

[Embedded content]

Its a bit sad that its stunning that a Presidential candidate would support basic scientific research.

58
piratedan  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:29:25pm

re: #57 Big Beautiful Door

well, not every campaign can attract the best people like Trump does… //////

and ty Samantha Bee:

“Asking” the “Tough” “Questions” (Act 2, Part 1) | Full Frontal with Samantha Bee | TBS

DIY Election Coverage (Act 2, Part 2) | Full Frontal with Samantha Bee | TBS

59
Skip Intro  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:30:08pm

re: #57 Big Beautiful Door

Its a bit sad that its stunning that a Presidential candidate would support basic scientific research.

Quite controversial in the US these days too.

60
gocart mozart  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:30:15pm
61
Jebediah, RBG  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:30:37pm

My first try with the LGF Memeinator.

62
jaunte  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:31:45pm

MAGA dunce caps and now this.

63
Stanley Sea  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:32:04pm

aqr7HL5HJJBUKPRrHnq/1j446C6XL4kUV4p2hsEcq9kUAH4Rez87+SWaIUUNW9bxI2pkZ9YrTkjf4gGozYJYxGHYi/6UzmzDnvQ1qW4gS0z83pZRAN7kUV8I+//0J0Sb9UcuR3CZDQiA7aOGl6RZWVFmyTvtbxhL1XYEYS4kQLHb1moxGa3e7idIu8drNXDhbcg+my23fg+e9Is3+/1M06G/glSlcsjHXrUwe7bGXclYGjYihszvmHFZg+aGbTMFy1kau+ZohC77R3yTTDvS+lek0/DOTcbN

64
MsJ  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:34:05pm

re: #9 Charles Johnson

He deleted it.

65
wrenchwench  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:36:22pm

re: #63 Stanley Sea

[Embedded content]

WlZyijfWmqG/b6qtI64T561TsMbaeIf8v47BhVggEHAF26+Qzp4t5rmnSiQXEeCs1kWZrsWbbNYUzbZvOGtNzbZ2BMY8ZKWiYlKBo7TcGQTO3XQAqnENn37fUAy7FZVxg5MZTEAyIDcFEVXJASa29Jk2icR9o9l68yZNhqZP7ake4zuD48BQLRLlTPStX/IXP7ltYBlcDk4=

66
ObserverArt  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:36:39pm

Don’t know if the full event of President Obama stumping for Hillary today has been posted…but after seeing Charles link a short version I went to see if there was more. Here it ‘tis!

Full Event: President Obama Campaigns for Hillary Clinton in Philadelphia, PA (9-13-2016)

67
makeitstop  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:38:11pm

re: #65 wrenchwench

[Embedded content]

My dad, too. If he wore a self-winding watch, he’d break the spring. For some reason he just overwound them.

68
ObserverArt  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:40:15pm

re: #58 piratedan

well, not every campaign can attract the best people like Trump does… //////

and ty Samantha Bee:

[Embedded content]

Saw some people making a big deal of Samantha calling out Hillary for “tripping over her own dick” and not not being fond of “insulting Americans into voting for her.”

All are in these videos. Bernie fans hang on the negatives.

Sure is a crazy election…it’s like a circular firing squad!

69
makeitstop  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:40:28pm

The DNC better give Donna Brazile that job permanently. She went in on Trump, tying him to Putin in a statement about the latest hack.

“The DNC is the victim of a crime—an illegal cyberattack by Russian state-sponsored agents who seek to harm the Democratic Party and progressive groups in an effort to influence the presidential election,” the statement reads. “There’s one person who stands to benefit from these criminal acts, and that’s Donald Trump. Not only has Trump embraced Putin, he publicly encouraged further Russian espionage to help his campaign. Like so many of the words Trump has uttered this election season, his statements encouraging cybercrime are dangerous, divisive, and unprecedented.”

More of this, please.

71
ObserverArt  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:44:25pm

re: #66 ObserverArt

Don’t know if the full event of President Obama stumping for Hillary today has been posted…but after seeing Charles link a short version I went to see if there was more. Here it ‘tis!

[Embedded content]

Heh…at about 9 mins in someone reminds the Pres that gas is $2 a gallon. He says thanks for reminding him and then says “Thanks Obama!”

He is very aware of the tweets and the ‘net comments.

72
darthstar  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:46:19pm
73
The Vicious Babushka  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:46:32pm

How Jill Stein spent 9/11

74
CuriousLurker  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:47:05pm

re: #63 Stanley Sea

Maybe this will help—saw it this morning and have been saving for you all day. ;-)

75
jaunte  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:47:34pm
76
Stanley Sea  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:50:43pm

re: #74 CuriousLurker

Maybe this will help—saw it this morning and have been saving for you all day. ;-)

[Embedded content]

[Embedded content]

Ty!!!

77
wrenchwench  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:53:01pm

re: #74 CuriousLurker

I just finished reading this:

Not trusting my brain (nor my newness to the topics): Is it as good as it looks?

78
CuriousLurker  Sep 13, 2016 • 3:57:54pm

re: #77 wrenchwench

I just finished reading this:

[Embedded content]

[Embedded content]

Not trusting my brain (nor my newness to the topics): Is it as good as it looks?

I only skimmed it, but it looks good. He She nails the real sectarian problem in the second paragraph (I’ve bookmarked it for later, thanks):

Certainly, the threat of sectarianism is growing. But the Shia-Sunni division is not the most urgent problem. Indeed it is convenient straw man that has detracted attention from the spread of extremely strict and intolerant Wahhabi and Salafi sectarian ideology from the fringes of the Sunni world into the mainstream. This sectarianism by stealth has been expanding globally over the past 30 years. […]

79
wrenchwench  Sep 13, 2016 • 4:00:40pm

re: #78 CuriousLurker

I only skimmed it, but it looks good. He nails the real sectarian problem in the second paragraph (I’ve bookmarked it for later, thanks):

She. I apologize for springing it on you. I feel good and bad at the same time depending on an outside opinion for clarity. (‘Good’ because I have such a good one!)

80
Backwoods_Sleuth  Sep 13, 2016 • 4:05:05pm

re: #54 The Vicious Babushka

In which Baby Whiplash claims that Hillary supporters are just as “deplorable” as Trump supporters because they are pro-choice and think Black people should not be lynched by police.

[Embedded content]

[Embedded content]

ummm…baby whiplash, I don’t believe “deplorable” was based on polling data.
No polling data at all.

81
CuriousLurker  Sep 13, 2016 • 4:11:10pm

re: #79 wrenchwench

She. I apologize for springing it on you. I feel good and bad at the same time depending on an outside opinion for clarity. (‘Good’ because I have such a good one!)

Oops, that’s what I get for not looking at the byline. I only looked at the guy in blog’s header.

82
Backwoods_Sleuth  Sep 13, 2016 • 4:14:36pm

re: #56 wrenchwench

I met a young lady with eyes that were half brown and half blue, divided on the diagonal. When she met you, she’d hold a gaze until you let go. Accustomed to stares, I guess.

My eye color changes from Hazel to Blue to Green depending on humidity or if I’ve been crying or other external forces.
It’s so weird, but it’s been like that all of my life.
MrBWS can always tell when I’m not being truthful when he asks “what’s wrong?” and I say “nothing” and he says “your eyes are very blue, so tell me what’s wrong.”

dammit…he knows.

83
wrenchwench  Sep 13, 2016 • 4:14:50pm

re: #81 CuriousLurker

Oops, that’s what I get for not looking at the byline. I only looked at the guy in blog’s header.

I looked her up. I couldn’t even tell from the tweet.

84
CuriousLurker  Sep 13, 2016 • 4:17:25pm

re: #83 wrenchwench

I looked her up. I couldn’t even tell from the tweet.

I just now peeked at her wiki page. She seems pretty accomplished.

85
wrenchwench  Sep 13, 2016 • 4:17:59pm

re: #82 Backwoods_Sleuth

My eye color changes from Hazel to Blue to Green depending on humidity or if I’ve been crying or other external forces.
It’s so weird, but it’s been like that all of my life.
MrBWS can always tell when I’m not being truthful when he asks “what’s wrong?” and I say “nothing” and he says “your eyes are very blue, so tell me what’s wrong.”

dammit…he knows.

Actively, revealingly heterochromatic. It’s a curse! But sounds so special.

86
Backwoods_Sleuth  Sep 13, 2016 • 4:18:43pm

re: #74 CuriousLurker

Maybe this will help—saw it this morning and have been saving for you all day. ;-)

[Embedded content]

[Embedded content]

needs some goopy poop on that sign, just to make a further point…

87
Backwoods_Sleuth  Sep 13, 2016 • 4:22:06pm

re: #85 wrenchwench

Actively, revealingly heterochromatic. It’s a curse! But sounds so special.

really…it’s just too freaky how it happens.
Every. Damned. Time.

I could never be an uncover secret ops spy person.

curses….

88
wrenchwench  Sep 13, 2016 • 4:25:10pm

re: #87 Backwoods_Sleuth

really…it’s just too freaky how it happens.
Every. Damned. Time.

I could never be an uncover secret ops spy person.

curses….

Special contact lenses. Nope, those can be seen.

89
Backwoods_Sleuth  Sep 13, 2016 • 4:26:10pm

re: #88 wrenchwench

Special contact lenses. Nope, those can be seen.

yep…

grrr…

90
TedStriker  Sep 13, 2016 • 4:27:01pm

re: #39 Scottishdragon

[Embedded content]

[Embedded content]

In related news. the NYT ran a lengthy opinion piece today on how magical balance narratives (which the Times is infamous for) really don’t exist and it is only liberals who hate their super detailed and repetitive reporting on a Clinton charity (which never turned up wrong doing in any event).

re: #40 Big Beautiful Door

But the NYT is a liberal rag hopelessly biased in favor of Clinton, don’tcha know.

The Old Grey Lady’s been reduced to turning tricks at Trump Tower.

91
dangerman  Sep 13, 2016 • 4:27:21pm

re: #31 Belafon

How we got here is this: a whole lot of Republicans will vote for the Republican over any Democrat, and the fringe of that party has used this to get Trump close to the White House. They have been helped by the Republicans being in control of so many states that they are able to skew elections in their favor. All of the things that have been set up over the decades, such as state elections occurring in off-presidential years, has allowed them to remain in power for far longer than they should. Some of them realize this, though, and are bending and twisting things to stay in power, even if it means breaking the country. It doesn’t help that a large portion of Democrats haven’t figured out what’s happening.

92
Dizzy  Sep 14, 2016 • 5:51:26am

I agree with so much of what Olbermann says, but the main reason why I dislike Olbermann persists. The clip is a great way to highlight the full Trump story but the hyperbole that he inserts into his speech does not make his argument stronger. On the contrary it give his opponents a perch with which to launch fallacious rebuttals. It also weakens his talking points instead of strengthening them by giving the impression that he has to resort to overstatements to make his point.


This article has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
The Pandemic Cost 7 Million Lives, but Talks to Prevent a Repeat Stall In late 2021, as the world reeled from the arrival of the highly contagious omicron variant of the coronavirus, representatives of almost 200 countries met - some online, some in-person in Geneva - hoping to forestall a future worldwide ...
Cheechako
2 days ago
Views: 89 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
2 weeks ago
Views: 258 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1