Pages

Jump to bottom

3 comments

1 freetoken  Sun, Oct 25, 2009 4:16:59pm

More trash from notorious AGW denier Bob Carter.

2 MurphyB  Sun, Oct 25, 2009 4:47:06pm

“Denier”? Where is the data then?

“Denier”? Where has the null hypothesis been confirmed? All you have are models. You have no science. The truth does employ professional liars, also known as politicians, to make its case.

BTW “Denier” was used a a label for persons who willfully discredited the occurrence of the Holocaust. Encarta:
the systematic extermination of millions of European Jews, as well as Roma, Slavs, intellectuals, gay people, and political dissidents, by the Nazis and their allies during World War II. In popular usage, Holocaust refers particularly to the extermination of European Jews.

Employing the term as you have, is abhorrently vile.

3 Mad Prophet Ludwig  Mon, Oct 26, 2009 11:25:23am

re: #2 MurphyB

“Denier”? Where is the data then?

“Denier”? Where has the null hypothesis been confirmed? All you have are models. You have no science. The truth does employ professional liars, also known as politicians, to make its case.

BTW “Denier” was used a a label for persons who willfully discredited the occurrence of the Holocaust. Encarta:
the systematic extermination of millions of European Jews, as well as Roma, Slavs, intellectuals, gay people, and political dissidents, by the Nazis and their allies during World War II. In popular usage, Holocaust refers particularly to the extermination of European Jews.

Employing the term as you have, is abhorrently vile.

You need to get a grip. You are not a persecuted Jew. This has nothing to do with the murder of my relatives.

The fact that you even bring that up when confronted with your anti-science screeds only makes you a cad.

You are a denier of the science. So is Bob Carter.

Now if you would like to ever look at the actual science with all the data you would like, please go ahead.

As to this specific case, the data were peer revied back in the day. The data were subject to analysis back in the day. These are not the only data sets, and there is no instance that somehow all of the tens of thousands of researchers with millions of data sets together are making it all up.

You would like to believe that there was one set of findings done 30 years ago, that no one looked at critically, that no other work was ever done, and that everything is based on this one set of very old and since superseded data.

That is just stupid.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
The Pandemic Cost 7 Million Lives, but Talks to Prevent a Repeat Stall In late 2021, as the world reeled from the arrival of the highly contagious omicron variant of the coronavirus, representatives of almost 200 countries met - some online, some in-person in Geneva - hoping to forestall a future worldwide ...
Cheechako
Yesterday
Views: 83 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
2 weeks ago
Views: 255 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1