Pages

Jump to bottom

5 comments

1 iceweasel  Fri, Jul 23, 2010 12:35:37pm

Excellent post. Really glad someone did a thorough page on the Franken amendment and what happened. Cheers Ludwig!

2 Mad Prophet Ludwig  Fri, Jul 23, 2010 12:40:37pm

re: #1 iceweasel

Excellent post. Really glad someone did a thorough page on the Franken amendment and what happened. Cheers Ludwig!

I was furious about it at the time. I posted it up and down. It was actually this particular case that crystallized my hatred of the GOP.

I was never particularly pro GOP, but this was the one that made me realize they were all (all the congress critters at least) souless shits and immoral to the core.

3 captdiggs  Fri, Jul 23, 2010 1:03:12pm

78 republicans voted FOR the bill.
Not that you’d know it from the way things are presented here.

The underlying rage and hatred of the GOP here, by some, is making some here look no different than Pamela Geller.

4 freetoken  Fri, Jul 23, 2010 1:22:13pm

re: #3 captdiggs

Dude, the point is 100% of the nay vote was (R). That makes it look like a political party making a political decision based on party beliefs. The majority of (R) in the house voted nay.

And no, it is not Geller-like to point that out, and unlike Geller LGF gives actual links to the data, as Charles did in the keypost.

5 Mad Prophet Ludwig  Fri, Jul 23, 2010 1:31:05pm

re: #3 captdiggs

78 republicans voted FOR the bill.
Not that you’d know it from the way things are presented here.

The underlying rage and hatred of the GOP here, by some, is making some here look no different than Pamela Geller.

Not the Franken amendment.

They all were quite lock step in protecting Haliburton from a pesky law suit or criminal charges to its male employees - should some woman whine about trivialities like:

gang rape and sodmization,

threats of losing her job for talking

and being imprisoned in a cargo crate for two days.

They were just fine with that. And do look up the text of the amendment. It was as narrowly defined to the issue of not allowing the government to contract with companies that force arbitrations in such cases. There was NOTHING absolutely NOTHING to bitch about. They were just protecting their corporate masters at the expense of American women.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
The Pandemic Cost 7 Million Lives, but Talks to Prevent a Repeat Stall In late 2021, as the world reeled from the arrival of the highly contagious omicron variant of the coronavirus, representatives of almost 200 countries met - some online, some in-person in Geneva - hoping to forestall a future worldwide ...
Cheechako
2 days ago
Views: 92 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
2 weeks ago
Views: 259 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1