Pages

Jump to bottom

3 comments

1 Timmeh  Sat, Jul 31, 2010 7:36:03pm

I wouldn’t extrapolate current trends to continue at the same rates for the next 15 years.

The same projections were made for Japan at the height of their economic bubble in the late 80s. It is a little more realistic perhaps to imagine that China will achieve what Japan could not based on its size, but it is not inevitable.

Assuming this does happen, I suspect that China will evolve into a more benign power, but I really have no idea.

2 freetoken  Sat, Jul 31, 2010 8:05:27pm

re: #1 Timmeh

Generally speaking projections have not been based on China continuing in the future at the pace it has the past 10 years. If 11% growth is what happened recently, some are saying that 5 or 6% annual growth is to be expected over the couple of decades.

Even that will be tough with energy supplies limited. Which explains why China is planning on building hundreds of nuclear power plants, as well as being the world leader in wind and solar.

I don’t know what to expect of China as a society and a nation. I hope they become more relaxed in many of their stances, but they are now acting so mercantilistically that they may overplay their hand in Africa and Asia and start some real trouble.

This is not to say that we, the US, ought to make China out to be the boogeyman. Rather, we need to accept that we no longer will get our way in many international relations.

3 Bob Levin  Sun, Aug 1, 2010 2:27:05am

re: #2 freetoken

Capitalism has changed quite a bit over my lifetime. The post WWII paradigm was one of raising the standard of living around the world—so that other countries will demand our products.

Essentially, our economy is one phase ahead of China’s. They have yet to build ecological effects into their idea of growth. This has to be done—it needed to be done in 19th century England, 20th century America, and it’s going to have to happen to 21st century China. I believe I posted something the other day about 40% of China’s water is unusable even for industrial purposes.

So our economic base has to move towards ecological products and services, and they are going to need to purchase those things.

The world economic game is no longer about dominance, as it was as the world crept up to two World Wars, but rather interconnectedness.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
The Pandemic Cost 7 Million Lives, but Talks to Prevent a Repeat Stall In late 2021, as the world reeled from the arrival of the highly contagious omicron variant of the coronavirus, representatives of almost 200 countries met - some online, some in-person in Geneva - hoping to forestall a future worldwide ...
Cheechako
3 days ago
Views: 119 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
2 weeks ago
Views: 280 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1