The Village of the Banned has decided that I am guilty of spreading blood libel against Jews, and that this entire site is guilty of it as well, because I have not been banned for it.

I don’t really like to give much attention to the folks over at “The Village of the Banned”, a bizarre online colony of former LGF posters who were banned for wanting to murder all Muslims, and or impose a theocracy in the US. Today is different though, because the Village is accusing myself and LGF of being guilty of spreading a medieval kind of hate speech towards Jews called blood libel. I draw the line at somebody calling me an anti-Semite.

Why are they exactly?

Well, in short, the folks at the Village are all pretty insane. Random things that would not set off normal people make them go crazy. This time, it just so happens to be the fact that I pointed out that Sweden does not hate Jews. Apparently by doing so, I too am now guilty of being a Jew-hater because the Village is convinced Sweden is anti-Jew. If you honestly believe that Sweden is one of the most anti-Jewish nations on earth, then you need to seek psychiatric help. Evidence that a small group of immigrants vandalized some Jewish property in one city is not evidence of an entire nation dedicated to Jew hate. Neither is the fact that Sweden condemns Israel for military actions undertaken by the IDF. Sweden condemns Hamas too, even goes to far as to boycott Hamas. The Swedes are neutral and pacifists, and condemn fighting wherever they see it. Abhorrence of violence is not Jew hate.

So how does this make me guilty of blood libel?

Well, like I stated above, the Village was convinced Sweden hates Jews. Evidence for this at the Village consisted of a story that was run by a Swedish tabloid that investigated the repeated and unanswered claims by Palestinians that dead Palestinians were coming back from IDF autopsies with organs missing from their bodies. The Village claimed this was blood libel on behalf of Sweden because the story run by this private tabloid was not true. Well, turns out after further investigation, that the story was in fact true. Israel admitted it had an autopsy doctor who was stealing organs from corpses and selling them. He did this all during the 90s. I informed the Village of their mistake in not accepting that the story had merit, and in an attempt to refute me, they started a thread dedicated to accusing me of blood libel with some citations to other contrary news stories. The problem with those other news stories? They all denied the organ theft claim, saying it was untrue, yet all of them came out a few months before the Israeli government admitted to it. Woopsie. Better luck next time Rodan, Speranza.

So the Palestinians who complained the IDF was bringing back corpses of Palestinians killed in fighting with organs missing was correct. The reporter reported on what Palesitinians told him. He didn’t reach any conclusions as to a giant organ-stealing conspiracy. He just reported the facts of what he saw and heard. How is this blood libel? Especially when organ theft is taking place? Furthermore, how is it blood libel for me to point out this fact? I dunno, but I’m pretty sure the problem is on the Village’s end.

…I think there’s only one possible conclusion for the way their brains work so defectively. Cheeto dust. These are fully-grown men who were banned from LGF years ago who sit around the computer munching cheetos, and stalking every move made at LGF, either by Charles or any poster. Over the years, they must have inhaled metric tons of Cheeto dust, eventually building up so much in their brains over time that they are no longer capable of reading or understanding things printed in English. It’s the only plausible answer.