Pages

Jump to bottom

7 comments

1 Virginia Plain  Wed, Dec 1, 2010 9:20:32am

Glenn Beck is pushing this falsehood to his rabid followers because his corporate masters know that if enough of his followers make enough noise, then the FCC will keep the rules as is. And Comcast, AT&T and others can do whatever they want.

2 nines09  Wed, Dec 1, 2010 11:13:51am

Beck once again shows who he truly is to anyone that takes his advice and LOOKS UP THE FACTS.
Glenn Beck=Lying sack of shit.
So I guess "This is opinion, not news" Billy Boy called him out on it? Or did he leave it dangle there for consumption? Let me guess.

3 AuralityKev  Wed, Dec 1, 2010 1:09:32pm

I wish it were only Glenn Beck pushing this ridiculous falsehood. I lean to the right politically but am in IT by trade. Net Neutrality is completely necessary in order to keep the internet thriving. Katz's definition is pretty close to what it actually is. Packets across a network are treated as equal to one another, regardless of whether they come from cocacola.com, pepsi.com, or reallypoorlittlecolamanufacturer.com. Everyone gets a fair shake. Comcast couldn't highly prioritize cocacola.com over any other traffic in order to solicit more money from Coke.

4 fantasmaguero  Wed, Dec 1, 2010 2:22:31pm

When a fellow from The Heritage Foundation has to correct Republicans, from their left...wow.

5 riggbeck  Thu, Dec 2, 2010 4:30:06am

The Fairness Doctrine was a badly flawed idea. If both sides (and why must there be only two sides?) must be represented in every controversial issue, then we sometimes get served a plate of steaming dingo's kidneys. A side effect is bland journalism that's afraid to offend.

Controversy is generated by interest groups. The obvious example is the push for teaching Creationism alongside Evolution in science. The mantra is: Teach the Controversy.

Nonsense. Teach the scientifically verifiable theory. And in the media, present the issues based on fact, not delusion.

Not having a Fairness Doctrine does mean that we get the nutjobs in splendid isolation, without the opposing arguments, but since when does rational argument matter to them? And from the other point of view, arguing with nutjobs gives them a spurious legitimacy, as if a flat earth was as likely as an oblate spheroid.

Terry Pratchett notwithstanding, who is a wise, humane, extremely funny writer, and therefore the polar opposite of a swivel-eyed nutjob.

6 Decatur Deb  Thu, Dec 2, 2010 4:50:34am

re: #5 riggbeck

The Fairness Doctrine was a badly flawed idea. If both sides (and why must there be only two sides?) must be represented in every controversial issue, then we sometimes get served a plate of steaming dingo's kidneys. A side effect is bland journalism that's afraid to offend.

Controversy is generated by interest groups. The obvious example is the push for teaching Creationism alongside Evolution in science. The mantra is: Teach the Controversy.

Nonsense. Teach the scientifically verifiable theory. And in the media, present the issues based on fact, not delusion.

Not having a Fairness Doctrine does mean that we get the nutjobs in splendid isolation, without the opposing arguments, but since when does rational argument matter to them? And from the other point of view, arguing with nutjobs gives them a spurious legitimacy, as if a flat earth was as likely as an oblate spheroid.

Terry Pratchett notwithstanding, who is a wise, humane, extremely funny writer, and therefore the polar opposite of a swivel-eyed nutjob.

It was also justified by the notion that the broadcast spectrum is a 'limited' publicly-owned resource. Since that public ownership hasn't been exerted over a supposedly unlimited internet, there is no serious argument to force "fair" access. Freedom of the press works best for people who own presses.

7 riggbeck  Thu, Dec 2, 2010 6:04:31am

re: #6 Decatur Deb

It was also justified by the notion that the broadcast spectrum is a 'limited' publicly-owned resource. Since that public ownership hasn't been exerted over a supposedly unlimited internet, there is no serious argument to force "fair" access. Freedom of the press works best for people who own presses.

I agree that the broadcast spectrum is a limited publicly-owned resource. The Fairness Doctrine, however, was a feeble attempt to ameliorate the worst excesses of corporate ownership. I'd compare it to Obama's Health Care Bill, where he has handed over the uninsured to the corporations. Without a strong public option, the illusion of choice is meaningless.

Similarly, without a strong, impartial public option for the news media, the Fairness Doctrine was just a sticking plaster on a gaping wound. It would be much more effective to restrict ownership so no corporation could gain undue influence. But that would be political suicide.

After 20 years in the US, I've now returned to the UK, where I'm enjoying the BBC. It has critics from both sides, which tells me it's getting the impartiality thing about right.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2021-06-05 2:51 pm PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds Tweet

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Square Cash Shop at amazon
as an LGF Associate!
Recent PagesClick to refresh
#Thegreatpoolpondconversion - 210919Saturday afternoon was spent leveling and starting this mosaic It's almost all recycled pieces from other projects.We got about half way through and had enough. Sunday we hauled some more dirt over and finished it up. The eyesore trash cans ...
Dangerman
2 days, 13 hours ago
Views: 182 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 3
Tweets: 0 •
The Stranglers - This Song (Official Video) This Song' is out on 10th Sept 2021 on Coursegood: slinky.toTaken from the new album 'Dark Matters' by The Stranglers: slinky.to Special thanks to Stuart Pearce. thestranglers.co.ukfacebook.cominstagram.com@StranglersSiteLyrics:I’m collecting all these feelings for youPut them in a box in a ...
Thanos
3 days, 15 hours ago
Views: 337 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 1 •
Jukebox the Ghost - Cheers! (Lyric Video) “Cheers!” out now: jukeboxtheghost.lnk.to“Cheers!” Lyrics Here's to more of the everyday, raise a glass and sing along, the outcasts and the underdogs On the benches, on the sidelines, wallflowers: this is our time ordinary people every dayIn the nosebleeds, ...
Thanos
6 days, 14 hours ago
Views: 430 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Tweets: 2 •
An Epic Takedown Appears to Be in the WorksAn epic takedown of Facebook is afoot: But going back to the WSJ series on Facebook, the quote in today's paper is priceless: "A now-former executive questioned the idea of overhauling Instagram to avoid social comparison. 'People use Instagram because ...
Eric The Fruit Bat
1 week ago
Views: 2,352 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Tweets: 3 •
#Thegreatpoolpondconversion - 210912We got our replacement solar panel.Figured we'd install, then take readings to sort of know if something was wrong in the future.One panel at a time, then pairs of 2, then all 3. Because they all connect to one feed ...
Dangerman
1 week ago
Views: 467 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 5
Tweets: 0 •
#Thegreatpoolpondconversion - 210905Not having that third solar panel for 3 weeks, it’s clear now that we definitely needed the upgrade when we decided in November. 3 puts us over the top of more electricity than consumption. Still no ETA so we turned ...
Dangerman
2 weeks ago
Views: 714 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 4
Tweets: 0 •
Evangelicals and the Limits of Evangelical EmpathyLink to the article at: alternet.org She writes of her own experience where she turned against evangelicals. Here are the critical paragraphs to think about. And this will bring me to the ongoing evangelical moral panic over exvangelicals, those who ...
JOE 🥓
2 weeks, 2 days ago
Views: 752 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 3 •
How Did the United States Treat the Creator of…The SaintJust a reminder of how one Leslie Charteris was treated by the Chinese Exclusion Act…and California’s anti-Chinese laws. Just in case you didn’t know, Leslie Charteris was the creator of this literary figure… Charteris himself wasn’t far removed from his ...
JOE 🥓
2 weeks, 4 days ago
Views: 1,026 • Comments: 1 • Rating: 5
Tweets: 3 •