Pages

Jump to bottom

7 comments

1 freetoken  Wed, Dec 8, 2010 7:39:23pm
If it were determined that he was involved in a “deal”, he should be brought up on charges of conspiracy of defrauding the taxpayers.

You keep going down this path of silliness.

It'll get you no farther than those who are demanding his birth certificate.

2 mikiesmoky2  Wed, Dec 8, 2010 7:57:14pm

re: #1 freetoken

Freetoken,
Thank you for your comment, but if you have read my other e-mails, which reflected serious circumstantial evidence, I am surprised at your "silliness" characterization.
Further, I said, "IF it were determined that he was involved in a "deal".
I suggest that the circumstantial evidence is powerful that a "deal" was made.
You equate this to the "birthers"? LOL
Come on! Please, give me a break.

Again, thank you for your comments.

michael

3 Political Atheist  Wed, Dec 8, 2010 8:01:13pm

Overstatement after overstatement. This poster may do well to switch to decaf or at the least less time spend with the punditry.

If it were determined that he was involved in a “deal”, he should be brought up on charges of conspiracy of defrauding the taxpayers.

If there were more than mere circumstantial evidence as interpreted by a severe critic the point could be take more seriously.

The most rational and logical answer is that there never was any intention to allow those “tax errors” to expire.

That is not the most rational interpretation.

4 mikiesmoky2  Wed, Dec 8, 2010 8:18:29pm

re: #3 Rightwingconspirator

REGARDING:

Overstatement after overstatement. This poster may do well to switch to decaf or at the least less time spend with the punditry.
RESPONSE: RWC, what "pundits" do you think I follow or consider. You know me better than to make such a comment.

If it were determined that he was involved in a “deal”, he should be brought up on charges of conspiracy of defrauding the taxpayers.

REGARDING: If there were more than mere circumstantial evidence as interpreted by a severe critic the point could be take more seriously.
RESPONSE: "....mere circumstantial evidence" - RWC, you may not realize this, but circumstantial evidence, in many cases, is stronger than direct evidence.

The most rational and logical answer is that there never was any intention to allow those “tax errors” to expire.

REGARDING: That is not the most rational interpretation.


RESPONSE: Okay, give it your best shot.

re: #3 Rightwingconspirator

5 Political Atheist  Wed, Dec 8, 2010 9:09:22pm

re: #4 mikiesmoky2
On the pundits-Just my impression. If you come to have this emotional response absent that influence, so be it.

The simpler more rational explanation is the obvious pull and tug of DC politics. there is no good evidence for any grad conspiracy as you suggest. Great claims require great evidence. You do not have it, at least not shown here. While circumstantial evidence can be powerful it is easily overmatched by physical evidence-locations, records, emails etc. Show me some evidence like that and your point will be far stronger. IMO.

As to this
CONCLUSION: Anyone who votes to extend the Bush tax errors regarding T.I.’s in excess of $250,000, whether temporarily or permanently, should be Impeached and ousted.

Umm,no. While a call to vote against anyone who votes to extend the Bush tax cuts, aka tax relief, need not face impeachment, as that is not actually anywhere close to the appropriate level of misconduct for that remedy. Calling for impeachment like this is just bluster and evidence of an over wrought rhetoric.

6 Political Atheist  Wed, Dec 8, 2010 9:11:33pm

re: #5 Rightwingconspirator

Whoops. "grand" conspiracy. Not grad.

7 mikiesmoky2  Wed, Dec 8, 2010 9:24:01pm

re: #5 Rightwingconspirator

The circumstantial evidence is quite powerful. Please review the November 12, 2010 posting, which is noted within this posting.

The main unanswered question is "why didn't the House vote on the extension for those with T.I.'s under $250,000 prior to the November election?

Think about it..................


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh