Pages

Jump to bottom

4 comments

1 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sun, Nov 27, 2011 11:09:29am
So where’s the problem? The problem is that it’s all lip service on the right! Those who most-loudly proclaim Faith In Blind Markets (FIBM) are generally also those proclaiming idolatry of private property as a pure, platonic essence, a tenet to be clutched with religious tenacity, as it was in feudal societies. Obdurate, they refuse to see that they are conflating two very different things.

Private property - as Adam Smith made clear - is a means for encouraging the thing he really wanted: fair and open competition.  Indeed, the propertarian reforms that Peru instituted under the guidance of Hernando de Soto, vesting the poor in the land they had always farmed, resulted in a boom that delighted both libertarians and socialists.  Safe and secure property rights are a boon... up to a point.

But anyone who actually reads Adam Smith also knows that he went on and on about that "fair and open" part! Especially how excessive disparities of wealth and income destroy competition. Unlike today's conservatives, who grew up in a post-WWII flattened social order without major wealth-castes, Smith lived immersed in class-rooted oligarchy, of the kind that ruined markets, freedom and science across nearly 99% of human history. He knew the real enemy, first hand and denounced it in terms that he never used for mere bureaucrats.

When today's libertarians praise the creative power of competition, then ignore the unlimited propertarianism that poisoned it across the ages, we are witnessing historical myopia and dogmatic illogic, of staggering magnitude.

I don't think that there is an "idolatry of property" on the Right, as Brin suggests in the headline. It's more an idolatry of the "private" part of the "private property" notion (and an implicit understanding that this privation shall only be legimitately held by a group that they prefer).

(By the by: The reference to feudalism is misleading, since the existence of property was extremely limited in feudal society, and the various questions of wealth distribution were very much not a matter of faith back then – more one of philosophical debate, like with Huguccio, William of Ockham, Thomas of Aquinus, Hostiensis, Bonagratia of Bergamo etc. even though the debate is often sketchy at best)
(Another by the by: Brin's charge of "essentialism" is ridiculous, given that his own argument is essentialist)

The article of faith is the dichotomy of good private individual versus evil collectivist state (or, in the extreme Paulian version the sovereign citizen against the corporatist New World Order). The economic notion of property is reduced to this political dichotomy and thereby almost completely misunderstood. I fear, btw, that Brin is also susceptible to this because he seems to reduce economic activity to any kind of decision-making.

The only grain of truth in this right-wing paradigm is that from a very limited point of view, any sort of welfare or social safety net will neccessarily include a wealth transfer from the wealthier to the poorer, will neccessarily somehow have to be deducted from the available net property. Of course, this view conveniently ignores that the installation, implementation and maintenance of a reasonable safety net is a prudent way of preventing the state from eventually collapsing under the weight of poverty or from taking over completely to avoid its own collapse. And in this I agree with Brin, namely that wealth disparity is a bad because it tends to make things worse, while a periodic economic egalitarianism tends to make things better.

On a related note, "safe and secure property rights" are not just a "boon", they are absolutely essential. Markets do not exist without prior establishment of property (i.e. that which is traded on markets); markets are a secondary phenomenon, macro-economically speaking. (By the by, I think it's of limited use to try and claim Adam Smith for neoclassical thought circling around markets and optimal allocation)

2 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Sun, Nov 27, 2011 11:16:49am

Just another comment:

the unlimited propertarianism that poisoned [competition] across the ages

I don't get what Brin means by "propertarianism". If he wanted to, for instance, refer to feudalism: Again, there was very little property at all then, if any, simply because very few people could be considered to have been free enough to have been actual proprietors, having been able to make use of the full scope of economic operations in relation to property (sell, buy, borrow, lease, rent, encumber, etc.). Strong property rights under a law that applies equally to all instead of a sovereign commanding arbitrarily and interacting with other sovereigns anarchically are a very recent development.

3 windsagio  Sun, Nov 27, 2011 1:00:55pm

by the way juante, I think it was you who linked to Brin's blog a few weeks back, with his Miller rebuttal.

Thanks for reminding me that blog exists, its always a really good read :D

4 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Thu, Dec 1, 2011 3:18:10am

This major premise by Brin is fundamentaly flawed btw:

That something is the most creative force in the universe. The principle that propels evolution, in nature, and that brought humanity into existence. It is --

Competition.

And what is the most competitive enterprise humans can engage in?

War


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2016-01-01 10:29 am PST
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds Tweet

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Recent PagesClick to refresh
Seth Meyers: Is Devin Nunes Investigating Trump or Working With Him?Seth takes a closer look at the House Intelligence Committee's investigation into the Trump administration's alleged ties to Russia.
teleskiguy
5 minutes ago
Views: 12 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 0 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Congress Just Killed Your Internet Privacy Protections - Mar. 28, 2017 Make and assert your own privacy. It's important for us all. Oh and take names, remember who did this. The House of Representatives voted Tuesday to repeal Internet privacy protections that were approved by the Federal Communications Commission in ...
Unshaken Defiance
54 minutes ago
Views: 61 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 1 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
U.S. Judge Finds That Aetna Deceived the Public About Its Reasons for Quitting Obamacare Aetna executives had moved heaven and earth to conceal their decision-making process from the court, in part by discussing the matter on the phone rather than in emails, and by shielding what did get put in writing with the ...
Unshaken Defiance
4 hours, 12 minutes ago
Views: 117 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Tweets: 1 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Tuffs Not Enuff PageThe tools of economics, science and law applied to well-known public policy issues. Where the Alt-Right and other interests sell doubt, we do what we can to construct sharp problem definitions and reach equally sharp conclusions. Evidence matters.
tuffsnotenuff
4 hours, 22 minutes ago
Views: 58 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 0 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
No, My Right to Abortion Did Not Cost Hillary the Election Yesterday, New York Times op-ed contributor and religious professor Thomas Groome popped up as the latest in a long line of bros getting it wrong at our newspaper of record about what cost Hillary the election. His take? Trump ...
Birth Control Works
7 hours, 50 minutes ago
Views: 111 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Tweets: 0 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
The Fred Rogers Company Statement Regarding Federal Funding for Public Broadcasting For more than two generations of Americans, The Fred Rogers Company has partnered with CPB and PBS to share what Fred Rogers called an “expression of care” for children and families through broadcast and digital media as well as ...
Birth Control Works
8 hours, 9 minutes ago
Views: 109 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 0 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
What’s Missing in Our Coverage of South Sudan’s Civil War In South Sudan, a civil war has now entered its fourth year of tearing open ethnic divisions and displacing millions. Since its onset in 2013, the conflict has threatened to pave a path to genocide and has led to ...
Birth Control Works
9 hours, 46 minutes ago
Views: 108 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 0 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Faux-Science- -Inside the Academic Journal That Corporations Love - Pacific Standard A recent lawsuit against Monsanto offers a clear and troubling view into industry strategies that warp research for corporate gain. In a lawsuit regarding the possible carcinogenicity of the pesticide Roundup, plaintiffs’ lawyers suing Monsanto charge the company with ...
Birth Control Works
9 hours, 51 minutes ago
Views: 122 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 0 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 1
Comments: 0
: 1
Cowboy Cookies Recipe - NYT Cooking Ingredients 3 cups all-purpose flour 1 tablespoon baking powder 1 tablespoon baking soda 1 tablespoon ground cinnamon 1 teaspoon salt 1 ½ cups (3 sticks) butter, at room temperature 1 ½ cups granulated sugar 1 ½ cups packed light-brown ...
The Vicious Babushka
14 hours, 11 minutes ago
Views: 112 • Comments: 1 • Rating: 1
Tweets: 0 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Foreigners Behind California Breakup Effortssalon.com Two Brexit British operators hired to promote Cali-Divorce, Russia behind efforts on both Left and Right to break apart California. This is consistent with higher ups in the Russian Government and Military publicly stating their desire to break apart ...
Rocky-in-Connecticut
14 hours, 35 minutes ago
Views: 100 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 0 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0