Pages

13 comments

Jump to bottom
1 Targetpractice  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 5:00:56pm

Don't have to even get that far into the decision to see how badly Orly and company screwed the pooch. Obama and his lawyer being no-shows would have meant an automatic ruling in their favor, but they demanded the case be ruled on its merits, no doubt as a means of avoiding the whole thing falling apart in appeals. The judge proceeded to let the carnival roll along, hearing each witness, including the "experts" that Orly's totting around...and then ruled that the case has absolutely no merit and shit-canned it.

Without a doubt, there will be appeals, but this judge covered his bases well. He didn't like being shown up by the White House, but he didn't let that color his judgment. Good on him.

2 aagcobb  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 5:07:27pm

re: #1 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

Without a doubt, there will be appeals, but this judge covered his bases well. He didn't like being shown up by the White House, but he didn't let that color his judgment. Good on him.

And those appeals will be complete failures just like every other case brought by the birthers.

3 Lidane  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 6:21:54pm

Outraged Freepers are outraged:

[Link: www.freerepublic.com...]

4 calochortus  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 7:06:42pm

re: #3 Lidane

Legal analysis from FR:

I guess the argument that your dad has to be a US Citizen doesn’t apply any longer. We lose...I guess it’s time to give up this angle. No way is anyone going to rule that he’s not natural born—that would screw up so much stuff they just can’t allow it.

This is presumably based on Minor v. Happersett, which if I understand it correctly, had to do with whether women were citizens, and if so, shouldn't they have the right to vote? The decision said yes they were citizens if their father was a citizen, but not all citizens could vote.
I believe we have moved on from there and women are citizens in their own right, so yeah, that doesn't apply any longer. Good call.

5 JamesWI  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 8:24:13pm

re: #3 Lidane

Outraged Freepers are outraged:

[Link: www.freerepublic.com...]

LOL....

The only way is for the candidates to expose his ineligibility and prosecute him!

This is the last straw!
The GA judge just rules that he is nbc because he is born in Hawaii!
Never mind his bc is proven to be fake, never mind authenticating it! obozo intimidates all of them. They will never do the right thing! There is no way out except to have the candidates exposing him. Romney, Gingrich, Santorum need to gang up on Obama and challenge him in public to prove that he was born to 2 US citizens or get out of the WH!

We need to yell out to them at their campaign stops to demand that they expose obama’s ineligibility! There is no time to waste!

Please.....please try to get your candidates to do this! It would be excellent!
---

And this one is telling.....

To: iontheball
"I guess we will just have to vote the POS out in Nov."

What a shame. I was was hoping we could find a way around that. Its frightening to leave this up to the American People.
191 posted on Friday, February 03, 2012 6:00:35 PM by Doe Eyes

Can't let Democracy work! We have to try to kick him out by making shit up in the courts! And if the courts rule against us, we'll whine about how "democracy" is dead, and just ignore the delicious irony!

6 aagcobb  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 9:20:07pm

I feel sorry for Malihi. He did his job, and now crazed birthers are maligning him across the internet as a traitor, corrupt or cowardly.

7 JamesWI  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 9:40:38pm

re: #4 calochortus

Legal analysis from FR:

This is presumably based on Minor v. Happersett, which if I understand it correctly, had to do with whether women were citizens, and if so, shouldn't they have the right to vote? The decision said yes they were citizens if their father was a citizen, but not all citizens could vote.
I believe we have moved on from there and women are citizens in their own right, so yeah, that doesn't apply any longer. Good call.

Reading that entire case, I find that their argument is even more pathetic than I thought it was. Listening to the birthers talk about, you'd think the Supreme Court said "Only people whose parents are BOTH citizens can be considered 'natural-born.'

Here, on the other hand, is what the Court had to say about "natural-born citizens":

Additions might always be made to the citizenship of the United States in two ways: first, by birth, and second, by naturalization. This is apparent from the Constitution itself, for it provides [n6] that "no person except a natural-born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President," [n7] and that Congress shall have power "to establish a uniform rule of naturalization." Thus new citizens may be born or they may be created by naturalization.

The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts.

So what the Court actually says, is that there have never been any doubts that a person born in the country, to parents who are citizens, are "natural-born". Then, the Court says that authorities have also considered anyone born in the US to be "natural-born," and that, while there have been doubts raised to that, they're not even going to bother going into it. And it doesn't go into what happens if the father is a citizen but the mother isn't, or the mother is a citizen but the father isn't.

THIS.....is their "smoking gun"???? This is what is causing them to go into a rage when the judge "ignores" the case?

Good grief. I should have expected this level of stupidity from Birthers, but still.....sometimes it surprises you.

8 aagcobb  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 10:05:01pm

re: #7 JamesWI

Wingnuts in general, and the subset known as birthers in particular, believe what they want to believe, facts be damned.

9 Tigger2  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 10:21:22pm

re: #5 JamesWI

LOL...

Please...please try to get your candidates to do this! It would be excellent!
---

And this one is telling...

Can't let Democracy work! We have to try to kick him out by making shit up in the courts! And if the courts rule against us, we'll whine about how "democracy" is dead, and just ignore the delicious irony!

This one takes the cake.

"I guess the argument that your dad has to be a US Citizen doesn’t apply any longer. We lose...I guess it’s time to give up this angle. No way is anyone going to rule that he’s not natural born—that would screw up so much stuff they just can’t allow it."

What part of Obamas "Mom" being a US Citizan do these idiots not understand.

10 JamesWI  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 10:23:46pm

re: #9 Tigger2

This one takes the cake.

"I guess the argument that your dad has to be a US Citizen doesn’t apply any longer. We lose...I guess it’s time to give up this angle. No way is anyone going to rule that he’s not natural born—that would screw up so much stuff they just can’t allow it."

What part of Obamas "Mom" being a US Citizan do these idiots not understand.

I guess they want to take us back to the days of the Founding Fathers.....specifically, back to the time when wives were considered their husband's property and not an actual "citizen."

11 JamesWI  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 10:32:02pm

re: #9 Tigger2

Also, I liked how some of them were complaining about Malihi apparently using dicta from the previous Birther case in Indiana. (For those who are not so legally-inclined, dicta are the parts of the written judicial opinion that are not legally binding because they extend beyond the issues before the Court, but are still often considered authoritative or persuasive).

Which is ironic, considering their supposed "definition" of Natural-born citizen is...........dicta......in Minor v. Happersett.

12 calochortus  Sat, Feb 4, 2012 8:50:21am

re: #10 JamesWI

Minor v. Happersett apparently found that women were both citizens and property... This was in the 1850s as I recall.
Women and children derived their citizenship from their husband or father as recently as the early parts of the 20th century. When my grandfather became a citizen in the early years of the century his wife and children were listed on his petition and became citizens with him.
Heck, in the 1970s adult women were charged in- or out of state tuition at some colleges based on what state their husbands were residents of. You could change your status just by getting married, without ever setting foot out of the state.

Many conservative men seem to long for those days.Women do not appear to be quite as much on board with that position.

And yes, the birthers are desperate and grasping at straws.

13 calochortus  Sat, Feb 4, 2012 8:58:43am

Oh, there was also some excitement at FR because this decision means Bobby Jindal and Marco Rubio are also qualified to, be president and won't that just frost the liberals! Except that I don't know a single liberal who would have claimed they weren't qualified by birth as natural born citizens.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

TwitterFacebook

Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing!
Take advantage of our New Year subscription special, and save 25% off the normal subscription price! For a limited time, one-year ad-free subscriptions are just $59.95. Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing now and save!
Read more...

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form
LGF Pages

This button leads to the main index of LGF Pages, our user-submitted articles. You can post your own LGF Pages simply by registering a free account with us.

Create a Page

This is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.

Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.

Last updated: 2014-12-15 2:06 pm PST

LGF User's Guide
Recent Pages
Thanos
Religious Land Use Appeal Looks to ‘Hobby Lobby’
Free Registration might be required at the link. In this case the Church wants to use it's land to feed the hungry, and admirable cause, while the city wants to "prevent crime." A federal appeals court on Monday will hear ...

1 hour, 38 minutes ago
Views: 64 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
SteveMcGaziBolaGate
Sign this petition
Please click on this link and sign the petition if you think this might help:wh.gov we petition the obama administration to:appoint the First Lady to lead the effort to increase vaccination rates for children to 100%. In light of the ...

8 hours, 42 minutes ago
Views: 66 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Souliren
Frank Sanatra and Sammy Davis Jr.
More: This is Great Art.Disclaimer: it's an a few still photos of Sinatra and Sammy Davis with an audio track singing Me and my Shadow. Ignore the video. Close your eyes. Everone who participated in this has been a part ...

11 hours, 49 minutes ago
Views: 83 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Rightwingconspirator
Tighten the Rules on E-Cigarettes? Is This Good Oversight?
The state report is not, however, an objective assessment. It obviously includes only the most damaging information about e-cigarettes. For example, some other studies have found potentially encouraging signs that vaping might help some smokers quit. In other words, ...

1 day, 18 hours ago
Views: 260 • Comments: 3
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5
FemNaziBitch
Mississippi Wouldn’t Allow This Teacher to Show Kids How to Use a Condom. His Simple Solution Is Brilliant.
More: Mississippi Wouldn't Allow This Teacher to Show Kids How to Use a Condom. His Simple Solution Is Brilliant.

2 days, 1 hour ago
Views: 235 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Khal Wimpo
Chuck C. Johnson boosting Twitter via fake followers
...in related news, water found to be wet. It's become common for politicians and companies looking to puff up their social profiles to "buy" followers from shady-ass sploggers. Which works when you're starting up, but after you start to get ...

3 days, 10 hours ago
Views: 741 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 149 • Rating: 6
aagcobb
The Average American Household Was Poorer in 2013 Than It Was in 1983 - Vox
Matthew Yglesias, Vox: The Average American Household Was Poorer in 2013 Than It Was in 1983 - Vox US net worth rose considerably over that period, which is what you would expect to see. Technology has improved and productivity increased, ...

3 days, 10 hours ago
Views: 275 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4
Lumberhead
Scott Walker’s Divisive Message
If any candidate could run a rigid campaign of polarization--aimed at winning as many white voters as possible--it's Walker. His language is already there. In his Iowa speech, he touted voter-identification laws and portrayed disadvantage as a pure product ...

3 days, 10 hours ago
Views: 428 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 5 • Rating: 4
Rocky-in-Connecticut
Republican Governor’s State-Run Media Outlet
I guess Republicans are against state-run enterprises except when they are for it. Indiana Governor (R) to start up State-Run official mouthpiece news outlet.indystar.com Hey- If a nice guy Republican/Tea Party favorite like Putin can have his own state-run mouthpiece, ...

3 days, 17 hours ago
Views: 299 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4
Skip Intro
Republican Net Neutrality Bill Would Gut FCC’s Authority Over Broadband
The party of pure evil strikes again. Net neutrality legislation unveiled by Republicans today would gut the ability of the Federal Communications Commission to regulate the broadband industry. As expected, the bill forbids the FCC from reclassifying broadband as a ...

1 week, 5 days ago
Views: 708 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 2 • Rating: 6
 Frank says:

Whereever you're going, don't walk there first. If you do, people will think you know where you're going.