Pages

Jump to bottom

13 comments

1 Targetpractice  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 5:00:56pm

Don't have to even get that far into the decision to see how badly Orly and company screwed the pooch. Obama and his lawyer being no-shows would have meant an automatic ruling in their favor, but they demanded the case be ruled on its merits, no doubt as a means of avoiding the whole thing falling apart in appeals. The judge proceeded to let the carnival roll along, hearing each witness, including the "experts" that Orly's totting around...and then ruled that the case has absolutely no merit and shit-canned it.

Without a doubt, there will be appeals, but this judge covered his bases well. He didn't like being shown up by the White House, but he didn't let that color his judgment. Good on him.

2 aagcobb  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 5:07:27pm

re: #1 Targetpractice, Worst of Both Worlds

Without a doubt, there will be appeals, but this judge covered his bases well. He didn't like being shown up by the White House, but he didn't let that color his judgment. Good on him.

And those appeals will be complete failures just like every other case brought by the birthers.

3 Lidane  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 6:21:54pm

Outraged Freepers are outraged:

[Link: www.freerepublic.com...]

4 calochortus  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 7:06:42pm

re: #3 Lidane

Legal analysis from FR:

I guess the argument that your dad has to be a US Citizen doesn’t apply any longer. We lose...I guess it’s time to give up this angle. No way is anyone going to rule that he’s not natural born—that would screw up so much stuff they just can’t allow it.

This is presumably based on Minor v. Happersett, which if I understand it correctly, had to do with whether women were citizens, and if so, shouldn't they have the right to vote? The decision said yes they were citizens if their father was a citizen, but not all citizens could vote.
I believe we have moved on from there and women are citizens in their own right, so yeah, that doesn't apply any longer. Good call.

5 JamesWI  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 8:24:13pm

re: #3 Lidane

Outraged Freepers are outraged:

[Link: www.freerepublic.com...]

LOL....

The only way is for the candidates to expose his ineligibility and prosecute him!

This is the last straw!
The GA judge just rules that he is nbc because he is born in Hawaii!
Never mind his bc is proven to be fake, never mind authenticating it! obozo intimidates all of them. They will never do the right thing! There is no way out except to have the candidates exposing him. Romney, Gingrich, Santorum need to gang up on Obama and challenge him in public to prove that he was born to 2 US citizens or get out of the WH!

We need to yell out to them at their campaign stops to demand that they expose obama’s ineligibility! There is no time to waste!

Please.....please try to get your candidates to do this! It would be excellent!
---

And this one is telling.....

To: iontheball
"I guess we will just have to vote the POS out in Nov."

What a shame. I was was hoping we could find a way around that. Its frightening to leave this up to the American People.
191 posted on Friday, February 03, 2012 6:00:35 PM by Doe Eyes

Can't let Democracy work! We have to try to kick him out by making shit up in the courts! And if the courts rule against us, we'll whine about how "democracy" is dead, and just ignore the delicious irony!

6 aagcobb  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 9:20:07pm

I feel sorry for Malihi. He did his job, and now crazed birthers are maligning him across the internet as a traitor, corrupt or cowardly.

7 JamesWI  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 9:40:38pm

re: #4 calochortus

Legal analysis from FR:

This is presumably based on Minor v. Happersett, which if I understand it correctly, had to do with whether women were citizens, and if so, shouldn't they have the right to vote? The decision said yes they were citizens if their father was a citizen, but not all citizens could vote.
I believe we have moved on from there and women are citizens in their own right, so yeah, that doesn't apply any longer. Good call.

Reading that entire case, I find that their argument is even more pathetic than I thought it was. Listening to the birthers talk about, you'd think the Supreme Court said "Only people whose parents are BOTH citizens can be considered 'natural-born.'

Here, on the other hand, is what the Court had to say about "natural-born citizens":

Additions might always be made to the citizenship of the United States in two ways: first, by birth, and second, by naturalization. This is apparent from the Constitution itself, for it provides [n6] that "no person except a natural-born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President," [n7] and that Congress shall have power "to establish a uniform rule of naturalization." Thus new citizens may be born or they may be created by naturalization.

The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts.

So what the Court actually says, is that there have never been any doubts that a person born in the country, to parents who are citizens, are "natural-born". Then, the Court says that authorities have also considered anyone born in the US to be "natural-born," and that, while there have been doubts raised to that, they're not even going to bother going into it. And it doesn't go into what happens if the father is a citizen but the mother isn't, or the mother is a citizen but the father isn't.

THIS.....is their "smoking gun"???? This is what is causing them to go into a rage when the judge "ignores" the case?

Good grief. I should have expected this level of stupidity from Birthers, but still.....sometimes it surprises you.

8 aagcobb  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 10:05:01pm

re: #7 JamesWI

Wingnuts in general, and the subset known as birthers in particular, believe what they want to believe, facts be damned.

9 Tigger2  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 10:21:22pm

re: #5 JamesWI

LOL...

Please...please try to get your candidates to do this! It would be excellent!
---

And this one is telling...

Can't let Democracy work! We have to try to kick him out by making shit up in the courts! And if the courts rule against us, we'll whine about how "democracy" is dead, and just ignore the delicious irony!

This one takes the cake.

"I guess the argument that your dad has to be a US Citizen doesn’t apply any longer. We lose...I guess it’s time to give up this angle. No way is anyone going to rule that he’s not natural born—that would screw up so much stuff they just can’t allow it."

What part of Obamas "Mom" being a US Citizan do these idiots not understand.

10 JamesWI  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 10:23:46pm

re: #9 Tigger2

This one takes the cake.

"I guess the argument that your dad has to be a US Citizen doesn’t apply any longer. We lose...I guess it’s time to give up this angle. No way is anyone going to rule that he’s not natural born—that would screw up so much stuff they just can’t allow it."

What part of Obamas "Mom" being a US Citizan do these idiots not understand.

I guess they want to take us back to the days of the Founding Fathers.....specifically, back to the time when wives were considered their husband's property and not an actual "citizen."

11 JamesWI  Fri, Feb 3, 2012 10:32:02pm

re: #9 Tigger2

Also, I liked how some of them were complaining about Malihi apparently using dicta from the previous Birther case in Indiana. (For those who are not so legally-inclined, dicta are the parts of the written judicial opinion that are not legally binding because they extend beyond the issues before the Court, but are still often considered authoritative or persuasive).

Which is ironic, considering their supposed "definition" of Natural-born citizen is...........dicta......in Minor v. Happersett.

12 calochortus  Sat, Feb 4, 2012 8:50:21am

re: #10 JamesWI

Minor v. Happersett apparently found that women were both citizens and property... This was in the 1850s as I recall.
Women and children derived their citizenship from their husband or father as recently as the early parts of the 20th century. When my grandfather became a citizen in the early years of the century his wife and children were listed on his petition and became citizens with him.
Heck, in the 1970s adult women were charged in- or out of state tuition at some colleges based on what state their husbands were residents of. You could change your status just by getting married, without ever setting foot out of the state.

Many conservative men seem to long for those days.Women do not appear to be quite as much on board with that position.

And yes, the birthers are desperate and grasping at straws.

13 calochortus  Sat, Feb 4, 2012 8:58:43am

Oh, there was also some excitement at FR because this decision means Bobby Jindal and Marco Rubio are also qualified to, be president and won't that just frost the liberals! Except that I don't know a single liberal who would have claimed they weren't qualified by birth as natural born citizens.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2021-06-05 2:51 pm PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds Tweet

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Square Cash Shop at amazon
as an LGF Associate!
Recent PagesClick to refresh
#Thegreatpoolpondconversion - 210919Saturday afternoon was spent leveling and starting this mosaic It's almost all recycled pieces from other projects.We got about half way through and had enough. Sunday we hauled some more dirt over and finished it up. The eyesore trash cans ...
Dangerman
1 day, 4 hours ago
Views: 121 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 3
Tweets: 0 •
The Stranglers - This Song (Official Video) This Song' is out on 10th Sept 2021 on Coursegood: slinky.toTaken from the new album 'Dark Matters' by The Stranglers: slinky.to Special thanks to Stuart Pearce. thestranglers.co.ukfacebook.cominstagram.com@StranglersSiteLyrics:I’m collecting all these feelings for youPut them in a box in a ...
Thanos
2 days, 6 hours ago
Views: 253 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 1 •
Jukebox the Ghost - Cheers! (Lyric Video) “Cheers!” out now: jukeboxtheghost.lnk.to“Cheers!” Lyrics Here's to more of the everyday, raise a glass and sing along, the outcasts and the underdogs On the benches, on the sidelines, wallflowers: this is our time ordinary people every dayIn the nosebleeds, ...
Thanos
5 days, 5 hours ago
Views: 361 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Tweets: 2 •
An Epic Takedown Appears to Be in the WorksAn epic takedown of Facebook is afoot: But going back to the WSJ series on Facebook, the quote in today's paper is priceless: "A now-former executive questioned the idea of overhauling Instagram to avoid social comparison. 'People use Instagram because ...
Eric The Fruit Bat
6 days ago
Views: 2,277 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Tweets: 3 •
#Thegreatpoolpondconversion - 210912We got our replacement solar panel.Figured we'd install, then take readings to sort of know if something was wrong in the future.One panel at a time, then pairs of 2, then all 3. Because they all connect to one feed ...
Dangerman
6 days, 9 hours ago
Views: 395 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 5
Tweets: 0 •
#Thegreatpoolpondconversion - 210905Not having that third solar panel for 3 weeks, it’s clear now that we definitely needed the upgrade when we decided in November. 3 puts us over the top of more electricity than consumption. Still no ETA so we turned ...
Dangerman
1 week, 6 days ago
Views: 655 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 4
Tweets: 0 •
Evangelicals and the Limits of Evangelical EmpathyLink to the article at: alternet.org She writes of her own experience where she turned against evangelicals. Here are the critical paragraphs to think about. And this will bring me to the ongoing evangelical moral panic over exvangelicals, those who ...
JOE 🥓
2 weeks, 1 day ago
Views: 699 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 3 •
How Did the United States Treat the Creator of…The SaintJust a reminder of how one Leslie Charteris was treated by the Chinese Exclusion Act…and California’s anti-Chinese laws. Just in case you didn’t know, Leslie Charteris was the creator of this literary figure… Charteris himself wasn’t far removed from his ...
JOE 🥓
2 weeks, 3 days ago
Views: 963 • Comments: 1 • Rating: 5
Tweets: 3 •