Pages

Jump to bottom

10 comments

1 WINDUPBIRD DISEASE [S.K.U.M.M.]  Sat, Feb 18, 2012 9:41:56pm

they're so evil! I have to laugh at how evil these shits are

2 RoadWarrior  Sat, Feb 18, 2012 10:54:51pm

Nobody should have the right to limit the reward to anyone else's labor. If someone doesn't like how much a CEO earns, they are free to build an organization to acquire shares in that company and change the board of directors. Why should I care if Mark Zuckerberg has $20 billion? It doesn't hurt me. I wasn't going to get any piece of that money if he didn't earn it. I'm certainly not entitled to his shares. I really do not care. I need to focus on what I can do for the world. Maybe, one day, I can figure out how to contribute something that people appreciate, as well.

3 Timmeh  Sat, Feb 18, 2012 11:14:41pm

re: #2 RoadWarrior

Nobody should have the right to limit the reward to anyone else's labor. If someone doesn't like how much a CEO earns, they are free to build an organization to acquire shares in that company and change the board of directors. Why should I care if Mark Zuckerberg has $20 billion? It doesn't hurt me. I wasn't going to get any piece of that money if he didn't earn it. I'm certainly not entitled to his shares. I really do not care. I need to focus on what I can do for the world. Maybe, one day, I can figure out how to contribute something that people appreciate, as well.

The problem as I see it though is that the rewards are not always distributed according to actual contributions but usually according to bargaining power. Rank-and-file workers today have very little bargaining power, whereas CEOs and boards of directors have immense bargaining power, and can basically set their own salaries.

Bargaining power is not the necessarily the same as "earning." For example, if you are dying of thirst in a desert, I could sell you a bottle of water for $1000. It might be worth it to you but the premium I receive is due to bargaining power, not because I "earned" it.

4 celticdragon  Sun, Feb 19, 2012 5:17:30am

re: #3 Timmeh

The problem as I see it though is that the rewards are not always distributed according to actual contributions but usually according to bargaining power. Rank-and-file workers today have very little bargaining power, whereas CEOs and boards of directors have immense bargaining power, and can basically set their own salaries.

Bargaining power is not the necessarily the same as "earning." For example, if you are dying of thirst in a desert, I could sell you a bottle of water for $1000. It might be worth it to you but the premium I receive is due to bargaining power, not because I "earned" it.

This.

Something else to consider is that American worker productivity has increased by about thirty percent in the last thirty five years. Pay has stagnated and even gone down in that time (especially in the last ten years) while executive compensation has roughly quintupled.

Things that make you "hmmm".

5 Obdicut  Sun, Feb 19, 2012 5:21:33am

re: #2 RoadWarrior

Nobody should have the right to limit the reward to anyone else's labor.

The subject, in general, is not labor, but the use of capital to produce revenue.

If someone doesn't like how much a CEO earns, they are free to build an organization to acquire shares in that company and change the board of directors.

They're also free to point out that the compensation is not actually based on the contribution to society, but just what the market will bear.

Why should I care if Mark Zuckerberg has $20 billion? It doesn't hurt me.

To have money aggregate among a small percentage of the population slows the velocity of money, dampens R&D, inhibits education, and impoverishes the nation. Traditionally, capitalism has been defended as the best system to guard aggainst the accretion of money into claves; to have it defended now because it accretes money into claves is fucking weird.

I need to focus on what I can do for the world. Maybe, one day, I can figure out how to contribute something that people appreciate, as well.

Who do you think contributes more to the world-- Jimmy Wales, or Zuckerberg? Atul Gawande, or Rush Limbaugh?

We used to care how people made their money. Now we just fetishize big incomes regardless of their source.

6 Achilles Tang  Sun, Feb 19, 2012 7:44:52am

re: #1 windupbird is in the gravity well

they're so evil! I have to laugh at how evil these shits are

Evil would be nice, but I'm afraid it is simply stupidity with a very close horizon (as comes from reading certain books too literally).

7 Achilles Tang  Sun, Feb 19, 2012 7:46:34am

re: #2 RoadWarrior

You really haven't thought much about this, have you? Can you spell oligarchy, for example? Do you know what it means?

8 Romantic Heretic  Sun, Feb 19, 2012 8:17:42am

I giggle every time somebody defends ludicrously large management salaries. It's not surprising though.

Our society suffers from two major delusions in this regard. The first is that people in management positions are capitalists, and that the higher they sit on the hierarchy the more capitalistic they are. This isn't true. These people are employees, nothing more. They don't own the company. They run little or no risk managing it. Even things like stock options are merely an illusion of ownership as such options are designed to make sure the manager they are assigned to never actually loses money.

The other delusion is that capitalist are wealthy. Which is another untruth. Most capitalists lose their shirts. At best they make a decent living. Saying being a capitalist is a path to wealth is like saying playing football is a path to the NFL. In real life, most of us end up sitting in the stands watching the truly skilled play.

Finally, many of those alleged CEOs are removed from reality by yet another layer. They are in finance rather than industry. We like to think that the stock market and all the other investment tools are capitalism, but in actuality it is speculation, gambling. A person who owns stocks doesn't really buy a piece of a company. They buy betting chits where they get a return on whether they bet intelligently or luckily.

Worse, most of the gamblers are not individuals anymore. They are institutions, abstract entities. Any money made through these entities gambling stays inside these entities and is bet yet again. This system may grow, but little of the money in this system ends up in the economy at large.

Now this system of finance resembles a tumour. Like a tumour it is spreading out of control, sucking up the body's resources and poisoning it as well.

Okay, done ranting. Have a good day.

9 nines09  Sun, Feb 19, 2012 8:18:50am

You can only hope that the luster doesn't wear off of Rick and he gets the nomination.

10 philosophus invidius  Sun, Feb 19, 2012 9:53:13am
people rise to different levels of success based on what they contribute to society

So I guess the creators of "Jersey Shore" and the Megaupload guy must have really contributed a lot to society.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2016-01-01 10:29 am PST
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds Tweet

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Recent PagesClick to refresh
Latest IoT DDoS Attack Dwarfs Krebs Takedown at Nearly 1Tbps Driven by 150K Devices If you thought that the massive DDoS attack earlier this month on Brian Krebs’ security blog was record-breaking, take a look at what just happened to France-based hosting provider OVH. OVH was the victim of a wide-scale DDoS attack ...
Thanos
42 minutes ago
Views: 79 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 5 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Off-Duty Cop Who Killed Delrawn Small Indicted on Murder Charges A city cop was indicted Monday on second-degree murder charges in the road-rage shooting death of driver Delrawn Small, who was killed in a July 4 confrontation with the off-duty officer, sources said. The cop, Wayne Isaacs, will be ...
Thanos
46 minutes ago
Views: 60 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 1 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Gov. Christie Was Happy to Hear of Fort Lee Gridlock: Ex-Crony Gov. Christie was “happy” when he learned that gridlock had overwhelmed Fort Lee following the mayor's refusal to endorse his reelection, his former loyalist at the Port Authority testified Tuesday. David Wildstein recalled in Newark Federal Court that he ...
Thanos
51 minutes ago
Views: 51 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 0 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Bomb Blasts Strike Mosque, Congress Center in Germany City of Dresden BERLIN (Reuters) - Two improvised bombs exploded in the eastern German city of Dresden on Monday evening ― one at a mosque and one at an international conference center ― but no one was injured, police said on Tuesday. ...
Thanos
3 hours, 35 minutes ago
Views: 89 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 1 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Like 2016 Campaign, First Presidential Debate Defied Conventional Patterns Clinton suggested Trump was hiding something and said he may have paid no federal income tax at all. “That makes me smart,” Trump said. “So if he’s paid zero, that means zero for troops, zero for vets, zero for ...
Thanos
3 hours, 54 minutes ago
Views: 83 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 0 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Donald Trump Fell for Hillary Clinton’s Trap at Monday’s Presidential Debate The Clinton campaign’s greatest fear throughout the general election has been that some other Trump would emerge ― a more measured, reasonable and mature man, one who might look like he was ready for the Oval Office. That man ...
Thanos
3 hours, 58 minutes ago
Views: 92 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Tweets: 0 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Factbox: Market Participants React to U.S. Presidential Debate JAMES ATHEY, INVESTMENT MANAGER AT ABERDEEN ASSET MANAGEMENT: "What we're seeing in markets this morning is a small, collective sigh of relief because most commentators, and the few polls that have been released, suggest Clinton won the debate. Equities ...
Thanos
4 hours ago
Views: 91 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 2 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
The Laowa 24mm F/14 2x Macro Lens Is Super Weird I'd say just use it indoors or on private property. Unless you want to look like an open carry gun guy. Interesting concept for certain kinds of images. Just maybe not near a Presidential motorcade. Venus Optics are quickly ...
Great White Snark
1 day ago
Views: 186 • Comments: 1 • Rating: 1
Tweets: 1 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Pharma Company Boosts the Price of an Old Acne Cream 3,900% The greedy, price-hiking ways of Turing, Mylan, Valent, and countless others are breaking out like blemishes across the face of the pharmaceutical industry. So it may come as no surprise that a simple acne cream, called Aloquin, saw its ...
Thanos
1 day, 17 hours ago
Views: 461 • Comments: 1 • Rating: 4
Tweets: 81 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 1
Comments: 0
: 1
Punishing Doubt [Cc] patreon.comAn examination of the religious condemnation of doubt.--Alex Gibney'Mea Maxima Culpa - Silence in the House of God'HBO--Alexander Bede Walsh abuse casebbc.co.uk--Os Guinness'God in the Dark: The Assurance of Faith Beyond a Shadow of Doubt'Crossway Books.--Abul Ala Maududi [Sayyid ...
Thanos
1 day, 17 hours ago
Views: 270 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 0 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0