Occupy Wall Street: A Future in Politics?
As Occupy Wall Street regroups for upcoming spring demonstrations, the movement has re-entered the headlines, but not for the marches and arrests seen last fall.
In January, Nathan Kleinman, a member of the Occupy Philadelphia movement, became what is believed to be the first person from the Occupy movement to run for Congress. Kleinman told Politico when he filed for his candidacy, “You need 1,000 signatures and a hundred dollars. It’s a pretty low bar.” He has taken to Twitter and Facebook to promote what will likely be an uphill fight against Democratic incumbent Allyson Schwartz.
Then, just this week, John Paul Thornton of Decatur, Ala., filed paperwork to create the Occupy Wall Street Political Action Committee. The filing created some buzz on Occupy’s message boards, with many questioning whether it’s possible to fight corruption by partaking in tools that many feel allow for the corruption in the first place.
So do these developments signal a shift in Occupy’s focus from demonstrations to political engagement? The short answer is no.” Occupy erupted because the political system is corroded and corrupted, many would say completely broken,” says William Dobbs, a press liaison from Occupy Wall Street’s New York base. “There are lots of approaches, but you can’t fix a legislature with a person or a PAC.”
From the beginning, Occupy Wall Street has been a diffuse movement with no single leader, centered on the message that the political and financial systems have catered only to the country’s elite. Throughout the fall, when I asked Occupiers about political engagement, the answers were as diverse as the people demonstrating. Many wanted to jump in and change the system; just as many, if not more, wanted to steer clear of politics completely and focus on removing greed and corruption. “We want to be a squeaky wheel for economic justice outside of the system to get the attention of those in power.” Dobbs says.