Pages

Jump to bottom

4 comments

1 SidewaysQuark  Thu, May 17, 2012 10:40:43am

My (possibly wrong) understanding of this is that, given the quantity of natural gas available in Vermont, that this is kind of like banning snowshoes in Bermuda.

2 Locker  Thu, May 17, 2012 10:43:25am

re: #1 SidewaysQuark

My (possibly wrong) understanding of this is that, given the quantity of natural gas available in Vermont, that this is kind of like banning snowshoes in Bermuda.

Can’t really comment on that but it does set an example. Personal opinion of course.

3 Feline Fearless Leader  Thu, May 17, 2012 12:42:05pm

If there’s natural gas in Vermont in any quantity it’s probably not black shale based.

tin.er.usgs.gov

4 lawhawk  Thu, May 17, 2012 1:41:17pm

None of the current natural gas - oil shale plays underway in the US involve Vermont. The closest is the Northeastern part of the Marcellus shale formation that runs into upstate NY and extends towards Albany, NY. So, it’s not like there is going to be any hydrofracking in Vermont anytime soon since there aren’t any oil shale formations with recoverable amounts within Vermont.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh