Pages

Sign InRegisterForgotten password?

RebelmouseTwitterFacebook
Advertisement

16 comments

Jump to bottom
1 jvic  Tue, May 22, 2012 1:43:58pm

1. The national elites have been running the country in an unsustainable manner for years. That most emphatically includes the scientific elites, except one might replace 'years' with 'decades' in the previous sentence.

2. The vulnerabilities of US basic research have been taking shape for decades. They have received grossly inadequate attention from the scientific establishment because the overall enterprise was booming.

3. There is absolutely no acknowledgment in the NYT piece that some of US physics' problems may be its own doing.

4. There is absolutely no acknowledgment in the NYT piece that there is more to physics than space and fundamental particles. (Or so I presume: afaik Steven Chu's Nobel Prize was not in either of those areas.)

5. IMO the NYT piece is a schlocky piece of special pleading. IMHO American science is in a serious, worsening, godawful mess to whose creation it has contributed significantly. Give us more money is not a serious prescription.

6. NB: In principle I favor major increases in US funding for basic & applied research, but not under the rubric of business as usual.

2 Obdicut  Tue, May 22, 2012 5:19:33pm

re: #1 jvic

Can you back up any of your points, please?

3 jvic  Wed, May 23, 2012 6:37:18am

Can you back up any of your points, please?

Descriptions of the Physics Nobel Prize by subfield can be found at nobelprize.org. An insider's view of particle physics can be found at the Not Even Wrong blog and in the book of the same name. There may well be graduate student chat sites with a bottom-up perspective similar to what I hear from a professor friend who talks to me off the record.

4 Obdicut  Wed, May 23, 2012 12:46:37pm

re: #3 jvic

Seriously, that's your backup for a vast condemnation of the state of physics in America and basically blaming physicists themselves for the problems?

That you've got a friend who talks to you 'off the record'?

Why not on the record? Professors don't tend to be shy about complaining about the state of affairs.

5 jvic  Wed, May 23, 2012 2:19:09pm

I see no indication that you have examined the sites I mentioned, let alone that you have looked for the grad student forums whose existence I hypothesized.

And I am not interested in responding to hyperbolic questions.

6 Obdicut  Wed, May 23, 2012 2:24:16pm

re: #5 jvic

I see no indication that you have examined the sites I mentioned, let alone that you have looked for the grad student forums whose existence I hypothesized.
.

You seriously are upset I didn't go out looking for hypothetical fucking grad student forums? Seriously?

Holy shit.

You haven't backed up your claims in the least. All you have is bare assertion.

7 TDG2112  Wed, May 23, 2012 2:26:34pm

jvic,
I have to side Obdicut here. I don't see you doing any serious work to back up your points at all. Certainly not in articulating them.

8 wrenchwench  Wed, May 23, 2012 2:43:39pm

re: #1 jvic

I'm curious about this claim in particular:

1. The national elites have been running the country in an unsustainable manner for years. That most emphatically includes the scientific elites, except one might replace 'years' with 'decades' in the previous sentence.

Can you elaborate? Or clarify?

9 TDG2112  Wed, May 23, 2012 2:53:18pm

Okay, back to my original line of thought when I read the page's posting:

Much better articulation of the article and the argument being made by the article is by Neil deGrass Tyson. He is very often pointing out that we are falling behind other nations in science, and this will effect our economy in a big way in the future. He lays out the impact of science on the US economy, namely in how it spurs innovation. Space exploration is one of the best ways to spur scientific innovation as it brings together all the different sciences, plus engineering. We're looking for life, Biologists, we're looking at other planets, geologists, we are of course studying physics and astrophysics as well as chemistry going on out there. And then you have to get there.

Short version on youtube:

To the point, short and designed for Congress members to digest:

Long, rambling and targeting an audience involved in space exploration:

The article that got him invited to Congress:
[Link: www.foreignaffairs.com...]

Otherwise just, search YouTube for his stuff. He has been banging on this topic for years. Dig deep enough and his argument is that Republicans SHOULD be in favor of funding science more than anyone (he worked for Bush and uses the experience to say they are all about making money, therefore funding science to spur American Innovation SHOULD BE a no-brainer). He doesn't talk about Tang, or "spin-offs" from the space program. He talks about Innovation and the culture thereof.

I can't say for sure but it seems he is trying to make an argument that Republicans can pick up and run with that Democrats won't object too much too.

Anyways, that is my rambling random thoughts on the subject. Apologies if it isn't anymore coherent than anyone else's.

10 jvic  Wed, May 23, 2012 4:02:29pm

re: #7 TDG2112

jvic, I have to side Obdicut here. I don't see you doing any serious work to back up your points at all. Certainly not in articulating them.

TDG2112, the condition of US physics, chemistry, etc was decades in the making. I tried to indicate that I understand the problem, let alone the solution, imperfectly; the IMO and IMHO in my original comment were not expressed casually.

My post consists of assertions by someone whose standing to opine is neither verifiable nor stated. Granted. However, note that I indicated two references: the specialties of Physics Nobel Laureates, and Columbia lecturer Peter Woit's dissident blog about fundamental physics. And note the evidence which Obdicut introduced to rebut my opinion:

Professors don't tend to be shy about complaining about the state of affairs, says Obdicut regarding my anonymous physics professor friend. My friend's grants, which represent summer salary and money to run his lab, are awarded via peer review. Not surprisingly, some peers are more equal than others. My friend does not openly alienate the most influential people in his specialty because he is one of many qualified competitors vying for the same money.

11 jvic  Wed, May 23, 2012 5:27:43pm

re: #8 wrenchwench

I'm curious about this claim in particular:

1. The national elites have been running the country in an unsustainable manner for years. That most emphatically includes the scientific elites, except one might replace 'years' with 'decades' in the previous sentence.

Can you elaborate? Or clarify?

You put your finger on my most generalized, judgment-callish point, but I'll try.

At least three factors influenced the growth of government support for research: its contribution to winning WW2, the Soviet military threat, and the shock of the Soviet challenge in space. The physical sciences were a national priority and grew like topsy. Jobs in industry and academia were plentiful.

That began to change with the aerospace cutbacks after the moon landing. ("Will the last person to leave Seattle please turn out the lights?") Despite some major bumps and ruts in the road, academic science continued to roll along---but the composition of the graduate student population began to change: fewer Americans, more foreigners. The number of academic openings shrank; though PhDs continued to be employable in industry, the effort required to acquire the degree---especially when compared to degrees in law, business, medicine, etc---came into question.

The emerging development is the growth of opportunities in foreign economies. Some leading American scholars have accepted positions in China and Europe. some overseas applicants to US grad schools are seeing comparable opportunities at home. The eventual effects of this are not yet known, but in all likelihood they will not be small.

It's my impression, from outside the field, that the current science power structure has ignored, and is trying to continue to ignore, the foregoing secular changes. Add to that the irresponsibility of the nation's governing elite, and add the fact that research is especially vulnerable in times of austerity. There are structural issues with American science that are more important than leaving some experiments to the Europeans, which is only a symptom.

12 SidewaysQuark  Wed, May 23, 2012 8:29:20pm

re: #4 Obdicut

Why not on the record? Professors don't tend to be shy about complaining about the state of affairs.

Well, tenured ones....

13 wrenchwench  Thu, May 24, 2012 9:05:36am

re: #11 jvic

Who are the 'scientific elites' that are running the country?

14 jvic  Thu, May 24, 2012 12:49:16pm

re: #13 wrenchwench

Who are the 'scientific elites' that are running the country?

That's (apparently) your opinion, not mine. I wrote that the scientific elite is part of the national elite. Scientists influence the political process but they are not the ultimate decision makers.

Also the scientific elite has factions and sub-factions; it does not necessarily speak with a single voice. On the contrary, there is competition for resources. As I indicated, the NYT article does not distinguish between a couple of subfields of physics and the whole of the subject.

As for who the scientific elite are, the NYT article mentions some of them. The National Academy of Sciences contains a bunch more, as do the governing councils of various professional societies.

15 wrenchwench  Thu, May 24, 2012 1:25:47pm

re: #14 jvic

That's (apparently) your opinion, not mine. I wrote that the scientific elite is part of the national elite. Scientists influence the political process but they are not the ultimate decision makers.

Also the scientific elite has factions and sub-factions; it does not necessarily speak with a single voice. On the contrary, there is competition for resources. As I indicated, the NYT article does not distinguish between a couple of subfields of physics and the whole of the subject.

As for who the scientific elite are, the NYT article mentions some of them. The National Academy of Sciences contains a bunch more, as do the governing councils of various professional societies.

See, this is why I asked for clarification. Your #1 reads like you believe the scientific elite are part of the national elite that runs the country. The fact that there are a bunch of factions argues against them being very influential.

I don't see a lot of influence by professional scientists in our government. We need more. Science requires more federal money if we want to be competitive.

16 jvic  Thu, May 24, 2012 6:57:38pm

IMO the scientific community would agree with one voice that science deserves more money. (And I agree, though with reservations.) Where the money should go is quite another matter.

Actually, there have been at least two major scientific influences on national policy in recent decades: missile defense and AGW. I'm not claiming that either concept will successfully be put into practice, but I'm saying that each has strongly affected the climate of opinion. Also, most of the scientific elite oppose missile defense whereas most subscribe to AGW.

If you want to get a flavor of what scientific controversy is like, the Not Even Wrong blog I've been mentioning is a good place to start. It might take multiple readings to get a feel for what's happening; much of the liveliest action is in the archives and the comments.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

Turn off ads by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day, our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form
LGF Pages Create a Page

This is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title and text already filled in.

Last updated: 2013-05-22 7:51 pm PDT

Recent Pages
Shiplord Kirel
Watch: Burning Texas Railroad Bridge Crumples Like Dominoes
This wooden trestle was 103 years old but, hey, we're fired up about business in Texas, thanks to low taxes and minimum regulation. A fire toppled a railroad bridge like it was made of dominoes outside the small town of San Saba, Texas. Members of the Lometa, Texas, volunteer fire department arrived on the scene, but they could only contain the fire and ...

1 hour, 39 minutes ago
Views: 59 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Heywood Jabloeme
Masturbation ‘At the Root of Culture Wars’ - Boing Boing
. . . and that is why he is so sure of the 'miracle of the emaculate conception'". The Atlantic's Hugo Schwyzer has a theory: that masturbation, as the most common sex act, is the heart of modernity's war between Christianity and secularism. Many progressives were bewildered by Antonin Scalia's blistering 2003 dissent in Lawrence v Texas, in which he warned that state laws ...

1 hour, 41 minutes ago
Views: 88 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
MichaelJ
Man Finds Comic Book Worth $100,000 Being Used as Wall Insulation
While remodeling his newly purchased home in Elbow Lake, Minn., David Gonzalez noticed something unusual amid the old newspapers that had been used as wall insulation. It was a copy of Action Comics No. 1 from 1938, the very first comic to feature the granddaddy of all superheroes, Superman. StarTribune.com spoke with Gonzalez about his amazing find as well as a subsequent family ...

1 hour, 58 minutes ago
Views: 69 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Political Atheist
My Response to Todays Speech-Standing O
Only the best of leaders dare to reduce the powers of their office or government. I applaud the effort in the strongest terms. Please support these changes with your own Congressman or Senator. While Obama would not declare an end to the war on terrorism, Obama offered to work with Congress to constrain some of his own authorities for waging it, reflecting what he ...

2 hours, 9 minutes ago
Views: 73 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Skip Intro
Knights Templar Drug Cartel Burns Michoacan, Western State in Mexico
LA RUANA, Mexico -- The farm state of Michoacan is burning. A drug cartel that takes its name from an ancient monastic order has set fire to lumber yards, packing plants and passenger buses in a medieval-like reign of terror. The Knights Templar cartel is extorting protection payments from cattlemen, lime growers and businesses such as butchers, prompting some communities to fight back, ...

5 hours, 32 minutes ago
Views: 87 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Vicious Babushka
$40 for Case of Bottled Water? The Free Market at Work in OK
More: $40 for Case of Bottled Water? 'Preying' on Oklahoma Tornado Victims Investigators with the Oklahoma Attorney General's office have already uncovered evidence of businesses taking advantage of the recent tornado's devastation by price-gouging in the weather-ravaged region, including a grocery store accused of charging consumers $40 for a case of water. Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt told ABC News that 30 investigators from ...

9 hours, 53 minutes ago
Views: 238 • Comments: 7
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 1
Bob Dillon
New Method for Producing Clean Hydrogen
Duke University engineers have developed a novel method for producing clean hydrogen, which could prove essential to weaning society off of fossil fuels and their environmental implications. While hydrogen is ubiquitous in the environment, producing and collecting molecular hydrogen for transportation and industrial uses is expensive and complicated. Just as importantly, a byproduct of most current methods of producing hydrogen is carbon monoxide, ...

10 hours, 11 minutes ago
Views: 110 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2
chadu
Constitution Preamble - Schoolhouse Rock
We the peopleIn order to form a more perfect unionEstablish justice, insure domestic tranquility,Provide for the common defense,Promote the general welfare andSecure the blessings of libertyTo ourselves and our posterityDo ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. (emphasis mine) Wow, who knew the Founding Fathers were a bunch of socialists, talking about helping out other people and whatnot? ///// ...

10 hours, 17 minutes ago
Views: 123 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
William Barnett-Lewis
Pope Francis Says Atheists Who Do Good Are Redeemed, Not Just Catholics
Pope Francis rocked some religious and atheist minds today when he declared that everyone was redeemed through Jesus, including atheists. During his homily at Wednesday Mass in Rome, Francis emphasized the importance of "doing good" as a principle that unites all humanity, and a "culture of encounter" to support peace. Using scripture from the Gospel of Mark, Pope Francis explained how upset Jesus' ...

22 hours, 28 minutes ago
Views: 419 • Comments: 11
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 8
FemNaziBitch
POINT: Unraveling Nice-Nasty Christianity
"Christians should stop wielding religion as a tool of oppression, write Evette Dionne at Clutch magazine." The following is from a link from this article at The Root: YouTube She continued, "That is not a godly energy you're giving off now! I don't understand being so saturated in a dogma and a theology that you would not embrace your sister in her deepest need ...

1 day, 2 hours ago
Views: 246 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
 Frank says:

In every language, the first word after "Mama!" that every kid learns to say is "Mine!" A system that doesn't allow ownership, that doesn't allow you to say "Mine!" when you grow up, has -- to put it mildly -- a fatal design flaw. From the time Mr. Developing Nation was forced to read "The Little Red Book" in exchange for a blob of rice, till the time he figured out that waiting in line for a loaf of pumpernickel was boring as f*ck, took about three generations. ... Decades of indoctrination, manipulation, censorship and KGB excursions haven't altered this fact: People want a piece of their own little Something-or-Other, and, if they don't get it, have a tendency to initiate counterrevolution.