Romney endorses Obama’s national security policies
In a debate I think the side that agrees with the other guy loses. I am pretty sure….
Which means why should we place Romney in the White House (talking to you, independents) when Obama has been doing the job for 4 years and Romney has no problem with how his job performance.
Game over. Vote accordingly.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/23/opinion/bergen-debate-world/
Romney endorses Obama’s national security policies
By Peter Bergen, CNN National Security Analyst
Editor’s note: Peter Bergen, CNN’s national security analyst, is director of the National Security Studies Program at the New America Foundation and the author of the new book “Manhunt: The Ten-Year Search for Bin Laden — From 9/11 to Abbottabad.”
(CNN) — Mitt Romney came to Monday night’s debate with a choice.
He could run to the right of President Obama on national security issues and also differentiate himself on such tricky matters as what to do about Syria, or the United States’ complicated alliance with Pakistan.Or he could essentially endorse Obama’s aggressive campaign against American enemies such as al Qaeda and the Iranian regime and his administration’s approach to knotty problems such as Syria and Afghanistan.
Despite some earlier campaign rhetoric, Romney chose to align himself almost completely with the Obama administration’s approaches to these issues.