Pages

22 comments

Jump to bottom
1 Bipartite Gnomenclature  Sun, Oct 28, 2012 8:48:54pm

I'm -5, -5.
Your turn.

2 Bipartite Gnomenclature  Sun, Oct 28, 2012 9:06:45pm

Ok, it looks like people are shy.

3 SanFranciscoZionist  Sun, Oct 28, 2012 9:09:11pm

Economic Left/Right: -3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.97

I always hover somewhere in the upper right of the left/libertarian range.

4 Daniel Ballard  Sun, Oct 28, 2012 9:13:08pm

Okay I took the test.


Economic Left/Right: -1.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.90

5 freetoken  Sun, Oct 28, 2012 9:50:19pm

I landed at:
Economic Left/Right: -1.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.87

Which puts me right on top of Nelson Mandela.

I do believe there is quite a bit of artificial choices in these tests, such as:

Multinational companies are unethically exploiting the plant genetic resources of developing countries.

Which doesn't really have a yes or no kind of answer as there are so many companies, large and small, that use genetic resources of so many nations, trying to generalize over this issue is misleading.

Much more telling would be to give specific examples, such as from court cases, and ask the participant to judge the case to favor one side or another.

I also think that ultimately trying to divide up one's views into this two dimensional structure can't truly represent the complexity of humanity.

Finally, I notice all of us so far are ending up in the lower left corner. Is this evidence of group selection?

6 freetoken  Sun, Oct 28, 2012 10:00:47pm

Did anyone else notice how incredibly close Obama and Romney are on that chart?

7 EiMitch  Sun, Oct 28, 2012 10:17:50pm

re: #6 freetoken

Which Romney?

8 sliv_the_eli  Sun, Oct 28, 2012 10:37:22pm

Economic Left/Right: -1.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31

Not sure who should be more shocked at falling near the other person's place on the graph - Nelson Mandela or me.

9 bratwurst  Sun, Oct 28, 2012 10:43:11pm

Economic Left/Right: -4.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.97

10 palomino  Mon, Oct 29, 2012 12:49:38am

Econ -3.8
Social -5.3

I guess that makes me French or something.

11 Tiny Alien Kitties are Watching You  Mon, Oct 29, 2012 12:52:16am

Economic Left/Right: -1.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.51

12 Tiny Alien Kitties are Watching You  Mon, Oct 29, 2012 12:55:39am

re: #5 freetoken

Pretty close match on our scores.

Finally, I notice all of us so far are ending up in the lower left corner. Is this evidence of group selection?

Yes.
But only because Moonbats and Wingnuts are just plain annoying to talk to if you aren't one of them.

13 researchok  Mon, Oct 29, 2012 1:07:43am

Myscores

Economic Left/Right: -1.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.26

14 CuriousLurker  Mon, Oct 29, 2012 1:14:54am

Heh, I took the test a few years back, Not much seems to have changed; I'm in almost the same spot as SFZ.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.15
View Chart

I'm kinda surprised no one is outside the "green zone" yet. So far we're mostly clustered up in the upper right quadrant of the green Left/Libertarian zone, which basically seems to make us primarily center-left.

Interesting, especially considering how much we fight with each other! The people who like to portray some of us as raving moonbats are going to have a sad. //

15 Bob Levin  Mon, Oct 29, 2012 4:13:39am

Francois Hollande. However, answering most of the questions felt like I was trying to jam a round peg into a square hole.

16 Bob Levin  Mon, Oct 29, 2012 4:55:30am

I didn't notice a little red blip for Marcuse and Horkheimer--who would find the test itself as an exercise in fascism. But hey, I gave into the Man for five minutes. That would put me with Adorno. A little dry Marxist humor there.

17 Obdicut  Mon, Oct 29, 2012 6:13:18am

The questions are far, far too limited. I'm far more authoritarian than this test would have you believe.

Really, I agree with freetoken-- a 2D test can't measure much.

One thing I think can't be captured by a thing like this is the end result of these ideals. For example, I support single payer health care not because I think we have an obligation to each other to help each other when we're sick or injured, but because it's simply the most practical and inexpensive way of going about it. So what should I answer to the idea that people who can pay more should get a higher level of care? There's nowhere on earth that doesn't allow some private add-on to the medical system-- private rooms, home health aides, etc. But I don't think that those who can pay more should be higher up on the the transplant list, for example.

However, my results: I'm a commie. A libertarian Commie.

Economic Left/Right: -9.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.49

Anyway, I believe the main purpose of this test is to tell people they're libertarians.

18 Obdicut  Mon, Oct 29, 2012 6:19:10am

re: #14 CuriousLurker

I'm hereby revealed as the raving moonbat. Which doesn't really line up with the actual way I behave, of course.

These questions are at least though-provoking, but they're even semantically difficult. Like the one about the commie slogan, about "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need". I honestly think that if we could magically have that happening, people would be very happy. Not even so much from the 'from each according to their need' but the 'to each according to their ability' part. I think if people really had jobs that used their abilities and they felt needed and part of society an' ting, that they'd be much happier than the current "Get educated, realize you actually want to do something else, try mid-career transition, get stuck in job that pays the bills but doesn't fulfill" mode.

But the test just asks me if I 'Fundamentally' agree with it, not if I think it's, oh, at all a practical reality. It's not. We can't create a society where that happens, it's not possible. It'd take omniscience and prescience.

19 CuriousLurker  Mon, Oct 29, 2012 6:20:17am

re: #17 Obdicut

However, my results: I'm a commie. A libertarian Commie.

LOL

Anyway, I believe the main purpose of this test is to tell people they're libertarians.

Hmm, that never occurred to me. Thanks.

20 CuriousLurker  Mon, Oct 29, 2012 6:22:08am

re: #18 Obdicut

Like the one about the commie slogan, about "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need".

I had no idea that was a commie slogan.

21 Decatur Deb  Mon, Oct 29, 2012 6:24:15am

re: #18 Obdicut

I'm hereby revealed as the raving moonbat. Which doesn't really line up with the actual way I behave, of course.

These questions are at least though-provoking, but they're even semantically difficult. Like the one about the commie slogan, about "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need". I honestly think that if we could magically have that happening, people would be very happy. Not even so much from the 'to each according to their need' but the 'to each according to their ability' part. I think if people really had jobs that used their abilities and they felt needed and part of society an' ting, that they'd be much happier than the current "Get educated, realize you actually want to do something else, try mid-career transition, get stuck in job that pays the bills but doesn't fulfill" mode.

But the test just asks me if I 'Fundamentally' agree with it, not if I think it's, oh, at all a practical reality. It's not. We can't create a society where that happens, it's not possible. It'd take omniscience and prescience.

If you buy into that you could be a Marxist. Or a Medieval Benedictine. Or a Hutterite.

(Sounds like a test I did a while back. Halfway between Mao and Gandhi on that one.)

22 Obdicut  Mon, Oct 29, 2012 6:31:22am

I'd like a very simple binary test:

"Do you think that your political ideals should be enacted wholesale, or do you think that, given that other people have different ideals, some form of compromise that allows a large portion of society to believe in and connect to their society and government is necessary?"

A lot of people's political positions kind of inherently imply that 99% of the society has to fervently believe in them, or the whole thing will be crapped up by the minority of the severely disaffected.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

TwitterFacebook

Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing!
Take advantage of our end-of-the-year subscription special, and save 25% off the normal subscription price! For a limited time, one-year ad-free subscriptions are just $59.95. Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing now and save!
Read more...

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form
LGF Pages

This button leads to the main index of LGF Pages, our user-submitted articles. You can post your own LGF Pages simply by registering a free account with us.

Create a Page

This is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.

Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.

Last updated: 2014-12-15 2:06 pm PST

LGF User's Guide
Recent Pages
Randall Gross
Christians More Supportive of Torture Than Non-Religious Americans
This is no surprise to me since the most common question I get from xtians when stating my atheism is "But how do you tell right from wrong without God?" A new Washington Post/ABC News poll finds that Americans, by ...

55 minutes ago
Views: 243 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 39 • Rating: 0
FemNaziBitch
‘God Loves Women Who Have Abortions’: The Religious Abortion Advocates That History Forgot
The New York legislature had just failed to pass an incremental reform to the state's strict anti-abortion law, leaving the status quo in place. At that time, deaths resulting from illegal abortions accounted for 42 percent of New York ...

3 days, 3 hours ago
Views: 448 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 25 • Rating: 0
Rightwingconspirator
Blackmores Night-Christmas Music Olde And New At The Same Time
Spotify Youtube

3 days, 22 hours ago
Views: 219 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Lumberhead
A History of Thugs
Civilization is imperiled. Demonic dark-skinned criminals exult in seizing property and security. Only a vanguard of brave uniformed officers can take them off the streets and restore order. It is 1835, and whites are finally confronting what Mark Twain ...

1 week, 2 days ago
Views: 665 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 1
Romantic Heretic
It’s Beginning To Feel A Lot Like Christmas
As always, Fairytale of New York makes me realize what time of the year it is.

1 week, 3 days ago
Views: 416 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2
Dark_Falcon
The College Rape Overcorrection
This is the article I promised to post this morning. The quoted passage is from the second section, "2. An Overcorrection". We are told that one of the most dangerous places for a young woman in America today is a ...

1 week, 3 days ago
Views: 734 • Comments: 11
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
cinesimon
Charles Barkley and the Plague of ‘Unintelligent’ Blacks
theatlantic.com

1 week, 3 days ago
Views: 763 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2
 Frank says:

I figure the odds are fifty-fifty I just might have some thing to say.