Pages

10 comments

Jump to bottom
1 Political Atheist  Fri, Dec 7, 2012 6:15:00pm

...

2 freetoken  Fri, Dec 7, 2012 6:25:44pm

From the list of abstracts:

[Link: agu-fm12.abstractcentral.com...]

CONTROL ID: 1503122
TITLE: Is Earth F**ked? Dynamical Futility of Global Environmental Management and Possibilities for Sustainability via Direct Action Activism (Invited)
AUTHORS (FIRST NAME, LAST NAME): brAd wErnEr1
INSTITUTIONS (ALL): 1. Complex Systems Laboratory 0225, University of California - San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
ABSTRACT BODY: Environmental challenges are dynamically generated within the dominant global culture principally by the mismatch between short-time-scale market and political forces driving resource extraction/use and longer-time-scale accommodations of the Earth system to these changes. Increasing resource demand is leading to the development of two-way, nonlinear interactions between human societies and environmental systems that are becoming global in extent, either through globalized markets and other institutions or through coupling to global environmental systems such as climate. These trends are further intensified by dissipation-reducing technological advances in transactions, communication and transport, which suppress emergence of longer-time-scale economic and political levels of description and facilitate long-distance connections, and by predictive environmental modeling, which strengthens human connections to a short-time-scale virtual Earth, and weakens connections to the longer time scales of the actual Earth.

Environmental management seeks to steer fast scale economic and political interests of a coupled human-environmental system towards longer-time-scale consideration of benefits and costs by operating within the confines of the dominant culture using a linear, engineering-type connection to the system. Perhaps as evidenced by widespread inability to meaningfully address such global environmental challenges as climate change and soil degradation, nonlinear connections reduce the ability of managers to operate outside coupled human-environmental systems, decreasing their effectiveness in steering towards sustainable interactions and resulting in managers slaved to short-to-intermediate-term interests. In sum, the dynamics of the global coupled human-environmental system within the dominant culture precludes management for stable, sustainable pathways and promotes instability.

Environmental direct action, resistance taken from outside the dominant culture, as in protests, blockades and sabotage by indigenous peoples, workers, anarchists and other activist groups, increases dissipation within the coupled system over fast to intermediate scales and pushes for changes in the dominant culture that favor transition to a stable, sustainable attractor.

[cont]

3 freetoken  Fri, Dec 7, 2012 6:26:27pm
[cont]

These dynamical relationships are illustrated and explored using a numerical model that simulates the short-, intermediate- and long-time-scale dynamics of the coupled human-environmental system. At fast scales, economic and political interests exploit environmental resources through a maze of environmental management and resistance, guided by virtual Earth predictions. At intermediate scales, managers become slaved to economic and political interests, which adapt to and repress resistance, and resistance is guided by patterns of environmental destruction. At slow scales, resistance interacts with the cultural context, which co-evolves with the environment. The transition from unstable dynamics to sustainability is sensitively dependent on the level of participation in and repression of resistance. Because of their differing impact inside and outside the dominant culture, virtual Earth predictions can either promote or oppose sustainability.

Supported by the National Science Foundation, Geomorphology and Land Use Dynamics Program.

KEYWORDS: [4430] NONLINEAR GEOPHYSICS / Complex systems, [6620] PUBLIC ISSUES / Science policy, [1834] HYDROLOGY / Human impacts, [0510] COMPUTATIONAL GEOPHYSICS / Agent-based models.
(No Image Selected)
(No Table Selected)

Additional Details
Previously Presented Material: 0%

Contact Details
CONTACT (NAME ONLY): brAd wErnEr
CONTACT (E-MAIL ONLY): bwerner@ucsd.edu
TITLE OF TEAM:

4 freetoken  Fri, Dec 7, 2012 6:37:41pm

The AGU is recording their lectures. The one in question is in this video:

Starts at 24:30

5 freetoken  Fri, Dec 7, 2012 6:49:44pm

I've only watched part of the video, but I see where he claims he's not a social scientist... but then his presentation is indeed mostly what one would describe as sociology.

Perhaps if a practicing sociologist would have presented the topic it would have had more "there there". As it currently stands the presentation doesn't appear to have much substance.

From a biological view our species is just transitory on this planet, and we know from anthropology that previous Hominini species last on the order of 10^5 or 10^6 years.

All of our "economics" are based upon agriculture, an invention from around circa 10,000 years ago. Through this invention we've greatly increased our numbers and thus our effects upon the rest of the planet.

It is unlikely, IMO, that any geophysical model can really include any detailed analysis of the human system, as even the best economists struggle with the most simple of system models of us.

6 EPR-radar  Fri, Dec 7, 2012 7:49:22pm

Actually I disagree with the title. We are not looking at an "Earth is fucked" situation as a result of human stupidity (i.e., short term thinking, profits uber alles, etc.).

We are looking at a "Humanity is fucked" situation.

7 Political Atheist  Fri, Dec 7, 2012 7:53:11pm

re: #6 EPR-radar

I would agree, but for the species we take down with us.

8 EPR-radar  Fri, Dec 7, 2012 7:57:36pm

re: #7 Political Atheist

I would agree, but for the species we take down with us.

I agree that the collateral damage from our actions is a real problem.

However, when appealing to centrists, right-leaning types, etc. I prefer to avoid anything resembling "tree-hugging" arguments and focus on "Let's not shit the bed" arguments.

And, to be a total pedant, Venus is a perfectly fine planet that happens to be incompatible with life as we know it. So nothing we can do to the Earth is going to fundamentally affect the planet.

9 lostlakehiker  Sat, Dec 8, 2012 1:57:06am

re: #8 EPR-radar

I agree that the collateral damage from our actions is a real problem.

However, when appealing to centrists, right-leaning types, etc. I prefer to avoid anything resembling "tree-hugging" arguments and focus on "Let's not shit the bed" arguments.

And, to be a total pedant, Venus is a perfectly fine planet that happens to be incompatible with life as we know it. So nothing we can do to the Earth is going to fundamentally affect the planet.

Yes. What's good for the planet is kind of an empty concept, and certainly nothing that will inspire many other humans to action. The argument has to be put in terms of "what's good for me and mine"? Here, if you think about it, time is a lot deeper than it looks at first sight.

Suppose, just to make up an example, there was a way to steer the earth and sun like a spaceship, and we could maneuver next to an enormous black hole that had all sorts of asteroids made of solid gold. Imagine we could capture these. But we, in turn, would be captured by the black hole. In ten thousand years, it would destroy us. But RIGHT NOW, maneuvering in to grab the gold would put us past the point of no return.

Would people really go for the gold? I doubt it. Even old people have relatives who are younger, or friends. All of today's young people will have to bear at least the leading edge of this storm we've conjured. And they will care about their children, who will bear the brunt of it.

Now higher CO2 levels aren't the same as dropping the earth into an incinerator that simply has a long fall to the flames. But the analogy is not too far off. We have, I judge, already crossed the point of no return when it comes to a major melt of the Greenland ice cap. The earth may not be fucked, but Rotterdam, NYC, Shanghai, Tokyo, LA, etc. etc. are. Not to mention Venice and New Orleans. All these cities will be under siege within a century or two. The most vulnerable will have been abandoned within this century, either as a precaution, or in the aftermath of a storm that killed tens of thousands.(Millions?) Right now, the net present value of real estate in those cities is seriously reduced from what most people seem to think it is. Building skyscrapers there, and building them to stand for centuries, is a fool's errand.

In the same way, consider farmland in Alabama or Texas. Buh-bye. It's going to be too hot there for growing anything but maybe sorghum or taro. And too dry in most of Texas. Then, kiss off Kansas and Iowa. True, Canada and Siberia will warm, but those places don't get as much sunlight and sunlight is the energy that drives crop growth. Square mile for square mile, northern croplands aren't a fair trade.

We are inventive, courageous, adaptable. We'll develop the wind/solar/nuclear tech we need, we'll adapt, and we'll come through chastened but stronger and better organized for the long haul. Capitalism will provide us the organizational scheme that gets this stuff built. The model can be what the US did in WW2. Set a goal and point the private economy at it.

Taxes on carbon based fuel can be the tool that sets the goal. It's not the best idea to set those taxes real high to start with; we need to improve our wind/solar tech before we go all in on building it. Right now, we can accomplish more for the same cost by improving the energy efficiency of our economy, and by pushing the R&D pace on wind and solar. And we have to get over our nuclear phobia. Nuclear energy can be part of the mix, and it's more nearly ready to go right now.

10 Obdicut  Sat, Dec 8, 2012 2:44:34am

re: #9 lostlakehiker

Capitalism will provide us the organizational scheme that gets this stuff built. The model can be what the US did in WW2. Set a goal and point the private economy at it.

That's pretty much a big jumble right there. When it's the central government commanding it, it's a command economy, it's not capitalism-- except insofar as those who control the capital of those companies will profit. But it's not the private economy.

Capitalism has completely failed in addressing AGW, as was easily predictable. Only communal, collective action can work.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

TwitterFacebook

Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing!
Take advantage of our yearly subscription, and save 50% off the normal subscription price! One-year ad-free subscriptions are just $59.95. Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing now and save!
Read more...

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form
LGF Pages

This button leads to the main index of LGF Pages, our user-submitted articles. You can post your own LGF Pages simply by registering a free account with us.

Create a Page

This is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.

Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.

Last updated: 2015-03-17 11:42 am PDT

LGF User's Guide
Recent Pages
EiMitch
Cracked: 5 Brainwashing Tricks That Work No Matter How Smart You Are
What's this? Another article on Cracked about how incorrigibly tribal-minded us homo sapiens are? Well, yes. But the proverbial devil is in the proverbial details. Proverbially. It's still worth reading. That's what I'm getting at. Everyone is talking about Scientology ...

2 hours, 54 minutes ago
Views: 51 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Thanos
Bruce Schneier’s Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World
You are under surveillance right now. Your cell phone provider tracks your location and knows who's with you. Your online and in-store purchasing patterns are recorded, and reveal if you're unemployed, sick, or pregnant. Your e-mails and texts expose ...

7 hours, 59 minutes ago
Views: 68 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Fred72
Are conservatives anti-science?
Are conservatives anti-science? Spoiler: Conservatives aren't anti-science or pro-science. But, they are pro-common-sense. And once more scientists adopt common sense approach to science, they'll find that they have the support of conservative politicians - the people whose job it is ...

2 days, 7 hours ago
Views: 645 • Comments: 25
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 3
Romantic Heretic
The Lavender Scare
Here is an interesting article on one of Tail Gunner Joe's sick witch hunts that has, unfortunately, been forgotten. I try not to feel schadenfreude of the fate of McCarthy's side kick, Ray Cohn, but I never succeed.

3 days, 18 hours ago
Views: 453 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
FemNaziBitch
Should Women ‘Man Up’ at the Office, or Does Office Culture Need to ‘Man Down’?
About the Graphic How should a woman try to get ahead in a male-dominated workplace? Perhaps the answer lies less on women "manning up" and more in how businesses value their employees. Many women confront this tension as they ...

4 days, 20 hours ago
Views: 790 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
William Barnett-Lewis
Orthopraxy Pt 2
If we accept the idea of Orthopraxy over Orthodoxy, then what does evangelism look like? What is the Witness of those who try to follow the Way of Christ Jesus? To evangelize is to spread the good news that we ...

5 days, 8 hours ago
Views: 507 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4
thecommodore
Eric Alterman: A Wake-Up Call for US Liberals
A short column in The Nation that is a must read. The primary difference between liberalism and conservatism, at least in theory, is that the latter is an ideology and the former isn't. Conservatism, as Milton Friedman argued, posits that ...

5 days, 16 hours ago
Views: 728 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 5
Great White Snark
The NSA Has Taken Over the Internet Backbone. We’re Suing to Get It Back.
Blow off Snowden all you like, but what was revealed to be true is still true. The NSA lacks oversight with power. FISA is already too much and now they casually exceed even that generous provision. The world first learned ...

1 week ago
Views: 773 • Comments: 9
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4
Lumberhead
Lead Prosecutor Apologizes, Admits Mistakes in Glenn Ford Case
This is a powerful admission of culpability and I applaud his courage in making it. It really should be read in its entirety. Glenn Ford should be completely compensated to every extent possible because of the flaws of a system ...

1 week, 3 days ago
Views: 939 • Comments: 4
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 8
Dark_Falcon
Sarah Vine of the DM gets it wrong on teaching about rape.
Sarah Vine of the DM gets it wrong: SARAH VINE: Teaching 11-year-olds about rape is a form of child abuse The problem with this country, I've come to realise, is that it treats adults like children and children like adults. ...

2 weeks, 4 days ago
Views: 1,603 • Comments: 6
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 9
 Frank says:

For some real personal satisfaction, try yelling out your own names. -- At a concert in Boston, Massachusetts to some fans (my friends) who kept yelling out Frank's name.