Fox News-War on the Macho Gland -because real life is a Disney Movie?
Venker is amused that women were so angry at her for insinuating that women “aren’t women anymore.” She was just trying to get the point across into your teensy little lady brains that “women shouldn’t let their success in the workplace become the biggest thing in their lives”:
If the ultimate goal is lasting love, women are going to have to become comfortable with sacrifice and capitulation. Because those are the underpinnings of a long-term marriage - for both sexes.
1. This goes without saying, but heteronormative, much? Not all women marry men. Not all men marry women. Not all people marry, period! Which leads to…
2. Maybe the ultimate goal isn’t lasting love? Because this isn’t a Disney movie?
3. Let’s say you are a woman whose ultimate goal is to fall in “lasting” love. Why it on women to “surrender?”
And from a link the comment section:
Diary of a Mansoldier, the Great War on Men
Then it all came crashing down. 2157, the forces of WOMAN came forth, bringing with them decrees of fairness and equal treatment under the law. Men quickly found that being on the same level as a WOMAN caused irreparable damage to their previously unknown macho gland. The macho glands literally shrank away, and men were left changed. Those who did not undergo regular treatments of Tucker Max therapy became known as “pleasant human beings.”
And Probably the best explaination I’ve seen so far (from the comments):
She’s equating femininity with personal choices that are different for every woman and it slays me.