Pages

11 comments

Jump to bottom
1 researchok  Mon, Dec 10, 2012 3:49:30pm

Gun control is a controversial enough topic.

BS statistics only make sensible gun laws all that much harder to be implemented.

2 freetoken  Mon, Dec 10, 2012 4:18:30pm

Math iz hard.

3 Skip Intro  Mon, Dec 10, 2012 5:01:41pm
In fact, Hemenway found that the defensive gun use number is so high that it is a mathematical impossibility.

Once again, we're dealing with the problem of faith-based math versus math-based math. Why is it one side always uses the former?

4 Political Atheist  Mon, Dec 10, 2012 6:03:29pm

re: #3 Skip Intro

Don't think for a minute that advocacy sites don't mislead one way or another. I don't want to get into a argument who is worse, just point out that advocacy sites bend the rules or mislead. Including HCI. That's the nature of advocacy. It is deliberately and (often enough) intelligently not objective.

If you want straight data you have to get it from the Dept of Justice, FBI or ATF and compile the data yourself. This topic is so highly politicized that there is no neutral party peer reviewed study in depth on defensive use of guns. There are reams and reams of raw data.

All those guns have not made us safe. Why? Too many of them are being used in criminal attacks. All these numerous gun control laws have not made us safe. Why? Too many criminals thwart these laws and use guns anyway.

What is the common element here? Criminal use. We have an excess of criminals that use violence. I don't need study to tell me what an innocent person needs if attacked in the moments before help arrives. Nor do I need a study to tell me what a criminal must be denied to protect us from his powerful weapons.

No matter what the real defensive numbers I offer two incontrovertible if controversial facts. One-The government can regulate guns. Two- The Second Amendment is an individual civil right, unburdened of any attachment to a militia.

5 Obdicut  Mon, Dec 10, 2012 6:06:20pm

re: #4 Political Atheist

All these numerous gun control laws have not made us safe. Why? Too many criminals thwart these laws and use guns anyway.

There are also crimes committed with legally owned guns.

6 Political Atheist  Mon, Dec 10, 2012 6:10:53pm

re: #5 Obdicut

Yes of course there are. When a person becomes a criminal by whatever motive-Anger, mental illness, to steal money, to rape-Everything they have legally or not is a resource for them. Some criminals are stupid enough to commit crimes and use their own cars to get away.

Road rage comes to mind-An ordinary person loses his or her temper gets road rage and assaults with a deadly weapon-The car.

7 Obdicut  Mon, Dec 10, 2012 6:27:41pm

re: #6 Political Atheist

That's fine. I'm pointing out that what you said isn't correct. Gun control laws obviously have made us safer than we would have been otherwise. But because we have very permissive gun laws, we also have a lot of people using their own legal weapon to commit a crime.

8 Political Atheist  Mon, Dec 10, 2012 6:51:58pm

re: #7 Obdicut

That's fine. I'm pointing out that what you said isn't correct. Gun control laws obviously have made us safer than we would have been otherwise. But because we have very permissive gun laws, we also have a lot of people using their own legal weapon to commit a crime.

I did not say safer. I said safe.

I'm making a distinction that is both legal and moral. The very instant a person uses a gun to commit a crime, even a crime of passion, it's no longer a legally possessed gun or a legal act. At that instant and on it's no longer a legal gun. Or an innocent person.

What you call permissive or not I do not know. California is a very populous state. It does not have (IMO) very permissive gun laws. Arizona does.

What I do know is we have a civil right to respect and regulate.

9 lostlakehiker  Tue, Dec 11, 2012 12:35:08am

People who think guns in the hands of civilians is a bad idea tend to brush aside the constitutional question. Maybe it is a bad idea. That, of itself, would not suffice to justify reinterpreting the plain language of the constitution to allow the government to ban privately held firearms.

The problem is one of precedent. If there are no limits to reinterpretation, and anything in the constitution means nothing except what we now find it convenient that it should mean, we don't really have a constitution.

But now, what of the merits? The case for guns in the hands of civilians is infinitely weak if defensive usage is the primary building block of the case. What needs to be looked at is what happens in otherwise comparable nations where guns are not legal. Take Britain. Far fewer gun murders, of course. Fewer murders of any sort, though, which makes it difficult to unravel what part of the difference can be attributed to the presence or absence of guns.

But there is another interesting statistic. While Brits generally do not murder each other, home invasion burglary is much more common than you'd guess going by the murder rates. And there is a prima-facie explanation for this: the burglar has no worries going into a gun-free home. He (it's a he, almost always) is young, fit, and fast. The victim is not. Any fight will resolve in his favor. But guns are equalizers. He may still have an edge, but an edge is no good. A burglar must hit targets in a regular rhythm to make a good living at it. Sooner or later, if the homes he's hitting are salted with a portion of gun owners, his luck will run out.

The point of civilian gun ownership is deterrence. In aggregate, having guns around makes being a burglar so dangerous that most of those who might otherwise take it up instead find some other occupation.

10 peguyjaures  Tue, Dec 11, 2012 1:19:00am

re: #9 lostlakehiker

And not only having guns around makes being a burglar more dangerous, it also makes burglars more dangerous: in England or in France, where burglars don't expect to encounter firearms, they tend to avoid carrying firearms themselves and would rather try to flee when caught in the act, as harming their victims would result in much harsher sentences, and it's better for them to try their luck in the next house. Overall, very few burglaries end with a fatality on any side.
By contrast, in the US, where a burglar might expect deadly fire at any time, he will be much more likely to carry a firearm, and to shoot first; and many burglaries have a fatal issue. So "defensive" firearms, in the long run, have made burglaries more deadly. Thing is, there isn't really a way out of this situation.

11 lostlakehiker  Tue, Dec 11, 2012 2:01:34am

re: #10 peguyjaures

And not only having guns around makes being a burglar more dangerous, it also makes burglars more dangerous: in England or in France, where burglars don't expect to encounter firearms, they tend to avoid carrying firearms themselves and would rather try to flee when caught in the act, as harming their victims would result in much harsher sentences, and it's better for them to try their luck in the next house. Overall, very few burglaries end with a fatality on any side.
By contrast, in the US, where a burglar might expect deadly fire at any time, he will be much more likely to carry a firearm, and to shoot first; and many burglaries have a fatal issue. So "defensive" firearms, in the long run, have made burglaries more deadly. Thing is, there isn't really a way out of this situation.

There are all sorts of things to think about, true. Though if I were to go into the burglary business, I would go unarmed. Case the joint carefully, select targets that figure to be unoccupied, and tamely submit if my luck runs low and I encounter an armed homeowner. That would be the smart way to ply a dumb trade.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

TwitterFacebook

Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing!
Take advantage of our New Year subscription special, and save 25% off the normal subscription price! For a limited time, one-year ad-free subscriptions are just $59.95. Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing now and save!
Read more...

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form
LGF Pages

This button leads to the main index of LGF Pages, our user-submitted articles. You can post your own LGF Pages simply by registering a free account with us.

Create a Page

This is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.

Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.

Last updated: 2014-12-15 2:06 pm PST

LGF User's Guide
Recent Pages
Thanos
Former Lord’s Resistance Army Commander Appears at War Crimes Court
A captured Ugandan rebel commander made his first public appearance Monday at a hearing before the International Criminal Court, where he stands accused of crimes including murder and enslavement. Speaking calmly in his native Acholi dialect, Dominic Ongwen, a ...

4 hours, 28 minutes ago
Views: 107 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
FemNaziBitch
GOP Hopes It Has Cracked the Abortion Code - Burgess Everett and Lauren French - POLITICO
National Organization for Women President Terry O'Neill dismissed that argument, calling the rhetoric surrounding the legislation misleading and saying it amounts to overturning "Roe v. Wade completely, period." "If you say 'viability,' that's the time where a fetus can ...

6 hours, 44 minutes ago
Views: 100 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Rightwingconspirator
Super Bowl 2015-Glendale Arizona May Again Lose Millions
Glendale Arizona gets to underwrite the tax exempt NFL for millions. Again. Weiers suspects that when the sun sets on Super Bowl XLIX, the only real loser may be his city. "I'm sure that we're going to spend $3 million," ...

9 hours, 13 minutes ago
Views: 152 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Ace-o-aces
Charles C. Johnson Is Still Looking for Investors.
5 days, 4 hours ago
Views: 761 • Comments: 7
Tweets: 9 • Rating: 9
Rocky-in-Connecticut
Sports Hero Gang Sign Shame
you know those professional athlete thugs- always flashing gang signs along with his baby mama. Fine example these two are. I expect Fox News and right wing blogs to have this as their cover story pronto. instagram.com Or maybe not. ...

1 week ago
Views: 551 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Skip Intro
Republican Net Neutrality Bill Would Gut FCC’s Authority Over Broadband
The party of pure evil strikes again. Net neutrality legislation unveiled by Republicans today would gut the ability of the Federal Communications Commission to regulate the broadband industry. As expected, the bill forbids the FCC from reclassifying broadband as a ...

1 week ago
Views: 495 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 2 • Rating: 5
The Vicious Babushka
Wingnuts Spend MLK Day Spewing Racism & Lies
The usual [wingnut]HURR HURR MLK WAS A REPUBLICAN & ALL TEH DEMOCRATS IS TEH RACIST LIKE THERE HERO ROBERT BYRD!!!! LBJ SAID TEH N WORD!!! HURR HURR[/wingnut] #tcot MLK Day

1 week ago
Views: 974 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 74 • Rating: 4
Michael McBacon
Praise - Marvin Gaye
I've been on a Marvin Gaye kick lately and thought I'd post this song. Enjoy.

1 week, 1 day ago
Views: 537 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2
John Vreeland
John McAfee: ‘I know who hacked Sony Pictures - and it wasn’t North Korea’
"I can guarantee they are wrong. It has to do with a group of hackers - I will not name them - who are civil libertarians and who hate the confinement the restrictions the music industry and the movie ...

1 week, 1 day ago
Views: 884 • Comments: 3
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 3
Lumberhead
Shopping While Black: The Role of Race in Retail
The researchers asked the subjects a series of questions about certain behaviors they had encountered while shopping or advertisements they had noticed, and broke out the results by race. They found that across the board, non-white Americans--and especially black ...

1 week, 2 days ago
Views: 749 • Comments: 8
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 4
 Frank says:

THE VERY BIG STUPID is a thing which breeds by eating The Future. Have you seen it? It sometimes disguises itself as a good-looking quarterly bottom line, derived by closing the R&D Department. -- from The Real Frank Zappa book.