Pages

11 comments

Jump to bottom
1 researchok  Mon, Dec 10, 2012 3:49:30pm

Gun control is a controversial enough topic.

BS statistics only make sensible gun laws all that much harder to be implemented.

2 freetoken  Mon, Dec 10, 2012 4:18:30pm

Math iz hard.

3 Skip Intro  Mon, Dec 10, 2012 5:01:41pm
In fact, Hemenway found that the defensive gun use number is so high that it is a mathematical impossibility.

Once again, we're dealing with the problem of faith-based math versus math-based math. Why is it one side always uses the former?

4 Political Atheist  Mon, Dec 10, 2012 6:03:29pm

re: #3 Skip Intro

Don't think for a minute that advocacy sites don't mislead one way or another. I don't want to get into a argument who is worse, just point out that advocacy sites bend the rules or mislead. Including HCI. That's the nature of advocacy. It is deliberately and (often enough) intelligently not objective.

If you want straight data you have to get it from the Dept of Justice, FBI or ATF and compile the data yourself. This topic is so highly politicized that there is no neutral party peer reviewed study in depth on defensive use of guns. There are reams and reams of raw data.

All those guns have not made us safe. Why? Too many of them are being used in criminal attacks. All these numerous gun control laws have not made us safe. Why? Too many criminals thwart these laws and use guns anyway.

What is the common element here? Criminal use. We have an excess of criminals that use violence. I don't need study to tell me what an innocent person needs if attacked in the moments before help arrives. Nor do I need a study to tell me what a criminal must be denied to protect us from his powerful weapons.

No matter what the real defensive numbers I offer two incontrovertible if controversial facts. One-The government can regulate guns. Two- The Second Amendment is an individual civil right, unburdened of any attachment to a militia.

5 Obdicut  Mon, Dec 10, 2012 6:06:20pm

re: #4 Political Atheist

All these numerous gun control laws have not made us safe. Why? Too many criminals thwart these laws and use guns anyway.

There are also crimes committed with legally owned guns.

6 Political Atheist  Mon, Dec 10, 2012 6:10:53pm

re: #5 Obdicut

Yes of course there are. When a person becomes a criminal by whatever motive-Anger, mental illness, to steal money, to rape-Everything they have legally or not is a resource for them. Some criminals are stupid enough to commit crimes and use their own cars to get away.

Road rage comes to mind-An ordinary person loses his or her temper gets road rage and assaults with a deadly weapon-The car.

7 Obdicut  Mon, Dec 10, 2012 6:27:41pm

re: #6 Political Atheist

That's fine. I'm pointing out that what you said isn't correct. Gun control laws obviously have made us safer than we would have been otherwise. But because we have very permissive gun laws, we also have a lot of people using their own legal weapon to commit a crime.

8 Political Atheist  Mon, Dec 10, 2012 6:51:58pm

re: #7 Obdicut

That's fine. I'm pointing out that what you said isn't correct. Gun control laws obviously have made us safer than we would have been otherwise. But because we have very permissive gun laws, we also have a lot of people using their own legal weapon to commit a crime.

I did not say safer. I said safe.

I'm making a distinction that is both legal and moral. The very instant a person uses a gun to commit a crime, even a crime of passion, it's no longer a legally possessed gun or a legal act. At that instant and on it's no longer a legal gun. Or an innocent person.

What you call permissive or not I do not know. California is a very populous state. It does not have (IMO) very permissive gun laws. Arizona does.

What I do know is we have a civil right to respect and regulate.

9 lostlakehiker  Tue, Dec 11, 2012 12:35:08am

People who think guns in the hands of civilians is a bad idea tend to brush aside the constitutional question. Maybe it is a bad idea. That, of itself, would not suffice to justify reinterpreting the plain language of the constitution to allow the government to ban privately held firearms.

The problem is one of precedent. If there are no limits to reinterpretation, and anything in the constitution means nothing except what we now find it convenient that it should mean, we don't really have a constitution.

But now, what of the merits? The case for guns in the hands of civilians is infinitely weak if defensive usage is the primary building block of the case. What needs to be looked at is what happens in otherwise comparable nations where guns are not legal. Take Britain. Far fewer gun murders, of course. Fewer murders of any sort, though, which makes it difficult to unravel what part of the difference can be attributed to the presence or absence of guns.

But there is another interesting statistic. While Brits generally do not murder each other, home invasion burglary is much more common than you'd guess going by the murder rates. And there is a prima-facie explanation for this: the burglar has no worries going into a gun-free home. He (it's a he, almost always) is young, fit, and fast. The victim is not. Any fight will resolve in his favor. But guns are equalizers. He may still have an edge, but an edge is no good. A burglar must hit targets in a regular rhythm to make a good living at it. Sooner or later, if the homes he's hitting are salted with a portion of gun owners, his luck will run out.

The point of civilian gun ownership is deterrence. In aggregate, having guns around makes being a burglar so dangerous that most of those who might otherwise take it up instead find some other occupation.

10 peguyjaures  Tue, Dec 11, 2012 1:19:00am

re: #9 lostlakehiker

And not only having guns around makes being a burglar more dangerous, it also makes burglars more dangerous: in England or in France, where burglars don't expect to encounter firearms, they tend to avoid carrying firearms themselves and would rather try to flee when caught in the act, as harming their victims would result in much harsher sentences, and it's better for them to try their luck in the next house. Overall, very few burglaries end with a fatality on any side.
By contrast, in the US, where a burglar might expect deadly fire at any time, he will be much more likely to carry a firearm, and to shoot first; and many burglaries have a fatal issue. So "defensive" firearms, in the long run, have made burglaries more deadly. Thing is, there isn't really a way out of this situation.

11 lostlakehiker  Tue, Dec 11, 2012 2:01:34am

re: #10 peguyjaures

And not only having guns around makes being a burglar more dangerous, it also makes burglars more dangerous: in England or in France, where burglars don't expect to encounter firearms, they tend to avoid carrying firearms themselves and would rather try to flee when caught in the act, as harming their victims would result in much harsher sentences, and it's better for them to try their luck in the next house. Overall, very few burglaries end with a fatality on any side.
By contrast, in the US, where a burglar might expect deadly fire at any time, he will be much more likely to carry a firearm, and to shoot first; and many burglaries have a fatal issue. So "defensive" firearms, in the long run, have made burglaries more deadly. Thing is, there isn't really a way out of this situation.

There are all sorts of things to think about, true. Though if I were to go into the burglary business, I would go unarmed. Case the joint carefully, select targets that figure to be unoccupied, and tamely submit if my luck runs low and I encounter an armed homeowner. That would be the smart way to ply a dumb trade.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

TwitterFacebook

Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing!
Take advantage of our end-of-the-year subscription special, and save 25% off the normal subscription price! For a limited time, one-year ad-free subscriptions are just $59.95. Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing now and save!
Read more...

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form
LGF Pages

This button leads to the main index of LGF Pages, our user-submitted articles. You can post your own LGF Pages simply by registering a free account with us.

Create a Page

This is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.

Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.

Last updated: 2014-12-15 2:06 pm PST

LGF User's Guide
Recent Pages
Rightwingconspirator
CT Supreme Court Rules 2nd Amendment Covers Knives and Batons
To me one of the most hypocritical aspects of some gun control meansures and their proponents has been how non gun yet still effective tools of self defense are also proscribed almost anywhere but the home. Often with more severe ...

2 minutes ago
Views: 24 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Randall Gross
The Teens Behind EarthPix and Other Viral Twitter Feeds Go Legit
Earlier this year, a piece in The Atlantic disclosed the names of the geniuses behind a series of massively-popular Twitter accounts, including Earth Pics and History In Pics -- each with over a million followers. Were they former journalists, ...

3 hours, 49 minutes ago
Views: 75 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
FemNaziBitch
‘God Loves Women Who Have Abortions’: The Religious Abortion Advocates That History Forgot
The New York legislature had just failed to pass an incremental reform to the state's strict anti-abortion law, leaving the status quo in place. At that time, deaths resulting from illegal abortions accounted for 42 percent of New York ...

4 days, 4 hours ago
Views: 499 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 25 • Rating: 0
Lumberhead
A History of Thugs
Civilization is imperiled. Demonic dark-skinned criminals exult in seizing property and security. Only a vanguard of brave uniformed officers can take them off the streets and restore order. It is 1835, and whites are finally confronting what Mark Twain ...

1 week, 3 days ago
Views: 699 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 1
Romantic Heretic
It’s Beginning To Feel A Lot Like Christmas
As always, Fairytale of New York makes me realize what time of the year it is.

1 week, 4 days ago
Views: 457 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2
Dark_Falcon
The College Rape Overcorrection
This is the article I promised to post this morning. The quoted passage is from the second section, "2. An Overcorrection". We are told that one of the most dangerous places for a young woman in America today is a ...

1 week, 4 days ago
Views: 792 • Comments: 11
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
cinesimon
Charles Barkley and the Plague of ‘Unintelligent’ Blacks
theatlantic.com

1 week, 4 days ago
Views: 807 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2
 Frank says:

Whenever you're down, just think about how you got there.