Pages

Jump to bottom

8 comments

1 Locker  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 6:43:06am

Hilarious... utterly and completely. Thanks man. Great post.

2 Destro  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 8:30:48am
Christianity got twice as much attention in the curriculum as any other religion. Islam was a distant second.

This is what a right winger would say to that:

"Islam was second??? That's bias right there I tells ya!!! We is a Judeo-Christian country not no Islam second place country"

3 watching you tiny alien kittens are  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 9:19:22am

The original email site is a hoot too. Looks like something drunken Pam would write.

[Link: teapartyorg.ning.com...]

4 HappyWarrior  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 9:38:30am

This is hilarious.

5 nines09  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 10:10:59am

re: #3 watching you tiny alien kittens are

The original email site is a hoot too. Looks like something drunken Pam would write.

[Link: teapartyorg.ning.com...]

Now that is word salad du jour. Terrorphobia?

6 Holidays are Family Fun Time  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 10:57:48am

The magical balance fairy that people insecure in their faith must go overboard in perceived retaliation.

7 Cankles McCellulite  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 1:52:33pm

re: #3 watching you tiny alien kittens are

OH-SWEET-PONE-CAKES. The comments at that site are entertaining beyond belief. Here we have "Doctor" Jean Reno explain the differences between conservatives and liberal:

I'm unaware who funds the "criminal-justice-major.net" but the numbers published above under "decline of american median wealth from 2005 - 2009" are badly skewed, in that:

1. The "data" appear to demonstrate that the "decline of the median income" is down only 16% for "white households." This false, highly manipulated percentage. suggests that the Bush administration buoyed up white families, as continually claimed by the left--one of their major talking points--a central part of their agenda.

2. The "data" appear to demonstrate that the "decline of the median income" is down by a whopping 53% for "black households." This little bit of fraud makes the direct inference that the GOP is directly responsible for a loss of income by "black households" of over 50% of all black american families. Considering that they use no statistics anywhere to support their contention of massive unemployment among "black households" one wonders about the real agenda behind these data. However, one only needs to look at the "references" used, i.e., CNN, an unspecified "gallup poll," two "wiki" references, etc. to cause considerable suspicion on the authenticity of their data.

On the other hand, current data suggests a different picture, e.g., employed women--of whatever color--now outnumber men. Further, while the median(?) income for american households is $81,000 per year the same study indicates that over half of those families living below subsistence levels in the US are white, i.e., hiring, especially in the past five years, demonstrates a preferential hiring of blacks over whites, of black women over white men and of preference of white women over white men. These real numbers combined, show the least employable persons are: Male, White, over 40 years of age. These data also indicate that education, Bachelors degrees, have no impact on employability of white-males, nor does experience in a given field show a significant improvement in the overall employability of these persons.

The bottom line: White males need not apply.

Regarding race war.
The liberals view the world very differently than conservatives. Mainly because conservatives do not cling to the wildly out of date, and clearly disproven notion that, as Marx claimed, that armed and violent rebellion of the proletariat, that's them, against the bourgeoisie, that us folks is, for them the ONLY way to defeat us is through the liberal, no pun intended, use of force and violence. This has become abundantly clear in the past four years, i.e., violence as a first option rather than the last, indiscriminate abuse of power and the easy transition away from the rule of law.
The sole problem for both sides of the race war issue is that they have proven as far back as the 1940's that white people do not riot, trash entire neighborhoods, burn buildings... or gang up on helpless white individuals and beat them into the ground, with duly riotous anger, and appropriate[sic] violence.
Recent historically relevant observations. Research the Watts riots, the Chicago riots or the LA riots. Even at Waco, the davidians were not out roaming the streets in packs by night looting and robbing.
What does this mean for us?
If there is violence in the near future it will be started by them--probably with the flimsiest of excuses (one of our most famous riots was caused only by the spread of a rumor of a black woman being beaten by white cops), of course it never happened, but that didn't matter then and it won't matter the next time.
The motley crew in Washington can afford to be rather casual in their violence in that they know as well as we do that white people WILL NOT get in their faces, WILL NOT call them on their illegal behavior

8 Flavia  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 3:14:16pm

I would laugh, except it's really not that funny. Ok, it IS funny, but it's also so very sad!!


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh