Pages

30 comments

Jump to bottom
1 palmerskiss  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 12:08:16am

not sure why you are posting an article written by maggie gallagher, as if anything that women says is based in science, reality, or decency.

you dont have to delete the article from lgf (but it would be the decent move considering her history) but by that same token - you do deserve the criticism for even suggesting that woman has any credibility on any issue.

for that you really should be ashamed (i am ashamed for you)

2 Dark_Falcon  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 6:33:08am

re: #1 palmerskiss

Gallagher's not an indecent person. He specialty isn't medical, but she's not so vile hater. You're off base in this one.

3 Obdicut  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 10:45:08am
Google “autism” and “aggression” and you will suddenly be treated to a counter world the formal autism community claims does not exist

This isn't true.

1. There's no 'formal' autism community.

2. A lot of parents of kids with autism talk openly about aggression.

3. Kids with aspergers are still more likely to be attacked than attack.

4 wrenchwench  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 10:51:13am

re: #2 Dark_Falcon

Gallagher's not an indecent person. He specialty isn't medical, but she's not so vile hater. You're off base in this one.

From the end of the article:

Maggie Gallagher is the founder of the National Organization for Marriage

That qualifies her as a vile hater in my book.

5 Obdicut  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 10:53:37am

re: #2 Dark_Falcon

Gallagher's not an indecent person. He specialty isn't medical, but she's not so vile hater. You're off base in this one.

Gallagher is definitely a vile hater towards gay people.

6 CuriousLurker  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 11:02:23am

This article is pure wingnut bullshittery.

re: #2 Dark_Falcon

Gallagher's not an indecent person. He specialty isn't medical, but she's not so vile hater. You're off base in this one.

Not a hater? You might want to ask some LGBT people if they agree.

As the article states, Maggie Gallagher is a co-founder of the National Organization for Marriage. The SPLC listed NOM as an anti-gay group in 2010 along with the American Family Association (Bryan Fischer), Family Research Council (Tony Perkins), Chalcedon Foundation (Rushdoony), Dove World Outreach Center (Terry Jones), and various other extreme, far-right religious groups.

• Here's her bio page at the NOM site

• Here's her Wiki page

• Here's a list of 54 articles related to Gallagher at Right Wing Watch

Apart from her lack of qualifications on this subject, let's take a look at what she offers to back up her assertion that "the suggestion that science has demonstrated there is no link at all between autism and aggressive violence is questionable" and that there is a "relationship between autism and aggression":

1.) Several anecdotes. Anecdotes don't trump science.

2.) An abstract (presumably one out of many) by the 19th European Congress of Psychiatry that included one study of "autism and violence" by researchers in Morocco. No link is provided to detailed results of the study or what the special challenges, if any, might be in Morocco, nor does she offer specifics on the level(s) of violence.

3.) Another "recent study", by whom she doesn't say, nor does she provide a link to the full results of the study so that the part she chose to focus on can be viewed in context:

"The prevalence of and risk factors for aggression were examined in 1,380 children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Prevalence was high, with parents reporting that 68 percent had demonstrated aggression to a caregiver and 49 percent to non-caregivers."

The fact that she declined to provide information on who did the study is a HUGE red flag. She claims it said the prevalence of aggression was "high". Really? High in which spectrum, specifically? Autism spectrum disorders means exactly what it sounds like, a range of conditions, not something that applies to every autistic person regardless of the severity of their disorder or how/where/if it is being (or has been) professionally treated. In addition, those examined were children & adolescents, not adults like Lanza.

What sort of "aggression"? There's a big difference between between yelling, throwing something, and murdering a school full of little children, FFS.

How does this "aggression" compare to aggression in groups of children & adolescents with other disorders?

How does this "aggression" compare to aggression in groups of children & adolescents without disorders?

Like I said, this article is bullshit. It's intellectually dishonest. If it were not, Gallagher would've provided context & documentation.

7 Charles Johnson  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 11:13:29am

Wow, a National Organization for Marriage shill promoted as an expert on autism.

There is no facepalm large enough. This is pitiful.

8 Charles Johnson  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 11:19:22am

Of course, there's a reason why right wing groups are focusing on autism for their dishonest claims. It goes back to what I've been saying for days -- it's a diversionary tactic to try to keep attention away from our insane gun culture.

Very interesting that an anti-gay religious right social conservative group is also pushing this line, isn't it?

9 The Ghost of a Flea  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 11:24:44am

re: #8 Charles Johnson

Of course, there's a reason why right wing groups are focusing on autism for their dishonest claims. It goes back to what I've been saying for days -- it's a diversionary tactic to try to keep attention away from our insane gun culture.

Very interesting that an anti-gay religious right social conservative group is also pushing this line, isn't it?

Religious Right, social conservative groups more and more have a parallel worldview in which psychology, therapy, and the clinical treatment of mental issues are instruments of secularism and relativism. There's a whole subculture of Christian alternative therapy, going from the mild (Christian counseling with your pastor rather than a therapist*) all the way through to the "Raising up a child" corporal punishment system and into the depths of stuff like exorcisms.

A big part of it is the confabulation of moral weakness and mental illness, particular as relates to children and conduct problems.

It's a very interrelated with the pseudo-psychology with which they explain homosexuality is seen as a disorder created by specific home-life conditions that "feminize/masculinize" children. And, of course, the quack methods of "fixing" homosexuality.

* I know excellent Christian counselors who are both spiritual people and trained counselors. But I've also both encountered in reall life and read the horror stories of how the "counseling" format is abused to shame and pressure people...particularly women...into suffering in silence. NoLongerQuivering, the website which hosts tales told by women who've left the Biblical Patriarachy churches/social systems they were raised or married into, features quite a few.

10 CuriousLurker  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 11:26:01am

re: #8 Charles Johnson

Indeed. It appears the full spectrum of wingnuts is being tapped to help with this one, which goes to show just how serious a blow it was.

11 CuriousLurker  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 11:30:39am

re: #1 palmerskiss

for that you really should be ashamed (i am ashamed for you)

re: #7 Charles Johnson

There is no facepalm large enough. This is pitiful.

Seconded. This sort of scapegoating is revolting.

12 HappyWarrior  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 11:54:01am

Oh for fuck sakes. Appreciate everyone who condemned this crap though.

13 HappyWarrior  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 11:55:42am

re: #3 Obdicut

This isn't true.

1. There's no 'formal' autism community.

2. A lot of parents of kids with autism talk openly about aggression.

3. Kids with aspergers are still more likely to be attacked than attack.

There's actually a lot of disagreement within the autistic community. Of course, if you read this crap, you'd think we all have our heads up our asses going la la la there isn't a problem. And you're absolutely right that kids with Asperger's are more likely to be attacked than attack themselves. Does the latter happen? Sure but they are more likely to be the victim than perp.

14 JEA62  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 12:51:09pm

I'm wondering why Yahoo gives valuable space for bigoted morons like Gallagher. The only thing she's an expert on is idiocy.

15 dragonath  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 12:51:22pm
Grandin also reminded us that, for austic people, “The principal emotion experienced by autistic people is fear.

If you cannot read people’s social cues, it’s hard to tell who is a threat and who is not. If you live in a world with social rules created by “neurotypicals” that make no sense, anxiety and fear are natural, perhaps inevitable, responses.

Experiencing fear is a lot different than being motivated by it.

Fear of gays.

Fear of liberals.

Fears of the "other".

16 ThomasLite  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 12:51:47pm
Google “autism” and “aggression” and you will suddenly be treated to a counter world the formal autism community claims does not exist: desperate mothers seeking help or respite from the violent behavior of large, aggressive, beloved autistic boys (and a few girls).

I think there might just be a few google hits on parents of non-autistic children struggling with aggression issues as well. For chrissakes, she really doesn't see the need to distinguish between correlation and causation now, does she?
and that's before even getting into the validity of the "scientific method by google search no. of hits" which seems ever so popular with idiots like these. Sheesh...

I realize it's comforting to tell yourself that someone who does something like this must be far, far away from common humanity but really? At least find someone less offensive to reassure you if you really must stick your head in the sand...

17 EPR-radar  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 1:02:28pm

Maggie Gallagher is a hate-filled POS with zero credibility.

You might as well cite an article by David Duke.

18 EPR-radar  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 1:17:39pm

re: #2 Dark_Falcon

Gallagher's not an indecent person. He specialty isn't medical, but she's not so vile hater. You're off base in this one.

False. She has been a central player in the anti-gay GOP propaganda mill, all of which is total bullshit, and most of which is frankly bigoted and hateful.

19 palmerskiss  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 3:08:00pm

re: #2 Dark_Falcon

she is an indecent person - she has manipulated scientific evidence to deny rights to glbt people, she has called glbt people pedophiles, nazis, thugs.

she has attacked glbt families, and even children in these families.

she has no business writing for yahoo - and she has no business on lgf as a legitimate voice in any debate.

and for defending her - you are also an indecent person

20 lostlakehiker  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 3:23:36pm

Who writes the article is never any concern of mine. I am not familiar with this author's other work.

The only question of interest is, does she have a point?

But I guess here, it's the other way around. The only question of interest is, who said it?

So maybe I'll address that question. Here's who (else) has something to say about the topic.

Link
Link
Link
And many more, but this is perhaps representative, the last link taking a stance opposite to the other two.

So, I guess now I'll find out if Susanna Schrobsdorff is persona non grata here. How would I know who is acceptable and who is not? I've never heard of her, and I don't know what political stance she takes on anything.

21 wrenchwench  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 3:32:07pm

re: #20 lostlakehiker

The only question of interest is, does she have a point?

The only question of interest to me is, does she have any credibility? In this case the answer is no. And since you say, "Who writes the article is never any concern of mine. I am not familiar with this author's other work." then you have no credibility either.

Both you and the author of the article you posted slur many good people. One of the three links you just posted has a woman slurring her own child.

It should be a concern of yours.

22 EPR-radar  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 3:38:53pm

re: #20 lostlakehiker

Who writes the article is never any concern of mine. I am not familiar with this author's other work.

The only question of interest is, does she have a point?

But I guess here, it's the other way around. The only question of interest is, who said it?

So maybe I'll address that question. Here's who (else) has something to say about the topic.

Link
Link
Link
And many more, but this is perhaps representative, the last link taking a stance opposite to the other two.

So, I guess now I'll find out if Susanna Schrobsdorff is persona non grata here. How would I know who is acceptable and who is not? I've never heard of her, and I don't know what political stance she takes on anything.

That is a fairly naive position to take.

Gallagher is wholly a creature of the RW noise machine. Her MO for many years has been to whip up hate against the gays as part of the RW culture war apparatus. Many of her bigoted and lurid fantasies have been front page topics here.

The fact that she now has something to say on the subject of autism after last week's shooting, when the entire RW noise machine is visibly trying to come up with any alternative to gun control, is most certainly no coincidence.

Scapegoating autism-spectrum people would be completely consistent with her past patterns of sleazy behavior.

23 CuriousLurker  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 3:47:23pm

re: #20 lostlakehiker

The only question of interest is, does she have a point?

No, based on the "proof" she offered, I can't say she does.

re: #20 lostlakehiker

So maybe I'll address that question. Here's who (else) has something to say about the topic.

Link
Link
Link
And many more, but this is perhaps representative, the last link taking a stance opposite to the other two.

So, I guess now I'll find out if Susanna Schrobsdorff is persona non grata here. How would I know who is acceptable and who is not? I've never heard of her, and I don't know what political stance she takes on anything.

I, for one, quite clearly pointed out the flaws in Gallagher's argument apart from her political stance, but by all means keep pretending that no one did.

You just swallow any crap you read and can't be bothered to take the time to see if the author is qualified to write about something that broad-brushes an entire group of people afflicted with a neurodevelopmental disorder, yet you expect us to waste time following & reading your links? You must be kidding.

You intellectual apathy & dishonesty is lamentable.

24 ProMayaLiberal  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 3:52:57pm

I have Asperger's Syndrome. But most of you know that.

I already feel extremely alone, and very sad because of it.

I don't need people like LostLakeHiker and Maggie Gallagher making it even harder for me emotionally because they need a scapegoat.

I don't want to be lonely.

25 EPR-radar  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 3:59:45pm

re: #23 CuriousLurker

No, based on the "proof" she offered, I can't say she does.

re: #20 lostlakehiker

I, for one, quite clearly pointed out the flaws in Gallagher's argument apart from her political stance, but by all means keep pretending that no one did.

You just swallow any crap you read and can't be bothered to take the time to see if the author is qualified to write about something that broad-brushes an entire group of people afflicted with a neurodevelopmental disorder, yet you expect us to waste time following & reading your links? You must be kidding.

You intellectual apathy & dishonesty is lamentable.

It is worth pointing out that the ad hominem arguments against Gallagher on this thread have not been based only on Gallagher's politics. A person can be right wing, or even social conservative right wing, and be a credible source, if arguments are presented honestly, facts are properly respected etc. (pretty rare these days, but still theoretically possible).

Gallagher has shown herself to be a hate-monger heavily invested in the business of dishonestly scapegoating non-straight people for all manner of social ills.

Nothing she says about any group of people that is or could plausibly be marginalized can be taken at face value.

Briefly, ad hominem can be a perfectly valid argument, for a source as deeply tainted as this.

27 HappyWarrior  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 5:34:04pm

re: #26 Charles Johnson

That Crazy Crippled Chick: When Do Autistic People Count? an Open Letter to Maggie Gallagher

This is an awesome rebuttal. Thanks for finding and posting it, Charles.

28 HappyWarrior  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 5:46:02pm

Ms. Gallagher's political views are irrelevant. They are yes repugnant but that's not why she's being criticized here She's being criticized because she's using people on the autistic spectrum as a scapegoat for violence. And as someone on the spectrum that pisses me off. And yes her credibility matters here. What background does she have in autism and autistic research? Let's not make this into poor Maggie Gallagher is being attacked for being a conservative. That's not what this is about. This is about her scapegoating people on the spectrum. It's already a tough enough world as is for people like me and PML. And it doesn't get any easier when people like Ms. Gallagher seem to lump us all in with the Ryan Lanzas of the world. We are your brothers, sisters, friends, sons, daughters, etc. We are you and you are us.

29 Henchman 25  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 6:47:26pm

With all due respect, as an autistic person, fuck you, fuck the article, and fuck the person who wrote that tripe.

30 Locker  Thu, Dec 20, 2012 10:11:41pm

re: #20 lostlakehiker

Dude you've been here for 6 years and posted over a thousand comments. Do you really think this kind of false cluelessness is going to fly?

We just had 110 post fight on another thread about the same cluelessness from a new member on his very first post. If we expect better of him we damn sure expect better of you.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

TwitterFacebook

Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day (per month) or 22 cents a day (per year), our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form
LGF Pages

This button leads to the main index of LGF Pages, our user-submitted articles. You can post your own LGF Pages simply by registering a free account with us.

Create a Page

This is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.

Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.

Last updated: 2014-03-07 2:19 pm PST

LGF User's Guide
Recent Pages
Randall Gross
SeaWorld Pulls Staff From Water in Killer Whale Shows
SeaWorld Entertainment will end the practice of having trainers in the water during killer whale shows, reported WTVJ-TV in Miami. After a trainer died in 2010 during a show with a killer whale, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration ...

58 minutes ago
Views: 62 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
FemNaziBitch
New York City Will Pay $10 Million to Settle Wrongful Conviction Case - ProPublica
New York City has agreed to pay $10 million to settle a wrongful conviction lawsuit filed by Jabbar Collins, who spent 15 years in prison for a murder he did not commit. The settlement announced today concludes a decades-long ...

5 hours, 45 minutes ago
Views: 96 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 1
CriticalDragon1177
The Japan Times - Can Japan show the West how to live peacefully with Islam?
Nicolas Gattig on Islam in Japan. Off course ignorant Islamophobic wingnut Bryan Fischer Is happy they "don't" allow Muslims in Japan. Man is he going to be upset if he reads this. Long ago, in another life, I went to ...

1 day, 23 hours ago
Views: 400 • Comments: 3
Tweets: 2 • Rating: 3
Rightwingconspirator
Photography Is Not A Crime
re: #274 NJDhockeyfan re: #262 NJDhockeyfan re: #259 jaunte So lets keep this in mind for Ferguson-Shoot an unarmed man in the head under color of authority and leave town with your identity protected. Take a picture of a protest, ...

1 day, 23 hours ago
Views: 241 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Laughing Gas
Scumbag “HBD believer” claims Michael Brown charged officer
WARNING: LINK TO HATE SITE He links to some ijreview, a right wing site: This guy makes me sick.

2 days, 2 hours ago
Views: 485 • Comments: 6
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 0
BadExampleMan
“Growth” and Some Jellyfish
This piece was basically just to use up some scraps I had sitting around. I liked the way the frit lace turned out but I didn't really have a use for it. I've been on a jellyfish kick lately. This ...

5 days, 16 hours ago
Views: 289 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 2
Pie-onist Overlord
Police Investigating Whether Rabbi’s Miami Killing a Hate Crime
More: Police Investigating Whether Rabbi's Miami Killing a Hate Crime (Reuters) - Police in Miami investigating the killing of a 60-year-old Orthodox rabbi over the weekend said on Monday they haven't yet decided whether the shooting was a hate crime. ...

1 week, 1 day ago
Views: 524 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 1
Romantic Heretic
The War Photo No One Would Publish
An interesting story on a photograph taken during Desert Storm that no news outlet in the US would publish. It is one of those photos that stares straight at the horror of war. It's hideous, stomach turning...and something that should ...

1 week, 4 days ago
Views: 1,244 • Comments: 8
Tweets: 4 • Rating: 7
Bubblehead II
Live web Cams on Oahu, Hawaii
Couple of live web cams for Oahu. H/T to explore.org Turtle Bay - East and Ehukai Beach, Oahu Sunrise isn't for a couple more hours so there isn't much to see. But should get interesting after daybreak.

1 week, 6 days ago
Views: 675 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 3 • Rating: 5
 Frank says:

Interviewer:
The notion of a "guitar solo" has preconceptions based on it; people automatically refute it because it's supposed to be self-indulgent or "for musicians." It's almost like things become iconographic and somehow lose their value for outsiders.

Zappa:
Well, whose fault is that? That's what writers do. Musicians don't do that. The average person doesn't sit around thinking about the "iconographic problems of a guitar solo." -- Interview for Musician magazine, by Matt Resnicoff, November 1991. Reprinted in July 1995 Issue.