Pages

12 comments

Jump to bottom
1 Skip Intro  Wed, Jan 9, 2013 8:54:04am
If you decide to get a carry permit, get lots of training

Are you saying that training is optional?

2 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 9, 2013 9:55:12am

You are an irresponsible parent in my eyes if you have firearms in a house with children - the stats overwhelmingly indicate that everyone’s in more danger having a gun in the house than not. (I read somewhere the other night that you or a family member are 41X more likely to either be shot or to shoot someone in anger, depression, or by accident than you are to repel a home invader) Remember that you might be highly competent with firearm safety, but is everyone who ever might enter your house also highly competent with firearm safety, including your children’s friends?

3 Political Atheist  Wed, Jan 9, 2013 10:45:01am

re: #1 Skip Intro
No I’m saying a great deal of training is what you need for CCW. Of course that varies a lot, say if it’s a persons first gun as compared to a frequent handgun target or hunter shooter.

Lifelong handgun shooters need far less training for CCW. They already possess many of the basic handling and safety habits.

4 Political Atheist  Wed, Jan 9, 2013 10:58:35am

re: #2 Randall Gross

If your guns and ammunition are properly stored, visitors with kids are not an issue. It’s no big deal to mave a gun from a defense fast release safe to the strong slow access safe. Or unload and strongly trigger lock all the guns.

With all due respect for your opinion, there are many people like diamond dealers and jewelers that face a very strong threat of armed assault and robbery. Many of them have kids. Unfortunately we have no way to statistically break out that group. Which is exactly where these kinds of numbers fail to guide us well in detail.

5 Randall Gross  Wed, Jan 9, 2013 11:30:57am

re: #4 Political Atheist

My opinion’s not going to change - even in the event your “jewelry dealers with kids and guns” get robbed the chances of them and/or their children being shot are much greater if they have a gun. It’s just the stats, it’s just how it is.

6 researchok  Wed, Jan 9, 2013 11:49:57am

For better or worse, stories like this are our reality.

Until we deal with the culture, nothing will change.

Randall is right- the stats tell the story more clearly than anything else. Owning a weapon does ncrese the chances of a fatal gun deaths.

The fact there are criminals out there who access guns is a separate and distinct problem.

Cigarette smoking declined when the prevailing culture was upended- and not a minute sooner.

I am not advocating for taking away thge right to own guns. I am advocating for an entire new framework in which we control that.

7 FemNaziBitch  Wed, Jan 9, 2013 12:20:37pm

I’d rather see an increase in training classes than an increase purchases.

I’d might be nice if people who already owned signed-up for training classes, either because they have never had any training or as a refresher.

8 FemNaziBitch  Wed, Jan 9, 2013 12:35:55pm

re: #4 Political Atheist

If your guns and ammunition are properly stored, visitors with kids are not an issue. It’s no big deal to mave a gun from a defense fast release safe to the strong slow access safe. Or unload and strongly trigger lock all the guns.

With all due respect for your opinion, there are many people like diamond dealers and jewelers that face a very strong threat of armed assault and robbery. Many of them have kids. Unfortunately we have no way to statistically break out that group. Which is exactly where these kinds of numbers fail to guide us well in detail.

Congress (gun lobby) has made it impossible for proper research to be done.

We don’t know how many instances of successful self-defense with a firearm discharge because there is no box to be checked on the police report for it. The data is not collected.

Mostly what we have is a compilation of data and anecdotes that have been scientifically theorized. While I think much of the information coming from academics and government number crushers reflects accurate guesses, they are limited by the data available. The rhetoric from the gun lobby is severely flawed
and emotionally charged.

Trying to create effective policy from the Public Health perspective is extremely difficult.

David Hemenway at Harvard has explained this in his book:

This ignorance about gun deaths stands in sharp contrast to the wealth of useful data available on motor-vehicle fatalities, for which more than 100 pieces of information per death are collected consistently in every state.

He is also one of the few who seems to be able to keep emotion out of the equation when talking about regulation.

In the 1990s, Smith and Wesson decided they wanted to be a responsible corporate citizen — they announced that they were working with the White House to increase gun safety — for example, whenever they’d sell a gun, they’d include a gun lock. That seems like a great idea to me; after all, cars come with seatbelts. But the gun lobby was incensed. They boycotted Smith and Wesson. And they forced that CEO out.

In his book talk on C-SPAN he talked more about the difficulty of collecting and comparing data.

I really recommend watching it because I think the Public Health approach is the best avenue we have to combat this issue.

9 Skip Intro  Wed, Jan 9, 2013 1:59:39pm

re: #3 Political Atheist

No I’m saying a great deal of training is what you need for CCW. Of course that varies a lot, say if it’s a persons first gun as compared to a frequent handgun target or hunter shooter.

That’s not what my question is. Simply put, is it required that people who apply for CCW take training class(es) before the permit is issued? Since I have never known anyone who felt the need to carry a concealed weapon, I really don’t know the answer.

10 Political Atheist  Wed, Jan 9, 2013 4:05:10pm

re: #9 Skip Intro

That’s not what my question is. Simply put, is it required that people who apply for CCW take training class(es) before the permit is issued? Since I have never known anyone who felt the need to carry a concealed weapon, I really don’t know the answer.

It should be required everywhere. It is not. Not even in California. Disclosure-Such a requirement would put money in my pocket as a trainer. But my overarching motive is public safety.

11 Political Atheist  Wed, Jan 9, 2013 4:08:29pm

re: #5 Randall Gross

My opinion’s not going to change - even in the event your “jewelry dealers with kids and guns” get robbed the chances of them and/or their children being shot are much greater if they have a gun. It’s just the stats, it’s just how it is.

I don’t expect it will Randall and that’s fine. Neither will mine. What might be a good thing is fair debate between us here in Pages or in topics. We can each put our points forward, and I hope add some sensible debate to a topic rife with emotion.

Police have kids too. Are they irresponsible parents if they keep a gun at home? I say not. What say you?

12 Obdicut  Thu, Jan 10, 2013 6:23:37am

re: #11 Political Atheist

I’d say keeping their guns in the house with their kids is another risk and sacrifice the police take to make the rest of us safer, even though it endangers their kids.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

TwitterFacebook

Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing!
Take advantage of our yearly subscription, and save 50% off the normal subscription price! One-year ad-free subscriptions are just $59.95. Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing now and save!
Read more...

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form
LGF Pages

This button leads to the main index of LGF Pages, our user-submitted articles. You can post your own LGF Pages simply by registering a free account with us.

Create a Page

This is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.

Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.

Last updated: 2015-02-13 1:58 pm PST

LGF User's Guide
Recent Pages
Thanos
Compliance & Security: A Race to the Bottom?
Kevin talks about a pervasive industry problem - being compliant according to your auditor and their checklist, but still being highly vulnerable. One of the common faults in compliance is senior level managers who don't really know enough end up ...

4 hours, 23 minutes ago
Views: 80 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Doofus
Troller gets Trolled
Curt Schilling showed a young punk you don't mess with his daughter on twitter. Schilling's fond paternal congratulations were met with "tweets with the word rape, bloody underwear and pretty much every other vulgar and defiling word you could likely ...

1 day, 1 hour ago
Views: 309 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Lumberhead
Pittsburgh’s Police Chief—the #EndWhiteSilence Twitpic Cop—Isn’t What He’s Cracked Up to Be
In this era of raw nerves, protests and increased tensions, Americans really want leadership. It's natural for the public and the media to desperately seek out examples that appear to affirm that our nation is changing for the better. ...

1 day, 2 hours ago
Views: 262 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
FemNaziBitch
The ‘War on Women’ Is the Latest War That Republicans at CPAC Want to Win
By this process, you can arrive at a conclusion like this: To win the War on Women, you better put a ring on it. At CPAC, conservatives dedicated an entire panel to "The Future of Marriage." One could be ...

1 day, 14 hours ago
Views: 302 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2
ಠ_ಠ
Edward Snowden, Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras doing a Reddit AMA
Earlier today interested Redditors posed questions to Poitras and Greenwald in Los Angeles, while Snowden posted from Moscow. A rare opportunity for average people to directly communicate with the (in)famous leaker.See the entire discussion HERE Redditor masondog13 asks: What's the ...

1 week ago
Views: 709 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2
Rocky-in-Connecticut
Muslims Join Hands At Oslo’s Largest Synagogue
Wait a minute... watching Fox News and the Republican talking heads I learned that all Muslims are bad bad bad and in no way can Islam be interpreted as any sort of peaceful religion. news.yahoo.com OSLO (Reuters) - More than ...

1 week, 3 days ago
Views: 927 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 8 • Rating: 5
BadExampleMan
Help Tel Aviv Roller Derby move forward!
For the last three years it's been my privilege to help coach a dedicated group of young women who have founded the first Women's Flat-Track Roller Derby league in Israel. They've learned, trained, fought, and worked unbelievably hard to bring ...

1 week, 4 days ago
Views: 745 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Great White Snark
Federal Judge Rules Ban on Interstate Handgun Sales Unconstitutional
Added bold is all mine. this was an awkward way to go about gun control anyway. It clearly impacts the law abiding far more than felons, and is by that definition inefficient and intrusive at best. Gonna have to do ...

2 weeks, 6 days ago
Views: 1,487 • Comments: 3
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 3
 Frank says:

The crux of the biscuit is: If it entertains you, fine. Enjoy it. If it doesn't, then blow it out your ass. I do it to amuse myself. If I like it, I release it. If somebody else likes it, that's a bonus. -- What he's talking about is obvious. He said this in an interview with Playboy magazine on May 2, 1993.