Pages

5 comments

Jump to bottom
1 John Vreeland  Fri, Jan 11, 2013 3:45:41pm

My reading of the relevant law in this case is that it would have to be a bullion coin, meaning that the vast majority of its value would have to be intrinsic to the metal of its construction. Or maybe they could make a it a commemorative coin instead, to commemorate the record high deficit.

2 stabby  Fri, Jan 11, 2013 6:01:42pm

re: #1 John Vreeland

If you’re right then the law can’t be used.

That is what Fox will claim in any case, because otherwise the tea party* nuts don’t have the power to end medicare, social security, the EPA, etc.

*Tea Party: The Fox News Micky Mouse Club

They originally thought they could do that by taking the house since the house is the source for spending authorization - but the Obama administration responded by not making budget and simply continuing to use the previous, sane, house’s spending authorization.

Now they’re hoping to use their power to stop paying our debts to send us back to 1900.

They probably wish that the debt ceiling stopped new borrowing instead of stopping PAYING our debts, but they’ll take what they can get.

Note that if we default and the interest rates on our debt goes up, then our economy will be ruined for the rest of our lives, the world economy will crash and the US will lose its place as an important economic power. The Chinese press already can’t resist telling its billion readers that the US no longer has a viable government.

3 stabby  Fri, Jan 11, 2013 6:02:49pm

In short they’re not being stupid, they’re being manipulative.

4 EPR-radar  Fri, Jan 11, 2013 6:36:33pm

Oddly enough, the simplest approach I can think of is the one I have not seen mentioned at all.

Congress has set tax rates and made appropriations that are inconsistent with the debt ceiling. If Congress is stupid enough to pass inconsistent laws, the Executive gets to choose how to “faithfully execute the laws”.

So, I’d like to see the administration treat the debt ceiling as a nothing-burger. No coin trick. No reference to the constitution. Just blow it off.

5 lostlakehiker  Fri, Jan 11, 2013 10:30:22pm

re: #4 EPR-radar

Oddly enough, the simplest approach I can think of is the one I have not seen mentioned at all.

Congress has set tax rates and made appropriations that are inconsistent with the debt ceiling. If Congress is stupid enough to pass inconsistent laws, the Executive gets to choose how to “faithfully execute the laws”.

So, I’d like to see the administration treat the debt ceiling as a nothing-burger. No coin trick. No reference to the constitution. Just blow it off.

Actually, there is no inconsistency. There is no statutory obligation to pay social security or medicare benefits at the current rate. Many other spending programs are likewise not debts of the government.

The legal course of action, if the debt ceiling were to be reached, would be to cut spending on all these optionals, while servicing the debt to the letter and to the penny. The president, who is sworn to uphold and defend etc. and to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, would then have the duty to take care that the laws, as written, be faithfully executed. The constitution itself positively insists that the debts be payed without question or delay. It does not insist that other spending programs go on as if cash had not run out.

Now whether draconian cuts to all other spending are a good idea? That’s another question entirely. They are not. They’re a very bad idea.

The markets would crash. The economy would follow. Our defense system would lose essential people, who cannot forever work without pay. Valuable infrastructure would go untended; penny wise and pound foolish “savings” would have to be found. It would be grossly irresponsible to force the government into such a fix.

But the fault for the cuts would lie with the people who voted to not raise the debt ceiling, and not with the president. His hands would be clean.

No coining of trillion dollar baubles would wash. That would make a laughingstock of our currency and our leadership.

If the president were to decide that the constitution is a mere scrap of paper, that would have incalculable consequences for the nation; that, too, would be a very bad idea. But the fault, in that case, would rest with him. How could he do that? How, after taking Lincoln for a model? Lincoln, who refrained from wartime measures that he could not find real justification for in the constitution? Who limited his emancipation proclamation to states still in rebellion, despite his private views that slavery was an evil across the board? Who allowed a pro-surrender candidate to campaign for the presidency, knowing the nation would be lost if that candidate won? Lincoln understood that winning ugly would destroy, in the long run, what he was trying to save with the war.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

TwitterFacebook

Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing!
Take advantage of our yearly subscription, and save 50% off the normal subscription price! One-year ad-free subscriptions are just $59.95. Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing now and save!
Read more...

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form
LGF Pages

This button leads to the main index of LGF Pages, our user-submitted articles. You can post your own LGF Pages simply by registering a free account with us.

Create a Page

This is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.

Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.

Last updated: 2015-03-17 11:42 am PDT

LGF User's Guide
Recent Pages
Thanos
Anti-Science Parents’ Group Files Appeal in Fight Against Kansas Public Schools Curriculum
An organization that claims a statewide teaching plan will instill a "a non-theistic religious Worldview" in Kansas public school students has taken its fight to an appeals court. Citizens for Objective Public Education (COPE) is asking the 10th U.S. ...

2 hours, 4 minutes ago
Views: 53 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
EiMitch
Cracked: 8 Things Vietnam War Movies Leave Out (By an Enemy Soldier)
cracked.com Once the fighting started, a lot of people died, well over a million on our side alone. For the war to continue, a constant stream of new fighters had to join up, and they didn't have the benefit of ...

15 hours, 46 minutes ago
Views: 218 • Comments: 4
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 3
Romantic Heretic
The Lavender Scare
Here is an interesting article on one of Tail Gunner Joe's sick witch hunts that has, unfortunately, been forgotten. I try not to feel schadenfreude of the fate of McCarthy's side kick, Ray Cohn, but I never succeed.

22 hours, 42 minutes ago
Views: 232 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
FemNaziBitch
Should Women ‘Man Up’ at the Office, or Does Office Culture Need to ‘Man Down’?
About the Graphic How should a woman try to get ahead in a male-dominated workplace? Perhaps the answer lies less on women "manning up" and more in how businesses value their employees. Many women confront this tension as they ...

2 days ago
Views: 313 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
William Barnett-Lewis
Orthopraxy Pt 2
If we accept the idea of Orthopraxy over Orthodoxy, then what does evangelism look like? What is the Witness of those who try to follow the Way of Christ Jesus? To evangelize is to spread the good news that we ...

2 days, 12 hours ago
Views: 343 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4
thecommodore
Eric Alterman: A Wake-Up Call for US Liberals
A short column in The Nation that is a must read. The primary difference between liberalism and conservatism, at least in theory, is that the latter is an ideology and the former isn't. Conservatism, as Milton Friedman argued, posits that ...

2 days, 20 hours ago
Views: 547 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 5
Great White Snark
The NSA Has Taken Over the Internet Backbone. We’re Suing to Get It Back.
Blow off Snowden all you like, but what was revealed to be true is still true. The NSA lacks oversight with power. FISA is already too much and now they casually exceed even that generous provision. The world first learned ...

4 days, 19 hours ago
Views: 608 • Comments: 9
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 3
Lumberhead
Lead Prosecutor Apologizes, Admits Mistakes in Glenn Ford Case
This is a powerful admission of culpability and I applaud his courage in making it. It really should be read in its entirety. Glenn Ford should be completely compensated to every extent possible because of the flaws of a system ...

1 week ago
Views: 764 • Comments: 4
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 8
Dark_Falcon
Sarah Vine of the DM gets it wrong on teaching about rape.
Sarah Vine of the DM gets it wrong: SARAH VINE: Teaching 11-year-olds about rape is a form of child abuse The problem with this country, I've come to realise, is that it treats adults like children and children like adults. ...

2 weeks, 1 day ago
Views: 1,186 • Comments: 6
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 9
Fred72
Obama, Reagan, treaties, and agreements
So sayeth Conservative Reason: This was a deal. Not an agreement. Not a treaty. A treaty lasts months, years, or decades. This was a short-term project to solve an immediate crisis. Were laws broken? Sure. But there was no violation ...

2 weeks, 6 days ago
Views: 1,294 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
 Frank says:

In the fight between you and the world, back the world.