IGNORANCE IN IDAHO: Lawmaker Equates Abortion Rights to Prostitution - Spokesman.com - Jan. 17, 2013
Mendive, a freshman lawmaker, defended his question in an interview with The Spokesman-Review.
“I am anti-abortion, so that’s why I brought up that question,” he said.
Mendive said, “Actually I grew up in Kellogg, and the reality is there used to be brothels in Wallace. That was a career choice - no one forced them into that.”
He said he didn’t mean that he thinks prostitution should be legal. “I think that there’s kind of a double standard,” he said. “With abortion there are two beating hearts, and prostitution, there’s just one. If a woman were going to make a choice to be a prostitute, that’s her decision as to what to do with her body.”
He said in his view, it’s comparable to someone deciding to use illegal drugs. “I don’t support that either,” he said. “Those were just examples.”
Mendive said he didn’t feel like his question was answered.
Hopkins said after the event, “He was correlating a criminal action with something that is constitutionally protected. Those are two completely separate issues.”
A woman may choose prostitution just as she may choose to rob a bank, but “that would be criminal activity that is not constitutionally protected,” she said.
House Majority Caucus Chairman John Vander Woude, R-Meridian, said Mendive’s “example, in my opinion, was a very poor choice.” Vander Woude said, “Rarely when a woman becomes a prostitute, is it because of a choice.”
This incident marks the second time in a year in which an Idaho lawmaker has gained national attention from comments he’s made about abortion. Sen. Chuck Winder, of Boise, the Senate assistant majority leader, made comments during the 2012 session in debate over a bill to require a woman to get an ultrasound before an abortion.
“I would hope that when a woman goes into a physician with a rape issue, that that physician will indeed ask her about perhaps her marriage, was this pregnancy caused by normal relations in a marriage, or was it truly caused by a rape,” Winder told the Senate last March.
Winder later said he was misunderstood and never meant to cast doubt on the truthfulness of a woman’s claim of rape.