Pages

17 comments

Jump to bottom
1 EPR-radar  Sat, Jan 19, 2013 2:16:39pm

Has anyone encountered a pro-gun talking point that is stupider that this one?

It would be a real challenge to exceed this level of stupidity, but there are an awful lot of energetic morons out there, so who knows?

2 Destro  Sat, Jan 19, 2013 2:29:07pm

re: #1 EPR-radar

Has anyone encountered a pro-gun talking point that is stupider that this one?

It would be a real challenge to exceed this level of stupidity, but there are an awful lot of energetic morons out there, so who knows?

The one where Jews would have prevented the holocaust if they were armed comes to mind as stupid. The USSR lost 20 million (maybe more) people fighting against the Nazis and they were armed to the teeth. I don’t see how the small Jewish community of Bourgeoisie shop owners would have defeated the Nazis in street battles when the armed Communist Germans lost to them in street fights (and the German Communists did not mind getting into fights in the first place). On and on.

3 Shiplord Kirel  Sat, Jan 19, 2013 2:52:25pm

I addressed this very claim a while back, citing an excellent wikipedia article.
The gun trade was one of the pillars of the slave trade. Some of the numbers are staggering. In the early 1700s, the Netherlands alone exported 20,000 tons of gunpowder to sub-Saharan Africa every year. An average of 400,000 guns were exported to the same area every year by the middle of the century. Among other things, this is more than the combined strength of all the European armies at the time and far more guns than were produced for any European or American domestic market, military orders included.

4 EPR-radar  Sat, Jan 19, 2013 5:38:12pm

re: #2 Destro

GUNZ would have stopped the Holocaust is indeed stupider. It is also more offensive, so some NRA apparatchik doubtless got his horns, tail and cloven hooves for this particlular bit of slime.

5 Skip Intro  Sat, Jan 19, 2013 5:56:18pm

re: #2 Destro

The one where Jews would have prevented the holocaust if they were armed comes to mind as stupid.

There are plenty of examples of how the Nazis responded to partisan attacks. A typical ratio was 10 to 100 dead for every Nazi shot or killed. Important Nazi deaths would require the massacre of an entire village or town, with everyone in it being killed, and the total destruction of the town.

Bands of armed Jews would have been faced with the burning of entire ghettos with everyone in them had they tried armed resistance. Is it really necessary to remind people that it took the combined military forces of the industrialized world five years to overcome the Germans?

6 The Force Ghost of a Flea  Sat, Jan 19, 2013 6:06:23pm

re: #5 Skip Intro

There are plenty of examples of how the Nazis responded to partisan attacks. A typical ratio was 10 to 100 dead for every Nazi shot or killed. Important Nazi deaths would require the massacre of an entire village or town, with everyone in it being killed, and the total destruction of the town.

Bands of armed Jews would have been faced with the burning of entire ghettos with everyone in them had they tried armed resistance. Is it really necessary to remind people that it took the combined military forces of the industrialized world five years to overcome the Germans?

Very much the same kind of retaliatory violence was used in the US South whenever there was a violent incident involving an escaping slave. Each slave rebellion results in an orgy of arbitrary violence against both free and enslaved blacks. And not just shootings and lynchings: rape and elaborate public torture were commonplace.

To look at the history of slavery and say “if they just had guns” is insanely insulting to the people that survived in those conditions. It’s a shallow fantasy of violence as panacea, with no reflection on the deeper context…which is unfortunately a consistent theme of many of these loud “we need guns for freedom” people.

7 EPR-radar  Sat, Jan 19, 2013 6:10:19pm

re: #6 The Ghost of a Flea

Very much the same kind of retaliatory violence was used in the US South whenever there was a violent incident involving an escaping slave. Each slave rebellion results in an orgy of arbitrary violence against both free and enslaved blacks. And not just shootings and lynchings: rape and elaborate public torture were commonplace.

To look at the history of slavery and say “if they just had guns” is insanely insulting to the people that survived in those conditions. It’s a shallow fantasy of violence as panacea, with no reflection on the deeper context…which is unfortunately a consistent theme of many of these loud “we need guns for freedom” people.

These points were also valid in the Jim Crow era —- I’m sure blacks who owned guns had as much to fear from the KKK and other white mob violence as blacks who were unarmed.

In fact, by the time one is seriously considering a heavily armed citizen vs. a mob, civilization is a distant memory. The fact that this fantasy is front and center for wingnuts is a giant tell on their views of modern US society.

8 Destro  Sat, Jan 19, 2013 6:51:46pm

re: #4 EPR-radar

GUNZ would have stopped the Holocaust is indeed stupider. It is also more offensive, so some NRA apparatchik doubtless got his horns, tail and cloven hooves for this particlular bit of slime.

The Jewish uprising against Rome comes to mind. If only the Jews were armed with swords - oh wait they were? How that turn out for them? Oh that bad, huh?

What is most insulting about this “armed Jews could defeat Nazis” claim is that there were armed Jews and they lost and it did not faze the Nazis in the least. Also, Jesus warned what would happen to weak communities if the rise up in arms against Rome. How can right wing Christians forget that example?

9 EPR-radar  Sat, Jan 19, 2013 6:53:36pm

re: #8 Destro

The Jewish uprising against Rome comes to mind. If only the Jews were armed with swords - oh wait they were? How that turn out for them? Oh that bad, huh?

What is most insulting about this “armed Jews could defeat Nazis” claim is that there were armed Jews and they lost and it did not faze the Nazis in the least. Also, Jesus warned what would happen to weak communities if the rise up in arms against Rome. How can right wing Christians forget that example?

Another trick question? The bible is there to be pounded and to be used to beat up others. Actually reading the thing is totally out of the question.

10 Destro  Sat, Jan 19, 2013 6:54:43pm

re: #7 EPR-radar

These points were also valid in the Jim Crow era —- I’m sure blacks who owned guns had as much to fear from the KKK and other white mob violence as blacks who were unarmed.

In fact, by the time one is seriously considering a heavily armed citizen vs. a mob, civilization is a distant memory. The fact that this fantasy is front and center for wingnuts is a giant tell on their views of modern US society.

Blacks did own arms in the South during Jim Crow - for hunting, etc. But if they shot up a white man the man and probably his whole family would be targeted for death. Also, I want to thank Blacks for non-violent resistance against the evil the endured.

America would be a mess if the Black Southern population rose up and carried out a long term “Sandinista” like resistance against white rule.

11 EPR-radar  Sat, Jan 19, 2013 6:57:23pm

re: #10 Destro

Good points. In fact, an open carry by a black person in an unusual location (e.g., a department store) would almost certainly have been viewed as a fatal case of being “uppity” in the Jim Crow south.

12 jaunte  Sat, Jan 19, 2013 7:06:52pm

re: #11 EPR-radar

Probably wouldn’t go over well this week, either.

13 EPR-radar  Sat, Jan 19, 2013 7:11:09pm

re: #12 jaunte

Probably wouldn’t go over well this week, either.

Too true.

In fact, I made a tongue in cheek proposal the other day of getting gun control on the table by having black and brown people do some legal open carrying.

Problem is, this would get people killed and fuel the race war fantasies of the RW nuts.

14 celticdragon  Sat, Jan 19, 2013 7:40:53pm

re: #5 Skip Intro

There are plenty of examples of how the Nazis responded to partisan attacks. A typical ratio was 10 to 100 dead for every Nazi shot or killed. Important Nazi deaths would require the massacre of an entire village or town, with everyone in it being killed, and the total destruction of the town.

Bands of armed Jews would have been faced with the burning of entire ghettos with everyone in them had they tried armed resistance. Is it really necessary to remind people that it took the combined military forces of the industrialized world five years to overcome the Germans?

It should be kept in mind that Jews after the war actually took the view that they would be armed and not permit anybody to get a second chance at them.

They might not have been able to stop the Holocaust the first time around, but they sure as hell made certain that they would be armed to the teeth after that. Note the armed Jewish partisans in post WW II British Palestine.

Also, German reprisals did not significantly deter the French Resistance or partisan fighting in the Ukraine, Norway or the Netherlands.

15 celticdragon  Sat, Jan 19, 2013 7:42:45pm

re: #13 EPR-radar

Too true.

In fact, I made a tongue in cheek proposal the other day of getting gun control on the table by having black and brown people do some legal open carrying.

Problem is, this would get people killed and fuel the race war fantasies of the RW nuts.

There are a number of NRA members who have actually advocated this. They point out (with some historical justification) that many gun control laws were specifically aimed at disarming minorities.

16 Destro  Sat, Jan 19, 2013 8:07:19pm

re: #14 celticdragon

It should be kept in mind that Jews after the war actually took the view that they would be armed and not permit anybody to get a second chance at them.

And that would have stopped Hitler and his Nazis (who enjoyed armed fighting in the streets) how?

And how is that relevant to American politics? What kind of American thinks his fellow Americans are planning to genocide him and his kind here?

17 Romantic Heretic  Sun, Jan 20, 2013 4:10:04am

re: #14 celticdragon

Also, German reprisals did not significantly deter the French Resistance or partisan fighting in the Ukraine, Norway or the Netherlands.

True, but they were backed and organized by the Allies, and there is no way they could have defeated the Nazis.

As an example look at what happened to resistance to the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe during the Cold War. Brutally and successfully repressed for decades. Only once the Soviet Union became too weak to stop them did groups like Solidarity survive and thrive.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

TwitterFacebook

Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing!
Take advantage of our New Year subscription special, and save 25% off the normal subscription price! For a limited time, one-year ad-free subscriptions are just $59.95. Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing now and save!
Read more...

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form
LGF Pages

This button leads to the main index of LGF Pages, our user-submitted articles. You can post your own LGF Pages simply by registering a free account with us.

Create a Page

This is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.

Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.

Last updated: 2014-12-15 2:06 pm PST

LGF User's Guide
Recent Pages
Thanos
Here’s how the BBC, disrupted by technology and new habits, is thinking about its future
... but on their interactive page they use Flash. The BBC was first granted a royal charter in 1927, and the charter has been renewed every 10 years since then. Its current charter expires on Dec. 31, 2016, and the ...

1 hour, 21 minutes ago
Views: 69 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Mich-again
Tech start-up infuses street view maps with infrared images
Pathteacher: MIT Professor invents way to illegally search thousands of homes for his business start-up. What in the world are these people thinking? The legality of their business model, which involves taking unsolicited drive-by heat scans of private residences is ...

5 hours, 4 minutes ago
Views: 83 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 0
Rightwingconspirator
Tighten the Rules on E-Cigarettes? Is This Good Oversight?
The state report is not, however, an objective assessment. It obviously includes only the most damaging information about e-cigarettes. For example, some other studies have found potentially encouraging signs that vaping might help some smokers quit. In other words, ...

1 day ago
Views: 179 • Comments: 3
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5
FemNaziBitch
Watch a US Senator Cite the Bible to Prove That Humans Aren’t Causing Global Warming
When Whitehouse first introduced this amendment a couple days ago, he made clear that by "climate change," he was referring to "what our carbon pollution...is doing to our atmosphere and what it is doing to our oceans." But the ...

1 day, 7 hours ago
Views: 312 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Khal Wimpo
Chuck C. Johnson boosting Twitter via fake followers
...in related news, water found to be wet. It's become common for politicians and companies looking to puff up their social profiles to "buy" followers from shady-ass sploggers. Which works when you're starting up, but after you start to get ...

2 days, 16 hours ago
Views: 690 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 149 • Rating: 6
aagcobb
The Average American Household Was Poorer in 2013 Than It Was in 1983 - Vox
Matthew Yglesias, Vox: The Average American Household Was Poorer in 2013 Than It Was in 1983 - Vox US net worth rose considerably over that period, which is what you would expect to see. Technology has improved and productivity increased, ...

2 days, 17 hours ago
Views: 232 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4
Lumberhead
Scott Walker’s Divisive Message
If any candidate could run a rigid campaign of polarization--aimed at winning as many white voters as possible--it's Walker. His language is already there. In his Iowa speech, he touted voter-identification laws and portrayed disadvantage as a pure product ...

2 days, 17 hours ago
Views: 382 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 5 • Rating: 4
Rocky-in-Connecticut
Republican Governor’s State-Run Media Outlet
I guess Republicans are against state-run enterprises except when they are for it. Indiana Governor (R) to start up State-Run official mouthpiece news outlet.indystar.com Hey- If a nice guy Republican/Tea Party favorite like Putin can have his own state-run mouthpiece, ...

2 days, 23 hours ago
Views: 257 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4
The Vicious Babushka
What a Soviet Soldier Saw When His Unit Liberated Auschwitz 70 Years Ago
More: What a Soviet Soldier Saw When His Unit Liberated Auschwitz 70 Years Ago When the Soviet Army's 322nd Rifle Division entered the concentration camp at Auschwitz on Jan. 27, 1945, they found a desolation. Mounted on shaggy ponies, they ...

4 days, 3 hours ago
Views: 653 • Comments: 5
Tweets: 3 • Rating: 9
Skip Intro
Republican Net Neutrality Bill Would Gut FCC’s Authority Over Broadband
The party of pure evil strikes again. Net neutrality legislation unveiled by Republicans today would gut the ability of the Federal Communications Commission to regulate the broadband industry. As expected, the bill forbids the FCC from reclassifying broadband as a ...

1 week, 5 days ago
Views: 679 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 2 • Rating: 6
 Frank says:

I can gross out anybody in this room. -- Said during a concert at Mount Holyoke College in the early 1970s.