Pages

24 comments

Jump to bottom
1 Gus  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 10:07:09am

Anwar al-Awlaki wasn’t just some American minding his own business on holiday overseas. He was connected to the following:

Fort Hood shooter
Christmas Day “Underwear Bomber”
Sharif Mobley
Times Square bomber
Stabbing of British former minister Stephen Timms
Seattle Weekly cartoonist death threat
British passenger plane plot
Cargo planes bomb plot

Had the Christmas Day “Underwear Bomber” been successful, 290 people would have been murdered.

Oh, and drones are incidental since they’re merely a weapons delivery system. However, it does make for good page hit grabbing headlines.

2 Political Atheist  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 10:38:57am

re: #1 Gus

The change in how we view imminet threat is what is changing. Right now that means drones and Obama. In the near future that will be global strike, various weapons and the same legal dilemma. The possibility some strikes are war crimes under international law.

That Iraq WMD threat was legally “imminent” enough to invade. This is not just grabbing headlines. A bit more from the article

“The Justice Department’s legal arguments purportedly defending targeted killing fundamentally misconceive the nature of self-defense,” University of Notre Dame professor Mary Ellen O’Connell said in a prepared statement. “It is a right to use military force against a state that has or is about to launched a major military attack on the United States. The 9/11 attacks led to a war of self-defense in Afghanistan. That had all the hallmarks of legality. Contrast that use of force with the CIA firing of missiles from drones at a single individual and innocent bystanders in Yemen. You do not need to be an expert in international law to understand the enormous violation of law involved and the egregious conduct involved in attempting to exploit lack of knowledge of the law to achieve political cover for targeted killing.”

Do we want future Presidents wielding this authority?

3 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 10:43:54am

re: #2 Political Atheist

I think the fact the Iraq invasion (based on highly criticized evidence that didn’t get thoroughly critiqued) is legally fine and a drone strike against a guy with a very high degree of certainty is legally dubious shows that what’s legally right and wrong isn’t the most important yardstick to measure the wisdom of these actions.

4 Gus  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 10:45:50am

re: #2 Political Atheist

The change in how we view imminet threat is what is changing. Right now that means drones and Obama. In the near future that will be global strike, various weapons and the same legal dilemma. The possibility some strikes are war crimes under international law.

That Iraq WMD threat was legally “imminent” enough to invade. This is not just grabbing headlines. A bit more from the article

Do we want future Presidents wielding this authority?

When al-Qaeda and the Taliban start talking about the legality and ethics of their operations then perhaps we can talk. In the mean time, we seem to be having a lop-sided philosophical debate on the topic. Also, the notion that “Obama is droning Americans” has been extremely sensationalized and over-dramatized. This policy has been put to use minimally.

I eagerly await for al-Qaeda and the Taliban to enter this moral debate.

5 harrylook  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 11:18:52am

Gosh, so glad you trust the current president to be correct when he orders an extra-judicial assassination of an American citizen. When the next guy comes in, though, we should re-instate the 14th Amendment.

Remember,
Waterboarding al Qaeda: against our values!
Military tribunal for al Qaeda: against our values!
Obama assassinating Americans: whatever….

Also, was al Awlaki’s 16 year old son was a “senior operational leader” of al Qaeda? Maybe they were targeting someone he was with, but we don’t know b/c it’s secret. So, reviewing administration’s stance: we can kill you based upon our suspicion; there need not be any intelligence of an imminent attack; and we never have to account for or justify any of this.

6 Political Atheist  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 12:42:18pm

re: #4 Gus

Unlike the Taliban, we have agreed to obey the law. When did we end that?

7 Political Atheist  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 12:53:29pm

re: #3 Obdicut

I think the fact the Iraq invasion (based on highly criticized evidence that didn’t get thoroughly critiqued) is legally fine and a drone strike against a guy with a very high degree of certainty is legally dubious shows that what’s legally right and wrong isn’t the most important yardstick to measure the wisdom of these actions.

Since the criteria is secret )we have no idea how certain) and the administration has re defined imminence, (no proof they won’t attack) the article makes a very valid point. Our drone strike program might sometimes be a war crime.

8 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 12:56:51pm

re: #7 Political Atheist

Since the criteria is secret )we have no idea how certain) and the administration has re defined imminence, (no proof they won’t attack) the article makes a very valid point. Our drone strike program might sometimes be a war crime.

It makes a perfectly valid point. My point is that saying the invasion of Iraq was legal and drone strikes aren’t is actually working against your point, since the Iraq war was far more dangerous, killed far more people, etc. so much more than the drone strikes do.

I think that our drone stuff isn’t actually useful and should be stopped, but in terms of whether it’s formally a war crime, I don’t care nearly as much as I do of the massive loss of life represented by the Iraq war and what led us to that point.

9 EPR-radar  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 1:05:11pm

re: #7 Political Atheist

Since the criteria is secret )we have no idea how certain) and the administration has re defined imminence, (no proof they won’t attack) the article makes a very valid point. Our drone strike program might sometimes be a war crime.

No other nation in the world presently has the military power to make a war crimes charge against the US stick, and this is likely to be true for many years to come. Thus the question of “war crimes” may be more of a distraction than anything else.

The underlying issue of the shaky grounds for this kind of preemptive action (both assassinations of individuals and preemptive wars such as Iraq) is, IMO, the main point.

Not so incidentally, I also tend to regard the issue of whether or not an individual assassination target is a US citizen as basically a distraction.

10 Political Atheist  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 2:18:38pm

re: #8 Obdicut

It makes a perfectly valid point. My point is that saying the invasion of Iraq was legal and drone strikes aren’t is actually working against your point, since the Iraq war was far more dangerous, killed far more people, etc. so much more than the drone strikes do.

I think that our drone stuff isn’t actually useful and should be stopped, but in terms of whether it’s formally a war crime, I don’t care nearly as much as I do of the massive loss of life represented by the Iraq war and what led us to that point.

The actual legality of the Iraq invasion is a matter of quite some dispute. Since “Bush lied people died” became the most common conclusion after the weapons were not there at all. Either we have a policy that has a rational definition of imminence or we don’t. At this time do not. That’s damn dangerous for a nation this powerful and frankly, reactionary.

11 Gus  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 2:19:44pm

The death of Awlaki is a major blow to Al-Qaeda’s most active operational affiliate. He took the lead in planning and directing efforts to murder innocent Americans … and he repeatedly called on individuals in the United States and around the globe to kill innocent men, women and children to advance a murderous agenda. [The strike] is further proof that Al-Qaeda and its affiliates will find no safe haven anywhere in the world.
— President Barack Obama

12 Political Atheist  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 2:22:05pm

re: #11 Gus

Would we be so accepting of this policy if Mitt Romney had won? Or worse?

13 EPR-radar  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 2:23:11pm

re: #10 Political Atheist

The actual legality of the Iraq invasion is a matter of quite some dispute. Since “Bush lied people died” became the most common conclusion after the weapons were not there at all. Either we have a policy that has a rational definition of imminence or we don’t. At this time do not. That’s damn dangerous for a nation this powerful and frankly, reactionary.

To be fair to both the Bush and Obama administrations, a good definition of ‘imminence’ in this context is not easy to come up with.

In both administrations, political expediency seems to be taking the place of principle. Bush wanted to go to war in Iraq, and made up excuses to do so. Obama (correctly) sees that there is little political danger in an aggressive drone strike policy, so that is implemented.

14 Gus  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 2:28:19pm

re: #12 Political Atheist

Would we be so accepting of this policy if Mitt Romney had won? Or worse?

Awlaki remains the only American “citizen” to have been eliminated under the so called “kill list.” I do not see any “droning of American citizens” as the hyped title of this article implies. Drone Americans?

So to answer your question, would I be more accepting? I think the answer would be I would trust Obama’s judgement better on this matter.

How would you have felt if this happened under a Republican president? How would you have felt in 2004?

15 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 2:39:04pm

re: #10 Political Atheist

The actual legality of the Iraq invasion is a matter of quite some dispute.

Well, what you said before was:

That Iraq WMD threat was legally “imminent” enough to invade.

16 Achilles Tang  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 3:28:34pm

re: #6 Political Atheist

Unlike the Taliban, we have agreed to obey the law. When did we end that?

Do you think “the law” can deal with all circumstances?

17 Achilles Tang  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 3:34:36pm

We have no problem with helicopters or airplanes with cameras, as long as they have a pilot on-board; but we are supposed to freak out if a similar vehicle happens to be piloted remotely.

The real advantage with using drones domestically is in various remote sensing modes, for agriculture, mapping and the like; which we also do now with piloted planes and satellites.

This whole issue is cretinous.

18 Political Atheist  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 3:59:25pm

re: #15 Obdicut

Well, what you said before was:

But then we found out it was not imminent at all. Hopefully that makes a difference in the legality. re: #17 Achilles Tang

We have no problem with helicopters or airplanes with cameras, as long as they have a pilot on-board; but we are supposed to freak out if a similar vehicle happens to be piloted remotely.

The real advantage with using drones domestically is in various remote sensing modes, for agriculture, mapping and the like; which we also do now with piloted planes and satellites.

This whole issue is cretinous.

Not at all! It’s not about drones as much as it is about precision weapons as an assassination tool. As I said above, for this President later in his term and more Presidents to come, “prompt global strike” (a hypersonic cruise missile able to hit anywhere in the world very quickly and accurately enough to go after a particular office or vehicle) will matter a lot. see these are weapons that go places where our manned forces could not. It’s about the extra reach, and as an assassination tool.

And it’s about altering the meaning of imminent. That has implication for conventional military forces being used too.

19 Political Atheist  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 4:03:38pm

re: #14 Ghost of Gus

How would you have felt if this happened under a Republican president? How would you have felt in 2004?

The Patriot Act and what followed has given me pause since it failed to sunset as promised. That might be after ‘04. Before that I took it as a matter of faith in our government, Bush and the military. The fail to end it as promised really got my attention and holds it to this day. The drone war does give me some concerns as I mentioned in my #18. When we redefine terms to be so broad we should all take notice.

20 EPR-radar  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 4:09:14pm

re: #19 Political Atheist

The Patriot Act and what followed has given me pause since it failed to sunset as promised. That might be after ‘04. Before that I took it as a matter of faith in our government, Bush and the military. The fail to end it as promised really got my attention and holds it to this day. The drone war does give me some concerns as I mentioned in my #18. When we redefine terms to be so broad we should all take notice.

No president wants to be the one to back off on these extraordinary powers, then possibly suffer the political catastrophe of a terrorist attack afterward.

Sunsetting the ‘Patriot Act’ was never a credible possibility.

21 Achilles Tang  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 4:30:15pm

re: #18 Political Atheist

But then we found out it was not imminent at all. Hopefully that makes a difference in the legality. re: #17 Achilles Tang

Not at all! It’s not about drones as much as it is about precision weapons as an assassination tool. As I said above, for this President later in his term and more Presidents to come, “prompt global strike” (a hypersonic cruise missile able to hit anywhere in the world very quickly and accurately enough to go after a particular office or vehicle) will matter a lot. see these are weapons that go places where our manned forces could not. It’s about the extra reach, and as an assassination tool.

And it’s about altering the meaning of imminent. That has implication for conventional military forces being used too.

The military aspect, internationally is different. I was commenting on what I have been reading about domestic use of drones.

As to assassination; while we do need checks on who says kill, and I believe there are such checks even though for some there will never be enough; but the same people will have nothing to say if we land twenty men in harms way to attempt to “arrest” someone who can be guaranteed to resist with violence and probably be killed, with some of our own.

It’s not a perfect world and can’t be made so. People need to live with that.

22 hellosnackbar  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 5:43:54pm

Drone technology is coming on a pace.
In a recent PBS documentary a chap working for BA e systems demonstrated
a 360 degree surveillance system whereby enemy identification was almost fool proof.
The only disadvantage of this technology is the incursion into privacy.
Little four propellor helicopters can fly along corridors and through hoops.
Drones are taking military campaigns into a whole new area.
And fortunately the US is way in the lead!!!
Obama had turned out to be a lot smarter than I first thought.

23 Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut  Tue, Feb 5, 2013 7:28:10pm

re: #18 Political Atheist

But then we found out it was not imminent at all. Hopefully that makes a difference in the legality.

It can’t post facto be an illegal war, unless you’re alleging that there was an actual conspiracy by Bush et al to defraud the US public.

24 harrylook  Wed, Feb 6, 2013 6:28:51am

Recall that the reviled Patriot Act involved Congress and the FISA court. This is a major expansion of presidential power. Hard to imagine a more slippery slope than the one created by this terrible white paper.

And of course, the vast majority of Obama supporters have nothing to say about it, because for them it is all about the man and never about the principles.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

TwitterFacebook

Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day (per month) or 22 cents a day (per year), our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form
LGF Pages

This button leads to the main index of LGF Pages, our user-submitted articles. You can post your own LGF Pages simply by registering a free account with us.

Create a Page

This is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.

Last updated: 2014-03-07 2:19 pm PST

LGF User's Guide
Recent Pages
CriticalDragon1177
New Exoplanet Could Be Earth’s Cousin — Or Something Totally Alien
This could be potentaily the first world we have found besides Earth that actually has Life on it. Than again, we can't be sure yet, so don't get your hopes up. Adam Mann reports, Astronomers are one step closer to discovering Earth Two. They have found an exoplanet slightly larger than our own, orbiting a star at a distance where it could have liquid ...

27 minutes ago
Views: 47 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Aqua Obama
Comcast PAC Gave Money to Every Senator Examining Time Warner Cable Merger
It's no surprise that Comcast donates money to members of Congress. Political connections come in handy for a company seeking government approval of mergers, like Comcast's 2011 purchase of NBCUniversal and its proposed acquisition of Time Warner Cable (TWC). But just how many politicians have accepted money from Comcast's political arm? In the case of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which held the first ...

1 hour, 12 minutes ago
Views: 114 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 4 • Rating: 0
Skip Intro
Edward Snowden’s Disembodied Head Makes Sweet Love to Dreamy Heartthrob Vladimir Putin
Vladimir Putin held his annual call-in show & Freedom Telethon today on the completely objective, totally independent, RT network (Page 6 Pravda ). While most starstruck conservatives were unable to get through to yell "Show us your boobs!", Edward Snowden - the Max Headroom of the tech-bro set - managed to make a video request of DJ Vlad, and it wasn't for Free ...

1 hour, 29 minutes ago
Views: 36 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
FemNaziBitch
Judge Rules North Dakota’s Ban on Abortions After 6 Weeks Unconstitutional
North Dakota's law banning abortions after 6 weeks of pregnancy is unconstitutional, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, striking down what critics had called the nation's most extreme limit on the procedure. The law, which was approved last year but never took effect, made it a crime for a woman to abort a fetus with a detectable heartbeat. Offending doctors faced up to five ...

1 hour, 52 minutes ago
Views: 122 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 7 • Rating: 1
Randall Gross
Healing Is the Message at Interfaith Service for Victims of Sunday’s Shootings
Clergy of different faiths, joined by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, delivered messages of hope and unity Thursday before more than 1,300 people gathered at the Jewish Community Center in Overland Park. "A pall has been cast over our great nation," Holder said. "We gather today not in joy, but in solemn reflection." The overall message, however, was focused on the power of ...

6 hours, 9 minutes ago
Views: 60 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
palmerskiss
More Than Half the Women in These Countries Are Married by the Time They Turn 18
The report is as sad as it is horrifying. A child bride forced into marriage in Nigeria has been accused of killing her much older groom and three of his friends by poisoning their meals with rat poison. The 14-year-old girl, Wasila Umaru, was married to the 35-year-old man last week. Although she told authorities she was forced into the betrothal, Wasila will ...

21 hours, 26 minutes ago
Views: 141 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Idle Drifter
Calgary stabbings: How knife crime in Canada can cause ‘moral panic’
What Calgary police chief Rick Hanson called the "worst mass murder" in the city's history didn't end at the barrel of a gun. Instead, the 22-year-old suspect identified on Tuesday as Matthew de Grood is accused of entering the kitchen at a house party, taking "a large knife" and using it to fatally stab four men and one woman, all of whom were students ...

1 day, 10 hours ago
Views: 138 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
aagcobb
New York Electoral College: State Joins National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
Ben Mathis-Lilley, Slate: New York Electoral College: State Joins National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. Instead of pushing for a Constitutional amendment, which would have to be ratified in 38 states, advocates ask individual state legislatures to pass an agreement: that they'll pledge all their presidential electors to the winner of the national popular vote as soon as enough other states pass the law to ...

1 day, 16 hours ago
Views: 177 • Comments: 7
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
cycroft
Russ Campbell’s Blog: Will Trudeau’s Party Pay for His Ill-Chosen Words?
Justin Trudeau has talked him­self into a defama­tion law­suit that is likely to leave his party quite a bit lighter in the wal­let. The shoot-from-the-lip Lib­eral leader and his On­tario cam­paign co-chair David Mac­Naughton are named in a $1.5-mil­lion li­bel suit filed on be­half of Chris­tine Innes, a can­di­date who was barred from run­ning for the Lib­eral party. Innes had wanted to con­test ...

1 day, 23 hours ago
Views: 113 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Political Atheist
The Insane History of Rockets at Jet Propulsion Laboratories
The Rocket Boys In the late 1930s, a group of Caltech graduate students were booted off campus after blowing up (part of!) their building during a rocket test gone awry. Unwilling to give up on the joy of semi-controlled explosions, the students and a few of their friends headed into the San Gabriel Mountains. They picked a deserted gully -- Arroyo Seco -- ...

2 days, 13 hours ago
Views: 219 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 2
 Frank says:

Whenever you're down, just think about how you got there.