Pages

Jump to bottom

3 comments

1 RadicalModerate  Tue, May 14, 2013 1:18:51pm

Extreme Tech has some serious backpedaling to do, as forensic analysis of the photo by some of the world’s foremost experts in digital imagery has deemed that it is not a faked/composited picture.

Digital photography experts confirm the integrity of Paul Hansen’s image files

Tue, 05/14/2013 - 19:33

Following recent discussion and speculation in the media about the photograph by Paul Hansen, selected as World Press Photo of the Year 2012 by the contest jury, World Press Photo has submitted the image files for a forensic analysis. The purpose of the investigation into the authenticity and editing history of the picture is to curtail any further speculation about the integrity of the image and to establish that it is not a composite.

Paul Hansen has previously described in detail how he processed the image file and World Press Photo has not had any reason to question his explanation. He has now again fully cooperated in the investigation carried out by independent experts. After examining the RAW file and the JPEG image entered in the competition, these are the experts’ conclusions:

“We have reviewed the RAW image, as supplied by World Press Photo, and the resulting published JPEG image. It is clear that the published photo was retouched with respect to both global and local color and tone. Beyond this, however, we find no evidence of significant photo manipulation or compositing. Furthermore, the analysis purporting photo manipulation is deeply flawed, as described briefly below.”

2 Randall Gross  Tue, May 14, 2013 3:08:40pm

Apparently the claim that it’s a fake is fake.

3 stabby  Wed, May 15, 2013 5:13:56pm

I looked at what is supposedly the original and the winner, to me the obvious differences are in the faces of the dead children, the color has been drained from them and the contrast raised.

Making them artificially colorless makes them LOOK dead while in the original, deeply saturated color (overly saturated even) makes them look no less alive than the adults. And the raised contrast draws the eye to them.

Presumably the photographer wanted the bodies to look a bit more lifeless in order to underline their deaths.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2021-06-05 2:51 pm PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds Tweet

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app Shop at amazon
as an LGF Associate!
Recent PagesClick to refresh
Uncommon US Flags #2: Commissioning Pennant A Commissioning Pennant is a flag flown from the masthead of a warship from the moment the ship is placed in service until the moment it is decommissioned. The only time the pennant is not displayed on a US ...
Anymouse 🌹🏡😷
1 day, 18 hours ago
Views: 230 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 4
Tweets: 1 •