More on L’Affiare Snowden: Reuters, Wired, The Hill
Jack Shafer, Reuters:
Edward Snowden’s expansive disclosures to the Guardian and the Washington Post about various National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance programs have only two corollaries in contemporary history—the classified cache Bradley Manning allegedly released to WikiLeaks a few years ago and Daniel Ellsberg’s dissemination of the voluminous Pentagon Papers to the New York Times and other newspapers in 1971.
Leakers like Snowden, Manning and Ellsberg don’t merely risk being called narcissists, traitors or mental cases for having liberated state secrets for public scrutiny. They absolutely guarantee it. In the last two days, the New York Times’s David Brooks, Politico’s Roger Simon, the Washington Post‘s Richard Cohen and others have vilified Snowden for revealing the government’s aggressive spying on its own citizens, calling him self-indulgent, a loser and a narcissist.
Yet even as the insults pile up and the amateur psychoanalysis intensifies, keep in mind that Snowden’s leak has more in common with the standard Washington leak than should make the likes of Brooks, Simon and Cohen comfortable. Without defending Snowden for breaking his vow to safeguard secrets, he’s only done in the macro what the national security establishment does in the micro every day of the week to manage, manipulate and influence ongoing policy debates. Keeping the policy leak separate from the heretic leak is crucial to understanding how these stories play out in the press.
Sometimes the index finger of government has no idea of what the thumb is up to. In 2007, Vice President Cheney went directly to Bush with his complaint about what he considered to be a damaging national security leak in a column by the Washington Post’s David Ignatius. “Whoever is leaking information like this to the press is doing a real disservice, Mr. President,” Cheney said. Later, Bush’s national security adviser paid a visit to Cheney to explain that Bush, um, had authorized him to make the leak to Ignatius.
Kevin Poulson, Wired:
Don’t read this if you aren’t him.
——-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE——-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - gpgtools.orghQIMA1tQlAt53r41ARAAsCwY0VverVliy5i29NafjAEhFpmwDDAHVdzOYtnGbOHL
Hi1t1hgRPe5NBD%2BAnDENmUbJf4hNxH88Uh4qTqy8ja4qAWyRSJXENijZs2Pjhv%2B8
ovJhDSDK3N8bGDcM7XS7o1FGrLJtpV2CqP4DP4rSr4fcQz1ZnRWrnBP9XI6FAbEp
XXRtW6mbtPWTLfgvn91Ka3aJGegXl6rFYeqmXgmZiPYrnmNSAgFGSKg%2BEr2Kz%2BjE
sl4tS/hqP9vhAAWWCOvT7U5LMuDGjawsBXjHTPA9FokP07euxRPxMraz5FmrtZYb
erFhkMlW5IV5zG1BEO5TetyM66hAZid/QwdFzlDW3wHQoYJdJWcZEYY0tGWbL3%2Bh
mfgcNX9gwnn0o0fU6xqpn/cApv3uZUkNIFPxQXGzHqrs/Vv215ut8zwLI17G/FIF
McuOAP%2BUpw4WSVUxw5%2BUhzRZazW1AO2DaipBou/3IIez0WhXhEB4AIwjdH5ATk7p
….
Alexander Boulton, The Hill:
Only 47 of 100 senators attended the 2:30 briefing, leaving dozens of chairs in the secure meeting room empty as Clapper, Alexander and other senior officials told lawmakers about classified programs to monitor millions of telephone calls and broad swaths of Internet activity. The room on the lower level of the Capitol Visitor Center is large enough to fit the entire Senate membership, according to a Senate aide.
The Hill was not provided the names of who did, and who didn’t, attend the briefing