Pages

Jump to bottom

2 comments

1 XtremeDave  Wed, Sep 4, 2013 10:32:34pm

I’m all for cannabis legalization (seriously California, get on it), but I can’t say I approve of what the Justice Department is doing regarding Colorado and Washington’s laws. If the Federal Government will approve states legalizing cannabis, then there should also be an effort to amend the Controlled Substances Act to remove cannabis from Schedule I and not place the freedom to buy, sell and use this plant at the will of US Attorneys, the DOJ and White House.

As much as I want to see Rand Paul get on a stage and pretend he didn’t worship Aqua Buddha to the 63% of Republicans who are opposed to legalization and laugh at the others who will undoubtedly play the reefer madness card, states need to know that the rule of law is behind them when they chose to legalize cannabis. John McCain and Mitt Romney would not have made the same decision that President Obama and Eric Holder made, and people who want to use and/or make a living off the production and sale of cannabis should be able to know that their freedom doesn’t rely on which party occupies the White House.

2 Amory Blaine  Thu, Sep 5, 2013 6:09:22am

I disagree regarding political ramifications for the GOP in 16. Removing it from schedule 1 will have ramifications for the dems. If Obama (proxy for the Justice Dept) does it, repubs will use every single hiccup re. pot legalization to attack dems as soft on horrible drug addiction. This way it remains in the states rights realm where it can be used to attack republicans as hypocrites. The classification can be used as a hammer of government meddling. The dems can use the argument that these state laws are new, and are closely examining the removal.


edit
Pot was non addicting 30 years ago. No one died from it 30 years ago. The public is fickle. All it will take to change public perception is some school bus driver with pot in his system getting hit by a train or something killing every child on board. Mixed with a media bent on creating controversy then there we’ll be. Right back to Nixon.

And plus, the author thinks there can be some kind of bipartisan agreement before the primaries? Is he out of his mind? Does he live in this country? As regards to his very weak argument of being at odds with UN treaties, well where is the UN to punish the use of chemical weapons in Syria?


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
The Pandemic Cost 7 Million Lives, but Talks to Prevent a Repeat Stall In late 2021, as the world reeled from the arrival of the highly contagious omicron variant of the coronavirus, representatives of almost 200 countries met - some online, some in-person in Geneva - hoping to forestall a future worldwide ...
Cheechako
3 days ago
Views: 121 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
2 weeks ago
Views: 283 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1