Pages

Jump to bottom

9 comments

1 Timothy Watson  Wed, Feb 26, 2014 2:12:08pm

Not a lawyer and didn’t stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, but I’m pretty sure that this ruling is entirely consistent with prior decisions.

A lone roommate (Roommate #1 in this example) can give consent for police to search the common area of an apartment or home. If the evidence was found in the other roommate’s (Roommate #2) bedroom or a private area secured by a lock which Roommate #2 only had a key to, there would be problems for the police.

2 Timothy Watson  Wed, Feb 26, 2014 2:18:04pm

In addition, here’s what a piece at SCOTUSblog had to say:

(1) After Fernandez, it’s pretty easy for the police to get around Georgia v. Randolph. Officers can just ask for consent when the target is not present. But this isn’t a major change in the law. The majority opinion in Fernandez largely reaffirms the narrow interpretation of Randolph adopted by lower courts in the years following Randolph.

In addition, here’s an opinion piece where the author calls the decision “narrow[]”.

3 BishopX  Wed, Feb 26, 2014 5:07:45pm

re: #1 Timothy Watson

The issue here is that the police are allowed to physically remove room mate #2, return and then ask room mate #1 for permission after room mate #2 already refused.

Particulalar to this case, the police returned and then threatened to take the child of room mate #1 unless she consented to a search…

It may be narrow but it’s pretty meaningful.

4 Timothy Watson  Wed, Feb 26, 2014 5:59:31pm

re: #3 BishopX

He wasn’t removed, he was placed under arrest for domestic assault. Previous case law said that he was okay to remove someone from a crime scene who refused consent if it was “objectionably reasonable”. Just like pretextual traffic stops, the Supreme Court doesn’t care about subjective arguments.

Further, if a husband beats the crap out of wife, gets arrested, tells the police that they can’t search for a baseball bat or another weapon that was used, the wife can’t give consent to search the house?

As for the consent of the roommate, the facts were in dispute:

Both petitioner and the dissent suggest that Rojas’ consent was coerced. Post, at 9, n. 5 (opinion of Ginsburg, J.). But the trial court found otherwise, App. 152, and the correctness of that finding is not before us. In suggesting that Rojas’ consent was coerced, the dissent recites portions of Rojas’ testimony from the suppression hearing that the trial judge appears to have rejected. Ibid. Similarly, the jury plainly did not find Rojas to be credible. At trial, she testified for the defense and told the jury, among other things, that the wounds observed by the officers who came to her door were not inflicted by petitioner but by a woman looking for petitioner during a fight. 208 Cal. App. 4th 100, 109-110, 145 Cal. Rptr. 3d 51, 56 (2012). The jury obviously did not believe this testimony because it found petitioner guilty of inflicting corporal injury on her. (Fernandez v. California (slip opinion), fn. 2)

FYI: Neither the trial court nor the California Court of Appeals agreed with the petitioner’s arguments, and the California Supreme Court refused to hear the case.

5 Dark_Falcon  Wed, Feb 26, 2014 7:32:37pm

re: #4 Timothy Watson

He wasn’t removed, he was placed under arrest for domestic assault. Previous case law said that he was okay to remove someone from a crime scene who refused consent if it was “objectionably reasonable”. Just like pretextual traffic stops, the Supreme Court doesn’t care about subjective arguments.

Further, if a husband beats the crap out of wife, gets arrested, tells the police that they can’t search for a baseball bat or another weapon that was used, the wife can’t give consent to search the house?

As for the consent of the roommate, the facts were in dispute:

FYI: Neither the trial court nor the California Court of Appeals agreed with the petitioner’s arguments, and the California Supreme Court refused to hear the case.

THIS. GGT, you shouldn’t be unhappy about this one. The Supreme Court essentially ruled in defense of battered women and against rape culture. Isn’t that a good thing?

6 FemNaziBitch  Thu, Feb 27, 2014 5:55:54am

It is my understanding that if the police believe a person is in imminent danger they do not need a warrant. This, IIRC, was a decided in a previous SCOTUS case.

Further, if a husband beats the crap out of wife, gets arrested, tells the police that they can’t search for a baseball bat or another weapon that was used, the wife can’t give consent to search the house?

This makes no sense to me. If a person is under arrest, the police would have time to get a warrant to search the hope with no worries of the person either fleeing or causing more harm to the DV victim.

7 Dark_Falcon  Thu, Feb 27, 2014 6:42:09am

re: #6 FemNaziBitch

It is my understanding that if the police believe a person is in imminent danger they do not need a warrant. This, IIRC, was a decided in a previous SCOTUS case.

This makes no sense to me. If a person is under arrest, the police would have time to get a warrant to search the hope with no worries of the person either fleeing or causing more harm to the DV victim.

Getting a warrant can takes hours and they might have been afraid word would get out and either the wife would recant before the warrant was issued or that someone would sneak into the house and dispose of the evidence. The LAPD doesn’t have to manpower to keep every angle of a normal house under observation for very long except for major crimes, so they may have felt it was “move it or lose it time”.

8 FemNaziBitch  Thu, Feb 27, 2014 5:22:42pm

re: #7 Dark_Falcon

Getting a warrant can takes hours and they might have been afraid word would get out and either the wife would recant before the warrant was issued or that someone would sneak into the house and dispose of the evidence. The LAPD doesn’t have to manpower to keep every angle of a normal house under observation for very long except for major crimes, so they may have felt it was “move it or lose it time”.

These are a lot of theoretical situations which are not mentioned in the original article.

9 Dark_Falcon  Fri, Feb 28, 2014 5:46:54am

re: #8 FemNaziBitch

These are a lot of theoretical situations which are not mentioned in the original article.

True, but the basic point remains: The police had valid consent from someone living in the house to search and therefore performed the search lawfully. Most of the justices currently on the Supreme Court favored a narrowing of the Randolph to allow for practicality. As SCOTUSblog points out, most times it isn’t an issue:

Conclusion

In the end, the practicalities of today’s ruling seem limited, because Justice Ginsburg is correct in noting that in most cases we care about, police will have either an exigency that permits immediate warrantless entry or probable cause that allows them to quickly obtain a warrant. Just last Term, in Missouri v. McNeely, the Chief Justice noted that “e-warrants” can be obtained in fifteen minutes or less. Thus, today’s decision is unlikely to make large waves in the deep ocean of Fourth Amendment caselaw. The larger battles, however (excuse my mixed metaphors), have yet to be fought. Cellphone searches and NSA surveillance remain to be explored. Today’s opinion provides little signal as to the Justices’ views in these broader arenas.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2016-01-01 10:29 am PST
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds Tweet

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Square Cash Shop at amazon
as an LGF Associate!
Recent PagesClick to refresh
Sade - the Sweetest Taboo (Official Live Video From San Diego) Sade – The Sweetest Taboo (Live From San Diego)Listen on Spotify -smarturl.itListen on Apple Music -smarturl.itAmazon - smarturl.it Follow Sade Website - sade.comFacebook - facebook.comTwitter - @sadeofficialInstagram - instagram.com LyricsIf I tell youIf I tell you nowWill you keep ...
Thanos
1 day, 1 hour ago
Views: 122 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 1 • Share to Facebook
King Princess - Hit the Back (Live Performance) King Princess - Hit The Back (Studio Performance) Literally all King Princess does is take fierce selfies and make gorgeous songs. Well, that’s not everything. The 20-year-old phenom is a proud queer ally, nimbly blending humor and activism both ...
Thanos
1 day, 4 hours ago
Views: 125 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 1 • Share to Facebook
SAINT MOTEL - Old Soul (Official Visualizer) "Old Soul" - Track #1 from The Original Motion Picture Soundtrack: Part 1 by SAINT MOTEL. Available everywhere now!saintmotel.lnk.to Follow SAINT MOTEL:instagram.comfacebook.com@saintmotelsaintmotel.com Lyrics: I got rubies in my hands nowI got rubies in my hands nowHow they shine I ...
Thanos
1 day, 4 hours ago
Views: 165 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 1 • Share to Facebook
The Raconteurs - “Somedays (I Don’t Feel Like Trying)” [Official Music Video] Music video for The Raconteurs single “Somedays (I Don’t Feel Like Trying)” from their latest album HELP US STRANGER. Shot at The House On The Rock in Spring Green, WI. Listen to HELP US STRANGER here: theraconteurs.lnk.to Catch The ...
Thanos
1 day, 20 hours ago
Views: 252 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 2 • Share to Facebook
Vampire Weekend - Sunflower (Live at Austin City Limits) “Sunflower” by Vampire Weekend performed live at Austin City Limits 2019 Father of the Bride available now: smarturl.it Recorded live at The Moody Theater, Austin, TX, August 22, 2019Produced by KLRU-TV, Austin PBSProducer: Jeff PetersonDirector: Gary MenottiEditor: Dan MartausCopyright ...
Thanos
1 day, 20 hours ago
Views: 215 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 1 • Share to Facebook
A Magnificent Cover of David Bowie’s “Heroes” by David Byrne and Choir! Choir! Choir! Choir! Choir! Choir! teamed up with David Byrne and a TON of singers in the Ford Foundation lobby of the Public Theater during the Under the Radar Festival to sing 'Heroes' written by David Bowie and Brian Eno It ...
teleskiguy
2 days, 23 hours ago
Views: 361 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 2
Tweets: 3 • Share to Facebook
Hors Piste: Hilarious Animated Short About a Mountain Rescue Where Everything Goes Wrong Only one goal: SAVE THE WORLD! After 46 awards in festivals (including a BAFTA for best student film) and more than 150 selections... Our film is online in FULL length for 1 month! Follow us on Instagram and Facebook ...
teleskiguy
3 days ago
Views: 415 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 2 • Share to Facebook
#Thegreatpoolpondconversion - 191110Another really satisfying and curious weekend. Last week we reminisced about the tarp and how well it’s been holding up. Well during the week it tore and leaked a bit. Not enough to do damage. We’ll kludge something using both ...
DangerMan (misuser of the sarc tag)
5 days, 4 hours ago
Views: 395 • Comments: 1 • Rating: 5
Tweets: 0 • Share to Facebook
Dan Deacon - Sat by a Tree (Official Video) Dan Deacon - "Sat By A Tree", from 'Mystic Familiar', out 31st January 2020 on Domino Record Co.Please note: Viewers with an aversion to watching close up footage of insects should be advised against viewing this video.Hear Dan Deacon ...
Thanos
6 days, 13 hours ago
Views: 290 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 2 • Share to Facebook
Zero 7 - Somersault (Official Video) Ft. Sia Stream the brand new Special Edition of When It Falls here: smarturl.it 'Somersault', released in 2004, is a single taken from Zero 7's second album 'When It Falls'. The track debuted in the UK charts at #56 and remained ...
Thanos
6 days, 21 hours ago
Views: 398 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 1 • Share to Facebook