Have We Become a ‘Surveillance State’? a Five-Part Test
Each question is looked at in some depth, and I did not see a lot to argue with. A few quibbles to be sure but a thoughtful piece indeed. I left off “Authoritarian Abuse” in keeping with the polite copy paste rules, but we agree that is just not a factor here in America. When I think about this technology & capacity in a place like Russia or China it’s a lot more threatening.
Have We Become a ‘Surveillance State’? a Five-Part Test
By Jay Stanley, Senior Policy Analyst, ACLU Speech, Privacy & Technology Project at 10:14am
Thinking it over, I came up with a five-part test by which we can consider the question:
Capacity. To what extent have we reached the point where we are technologically capable of building a total surveillance society?
Infrastructure. To what extent have technological capacities actually been utilized to build infrastructures for mass surveillance?
Activation. To what extent are those surveillance infrastructures actually being used to collect, store and analyze people’s data?
Enforcement. To what extent is that surveillance actually being used by the government to enforce societal laws, rules, regulations, and norms?
More: Have We Become a ‘Surveillance State’? a Five-Part Test