Pages

Jump to bottom

9 comments

1 EPR-radar  Apr 18, 2014 6:43:04pm

Once a partisan hack, always a partisan hack. Mark Kirk is supposedly less obnoxious than the true-believing wingnuts, but I don’t buy it.

Every time the GOP really wants his vote in the Senate, they have it. He is permitted to deviate from GOP orthodoxy on lesser votes as a concession to the fact the Illinois isn’t a deep red state.

2 sagehen  Apr 19, 2014 12:14:58am

I have complete faith that Israeli intelligence knows what’s what.

I’m less certain that they’ll speak the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, out loud and in public.

3 Dark_Falcon  Apr 19, 2014 4:13:31pm

Nothing wrong with Sen. Kirk’s actions. Assurances given by a liberal Democrat should be treated with suspicion (and when warranted, hostility) by Republicans. Wendy Sherman has a different way of viewing the world than Sen. Kirk and he feels her way is badly flawed (I agree with him, BTW).

Moreover, it would foolish for any Republican senator to agree with the Obama administration over the Israelis when it comes to Iran. Doing so emboldens Iran, supports an administration that has proven irresolute where Iran is concerned, and alienated that senator from him party.

Mark Kirk is right and Wendy Sherman is wrong.

4 Dark_Falcon  Apr 20, 2014 4:55:37am

re: #3 Dark_Falcon

Nothing wrong with Sen. Kirk’s actions. Assurances given by a liberal Democrat should be treated with suspicion (and when warranted, hostility) by Republicans. Wendy Sherman has a different way of viewing the world than Sen. Kirk and he feels her way is badly flawed (I agree with him, BTW).

Moreover, it would foolish for any Republican senator to agree with the Obama administration over the Israelis when it comes to Iran. Doing so emboldens Iran, supports an administration that has proven irresolute where Iran is concerned, and alienates that senator from his party.

Mark Kirk is right and Wendy Sherman is wrong.

Edited, PIMF

5 palomino  Apr 20, 2014 7:04:43am

re: #3 Dark_Falcon

Nothing wrong with Sen. Kirk’s actions. Assurances given by a liberal Democrat should be treated with suspicion (and when warranted, hostility) by Republicans. Wendy Sherman has a different way of viewing the world than Sen. Kirk and he feels her way is badly flawed (I agree with him, BTW).

Moreover, it would foolish for any Republican senator to agree with the Obama administration over the Israelis when it comes to Iran. Doing so emboldens Iran, supports an administration that has proven irresolute where Iran is concerned, and alienated that senator from him party.

Mark Kirk is right and Wendy Sherman is wrong.

What are you even talking about? Obama, Kerry, et al. have said repeatedly that the temporary deal with Iran has no better than a 50% chance of working, which means it will probably be dead in a few months. How many times do we have to say “we will not allow Iran to get nuclear weapons” before it makes you happy? Shouldn’t we at least try diplomacy before the inevitable war that you seem to desire so badly?

6 palomino  Apr 20, 2014 9:25:46am

re: #3 Dark_Falcon

Nothing wrong with Sen. Kirk’s actions. Assurances given by a liberal Democrat should be treated with suspicion (and when warranted, hostility) by Republicans. Wendy Sherman has a different way of viewing the world than Sen. Kirk and he feels her way is badly flawed (I agree with him, BTW).

Moreover, it would foolish for any Republican senator to agree with the Obama administration over the Israelis when it comes to Iran. Doing so emboldens Iran, supports an administration that has proven irresolute where Iran is concerned, and alienated that senator from him party.

Mark Kirk is right and Wendy Sherman is wrong.

So you think it’s a good idea in general for American politicians to openly support foreign countries over their own nation’s official foreign policy?

Did you feel this way when Bush was prez, or does this only apply when a Democrat you disagree with is in office?

7 Dark_Falcon  Apr 20, 2014 3:45:29pm

re: #5 palomino

What are you even talking about? Obama, Kerry, et al. have said repeatedly that the temporary deal with Iran has no better than a 50% chance of working, which means it will probably be dead in a few months. How many times do we have to say “we will not allow Iran to get nuclear weapons” before it makes you happy? Shouldn’t we at least try diplomacy before the inevitable war that you seem to desire so badly?

And Obama said the use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime in Syria would be the crossing of a “red line”, but when that line was actually crossed the Obama Administration did not put forward a plan to actually punish the Assad government for having done so. So you will please excuse me if I feel Barack Obama’s declarations regarding rouge nation’s having WMDs seem to me less than 100% credible.

8 palomino  Apr 20, 2014 10:00:04pm

re: #7 Dark_Falcon

And Obama said the use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime in Syria would be the crossing of a “red line”, but when that line was actually crossed the Obama Administration did not put forward a plan to actually punish the Assad government for having done so. So you will please excuse me if I feel Barack Obama’s declarations regarding rouge nation’s having WMDs seem to me less than 100% credible.

An interesting post. It doesn’t actually respond to anything I said. Once you started talking about red lines, you just got lost.

So anyway I guess you wanted Obama to bomb Syria? Even after both parties in Congress made it clear they opposed such measures?

OK, let’s say we did some bombing, then what? If we leave it at that, we haven’t done much and Assad probably still wins the civil war. Then the question becomes, “What was the point if such a monster is still in power?” So then we take the next step, and then eventually we’re in another Mid East quagmire.

Is it possible to accept that not every crisis around the world is a mission for Team America to solve?

And I notice you didn’t respond to my other post. Go on, give it a shot.

9 Dark_Falcon  Apr 21, 2014 8:17:53pm

re: #8 palomino

You misunderstand my views on Syria: i was in favor of action only if it would seriously damage the Assad regime and if damaging the Assad regime was in our interests. I think Obama should not have drawn that ‘red line’ in the first place.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2021-06-05 2:51 pm PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds Tweet

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Square Cash Shop at amazon
as an LGF Associate!
Recent PagesClick to refresh
My Technology Horror ShowJesus Christ on a fucking pony - what a mess things have been today when it comes to my own personal tech!First, I upgraded from an iPhone 12 mini to a iPhone 13 Max at Best Buy - the dude ...
Eric The Fruit Bat
3 hours, 23 minutes ago
Views: 62 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 2 •
#Thegreatpoolpondconversion - 210919Saturday afternoon was spent leveling and starting this mosaic It's almost all recycled pieces from other projects.We got about half way through and had enough. Sunday we hauled some more dirt over and finished it up. The eyesore trash cans ...
Dangerman
5 days, 9 hours ago
Views: 298 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 3
Tweets: 0 •
The Stranglers - This Song (Official Video) This Song' is out on 10th Sept 2021 on Coursegood: slinky.toTaken from the new album 'Dark Matters' by The Stranglers: slinky.to Special thanks to Stuart Pearce. thestranglers.co.ukfacebook.cominstagram.com@StranglersSiteLyrics:I’m collecting all these feelings for youPut them in a box in a ...
Thanos
6 days, 10 hours ago
Views: 492 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 1 •
Jukebox the Ghost - Cheers! (Lyric Video) “Cheers!” out now: jukeboxtheghost.lnk.to“Cheers!” Lyrics Here's to more of the everyday, raise a glass and sing along, the outcasts and the underdogs On the benches, on the sidelines, wallflowers: this is our time ordinary people every dayIn the nosebleeds, ...
Thanos
1 week, 2 days ago
Views: 565 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Tweets: 2 •
An Epic Takedown Appears to Be in the WorksAn epic takedown of Facebook is afoot: But going back to the WSJ series on Facebook, the quote in today's paper is priceless: "A now-former executive questioned the idea of overhauling Instagram to avoid social comparison. 'People use Instagram because ...
Eric The Fruit Bat
1 week, 3 days ago
Views: 2,492 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Tweets: 3 •
#Thegreatpoolpondconversion - 210912We got our replacement solar panel.Figured we'd install, then take readings to sort of know if something was wrong in the future.One panel at a time, then pairs of 2, then all 3. Because they all connect to one feed ...
Dangerman
1 week, 3 days ago
Views: 585 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 5
Tweets: 0 •
#Thegreatpoolpondconversion - 210905Not having that third solar panel for 3 weeks, it’s clear now that we definitely needed the upgrade when we decided in November. 3 puts us over the top of more electricity than consumption. Still no ETA so we turned ...
Dangerman
2 weeks, 3 days ago
Views: 824 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 4
Tweets: 0 •
Evangelicals and the Limits of Evangelical EmpathyLink to the article at: alternet.org She writes of her own experience where she turned against evangelicals. Here are the critical paragraphs to think about. And this will bring me to the ongoing evangelical moral panic over exvangelicals, those who ...
JOE 🥓
2 weeks, 5 days ago
Views: 853 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 3 •