Pages

Jump to bottom

2 comments

1 William Barnett-Lewis  May 10, 2014 11:37:07am

Take a close look at the laws they’re supporting. The last draft of the MN one I saw was worthless.

If the NRA supports it, you can be sure it does nothing to get guns out of the hands of domestic abusers.

From the HuffPo piece:

Those changes, Bassett and Wilkie wrote, include altering a provision that will now, if signed into law, allow alleged abuser to surrender their guns to friends and family instead of the state. And although it might only be a minor edit, it could be monumental news for anti-violence advocates who for ages have fought, albeit unsuccessfully, against lobbyists from the NRA who have tried to all but abolish anything that may interfere with the Second Amendment to the United States’ Constitution’s right to bear arms.

Think about that - the accused’s family is supposed to hold these weapons and keep them away from them. Some will, I am sure, but many more won’t.

I also dislike the idea of government holding weapons - police departments have too much incentive to, basically, steal the goods in question as they do with drug case confiscations.

A better idea than either would be to have a neutral third party - bonded and an FFL holder - be required to store the firearms until the case is fully adjudicated. If found not guilty, they can be returned. If found guilty they can be sold on the open market (since the holder is an FFL) and the proceeds minus any court fees or fines returned to the original owner.

That would actually accomplish something good however so you can bet the NRA would fight it tooth and nail.

2 FemNaziBitch  May 10, 2014 11:50:06am
A better idea than either would be to have a neutral third party - bonded and an FFL holder - be required to store the firearms until the case is fully adjudicated. If found not guilty, they can be returned. If found guilty they can be sold on the open market (since the holder is an FFL) and the proceeds minus any court fees or fines returned to the original owner.

That would actually accomplish something good however so you can bet the NRA would fight it tooth and nail.

I agree, and may be relinquishing my life membership to the NRA very soon.

They don’t represent the best interest of gun owners. They represent the best interest of gun manufacturers.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
Once Praised, the Settlement to Help Sickened BP Oil Spill Workers Leaves Most With Nearly Nothing When a deadly explosion destroyed BP’s Deepwater Horizon drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico, 134 million gallons of crude erupted into the sea over the next three months — and tens of thousands of ordinary people were hired ...
Cheechako
Yesterday
Views: 68 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
4 days ago
Views: 167 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1