Pages

Jump to bottom

8 comments

1 Thanos  Feb 6, 2015 2:14:16pm

Exciting, but also highly disappointing…

2 Thanos  Feb 6, 2015 2:17:16pm

Your amazon code thing isn’t working right…

3 Charles Johnson  Feb 6, 2015 2:32:53pm

re: #2 Thanos

Your amazon code thing isn’t working right…

Those are shortened links that don’t contain an ASIN code. It wasn’t designed to handle those. But I shall investigate.

4 Charles Johnson  Feb 6, 2015 2:56:51pm

Fixed!

5 goddamnedfrank  Feb 6, 2015 3:37:27pm

re: #1 Thanos

Exciting, but also highly disappointing…

Agree.

Native iso range is 100 to 6400, one and two thirds stops less than the Nikon D810. Losing the high end is bad enough, but not being able to shoot at ISO 64 reduces your long exposure capability without having to add ND filters. Adding ND filters is a less than ideal solution here because the older Canon lenses most Canon users already have don’t possess the optical resolution capability to pass through 50 MP worth of information. Adding more glass, regardless of the quality, isn’t what you want to do. Anybody who gets this body will need to buy all new high end L series (ideally prime) glass to take full advantage of it. Even then the optical aberrations towards the edges may well rob the sensor of information it might otherwise be able to resolve, even when stopped down.

Its shortcomings with video don’t matter to me, video should be an afterthought with a camera like this.

Anyway, it’s interesting and a coup for Canon that they’ve been able to cram this many MP into a 35mm sensor. I still think however that it may have skipped over the data quality sweet spot in this format. It seems like they’re going after the medium format digital market. If in the end they can get companies like Phase One to be a little more competitive in their pricing that will be a good thing.

6 Skip Intro  Feb 6, 2015 4:19:17pm

re: #5 goddamnedfrank

Losing the high end is bad enough, but not being able to shoot at ISO 64 reduces your long exposure capability without having to add ND filters.

You can expand the range down to ISO 50 and up to ISO 12800. The big disappointment to me, other than no ISOs above 12800, is that the dynamic range is no better than that of the 5d MkIII.

Nikon still has the edge here, and if I didn’t have so much Canon gear I’d switch. Also mirrorless cameras from Sony and Fuji have really come up with some great innovations that neither Canon nor Nikon have. All they lack, in Sony’s case, is great glass.

7 Thanos  Feb 6, 2015 6:11:03pm

I’m really thinking that I am headed mirror-less as soon as the lens assortments grow a bit.

8 Tsuga  Feb 6, 2015 7:01:52pm

Sony also uses lossy compression on its RAW files, resulting in artifacts, and its firmware updates basically root your computer. Intriguing and attractive cameras with some real issues for now…


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
Yesterday
Views: 89 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0