FBI Report on the shooting of Michael Brown by officer Darren Wilson
ii. Witnesses Consistent with Prior Statements, Physical Evidence and Other Witnesses Who Inculpate Wilson
There are no witnesses who fall under this category.
The report CNN quotes the report lists multiple witnesses whose testimony, in the judgment of the FBI, would serve to exculpate Wilson, and whose testimony was consistent with prior statements, physical evidence, etc.
The report also discusses the testimony of witnesses whose testimony would have served to inculpate Wilson, and discusses the reasons why such testimony would have been subject to impeachment at trial.
The upshot is that when the Ferguson grand jury no-billed Wilson, they had good reason.
This matter was a very big deal at LGF with many posts full of fury at Wilson. At how he “gunned down” Brown, meaning, murdered him in cold blood. At how the Ferguson grand jury ignored the evidence and let Wilson off. All of that was wrong. The FBI, and the Holder-led Justice Department, did a careful job and found that there just wasn’t any case that would hold up in court.