Pages

Jump to bottom

6 comments

1
The Dude Abides  Apr 15, 2016 • 9:10:21am

Bogus decision//

2
mmmirele  Apr 15, 2016 • 11:55:58am

Needs an appeal. One of the first things we were told in Constitutional Law at law school lo all these decades ago is that courts needed to stay out of deciding what was a doctrine and what wasn’t. This federal judge should not be making that decision, it’s a violation of the First Amendment.

3
cat-tikvah  Apr 15, 2016 • 1:55:31pm

Prove that this isn’t a “sincerely held religious belief”.

4
jaunte  Apr 15, 2016 • 9:03:32pm

Tweeted just to get that picture out there.

5
Rocky-in-Connecticut  Apr 16, 2016 • 11:42:27am

Just what I feared, with the passage of “Religious Freedom” laws, now government has the ability to decide which religions are valid and which are not.

This is the very definition of a Government mandated Theocracy and …Oppression.

6
John Vreeland  Apr 17, 2016 • 8:13:21pm

The proper test should be whether a specific demand of the prisoner unduly burdens the prison. Or something like that. I do have to take note of the fact that a “pirate costume” seems insincere, however.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh