Pages

Jump to bottom

8 comments

1
otoc  Apr 28, 2016 • 3:43:22am

Nice job cd1177. On the point of consensus, a paper recently came out that supported cook and trashed the sceptic view that there is none. There is consensus and the only argument against uses flawed methods.

2
Big Beautiful Door  Apr 28, 2016 • 4:34:46am

Excellent article. Kudos.

3
KerFuFFler  Apr 28, 2016 • 9:01:09am

The deniers seems to think that there is no point paying attention to this risk unless we are 100 % certain (as opposed to 97%) that global warming is real. What other risk would we consider treating this way? Is Russian roulette a safe bet because only one of the six chambers is loaded?

If you were driving and saw a sign that a bridge had a 5% chance of collapsing, would you cross the bridge rather than taking the detour? So, you might if you were in a big hurry in an emergency. But would you if your kid was in the backseat? With climate change, all our kids are in the backseat.

4
CriticalDragon1177  Apr 28, 2016 • 10:08:38am

re: #1 otoc

Nice job cd1177. On the point of consensus, a paper recently came out that supported cook and trashed the sceptic view that there is none. There is consensus and the only argument against uses flawed methods.

Sorry, but could you reword that last sentence. I think I might be having some trouble understanding what you meant.

5
CriticalDragon1177  Apr 28, 2016 • 10:12:12am

re: #3 KerFuFFler

The deniers seems to think that there is no point paying attention to this risk unless we are 100 % certain (as opposed to 97%) that global warming is real. What other risk would we consider treating this way? Is Russian roulette a safe bet because only one of the six chambers is loaded?

If you were driving and saw a sign that a bridge had a 5% chance of collapsing, would you cross the bridge rather than taking the detour? So, you might if you were in a big hurry in an emergency. But would you if your kid was in the backseat? With climate change, all our kids are in the backseat.

Good point! That’s a very dangerous attitude to have when we have overwhelming evidence that we are in serious trouble. Just about any reason we had to doubt the idea that pumping all that carbon dioxide into the atmosphere would cause global warming is gone.

6
CriticalDragon1177  Apr 28, 2016 • 10:15:26am

Another potential problem caused by climate change that I forgot to mention is that due to sea level rise, some Island nations may even cease to exist within the next few centuries, if we don’t stop this.

Will Pacific Island Nations Disappear as Seas Rise? Maybe Not
news.nationalgeographic.com

I should have brought that at some point, since it only makes my case even stronger, that this is a real problem, and we have to do something about it.

7
otoc  Apr 30, 2016 • 3:44:05am

re: #4 CriticalDragon1177

Sorry, but could you reword that last sentence. I think I might be having some trouble understanding what you meant.

My apologies for not being clear. I needed to wait until I had the time to sit at a computer to pull some links. A hard task when answering on an iPhone.

The skeptics use Tol as “proof” that there is no consensus. A more recent paper from Cook (2016) supports the Cook (2013) study you mentioned while continuing to trash Tol’s study. So there is consensus. The only argument against consensus uses flawed methods.

Research shows — yet again — that there’s no scientific debate about climate change

While the consensus has been documented by many studies over the years, the most widely cited is a 2013 paper led by John Cook of the University of Queensland’s Global Change Institute. The study examined thousands of peer-reviewed scientific papers and found that, among those papers that took a position on the causes of climate change, 97.1 percent of them supported the idea that global warming is caused by humans.

Earlier this year, however, University of Sussex professor Richard Tol published a comment criticizing the 2013 study and suggesting that 97 percent may be too high a figure. In his comment, Tol returned to some of the published research on the consensus and re-examined the accompanying data, noting that Cook’s paper did not include studies that took no position on climate change, and that surveys including scientists who don’t study climate tend to have somewhat lower rates of consensus.

After examining the comment, however, Cook and a team of other researchers concluded that these arguments were problematic at best. In their new paper, they re-examined the published literature on the climate consensus, finding that the 97 percent calculation remains a robust and well-supported statistic.

“The biggest flaw [in Tol’s argument] is that he misrepresents many of the other studies on the consensus,” said Cook, lead author on the new paper.

“He tries to argue that our paper is an outlier — is different to all the other studies in their estimates of the expert consensus,” Cook said. “But the way he arrives at the expert consensus is by using groups that include non-experts, which is a classic technique to try to obtain lower estimates of the scientific consensus.”

It’s true that scientists who don’t study climate also don’t accept the scientific consensus as strongly. But this variability is to be expected when non-experts are included, the authors of the new paper explain.

8
CriticalDragon1177  Apr 30, 2016 • 5:07:46am

re: #7 otoc

Okay, thanks. That’s kind of what I thought you were saying, but it wasn’t clear to me.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2016-01-01 10:29 am PST
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds Tweet

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Square Cash Shop at amazon
as an LGF Associate!
Recent PagesClick to refresh
Bruce Springsteen - Sleepy Joe’s Café (Lyrics)"Sleepy Joe's Café" track five on Springsteen's nineteenth studio album Western Stars
Thanos
1 day, 4 hours ago
Views: 140 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 1 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Regina Spektor - ‘Blue Lips’ (Live at WFUV)wfuv.org • Follow @wfuv: ow.ly Regina Spektor performs "Blue Lips" live in Studio A. Recorded 5/22/19. Host: Alisa AliAudio: Jim O'HaraCameras: Kay Kurkierwicz and Thomas KoenigEditor: Thomas Koenig
Thanos
1 day, 4 hours ago
Views: 126 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 2 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Outta My Head — Pomplamoose / Khalid Come see Nataly preform with Inara at Largo on June 18: bit.ly Save this song on Spotify: spoti.fiBecome a patron of our music (to vote on the songs we cover and get merch and stuff like that): patreon.com A ...
Thanos
2 days, 7 hours ago
Views: 176 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 1 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
The Raconteurs - ‘Bored and Razed’ (Lyric Video) Lyric video for The Raconteurs “Bored and Razed" from their forthcoming album HELP US STRANGER – out June 21st. Listen to "Bored and Razed" here: theraconteurs.lnk.to Pre-order & pre-save the upcoming album HELP US STRANGER here: theraconteurs.lnk.to HELP US ...
Thanos
2 days, 13 hours ago
Views: 172 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 1 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
SERGIO MENDES & BRASIL’66 - the LOOK of LOVEComposed by Burt Bacharach and Hal David and sung by Dusty Springfield, which appeared in the 1967 James Bond film Casino Royale.
Thanos
4 days, 14 hours ago
Views: 229 • Comments: 3 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 1 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Jeremy HuntWhen his name was mispronounced live on the BBC one morning we all had a good giggle, that first time, and then it takes a while to become funny again but we have done it: metro.co.uk
Dom
6 days, 15 hours ago
Views: 412 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 0 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Los Coast - ‘The Morning Weight’ [Live]The new album Samsara is available June 14: geni.us
Thanos
1 week, 4 days ago
Views: 675 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 3 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Suppressing the Press in Australia Dept: Police Launch Second Raid on the Media in 24 Hours The ABC's headquarters in Ultimo have been raided by federal police, with the broadcaster's manager describing it as a "worry" for press freedom. It's the second federal police raid on journalists in 24 hours, officers spending seven hours yesterday ...
Thanos
1 week, 5 days ago
Views: 646 • Comments: 1 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 4 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
An Ode to the ColonAnd paean sounded too renal-ish. Ok, maybe more homage. We take our bodies for granted - oh yes we do. All of us. All the things they do and are supposed to do. All the systems and subsystems, pieces, parts, ...
DangerMan
1 week, 5 days ago
Views: 552 • Comments: 1 • Rating: 7
Tweets: 0 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0
Video Killed the Radio Star - Walk Off the Earth Ft. Sarah Silverman Stream or Download this song here: walkofftheearthent.lnk.toCatch WOTE live! CLICK HERE FOR TICKETS: goo.glSubscribe to WOTE here! bit.lyWatch and listen to our Greatest Hits!: bit.lyWOTE merch available here: walkofftheearth.myshopify.com Walk off the Earth hooked up with the amazing Sarah ...
Thanos
1 week, 5 days ago
Views: 739 • Comments: 1 • Rating: 3
Tweets: 3 • Share to Facebook
Shares: 0
Comments: 0
: 0