Pages

Jump to bottom

5 comments

1
DangerMan (misuser of the sarc tag)  Nov 2, 2019 • 6:48:29am

Good to see you

2
Jay C  Nov 3, 2019 • 10:14:20am

Yes, nice to see youā€™re still with us!

And as LGFā€™s Resident Flag Maven, maybe you can answer this question*:

Is there ANY logic/truth/reality behind the nutbar-CT assertation that a gold fringe on a US flag is somehow ā€œillegalā€ and somehow ā€œinvalidatesā€ the authority of the banner?

*Iā€™ve heard this stupid shit for years, but was amazed to see it recently, still circulating on the recesses of the Internet: some nutjob claim that since a fringed flag is somehow ā€œillegitimateā€, any ā€œproceedingsā€ with one present- like a courtroom trial - is somehow ā€œinvalidā€.

3
Anymouse šŸŒ¹šŸŽƒ  Nov 6, 2019 • 10:39:40pm

re: #2 Jay C

Yes, nice to see youā€™re still with us!

And as LGFā€™s Resident Flag Maven, maybe you can answer this question*:

Is there ANY logic/truth/reality behind the nutbar-CT assertation that a gold fringe on a US flag is somehow ā€œillegalā€ and somehow ā€œinvalidatesā€ the authority of the banner?

*Iā€™ve heard this stupid shit for years, but was amazed to see it recently, still circulating on the recesses of the Internet: some nutjob claim that since a fringed flag is somehow ā€œillegitimateā€, any ā€œproceedingsā€ with one present- like a courtroom trial - is somehow ā€œinvalidā€.

Iā€™m just reading LGF, not commenting.

As for the nutbar pro se legal assertion by various nutbars, sovereign citizens (but I repeat ā€œnutbarā€), &c, no, there is no legitimate claim to the idea a fringe on a flag somehow makes a proceeding illegitimate.

a) A flag is not even required to have a proceeding. They are normally found in courtrooms or city council meetings or whatnot, but there is no requirement for a flag at all. If I went as a visitor to a proceeding with a ninety-three star flag, it would most certainly be invalid as a US Flag, but would in no way invalidate the proceeding just because I have that flag with me. The proceedings of a court or government meeting are valid because they are conducted under the US and state constitutions, and federal, state, and local statutes, not because of an object in the room.

b) Regarding the assertion that a gold fringe somehow means a flag with a gold fringe is a reference to Admiralty Law, most of these douchecanoes couldnā€™t describe what that is anyway. A description of Admiralty Law can be found at Wikipedia:
en.wikipedia.org
Gold-fringed flags are not flown from shipsā€™ masts anyway. Ships fly regular flags.

c) The origin of gold fringes on flags are lost, but they are thought to be originally decoration placed on flags by military units.

Army Regulation 840-10 (Flags, Guidons, Streamers, Tabbards, Automobile and Aircraft Plates), available by searching for the PDF under that regulation number, is basically the US Flag Code on steroids. It describes every possible way in which the US Army would display any sort of flag. That regulation is the only place anywhere in US law you will even find mention of a flag with a gold fringe.

By that regulation, all flags displayed indoors not flat (on a staff) shall carry a gold fringe. The regulation does not state why the flag should have a gold fringe. Note Army Regulations are not Admiralty Law.

d) Sovereign Citizens will often cite Executive Order 10834 (dated August 21, 1959) as evidence that a gold-fringe flag is used for an Admiralty Court. You may sometimes see that executive order number cited in the claim, with text supporting the claim.

That order actually is the order defining the dimensions and layout of the US Flag after Hawaiā€™i was admitted as a state, to replace the forty-nine star flag then in use. (The fifty-star flag did not come into use until July 4, 1960; the order was to define how the flag would look with a long enough lead time that manufacturers could make new flags.) All the sovereign citizen has done is swap out the text of the actual executive order with their nonsense.
ushistory.org

The body of Admiralty Law refers to statutes and laws of various nations regarding maritime activities and property (both on the sea and on shore). When those laws are used, they are adjudicated in a regular landlubber court, not some special sort of ā€œAdmiralty Court.ā€ Admiralty Courts do not exist.

4
Anymouse šŸŒ¹šŸŽƒ  Nov 6, 2019 • 11:05:45pm

[deleted by me - repeat post]

5
Anymouse šŸŒ¹šŸŽƒ  Nov 7, 2019 • 12:16:20am

re: #2 Jay C

Continuing here.

Navy Regulations (youā€™d think if some dipweed was trying to make an Admiralty claim this is where they would go) regarding display of the US Flag (along with other maritime ceremonial procedures) are found in Navy Regulations Chapter 12: Flags, Pennants, Honors, Ceremonies, and Customs.

Like the Army regulations above, the US Navy regulations describe every possible way the US Navy might display a US flag both at sea and in port, along with shore facilities.

A gold-fringe flag is never mentioned in Navy Regulations at all. The various flags used by the US Navy are defined, but in no instance is a gold fringe ever described for maritime use.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
The Pandemic Cost 7 Million Lives, but Talks to Prevent a Repeat Stall In late 2021, as the world reeled from the arrival of the highly contagious omicron variant of the coronavirus, representatives of almost 200 countries met - some online, some in-person in Geneva - hoping to forestall a future worldwide ...
Cheechako
2 days ago
Views: 100 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
2 weeks ago
Views: 263 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1