According to one of his former close female colleagues, yes.

Nadia Naffe, who once worked with O'Keefe on "Project Veritas" (the NH voter fraud fiasco O'Keefe and co. caused for themselves), has come forward with information backing up a previous legal claim she made against O'Keefe regrading an incident where O'Keefe sexually harassed her and drugged her.
According to Nadia, O'Keefe became obsessive over her during the planning stages of "Project Veritas" last year, which lead to an incident at a renovated barn where O'Keefe allegedly tried to date rape Nadia.
Nadia blogs about the incident:
It was never my request to lodge in close quarters with you, that evening or any other. Indeed, you were the one who insisted I stay at the location you use as your office and apartment. The property you referred to as a renovated barn. You advised me that accommodations in NYC would be too costly and Project Veritas needed to save money. You stated you had purchased supplies and materials from Home Depot, linens and blankets to make me more comfortable and that you spent the entire day, prior to my arrival, cleaning and preparing the 'barn' for my visit.
When you observed me lying in bed, talking on the phone with a male friend, you became noticeably upset. You picked up your penny loafers and stormed out of the room like a 10-year old boy having a tantrum. You called me on the phone moments later demanding to know why I was talking on the phone with someone else in your presence. You were furious. Your tone was hostile and bellicose. I will never forget the revolting, repulsive and disgusting words you used on the phone with me that night. I hung the phone up on you, because I refused to tolerate your verbal abuse any further.
A roofie?
I tried to run away, but I didn't know where I was. I felt disoriented after drinking the alcohol you purchased. It was pitch black outside and there were no lights. It was freezing cold inside the barn, there was no heat inside and I couldn't see the steps leading downstairs. I called and texted you dozens of times that night, insisting that you return me to the train station or provide me with transportation out of the remote location which you brought me to. When I told you I felt sick, you didn't seem surprised. You advised me to lie down in bed and that everything would be better in the morning.
After hours of your continued refusal to transport me out of this remote area, I began calling several people I knew asking for help. Ryan tried to understand why I was crying, and so desperate to leave, but I was too sick and nauseated from the alcohol to tell Ryan what you had done. My last resort was to threaten to call the police. It was only then, did you agree to take me to the train station in New York. I had hoped this would be a smooth process, but with you James, there is no nuance.
When you returned to the barn, you brought an older white male with you to intimidate me. You never advised me of his presence. He stood in the dark, hiding downstairs behind the staircase. I heard his footsteps and began screaming and shouting at the both of you. I thought you brought him there to assault me. But even as I screamed and yelled at you and that man, you and he persisted in trying to convince me to spend the night in the barn.
James, I am not a fool. The barn is the same place where you taped intimate moments with Emma, without her knowledge. You are looking for a reason to blame me for what happened that night, so that you can become the victim. Perhaps, you believe by denigrating my personal character and using the same sexually suggestive tactics that are currently being used against Herman Cain, that my reputation will be ruined and so that yours can be spared. But James, the only place your version of the facts has any merit is in your paranoid head.
More here at Nadia's blog:
[Link: nadianaffe.com...]
So it looks like O'Keefe is not only a lying, bungling fraud, but is also likely to be a very creepy sexual criminal.
How times have changed....
Compared with what Rick said in 2011,EXCLUSIVE: The 2012 candidate once argued it was "wrong" for the federal government not to be "proactive" in shaping the health care market and boasted his voting record was "in the middle."
Rick Santorum's pitch to Republican voters is simple: He is the "true" and "consistent" conservative in the GOP's presidential nomination fight. He describes himself as "a candidate who, throughout [his] career, has not only checked the box on conservative issues but has fought for conservative issues." And he slams front-runner Mitt Romney for flip-flopping on abortion and the Wall Street bailouts and, most of all, for passing government-mandated health care reform in Massachusetts. If elected president, Santorum vows he will end the "tyranny" of President Obama's Affordable Care Act.
Yet as an up-and-coming congressman in the early 1990s, Santorum took a much different line. Then—like now—health care was one of the nation's most divisive issues. In 1993, Republicans were up in arms about a health care reform bill spearheaded by Hillary Clinton and pushed by President Bill Clinton. Republicans decried the measure as excessive government intervention in the marketplace, and Santorum opposed the legislation. But his position was not so clear cut.
During that fiery debate, Santorum said it would be a mistake to allow the delivery of health care services to be determined only by the market. He asserted that Republicans were "wrong" to let the "marketplace" decide how health care works. He instead argued that government should play a "proactive" role in shaping the health care marketplace "to make it work better."
At a November 2011 debate, Santorum boasted about his unwavering conservative record on health care. "I was always for having the government out of the health care business," he said, "and for a bottom-up, consumer-driven health care, which is different than Governor Romney and some of the other people on this panel." Yet Santorum, who has attacked Romney for reversing his positions, has flip-flopped as well.I could add commentary here about what a flip-flop this is, or what a hypocrite Santorum is, but I think the article pretty much speaks for itself on all of those. I will however, laugh like a 12 year old at the frothy one talking about "bottom up" driven healthcare.
Read the rest at:
[Link: motherjones.com...]
