My apologies to anyone made dumber by this clip.

Rush Limbaugh begins this clip by describing a recent episode of Hawaii 5-0 he watched, in which a couple had kidnapped young girls, and kept them in shackles, which enabled them to collect increased welfare benefits, and when the girls turned 18, they would be killed.

This reminded him of the recent escape of three women in Cleveland who had been held captive for ten years, and in his own unique and twisted way, he found a way to connect this to President Obama.

Glenn Beck’s “sources” on the shooting at Bush International Airport in Houston have him speculating that this was a false flag operation, and speculating is all he can do because he offered zero evidence to substantiate this idea. Then he suggested - again with zero substantiation - that the shooter was someone who had been “wound up” by the uber left, and suggested that as an “honest journalist*” he would investigate where the guns he used came from, and if they were illegal…well then he Godwins and Derps.

*You’ll never see the words “honest journalist” and “Glenn Beck” in the same sentence, unless the sentence is talking about what he is not.

Link

Of course there is no basis at all for this claim, but why let facts get in the way of stoking Christian Persecution Syndrome?

More here

It’s too bad Suspect # 1 won’t be able to be legalized by Marco Rubio, now.

— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) April 19, 2013

Quick, someone get me to a hospital so they can sew my sides up!

Somebody please tell me why the hell Michele Bachmann is on the House Intelligence Committee? I mean, besides creating a textbook oxymoron. This committee deals with important state secrets, with the CIA and other government spooks. It’s not a place for someone of little brain. Seriously, people’s lives could be at stake. Yet there she sits, with her cool little nameplate, with her very own microphone, asking… well, that’s the problem.

In a hearing this past Thursday with new CIA director John Brennan and some of his top men, Bachmann let her freak flag fly when she had a turn at the mic. Her first question (wait for iiiit)… that’s right: Benghazi. Give yourself 10 gold stars if you got that right (you’re on the honor system). Yes, Michele wanted to know if the White House had informed the State Department of the “armed drone strikes” it had ordered prior to the attack on the Libyan embassy.

John Brennan looked perplexed for a few seconds, then replied:

“Armed drone strikes in Libya? I am unknowing of such and would defer to the White House to address your question… the White House doesn’t have a drone capability, responsibility… I don’t know what it is specifically you’re referring to.”

Hat tip - Addicting Info

Right Wing Watch has the deets:

Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy dedicated his Washington Times column today to a letter demanding another investigation into the attack at the US Mission in Benghazi. The letter relies on debunked conspiracy theories and Gaffney amusingly argues that “this is not an effort to settle political scores:

It has been nearly eight months since jihadists attacked U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed, and many more were badly injured. That is pretty much all we know for sure about an incident that has let’s face it been subjected to the most comprehensive and successful cover-up in modern political history.

Now, 700 heroic special operations veterans have written an open letter to Congress calling for the creation of a new investigative committee to establish the truth. They want to know, in particular, why warriors like them weren’t allowed to aid our countrymen in their hour of need.

…

This is not an effort to settle political scores. Neither the Democrats who run the Senate nor Republicans who run the House have conducted the needed “full accounting.” What is required is more than just a postmortem on a national security debacle, however.

And here’s the best part:

The leader of the group which issued the letter, Larry Bailey, is a longtime Obama critic and an unapologetic birther.

But that isn’t a problem for Gaffney, as he too is a birther.

A couple of days ago, I was complaining about macho babies and their road tank 4X4 pickups.

Lubbock police are investigating an early morning hit-and-run accident in the Overton neighborhood as an aggravated assault.

The accident, which occurred about 2:30 a.m. Monday, April 8, resulted in an accident investigation callout. According to witnesses, a white pickup truck struck a woman near Mac Davis Lane and Avenue V and drove away.

Sgt. Robert Hook of the LPD traffic division said the case was referred to the crimes against persons division after officers determined the woman was struck deliberately.

The victim, who was taken to University Medical Center, has not been identified.

Eric Finley, a UMC spokesman, said the woman is in critical condition.

I was leaving a social engagement and happened to witness the immediate aftermath of this incident, including the pickup fleeing the scene. It is a white long cab 4wd pickup, probably a Ford, with loud exhausts and a black brush guard. The girl has very serious head injuries. She was part of a crowd that witnesses said had been blocking the street. I will not speculate about causes but one witness said there was an exchange of words between the crowd and the driver. One jackass from the crowd tried to fight with an EMT and was arrested. It was as senseless and stupid an occurrence as I have ever seen even in Lubbock.

More: Police Invesigate Early-Morning Assault

Dim Jim Hoft, picking up a story that is blazing across Wingnutistan, posts a blurry picture of a video screen where you can tell who is on it, along with audio of, at best, a mixture of cheers and boos.

Yeah, they booed Obama out of there. Told him off. Put him in his place…

Uh…yeah…

But of course, the real fun are the comments, where there is enough Derp to feed an army, particularly the ones about Reggie Love:

King_Putz • 3 minutes ago
Couldn’t happen to a nicer A hole.

Meaunkey Snaut • 21 minutes ago
FAKE…FAKE………..FAKE..FAKE…….
who in their right mind would boo DEAR LEADER?

If this video is authentic, those subjects are lucky DEAR LEADER didn’t step into his limo and order a DRONE STRIKE on those lowly serfs!

Barack Hussein Obama

MMM MMM MMM !!1!

metal • 3 hours ago
It’s a fact now that the petition to even get him and Hilliary on the ballot to run in 2008 was forged, he made it by 34 names and 90 were fraud, IMPEACH THE IMPOSTER!

Atnuk Etnik • 3 hours ago
Booed? That’s all? Its a good thing we aren’t 19th century France. Or President Petulant Pontificateur and his beast of a wife Moochie Antoinette James Earl Jones in a Wig obama would get a lot more than just booed.

Gas_Passer • 4 hours ago
It is really funny that Obama got booed at a thugball game in Washington D.C. Does anyone think Obama would get booed at a Chicago Bears game played at Chicago?

SJF ** • 4 hours ago
I see Reggie Love is by his side AGAIN. What is the deal with this Love guy??? Seems like BO is photographed with him more often than he is Michelle. I thought Reggie Love no longer worked for him. It’s just down right weird.

Atnuk Etnik SJF ** • 3 hours ago
It is common knowledge that Reggie Loves to play hide the salami with the metrosexual mom-jean wearing petulant pissant of a boy-king currently occupying the white house and burning through the peoples rights and money…Some call him the SCOAMF, but you can call him King Putt.

xbox361 • 4 hours ago
most politicians get booed at sporting events. don’t put too much into something like this. if a reporter ever boos, that will be news

Atnuk Etnik xbox361 • 3 hours ago
You can’t boo while fellating.

xbox361 Atnuk Etnik • 36 minutes ago
you are right and funny

Peter Gillis • 5 hours ago
even blacks and dumb a$$ linbritards are coming around to see this man child for what he is

Tom McDaily • 5 hours ago
what? The Kenyan in Chief had nothing better to do?

Td Torquemada • 5 hours ago
Is that Reggie Love ear frenching our dear leader?

Hank • 5 hours ago
You know what, even IF the video is fake, I don’t care. Why? Because that’s how the left operates 24 hours a day. All they do is lie and defame and slander the right every chance they get. Give them a taste of their own medicine. Even IF it’s fake, if it pisses them off, then GOOD. It’s a win-win, fake or not.

My apologies to anyone who has found themselves dumber for having read a Dim Jim post.

Words cannot express just how dumb this is.

Roll the tape:

They’ve been doing this all week, too. A sampling:

On March 21, O’Reilly lambasted President Obama and the White House for empowering “secular progressives” to pressure school districts around the country to eliminate terms like “Easter bunny” and “Easter egg.” O’Reilly complained that “the war on Judeo-Christian tradition continues in some public school districts,” citing districts in five states that he said “are having Spring egg events. Moderated by a Spring bunny”:

O’REILLY: I know it’s stupid. You know it’s stupid. But it’s happening, and there is a reason why it’s happening. Secular progressives are running wild with President Obama in the White House. They feel unchained, liberated and they are trying to diminish any form of religion. The goal is to marginalize religious opposition to secular programs.

=====

March 27: Fox’s coverage of the “War on Easter” came to a head when it dedicated six segments to the so-called “War.” Fox’s early show, Fox & Friends First, covered the Alabama middle school’s decision twice, asking the audience to weigh in on the supposed controversy.

On Fox & Friends, the co-hosts also commented on the Alabama middle school’s decision to remove “Easter” from school activities. In the first segment, co-host Brian Kilmeade reacted to a clip of the principal explaining why she made the decision to drop the word “Easter,” asking if she was nine years old because of how she spoke. Co-host Gretchen Carlson wondered why using the word “Easter” was concerning at all:

CARLSON: I just always love to know who complains about this. Because if you’re talking about Passover this week, and you’re talking about Easter, I think those are the only two religious holidays this week. Correct me if I am wrong. So if you include both of them what’s the big deal? I guess if you believe in nothing, then you would be one that might criticize, saying either of those two words. But then, can’t you just leave the option out there for people if they believe in nothing to just - okay you believe in nothing. I just don’t understand when people get their undies in a bundle.

I apologize to anyone who got dumber after reading this.