Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:38:26 pm
Yep, Lance was a doper. Which I could actually forgive (even though the seeking-Oprah's-benediction thing is totally transparent), because the fact is the whole sport does it.
But Armstrong went out of his way to smear and try to destroy people who told the truth about him, and even won several large court judgments that we now know were obtained through fraud.
Some of those people are now suing him to get those judgments back. Floyd Landis has filed a federal whistle-blower suit against Armstrong for defrauding the US Post Office. His life has become ... complex.
He'll still come out of this with a lot of money, but nobody will ever forget the things he did to try to protect his kingdom of lies.
It's also still a fact that he was an amazing cyclist, drugs or not. In a sport where -- let's face it -- all the top athletes were doing everything they could to get a slight edge, Lance had much, much more than an edge.
On his best days, he dominated the field in a way very few cyclists ever have; the epic battles with Marco Pantani and Jan Ullrich, the time trials where he absolutely blew away the competition, the insane climbs in the Alps when he would get up on the pedals and dance, and just rocket away from the lead group like a cycling god.
But athletic talent and human decency don't always correlate, and Lance Armstrong may be the prime example.
I can't help wondering, though, if Sheryl Crow knew he was hitting the EPO.