little green footballs

ABC's Jonathan Karl: Yes, the Story Was False but It "Entirely Stands"

Sun, May 19, 2013 at 11:36:49 am

If you've been following the story of the Benghazi "talking points" emails, you know that it's now been confirmed beyond any doubt that Republican sources fed false information to the media, especially to ABC News's Jonathan Karl. Karl claimed that he had "obtained" these emails, and we now know that this was completely untrue -- he was quoting the words of his anonymous source, who lied to him. He did not "obtain" or even see the actual email in question.

The ethical thing to do at this point would be to correct and retract the story, and reveal the name of his dishonest source. But that's not the path Karl is choosing:

On the Sunday, May 19 edition of CNN's Reliable Sources, host Howard Kurtz read a statement from Jonathan Karl, chief White House Correspondent for ABC News in response to his reporting on altered emails related to the Sunday talk show talking points following the attacks on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya in September 2012. Karl now expresses regret about his original reporting on May 10th on the Benghazi emails. The statement reads:

"Clearly, I regret the email was quoted incorrectly and I regret that it's become a distraction from the story, which still entirely stands. I should have been clearer about the attribution. We updated our story immediately."

-Jonathan Karl, ABC News Chief White House Correspondent

Amazing. ABC News should be ashamed of this kind of egotistical ass-covering. Their credibility is at stake, and they're letting their anonymous right wing sources get away with lying to them.

Via: ABC News' Jonathan Karl Addresses Criticism on Reporting of the Benghazi Talking Points Controversy - CNN Press Room Blogs

Also see:
Jon Karl got played by a confidential source and now ABC News has a big Benghazi problem » Pressthink
What do Jonathan Karl and James O'Keefe have in common?