But we will, and we’ll make sure they understand that if they want to pass through the District of Columbia with loaded firearms as long as they are in compliance with the firearms laws for transportation of firearms to the District, we’re all for it. But passing into the District of Columbia with firearms is a violation of the law and we’ll have to treat it as such.

Huh? What does that even mean? This is another credibility race to the bottom, not sure who wins here. After all DC was the source of the one anti gun law so egregious it compelled the Supreme Court to finally after decades of reluctance uphold (IMO) an obviously individual right. I guess I’ll have to dig into DC code and see if there is any legal way to enter DC with a loaded gun. i doubt it very much.

As to the gun advocates-Again IMO-Stop this foolishness now. There are far better ways to get this done. More helpful and more persuasive. No guns required for that at all.