Dragged up from the CL’s thread:

re: #214 A hollow voice says, Inpeach…

Neither of your links says anything about military custody (“discussing greater military involvement” is not the same thing). Using former wwii internment camps is not military custody unless the military administers them.

If someone has a link to information about transfers from ICE et al. to actual military custody, I would like to see it, but I haven’t found anything.

It will not be that clear-cut. The concept of “tenency” prevails, which allows things like USAF sites on NASA bases and vice-versa. Army installations host non-command Army elements, DoD, other Federal agencies, and private contractor operations. The meat, though, is that the base (like Sill) assures security and limits access. The flipside is that the sad-ass 06 who runs the real estate and the 3/4-star who runs the troop elements will be the ones covered in shit when it all goes tits-up.